Reuters, not Rasmussen?

Heck if you put my name on that poll i'd probably get 20%

Yes, Reuters

Damn, that's good

Trump tweet about Reuters poll in 3, 2...

whaw wha'

10% of democrats

strongly approve!?

registered dems probably

It's probably those registered Democrats in WV

like from WV

This is why changing trump's character doesn't matter

no one is in the lean category

everyone has made up their mind on Trump

If only Drumpf did the Fireside Chats I recommended on day 1

And there are most dissapprove strongly than somewhat

What like FDR?

Yes

I could see that

HEY

51-49!

For independents!

The public doesn't really know the problems facing Trump, he could tell them face to face

wait

45%

51-45!

that's great

That's better than great that's fantastic

And more democrats approve of Trump than republicans disapprove

It's only two polls that have Trump doing good, blumpfkin

Which means we're still more unified

Reuters and Rasmussen

Only two good polls... <:wojaktrump:422438927631384577>

At least unified on Trump

Polls are all bullshit.

If he's doing pretty well in Reuters, then we're in good shape

<:wojaktrump:422438927631384577>

i never believe any of them

Only actual election results are what matters

This could be a trend,

nah

a continued pattern of White Voters,

feeling disaffected and alienated,

causing them to embrace Trump with open arms

I wish.

But I doubt it./

Independent Voter Generic Ballot

White Independents

wew

Whites overall

White Men w/ no College Degrees

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 “rural and suburban retards”

White Women

huwhite wammens

Trump Approval by Demographics Subgroups:
Non-College White Men: +30
White Men, 50-64: +30
White Men: +21
White Men, 30-49: +20
White, 65 or older: +19
White, 50-64: +17
College White Men: +14
Non-College White Women, 50-64: +10
White: +8
White, 30-49: +5
White Women, 50-64: +5
College White: +2
Non-College White Women: 0

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 link?

🆙 | **Winston leveled up!**

new bot?

looks like it

On a scale from 1 to 10 how much do you agree with this?

https://twitter.com/lpdonovan/status/992156444760989697
What the fuck

This reminds me more of a comedy sketch than a political campaign ad

Apparently that guy has been receiving a bunch of money from a democrat SuperPac

@Rhodesiaboo yeah, honestly.

Everything he said is spot on except the "we"

because a lot of people love those things,...

China people

Cocaine mitch

For the kids

Cocaine mitch lol

That's the funniest thing I've seen in a long time.

I really hope he doesn't win though.

Laugh if you must

But this cost 35 dollars to edit

and 1.2 M people have already seen it on Twitter alone

Meanwhile Jenkins and Morrissey are attacking each other and ignoring Blankenship

35 dollars?

🆙 | **FLanon leveled up!**

That seems way over-budget

fag

NEVADA
Sen. Dean Heller (R) Job Approval:
Approve 29%
Disapprove 51%

NEVADA
Trump Job Approval:
Approve 44%
Disapprove 51%

Large oof on Dean Heller

He probably isn't going to be able to shake the Obamacare vote stuff in the general

what?

He voted for repeal.

Also

Full smear camapign has begun against Little

implying that Little had an actual chance in hell of winning

🆙 | **Walter Johnson leveled up!**

How am I just lvl 2?

That makes no sense

test

@Walter Johnson So he's just another meme candidiate?

The same thing we've been doing for years now

Just running people that aren't suppose to win but make us more legitimate.

When are we going to start getting these people in office to actually impalement our policies.

What's the alternative, exactly?

alright I see.

🆙 | **zakattack04 leveled up!**

ayyy

There's no actual reasonable next step,.

It's just "oh yeah we're a little more legitimate now, but the establishment still controls all of our politicians :)"

I'm talking in this particular race you know

Hi talking in this particular race you know, I'm Dad!

I'd agree with you 100% if this was any other state

And I just learned today that high testosterone correlates with hair loss

d!dab

nothing wrong with the bruce willis look

True, but I'd rather not.

I like full head of hair./

okay, what does the weeb-ass looking bot "Nadeko" do?

something

Very informative

idk I didn't put it in the server

Who did?

Sclumpf BTFO

lmao that's fine

Your legacy is going to be Thumbs Down

Literally and figuratively

The least you could've done McCain was ask Trump for forgiveness

@zakattack04 <:trueconservative:423311896356061186>

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 I love it lol so true

@zakattack04
The BRÄIN man is the epitome of male dominance and masculinity.

Let's start by looking at his tumor. His swelling is large. Its domineering size makes his presence known without him even needing to point himself out.

He is bipartisan, as a result of his high levels of patriotism. This gives him the appearance of health and strength.

The BRÄIN man's demeanor is one of a true maverick. He is principled, assertive, and can be explosively conservative. His behaviour strikes fear into the more timid, cowardly members of the GOP

>He is bipartisan, as a result of his high levels of patriotism. This gives him the appearance of health and strength.

I'm dying

Hi dying, I'm Dad!

go

FUCK

*throws headset*

Hi zakattack04, I'm Dad!

Trump's approval is higher than it has been since May 2017

Trump's net approval is 1.5 points higher than Jimmy Carter at the same point in his presidency,

identical with that of Harry Truman and Gerald Ford,

and 1.5 points lower than Ronald Reagan

Well, he's got to keep trucking

When is the summit with North Korea btw?

Hmm, looks like it hasn't been made public yet

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/05/politics/donald-trump-border-wall-close-country-remark/index.html

Sorry I’ve been gone for so long, I’ve been incredibly busy

But anyways happy Spico De Mayo

@zakattack04 The thing is that Trump has been compared to Hitler, Nazi, Fascist for the longest time and people consider the news fake, ie fake news

Interesting forebodes

The dynamics are certainly something, perhaps the average white person has drowned the insults out enough so someone who does hold those positions is electable.

A sort of crying wolf effect maybe

@shrub yeah but with his rhetoric on Israel, they could smear it really well.

especially in California.

I'm not sure how Israel could play out

Hi not sure how Israel could play out, I'm Dad!

I don't really take these people to really give a fuck about zionism

I think him calling Israel a terrorist country is going to shatter his boomer support

And CNN is gunna run that all day

Like we've just discussed, will they care?

Smear campign has worked for everyone but Trump

This could turn to a litmus test for how many people really care about this kind of stuff, I think it's interesting

So yeah

it works

I mean, with Moore it wasn't because of policy

They tried to go with "Ayatollah Moore" but it didn't work because that actually would be popular in 'bama

He'll be taken down.

AIPAC will stop him

as they always do

In the General? Of course.

probably in the primary too.

He will not, except in the most legendary of circumstances, win the general.

The primary is in the air, there is about a month.

It's about seeing where our core constituency is concentrated in

^

Kinda like this but with a lot less to lose
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_gubernatorial_election,_1991

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 you need to remember to put the source of the graph in.

https://ballotpedia.org/Texas_House_of_Representatives_District_13 - today

Won by 57% in 2016 by Republican in the Texas House Leighton Schubert.

let's see how the swing goes

the election previously went up to special election only in 2015

According to Ballotpedia it's May 5th.

yes, it had a special election in 2015 and now it has one today

The incumbent did not resign in disgrace, but it'll be interesting to see what happens I guess

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/05/04/hd-13-special-election-reaches-contentious-conclusion-more-elections-a/

One thing to note is that in 2015, both of the top 2 contenders were Republicans, the dem did not go to the runoff

@[Lex] How to lose and election part 2

Split your votes lol

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 holy hell

Wolfskill is /ourgirl/ but we'll see how it pans out. It could very well be split unto a Democratic victory.

Almost 50 percent of Hispanics agree it is at the cost of whites

This is scary

It's like they know

They're trying to take America

dude both of them got higher than the dem last time

But I highly doubt it.

a runoff pitted the 2 Rs against each other, and this one could also

@FLanon I'm just saying

It's stupid

How?

They're extremely close.

To split your votes?

Both candidates.

2 Rs go to the runoff, no chance of a Dem getting elected

because it risks losing the seat all together

if it was 7 Rs then you'd have a point

But it's 2.

even if it was 2

It's a dumb idea.

have the primary pick the person

and there were 3 Rs in this one

and be done with it, unless it is at the utmost urgency that the person put through the primary is a problem.

it's honestly stupider to run 1 R in that district than 2

my point is it sets a bad precedent.

That republicans can just run if they don't win the nomination.

Imgaine if they did this with a Senate or a US House seat.

Or even a state house seat.

dude it's a state legislature

It's a problem that should be condoned

shoudln't*

In this district, we should

Even if a dem got higher in the polling, a runoff would destroy the dem

alright

A runoff generally does very much harm the Democrat in these solid red races. It increases turnout and can drain voters from the Democrat.

I'm just saying like in GA-06

Hi just saying like in GA-06, I'm Dad!

What if Ossoff got 50% of the vote

It's not anything like that

This bot is a rat.

no

Oh my gosh FLanon

It is nothing like that now, but we need to consider the possibility that it can.

There is not a chance in hell, read my words, that a democrat will get over 50% in this district

YES

The is true!

but in OTHER districts it is possible.

What precedent is there to set exactly?

And if Republican candidates see this as a fine behavior.

This is a spot that shows it would vote for 2 Rs over 1R and 1D

nvm, you have your opinion set.

It is absolutely harmless

And aren't listening.

I doubt this will be reviewed as precedent. This is not a high profile race.

It's a low profile race in an extremely red area that no one expects to flip.

Obviously the strategists in California would take a much higher priority than running 40 different R candidates

It's a sense of consistency, my argument is it is generally, a bad idea to split your votes

Across the board,. this stupid and lets avoid it in the future if possible.