I'm confused >.<

If she'll be the best Senator Tennesee has had since Gore?

I thought Gore was a total fucking cunt.

Button Mash likes Gore

What?

Al Gore!?

at least his senate years

@zakattack04 Because Democrats found the best candidate possible

because he voted against immigration apparently

Al Gore was excellent on his immigration votes

Button Mash posted that its largest denomination is Catholic.

I imagine Blackburn would be better

I think the fact that he voted to force nuns to buy contraception is what cinches it though.

If you believe that the Pope is the Antichrist, you usually don't want to force people to buy contraception.

yeah it's probably good to portray him as anticatholic

has he gone on record as saying that btw?

Nope, he joined a Protestant denom that believes that.

They claim not to be anti-Catholic however.

Oh come on, compared to Corker?

Gore was far better

I have a question about the effectiveness of these "Anti-Catholic" memes. I just don't think this will work at all considering most Democrats aren't as religious as right wingers. Even Nacy Pelosi parades herself around as a devote Catholic and she's not losing support from San Francisco anytime soon.

Catholics aren't as religious as Evangelicals

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Gore created the whole carbon credit system which he used to enrich himself.

he's a scumbag.

Many people identify as Catholic because they have Irish ancestry

@zakattack04 um no sweetie, Immigration is all that matters

Actually irritates me when you say that.

So you would support a literal communist if they were tough on immigration?

good question

yeah, he would lol.

By his own principles.

probably

depends who is running against the communist

I think I would too

Waht!?

You would support a total Progressive as long as they were anti-immigration!?

So someone that wanted to legalize gay marriagne, make hate speech a crime?

If it was McCain/Graham vs a anti-immigration communist,
I'm going with the Communist

if it was a neolib "conservative" who wants open borders vs a communist who wants to close them for wage reasons, I'd vote for the communist

^

It's a matter of balance

I think this is incredibly narrow minded.

Dude

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Now you're changing your stance.

The clock is ticking

We don't have time for a perfect candidate

Matter of balance does not equal one policy voter.

Immigration outweighs most issues

"um no sweetie, Immigration is all that matters"

If it was Ben Shapiro vs. like a Nazbol I'd vote against Shapiro

That's not what you said lol.

By what you say.

You can change economic policy on a dime, but demographics are much harder to change

it means nothing else matters except immigration.

@FLanon This is also not true.

Changing economic policy on the dime is what caused depressions.

Most commies *are* open borders so it doesn't matter much

Well, name me some issues, and I'll tell you if I'd vote for them over a immigration-hardlining communist @zakattack04

but you can and that's the point

it's possible

How about cultural issues?

Like what, be specific

Like gay marriage and hate speech?

I'm a single-issue voter on abortion, immigration, homosexuality, taxes, healthcare, regulation, and literally every other Republican thing.

Remember that people like me are a huge amount of the GOP and will not vote for wishy-washy moderates.

We already lost on gay marriage,

Well communist countries usally don't have to deal with immigration because nobody wants to move into their shithole countires

SCOTUS can overturn itself anyday lol.

and hate speech? please. The supreme court will never overturn the first amendment

Umm.

we're pretty much on the retreat with the gay issue atm

maybe someday we can come back to it

They've already limited freedoms before.

They can do it again.

there will also never be a constitutional convention

Did they overturn the Patriot Act?

SCOTUS actually can't just overturn itself anyday.

Congress did

It's theoretically possible but it basically doesn't happen.

@Nuke They've overturned massivly historic cases just because the times have changed.

They totally can.

Even though "precendent" only means something when it supports the majority party's positions.

The only ruling to overturn a ruling as old as Brown v. Board is actually Brown v. Board.

Schneck was Overturned buy Brendenburg

vs ohio

by*

And we almost lost on Heller vs DC

Which would've basically removed the 2nd amendment.

@FLanon Remember how Moore ran entirely on how Sodomites were destroying America?

Yeah

I wish he won damnit

He should've ran more on immigration

But isn't it amazing,

nah he never would've won.

He should've held back the comments about slavery

The allegations were too damaging.

Would've damaged the GOP as a whole.

He had a great chance of winning

White Alabama voted for Moore by +39 points @zakattack04 @zakattack04

Until the allegations arose.

yeah BM but

No one wanted to vote for him after the sexual stuff.

He would have won if he tried harder

It was razor thin

Nah, people were just successfully suppressed

Debate, do anything other than watch football

The DNC worked their magic.

It was close enough

Brandenburg v. Ohio wasn't as big of a deal as Brown v. Board.

Schenck totally was

He easily could've won but he tortoise and the hare'd it and he was the hare.

That was the first case establishing limitations on the 1st amendment

Precedent is meaningless unless honestly.

52% of Trump voters in Alabama didn't show up

Look at Earl Warren's court.

that's how he lost

Come on, it was winnable

Easily winnable.

He didn't try hard enough.

Maybe, but it would've given Democrats great ammo for the midterms.

"phedo sympathizers"

The fact is you need a big majority for that sort of thing.

Roe v. Wade was a 7-2 decision for instance.

@Nuke Heller Vs DC was 5-4

Litteraly one more Democrat and the 2nd amendment would be gone.

Just like that.

Heller v. DC did not overturn anything. There's a tendency for the SCOTUS to not overrule, but instead weaken, and SCOTUS usually only weakens them really.

A great example is Lochner, which is still an active decision, but they've declawed it so much that it's effectively overturned.

Heller vs DC would have overturned it if the liberal side of the court had a majority is my point.

even though precedent was set, it is basically meaningless.

HELLER V. DC WOULD NEVER HAVE OVERTURNED ANYTHING

>win 29% of the White Vote
>still win

Jones is the luckiest politician alive, honestly

The Second Amendment as we know it today was basically established in the 21st century.

It was regarded as only applying to the federal govt until the 20th century and then no one really violated it until the 21st century when SCOTUS had to issue a ruling.

He got an insane percent with the blacks

Like 97% or something right?

Virtually 100%

yes

what individuals right

natural conservatives

Furthermore, justices tend to not want to overturn things, as I said. The decisions you just cited had precedent at very least, as SCOTUS did not even rule that the First Amendment applied to states _at all_ until later on.

Don't worry tho, Kanye will turn that around for sure

I hope McDaniel campaigns right

He's an excellent conservative,

White Mississippi loves him

but dear god

the Black Bloc

It would wipe him out

@FLanon 98% of black women voted for Jones

I think Espy won't be able to get Mississippi to vote for him because he's black tbh

White turnout THROUGH THE ROOF

@Nuke Tell me Deep Southerner,

Why did South Carolina nominate Haley and Scott then?

<@&414473406264639488> Gov Debate tonight

Newson vs Villarosa over who can pander to leftist and Nonwhites the most

*Villaraigosa

Literally what happened last time

https://streamable.com/q90jm

And Leftists hate Villaraigosa because he supports charter schools and is against a Single Payer plan that would double the state expenses

@🎃Boo-ton🎃
1. Mississippi is not South Carolina.
2. Tim Scott is a Republican.
3. Indians are not black.
4. Nikki Haley is a Republican.
5. Cao & Jindal were also Republicans.

"i wanna thank the latino community"

Oh gay

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/856/text

Imagine voting for something THIS loaded

JOHN MCCAIN IS DYING SOON
JOHN MCCAIN IS DYING SOON
JOHN MCCAIN IS DYING SOON
JOHN MCCAIN IS DYING SOON
JOHN MCCAIN IS DYING SOON
JOHN MCCAIN IS DYING SOON

The question is....who is going to run for his seat after he croaks?

I'm guessing that McSally, Ward, and Arpaio can opt to run for that seat instead?

idk

But Im the first person whose going to find his grave and take a shit on it

@Deleted User @FLanon
The BRÄIN man is the epitome of male dominance and masculinity.

Let's start by looking at his tumor. His swelling is large. Its domineering size makes his presence known without him even needing to point himself out.

He is bipartisan, as a result of his high levels of patriotism. This gives him the appearance of health and strength.

The BRÄIN man's demeanor is one of a true maverick. He is principled, assertive, and can be explosively conservative. His behaviour strikes fear into the more timid, cowardly members of the GOP

ahahahahahahahaha

WHICH DEMOCRAT WILL RUN FOR MCCAIN'S SEAT??????????

@Nuke I can do one better

Imagine voting for something as loaded as this!

https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/4173

Oh wait, they did

Feed the bureaucracy, agh I just can't get enough regulations!! <3

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/856/text

" Whereas, on November 6, 2017, during debate on the GOP tax scam, the Chaplain led an opening prayer asking God to bless Congress and for Congress to “guarantee that there are not winners and losers under the new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all Americans”;"

" Whereas, under the GOP tax bill, more than 80 percent of its benefits flow to the richest 1 percent and the corporate special interests, ignoring the needs for struggling men and women and children;"

Imagine voting for something as loaded as this to even make it to the floor!

https://splinternews.com/oh-look-republicans-might-have-another-nazi-on-the-bal-1825642668

Is he, dare I say, /ourguy/ ?

@Nuke I bet Speaker Ryan put it on the floor as a joke.

@Walter Johnson Nazi? *Endorses*

I swear if what I say on this discord ever gets released I'm probably going to have to end up killing myself since the media is going to slander me hardcore.

But hey, I'm down for the race >:)

Lesss go CNN

@zakattack04 No you infighter Nancy Pelosi did

>.>

@Nuke oh, my bad >.<

Nacy is a devote Catholic, she did it all in good faith.

"I don't even know what to call Sarah Saunders, she is the Uncle of White Women". What?

@Deleted User @FLanon

NEW MO Sen 2018 General Election Poll:

Hawley (R) 45%
McCaskill (D) 45%

Other whitepill:

@FLanon White Millennials (especially White Millennial Men) are abandoning the Democratic Party in droves

The trend persists:
The White Democrat is on the brink of total extinction
(and it's beautiful)

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Got a pic showing white women 18-34?

This might just be because Gen Z is hitting adulthood.

So if there's an increase in the 35-x age group Democrat vote, then the Millennials are just getting older.

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 I knew this would happen. I was very Liberal until I was about 30. Then I got a good job and felt I had a bright future

@Nuke It seems unchanged, White Women (18-34) were polling at +1 R in 2016 and continue to do so

Huh, better than their boyfriends?

That's odd.

WALL

Should we rally behind Travis Allen in CA?

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 it was only a matter of time before Hawley began to lead McCaskill, that's why I'm skeptical of the fact that Dean Heller is 'leading' Jacky Rosen

because it's a matter of name recognition. McCaskill and Heller are the incumbents, but the state they're in isn't particularly friendly to their party. So a challenger with less name recognition, months away from November, might be 'behind' in the polls but that's because people don't recognize the name as much.

@Nuke I wouldn't be surprised if there's a clear difference between, say, the 18-20 (early Gen Z crowd) and the 27-37 (early Millennial) crowd

those born in 1981-1990 are generally to the left of those born 1996-2000

Yep.

Because 9/11 and Bushism have an extremely profound influence on younger kids

also outright moral repugnance was surprisingly common in my teens

like people would openly be disgusted by others' behavior

Pretty interesting transition point, really
In 2016, 48% White Millennials leaned Democrat & 36% Republican. In 2018, things almost completely reversed, with 46% preferring GOP

@FLanon and yes

https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls

Whites 18-29: 43% Clinton & 47% Trump

Stronger majorities among older groups

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 I thought we're suppose to rally behind Cox.

Allen got booed for saying he was going to get rid of sanctuary cities... I just...

pls my state

gotta be decisive, my gut's telling me allen

Allen can't win here

There's just not enough right wing votes

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Looks like those Dank Memes are having their effect on the Millienial Generation

I think it's just them aging

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/169976524#p169978553

>mfw I can spot BM in /ptg/ threads

nah its that meme magic

Does anyone seriously believe that had an impact?

what had an impact ?

maymay magic

Got a few new people to join

@RoastedAdawg thanks

Np

who's jim christiana?

No one knows

we abandoning barletta?

@Nuke so why did you replace Barletta ?

I'm not aware of the alternatives

Hi not aware of the alternatives, I'm Dad!

@Deleted User We discussed it last night. His social media presence was so bad we'd have to actively defend it ourselves, and he's also not as good on policy.

oh, you're referring to Barletta as someone whose social media presence is bad?

how's Jim Christiana when it comes to that

https://www.facebook.com/Christiana2018/