#creation-vs-evolution (Discord ID: 484515915069784085) in The Ice Wall, page 14
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
like a moth population slowly turning black when coal dust from nearby power plants coated the trees black
one moth had a genetic mutation (he was black) that helped him survive amongst the now black trees
he made more black moths who all survived better than the main population that were more beige
Lol I learned this in middle school
It's basic science.
Denying it is like denying the moon landing
people deny that too!?
it's like denying vaccinations
the moon is a projection made by the fbi
the sun is a projection made by fbi
no venus is
no its the stars we see
T H E U N I V E V E R S E I S A C T U A L L Y A P R O J E C T I O N M A D E B Y T H E F B I
JESUS WAS WRONG
Creation is a baseless theory
It's the god of the gaps problem
our holy pasta overlord created us and we grew to be tall from our small sizes and became superior men
we really cant tell if we created by god or evolved. so yeah just wait a bunch of years till ur dead then find out the truth
Anyone who doubts the theory of evolution and thus ignoring the overwhelming evidence supporting the theory is just so stupid
God is gay
ludde#8229 (251718716893429760) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
U guys are wild
Pewdiepie created all
As a Roman Catholic, you can't deny evolution
Roman Catholic? dafuq is that, .. PAGANISM with "roman catholic stamp of approval" on it 😆 lmfaoff
--and 'i' was RAISED roman Catholic, .. because im Italian (italian american)
~~Darwinian Evil-ution~~ \ ❌
the fact that john paul 2 said that evolution is not a theory should be enough
Are you guys muting everyone pro evolution?
evolution is pretty much just proven fact at this point how is this still an argument
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils here's some stuff about some old human fossils
So does this channel question evolution or something
Well based on my personal belief evolution isn’t the only factor. Creation and evolution coincide. No, I don’t think we evolved from a single cell. I believe that from creation we evolved. If this makes no sense I’m sorry I’m not good at explaining things
around the same as yours
Would you like the further discuss?
kinda unsure if we evolved from a single cell or just kinda like popped into existence or whatever then evolved from there
but evolution's real
Well if a baby can grow from a single cell, I’d say it’s possible
We’re talking about millions of years tho
Not 9 months
LMAO he posts aka "human fossils" 😆
-- Do you ALSO 'believe' all them "Dino bones" on display, at the local museum?? <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ? lmaoff
lol! Stop SnooZzzinggg..
oh god are you one of those people with the iq of a fudgesicle that thinks that the government buried fossils just to go back and pretend to unbury them
@Deku Scrubster - you believe anything dont u
wow, what a way to be
Dont you know KID (infant soul) theres an AGENDA going on? ..behind all that?
~~that's literally what you're doing but aight~~
smh at you sleepwalking..
just agree to disagree i guess, i believe evolution is real and the earth is round, you believe we all made by god, and that earth is a dome. There's not gonna be any changing what either of us thinks so let's just not be asses about it i guess
I'd suggest..not just "coming onto apage" and starting from scratch down at the bottom, AS IF there's been nothing already discussed/shown/presented/proven//etccc
---am saying...why dont you SCROLL UP a wayssss, k 👌
so...let's get this straight: If i ignore your "evidence", i'm just a dumb "sheep", but if you call me an idiot for believing in my evidence, i'm the dumb heretic.
"evidence"? lol, ..what you talking about, ..them Bones/fossils? you claim are real? <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> lols...
present your evidence, and i don't want "just scroll up". I want you to provide some evidence yourself, right here.
instead of just "lol you actually believe that?"
why sholuld i (or we) be a broken record?
look around, m'kay
im in no mood right now to play "Text-tag" back and forth,, you just got here, ...i/we been doing this All-day already
i mean i don't want "Text-tag" either but you just keep going "lol you actually believe that" so ~~ i didn't know you actually had your own argument~~
@Deku Scrubster - well, ..yeah...its a SHAME actually! that you be-Lie-ve that
you just take anything you get spoonfed, huh
But... so are you
--thats' why people like you...believe you're on a spinngin flying titled wobbling twirling eliptically-orbital oblate-pearoid waterball, etc and -- because you just believe and trust anything them sickass Sci-fi priests feed you -- no critial thinking, nor in-depth investigation or conduct ntohing on your own, as far as experimentation/tests/none of it -- etc, ..the list goes on and on, unfortunatley
Well and people like you believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old despite a whole lot of evidence otherwise, that most of proven science is a hoax, and when someone says otherwise you just shove the Bible in their face and say it’s fact and theyre completely wrong because you said so
@Deku Scrubster -- thats about the 3rd time, or more, .that you assume i am religious 🤔 why is that
sorry for assuming that, cause you’re arguing for creationism and have the tag and stuff I guess
Sorry for assuming man
what makes you assume "Creation" has anything to do with any "religion" ?
-- No, i am not (mainstream religious//organized religion)
indeed i am a Creationist
-- indeed i know >> darwinianEvil-ution is bunk and bogus
And I guess the world is only 3000 years old
Who said that?
K. Stop trolling
Stop being <:butthurt:507983822244151306> ❄
No one said the earth is 3000 years old
No one said 6000
You dont know how old the earth is
Stop acting as if you do
Cuz it makes you look dumb
And closed minded
I dont know
Dont have an estimate
No one can know that
So is 4.5 billion too much?
4.3 billion is just righr
Where can I read the Talmud? I hear about it being satanic but I dont want to bring evil upon myself if thats what happens when one reads it
God created evolution
There I destroyed both sides
o shoot you got us
isnt it 13 or so billion? i dont really remember but isnt that the generally accepted date
or 13.5 or something
i grew up not learning about any of this because my family is extremely christian so i honestly have no clue
That's the universe
guys, god isn't real. Change my mind
19th century German philosopher Karl Marx, the founder and primary theorist of Marxism, had an antithetical and complex attitude to religion,viewing it primarily as "the soul of soulless conditions", the "opium of the people" that had been useful to the ruling classes since it gave the working classes false hope for millennia.
There you go
God is complete lie
wait, so i have a question for you "god believers"
do you think god created everything? or god started evolution?
(both are wrong btw)
He doen't exist
God does man... Yall geeked
G o d i s n o n - e x i s t a n t
In your 3 pound brain
Full of bs
Congrats on being programmed into nothingness
Explain to me how god was made
I find it funny how Christians rely on some celestial being for almost anything, he hasn't given us any sort of sign what-so-ever that he actually exists. For all you know, the bible could be fake.
There is no proof that there is no god, but there is no proof that there is a god
that's not how mafia works
Burden of proof is a thing
I literally asked my religion teacher if he believes im god and he said no
Yeah i did too. She said hes just a metaphor
keep on be-Lie-ving in your Evil-ution then, m'kay
~~darwinian evil-ution~~ \ ❌
If evolution happened why isn’t it seen today in some form
You don't see species changing species
Yes. Species do not change into other species
"Researchers from Princeton University and Uppsala University in Sweden report that the newcomer belonging to one species mated with a member of another species resident on the island, giving rise to a new species that today consists of roughly 30 individuals." https://phys.org/news/2017-11-galapagos-species.html
@Depression2405 There are many examples of animals evolving in different environments to be kept alive or left alone by predators
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2018/11/wildlife-watch-news-tuskless-elephants-behavior-change/ This is always my favorite example of it
We witness the jump from single-celled to multi-celled in under 11 months. Multiply that by about a billion and you get the picture.
I love hearing all the stories of how humans have accidentally caused adaptation.
It's a small example of an animal changing to keep it's survival but also a big step in the way of proving evolution/adaptation to environment in the animal kingdom
I don't think anybody denies adaptation. Lots of creationists even accept species changes.
Such as Ken Ham.
It's new "kinds" (whatever that means) that they want to see directly.
Is the thing about evolution like how humans evolved from apes and whatnot?
What made these species?
It tells you in the articles.
Environmental pressures trigger natural selection. The tuskless elephants had an advantage because poachers wouldn't want to hunt them. The algae went multicellular because paramecia were hunting them. It's a lot easier to survive the onslaught when you've got many cells than when you've got only one.
What made the environmental pressures
What designed the life
@Ivan Pavlovich wouldn’t we be able to see the in between stages of evolution to be able to prove it
@Depression2405 Eehhhhhhh.... It would support large-scale evolution, but it wouldn't prove it. I may be nitpicking here, but *all* adaptations fall under "evolution". It's just that when people hear "evolution", they think of large-scale changes. So, those changes you see do prove evolution because they *are* evolution, but you really can't extrapolate that to large-scale changes without more evidence.
As for Citizen's questions, 1. The environmental pressures came from nature. Some are applied by humans, some by predators, and others are just consequences of local conditions. 2. Who says life was designed?
The things just adapted to things they were surrounded with
So wait @Ivan Pavlovich even if there was small changes you would see something, for an example, between a man and an ape at some point in the present or something leading to it or even possibly in the past there would be proof of a thing between man and ape; but no one has ever found such proof. This is why Darwin himself said that his theory of evolution was false.
But do you believe it
The evidence proves it so it isn't something to believe but either be ignorant of or acknowledge it @Depression2405
@Citizen Z With saying nothing I was trying to say that it was not spesifically designed to be an eviromental pressure
@Depression2405 Let me start with the last thing you said. Darwin *never* recanted. That's a myth, and even creationists have started admitting it. From "creation.com": "It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people." https://creation.com/did-charles-darwin-recant
As for "missing links", I'd advise you to do some more reading on your own, since I'm not knowledgeable on this subject, but I think that with the new addition of *H. Luzonensis* there are now at least 6 extinct species within the genus *Homo*. I might be forgetting some, but whatever.
there was no creation, a person just popped into existence you fat tards
🐒 👽 <:nasalies:485141702403686403>
What a nice argument man
big bang didn't happen
`Evolution is merely an excuse for atheists to deny God`.. nothing more .. nothing less
Al Masih kam everyone
btw it does say that the earth is flat in islam
keep that inmind
idk im not a muslim
im arab christian
does it say that?
in the quran
both in quran in bible infact
bible says 4 corners but Allah means east west north south
thats what he means he wants to say east west north south
Honestly, everyone says that in Incas time and stuff they would make up creation stories and stuff to try and make a way of their existence. So why does this not apply with the Bible? It was just people back then who wanted to create a creation story, just like the rest.
C U M !!!!
yeeet the Savior#4157 (564498149427904536) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
Can creation and evolution not be the same thing? Just throwing out the idea that God used evolution to create man. And being the idiotic nonomnicient little mortals we are, we may have made a few mistakes in the Bible to suggest otherwise?
And this is coming from an Atheist.
Seriously it took me like 5 mins to come up with this why are people still fighting about it.
Also to the flat earthers that keep trying to use the Bible as proof the earth is flat. Guys, stop, you're using a multi thousand year old book that has been translated a multitude of times as solid evidence. There is a million ways that could be jacked up, and EVERYONE believed in a flat Earth back then because EVERYONE was ignorant, not stupid, but ignorant.
Thx Jacku, I don't feel alone anymore.
Lol yeah, I feel like we'd know if it wasn't considering the massive agry lizars that used to run around, or if only 2000 years ago they all just suddenly died, there would probably still be corpses scattered around the planet (well only bones but you get it)
we are monkeys.
has anyone here seen the similarity's in creation and evolution?
instead of seeing the obvious differences why cant both be true?