paid out almost 4 bil

hmmm

That unfortunetly happens

Our research should be about making vaccines safer

Not destroying them

vaccine insert says in can cause autism and sids

Or... destroying research as some here think

Of corse anti vaxxers say it does

so they claim it does not cause autism but it is one of the adverse effects

The companies are forced to say that

Of course, or else they will get sued

What if I am an asperger autist

I have a vaccine shoot

yea cause the SCIENTIFIC evideence shows it does this

And then sue the company

Your conclusion

that is why they have to say it

We can both have different conclusions

Also even if you think that vaccines cause autism

https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/157-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link?fbclid=IwAR0qoz2mSBld-uf_kAonv5wd0pCVwXrpvuS2wfNu-mLB2I8gzFvHmwzEJ48#scribd

157 research papers

Shouldn't you be fighting for better vaccines instead of becomming anti vax?

read up

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-06-genetic-sequencing-science-breakthrough-just-proved-that-measles-outbreaks-are-caused-by-the-measles-vaccine.html

No, I have a calculus test to study for

Can you please listen to me

https://jcm.asm.org/content/55/3/735

Shouldn't you be fighting for better vaccines instead of trying to destriy it

seems the measles vaccine is causing these outbreaks

i think you need to do better research

If you have proof that vaccines cause autism then fight for better vaccines

and stop believing what you are told

Different conservatives

proof is they are testing on you

There are so many different stuff you can do besides trying to destroy it

getting the flu shot is like the stupid test

if you get one they know they got you

posted a video of dr oz saying he does not vaccinate his kids

but he wants you to do it to yours hmmmm

sounds kinda shady to me

Also the fount you sent me

sounds like a paid shill who knows better

Says nothing that vaccines are cuasing an outbreak

they were even caught faking the measles on a baby lol

It said they developed a new way of detecting it

Ok dude, look

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=184&v=Am630xkAotI

the even used photo shop like nasa does

HAHAHAHA

If you are going to vomit supposed evidence on me, talk with me like if you where a machine, pumping information and ignoring what I am saying then there is no debate here

You didn't even took time to read me sources

You just said they where fake

there never has been a debate here you could not even answer 1 damn question i posted

Of course, you said what I was saying was wrong and sruff

You literally vomited big words and complex questions that I needed time to search

btw you never told what 1 question you answered

I got the answers that you didn't even opened, you just ignored

2*

you derailed from that one

The one from (is it better having neurotoxins or the disease

Or (how vaccines work

When I was responding you just vomited more questions

And counter evidence

When I sent evidence you ignored

Could you please provide scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?

this one?

No

Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing disease?

Yes, tuis

so how does injecting your self with a neurotoxin prevent disease?

It's better to inject very little quantities of mertiolate on your blood rathern than dying from a dangerous disease

Also they don't use inorganic Hg

lol a neurotoxin is just as bad if it is organic lol

hence the word nerutoxin

So you never used merthiolate?

It's a very popular antiseptic

My dad used it, my mother did

Prob my granfathers and grandmothers

lol it is a antibacterial lol

not the same thing

It's the same thing they use on vaccines

The thing is that there is less on vaccines than on merthiolate itself

Probably

but i bet you think those anti bacterial are ok even though they are indiscriminate killers and kill all the bacteria good and bad

What good bacteria?

They are un your blood

You put it on scratches

killing off your good gut bacteria making you more likely to get sick

They don't come into contact with them

triclosan is one good example

yea they do

Tell me something

Have you got an degree in medicine? Or chemistry?

ppl think that with triclosan because they just wash their hands with it but it gets into your body thru your pores and into the bloodstream where it is carried to the gut and kills off the good bacteria youy need and this is a known fact

so if triclosan can do this then so can others

Have you got an degree ln any of those?

No need to answer

You don't need a degree

But you must know it is hard

It takes a lot of research

And study

To develop those stuff

dont need one tbh ppl with degrees in those fields cant even answer 1 of the 9 questions so it does not really matter at this point

So you just throwed everything I said or that any other scientist said on the trash

Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?

never been answered

I did on one of that sources

cause they dont do it

Also nobody keeps that on their computer

There is prob,

Anyway, you really don't want debates

You want to destroy your oponent by any means necessary

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-12-why-the-vaccine-industry-refuses-to-conduct-clinical-trials-using-a-genuine-placebo-control-group.html

I am sorry to say but you are kinda cheating

And not getting the real point here

point is there bad for you

Look at this source NaturalNews.com

hahahaha this is typical you are doing it right now cause you can not answer the questions

I am not an specialist

I answered 2, but the others I had to point proper specialists works

- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.
Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.

looks like you are on number 2

Ye, I can't answer if you keep bombing me with arguments and stuff

you have not aswered any of the questions lol

When I did ansered with scientific knowledge you just tried the best to refute it

Well I had, you just st your opinion refuted it

what scientific knowledge???

About biology mayby?

google

Omg

Google scholar

yea that crap lol

There is a huge difference on googling on wikipedia and google scholar

what because it says scholar on it you think it knows better hahahahaha

Google scholar is a source for actual scientific knowledge

google is not a trustable source

Of course, it's only specialists works

- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.
Not one anti-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.

you dont know what scientific is

Looks like you are number 2

what is the scientific method???

Scientific methods constits of a series of criteria to acrueally get accurate knowledge

that is not the scientific method hahahahaha

this shows me alot about you now lol

you dont know shit do you

I said I am not an specialist on medicine

all the research you have presented can be refuted and is produced for money

About scientific method, it's hard to actually resume it

Even more in anothe rlanguage

Yours can be too

you dont even know the scientific methd this is pathetic o

Who guarantees that this guy in youtube are speaking 100% true

if you dont follow the scientific method then your science is pseudoscience

Who guarantees that Naturenews are speaking the truth

Well, those articles followed

that is fact

Also yeah, I am righton what I said

???

The scientific method is a series of criterias

with what??

no your not

Scientific Method Steps
Make an Observation. Scientists are naturally curious about the world. ...
Form a Question. After making an interesting observation, a scientific mind itches to find out more about it. ...
Form a Hypothesis. ...
Conduct an Experiment. ...
Analyse the Data and Draw a Conclusion.

Why? Because it's what google says?

This is a series of criteria...

that is the scientific method

hahahahaha

You need those to get trustworthy data

very vague way to say it

Yes

It is

so you didnt know the steps it seems

like i said

shows you dont know shit about science

Why do you drawn that conclusion?

Ok now you are been offensive

you dont even know the steps to the scientific method then you are not doing science are you?

I know the steps

you did not provide them when asked

you had to wait till i posted them

pretty funny

Well, which is easier

so you have zero proof you knew it

ZERO

Give an vague idea or give the complete idea

While you bomb me with questions and counter proof

still waiting on a answer to any of those 9 questions

See, this isnot an debate

your right you have not really addressed any of my questions

I answered 2, you just ignored it and pointed to a very weak based fount

that is not a answer to number 2

lol

So the answer is what you want it to be

Yes, this isnot a debate

Tou act like a teacher in a classroom

a anti bacterial is not the answer to the question lol

you are making up shit as you go along

Which is the substance used to conserve vaccines

Thiomersal

Or it's comercial name

Merthiolate

It's an organic form of Hg

show thiomersal is safe cause it is not

still crosses the bbb

I sent an scientific article to you explaining about it

Proof that you didn't readed it

your argument cause it is organic is absurd btw . nothing that is listed a toxin is good for you in any dose

Proof that you don't know what organic means

and straight into the veins

It's not safer because it's organic

Benzen causes cancer

so you are getting 100% of that absorbed itno your system

Yet if you connect it with another carbon chain it does not

Read the article

Please

lol just cause something is organic does not mean it is safer

pretty funny

Yes, you are right

But that's not what I am saying

that is like saying calcium fluoride is safer than sodium fluoride and it is false

I explained how an organic thing can or cannot cause cancer

yea they can

HAHAHAHAHA

Benzen is an example

It can cause cancer

fluoride causes cancer

both do calcium and sodium

But if you put it on a carbon chain it does not

Well not that molecule

calcium is the organic version and it has the same effects on the human body

Calcium is not organic

As far as I know

calcium fluoride is the orginic version

An organic molecule have carbon, hydrogen, etc

hahahahaha

wtf

Hmmm then idk

Everything is organic

But calcium itself isn't organic as far as I know

@sean g no it is not

So...
Vaccines
How about em

Ok, so you actually think you have refutated my answers

But you haven't even readed the articles I sent

In fruits, vegs have organic calcium

sodium fluoride comes from fertilizer and aluminum factories

And everytime I said something you replied with the same sources

aluminum that has been processed

Inorganic calcium is that calcium found in foods that have been produced with the use of chemical fertilizers, additives, etc. ... PCRM states there are adequate sources of organic calcium from fruits, vegetables and grains to achieve our necessary requirements of usable organic calcium.

So this show your huge disrespect for me

And the debate itself

that was like saying that naglase is organic when it is a man made enzyme