climate-propaganda
Discord ID: 551433518991933442
1,364 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/6
| Next
Stronger endurance
Longer lifespans
The co2 fear mongers know this and that is why they mislead you
They dont want you to live longer
But what about the oceans growing too much algae that causes dead zones. Dead zones are patches of water that doesnโt have enough oxygen to sustain gill breathing
Fake news
Thereโs research into it thatโs been per reviewed
Co2 levels were many times higher in the past and life thrived
Peer*
Now weโre going into it with billions of tonnes if pollution
I dont polute. Maybe you should stop if you do
breathe in a load of co2 for a bit then haha
Natural levels dippy
I think we will be gone by 2050
Thats stupid
Why would you think that
bruh
when you say that you want more co2
how much more are you talking
Ecuse me what the FRICK
We need less CO2
@Brian (Fourth Amendment) why do we need less co2?
You want trees to die?
Does anyone here know what happens to plants when you raise them indoors with little ventilation?
They starve
They grow slowly
They are unhealthy
All because of the lack of co2
Demonozing co2 is the dumbest position anyone could ever take.
Unless you want to kill everything
@Citizen Z would that not be harmful to humans in anyway?
Co2 is good and im sticking to my story
Life has also thrived at the bottom of the ocean and in Antarctica
Just because itโs habitable for them
Doesnโt mean itโs habitable for us
single cell organisms are much more survivable than humans
for sure
Life on the suface of the earth thrived with co2 levels many times higher
Interesting point Citizen
Again, life also thrived in the marianas trench.
doesnโt mean humans can live down there
Yes exactly
Life thrives because of co2
I agree with you @Citizen Z
As global warming is not what it seems
@Citizen Z do you not believe hat co2 in large quantities is toxic to humans
Co2 said
Hoes mad
My mom told me that co2 hoes mad
The earth is flat.
Agent Smith is gay
Morpheus is gay
v
We are only at .04%
50% increase would be .06%
Well within human limitations
Not even .1
We can handle 1.0%
The "survey" was a two-question, online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of whom [only] 3,146 responded. Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers then selected 79 of their sample and declared them "experts."
Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 out of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 per cent were found to agree with "the consensus". That's where the 97 per cent comes from.
shows you how they manipulate the numbers to push a agenda
So this is a very Michael Mann "reconstruction": just as a couple of Californian bristlecones can determine the climate for a millennium, so a couple of dozen Californian scientists can determine the consensus of the world.
Wow, you mean the 97% consensus number comes from just 75 scientists that were hand-picked from an email survey?
Yep. Out of the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected to "count" for the climate change survey that every mainstream media news organization quotes as FACT.
Not quite the "settled science" you've been told, is it? In fact, it all looks rather shoddy.
By contrast, over 30,000 scientists have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative.
so more scientist claim it is a HOAX than says it is real hahahaha
A staggering 30,000+ scientists have come forward confirming that man-made climate change is a hoax perpetuated by the elite in order to make money.
The science is clearly not settled, and banning people from talking about it, based on evidence, is not only unethical, but... unscientific.
And, of course, there are the more than 31,487 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields.
that is way more than 75 scientist they used for the study hahahaha
Okay
So
I see
All those plants and trees that require evil co2 need to go
Do you spend all day trying to get banned?
This never made any sense to me. We breathe out CO2 in O2. Plants love CO2. They thrive as it goes up. I have seen more and more plant life. Crops will grow faster with it. I simply can not see the damage more of it would do. A bit warmer would be wonderful for most of us. We could live further north.
hey @Citizen Z
Yes? @Hirohito's chins
how come i still cant speak in some of he channels
@Hirohito's chins you have to have new member role removed.
how do i got about doing that
How do you folks resolve the fact that major oil companies found proof of human-emission caused climate change and then deliberately spread misinformation to make people believe it was a hoax
Doesnโt it make much more sense that climate Change is real and that the denial of it is the conspiracy?
What would be the motive for scientists claiming climate change is real?
Do you think it compares at all to the clear and obvious profit motive that coal and oil companies have in hiding climate change?
I simply cannot understand how someone who claims to be a seeker of truth can be fooled by these corporations and their lies
โShellโs assessment foresaw a one-meter sea-level rise, and noted that warming could also fuel disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, resulting in a worldwide rise in sea level of โfive to six meters.โ That would be enough to inundate entire low-lying countries.
Shellโs analysts also warned of the โdisappearance of specific ecosystems or habitat destruction,โ predicted an increase in โrunoff, destructive floods, and inundation of low-lying farmland,โ and said that โnew sources of freshwater would be requiredโ to compensate for changes in precipitation. Global changes in air temperature would also โdrastically change the way people live and work.โ All told, Shell concluded, โthe changes may be the greatest in recorded history.โ
For its part, Exxon warned of โpotentially catastrophic events that must be considered.โ Like Shellโs experts, Exxonโs scientists predicted devastating sea-level rise, and warned that the American Midwest and other parts of the world could become desert-likeโ
โDespite scientific uncertainties, the bottom line was this: oil firms recognized that their products added CO2 to the atmosphere, understood that this would lead to warming, and calculated the likely consequences. And then they chose to accept those risks on our behalf, at our expense, and without our knowledge.โ
Good sci fi story
Complete garbage tho
I could explain why it's garbage. Problem is i dont care if ppl want to believe a bunch of bs like that.
So oh well. The liberals will self destruct from lies.
If you tell one lie, you have to tell 100 more.
The truth is easy
Build yourself around truth and your life will be easier
the truth is easy when it's "oh yeah? well, it's simply not happening" lol
More like ppl saying it is happening. Only thing tho is they are trusting a bunch of liars
Answer me this, is low lying farmland protected by levees?
Are aquifers being depleted because of drought or over usage and improper river management?
Ever heard of a flood plane?
Did you know in places where they are running their aquifers dry, like California, they have talked about removing thousands of miles of levees,
Turn the rivers and flood zones back to a somewhat natural state
Thats the only way to recharge the aquifers
Did you know glaciers have been growing and receding for thousands of years. The amount of time we have been recording their sizes is minuscule
Co2 is good.
Demonizing it is just stupid
The entire post that person made above was a copy and paste. They have zero clue what they are talking about
Dont believe the bullshit
Do your own study
Socialism is a weak form of communism
It will never work without capitalism to pay for your free shit. When you grow up and realize how the world works you will see that. @๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
XD
The idea of communism is partially ok but there will always be a way to shatter it
Most cases it will be corruption that breaks the rule of communism or even opposing parties like the US
In our current society, it will never last
https://stormhighway.com/plantstorms.php Simple, observable, repeatable. Basic science. Overblow the input -- the output has to go somewhere, leading to chaos when it finally outputs. The water cycle has been hijacked.
๐
Fix the oceans and the air will fix itself, nobody is lifting a finger about the plastic in the ocean, meanwhile pay up your Carbon Taxes good Goyim
Yes, we are trying to fix the plastic problem
But unfortuetly, the oceans won't clean the air if temperature saises more
It will just release Co2 itself
@Citizen Z totally agree. c02 is not the issue.... natural change is the issue..... other feedbacks are NOT being studied. (such as clouds, PDOs, cosmic rays, solar rays). IF c02 was the cause of temp rise (solely) then the artics woud rise MUCH faster than the tropics , thus reducing the force of storms, not strengthening them....... basic physics there.
@Deleted User northern California is heavily chemtrailed to prevent rain and snow in the Oroville area. (Sierra nevada mountains) The dam will fail when they want it to fail, not before.
I think they will just detonate the charges
Yes when the time comes
They have ADMs in the dam
Atomic demolition munitions
A lot of the larger mega dams have them
@Deleted User thats a good catch, that weather report gif.
Right now I've got the motherload of red pills
I'm going through them
Nice ๐
Okay, so basically you guys don't believe in global warming?
Sorry, but it's scientifically proven
In Romania (where I'm from) We went from highest temperatures in summer from 30C, to 38C, so far in the Summer. And the sun is on a phase low, it's emmiting less light than it usually does.
In my town we have had 8 or so tornadoes in the past two years, when we havenโt had one for decades. We also had record flooding in spring 2017 and 2018, displacing thousands and destroying houses throughout the city. Itโs stupid to deny climate change when there is absolutely zero evidence to say itโs not happening. Itโs just an excuse for rich people to ignore the problem because they are going to die soon and donโt want to deal with it.
Thats weather for you
Its random
Tornados are always random
You should learn facts and keep your emotions out of it
yeah, to an extent
But @Citizen Z when situations like this start popping up all over the world, along with the actual evidence that proves climate change, itโs useless to deny it
it proves climate change?
All it proves is more ppl have populated more area
More ppl affected
Thatโs not how it works
Prove climate change to me
Man made climate change
And the tornados arenโt proof of climate change, they are a result of climate change and corroborate with the actual scientific data
World is ending in 12 years?
No.
Tornados are result of warm air meeting cold air
This is basic
Tornadoes have been going on longer than we have been recording them
Obviously
Prove climate change
Man made
Sea level rise
All the mumbo jumbo hocas pokas you believe in
Prove it to me
Im sure thatโs a coincidence
Greenhouses gasses trap heat and heat up the atmosphere
If you think thatโs a lie then prove to me that you will not feel cold in Antarctica
Tornados happen due to vast temperature differentials, tornados increase due to climate change because hotter water
๐
๐๐๐Iโll use emojis because I canโt debate
http://humansarefree.com/2016/11/the-97-of-scientists-agree-on-climate.html http://humansarefree.com/2016/09/over-30000-scientists-declare-climate.html Over 30000 is far more than the 75 that made up the 97% go push bs somewhere else
Not a debate room
Feel free to post your tornado data
?
Oh I see
Sorry bout that
Wait
The description says itโs for debating
So you were debating. I wasnt
You posted an image
And some other non sense along with an ad hom
are you denying global warming
Show me the data
Notably man made climate change alarmists
Liars and misled sheep
(Always) Ten Years Left To Save The Planet
I'm sorry to bare terrible news ( especially as it's my first post ) but I'm afraid we don't have that long. UK's prince Charles claims we only have 18 months to save the planet. https://youtu.be/-jH4WgfVjCo
(๐คฃ)
You wount be deceived if you dont watch it...
18 months huh
Funny
I bet ppl believe that too
Pretty mean to scare ppl like that
I was gonna try to find a channel that fits this best, but this will work.
So, how do climate zones work in the flat earth?
Ah, nevermind.
โซ I spilt lean on my pants โซ
โซ life sucks, oh well, true dat โซ
Farmers lost a lot due to flooding this year.
Had nothing to do with carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide is still .04%
Who said carbon dioxide is the main contributor
Itโs Methane that is release from agriculture that does more damage to our planet
30x more damaging than carbon dioxide.
1,364 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/6
| Next