flat-earth
Discord ID: 484516084846952451
118,849 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 8/1189
| Next
1 inch off the ground or 5 feet up?
6 feet?
I'm tired gotta goto sleep
The angle that was labeled in the last pic
Ugh whatever ok
What height did you use?
This is the distance the object would disappear using 0.02 as the angle and 6ft as the height of the observer
I used 6 ft for both
Feel free to check the math
It's simple geometry
Cool.thanks ill look at it
Ok tell me what you think when you're done
So what r u saying?
According to the information provided, objects of the size specified would vanish fully at 299.96 feet instead of 3 miles
You must of done something wrong
You're welcome to find where I messed up
Think about what you are saying
I did
5 foot object doesnt disappear at 300 feet
It does at 3 miles
Now you're catching on
It would vanish to the naked eye
At 300 feet the bottom few inches prolly start disappearing
Without a telescope
5 feet isn't too big
I would imagine it'd be hard to see from that far away
The bottom starts disappearing, sure. But that's assuming you can see it without using a telescope
Thats what we are talking about just human vision limits
Ok hun
The angle of light going into the retina
In the back of the eye
Yep
K
Would you care to explain how the sail of a sailboat does not become unresolvable gradually when aided by a telescope then
It does
Or maybe why it doesn't appear to sink when viewed by the naked eye
It does
It doesn't
Sure it does
It becomes unresolved to the naked eye before it becomes unresolved with a telescope
It appears to sink and even starts blending with the sky
Telescope brings it back into view
If your theory was correct you would be able to see it vanish behind the horizon once with the naked eye then again while using a telescope
You do
You don't
Go watch a boat then use binoculars
I will
Ok
Let me know what you get
But if I don't see it sink twice you're gonna have to explain that to me
Ok
Nite
Nite
Looks like it was 17000 feet not 299 feet
Okay so three things:
1. That's not a right triangle, it's isosceles. The formula depends on it being a right triangle. With an isosceles triangle the sides could be literally any length. That's why you're getting the exact same distance you put in.
2. You're using a different input. The height and angle are still the same, but you're using 17,188 feet instead of the agreed upon 15,840 feet.
3. My math with the 300 ft only used the height of the observer and the angle of 0.02 to find the distance at which the angle would be 0.02. It didn't use the three mile distance at all.
15k feet for 5 feet not 6
I never said 15840 feet
I said about 3 miles
Either way your math is obviously wrong
It doesn't work that way
Mr Z isnt good at maths it seems
Its to bad globies are stupid
@UltimateLifeformGappy#4626 are you blind it's a right triangle for the angle to the ground an isosceles triangle for the cone of vision.
Gone
Ya
Angle to the ground from 300 ft away is 1.145 degrees
No its .02 degrees
๐
Ur wrong do the math
๐
Everyone knows if you look across a football field everything shrinks to nothing
Duh
Everyone knows .02 degrees isnt real
Try doing some math
๐
Lol
I'm trying to figure out what he screwed up
Just another troll hell bent on arguing with me and will give fake math to try and deceive me
Its common sense
I figured it out. He used radians not degrees
Poor soul
A simple mistake cost him his flat earth server participation
๐
conversion sux
1 radian is just under 57.3 degrees
Poor guy
Im sticking to my story
here's the funny part . Somewhere in the world he is setting there convinced he was correct ๐
Thats pretty funny
118,849 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 8/1189
| Next