Like Wikipedia ?

Alright

Do both parties agree on this rule?

NO

I agree, yes

in flat earth debate personal research generally means that someone did an "experiment" and saw the results they wanted by ignoring things or not understanding

either that or a flawed "experiment"

Wait where is Gwench

With hard proof and peer review i agree

so no personal research at all

Just @ her

Hard proof, reliable source, and peer reviewed

ZYes'

Yes*

hey Astra you'll do

Yes

you're a flat earther

wanna debate?

Sure

@×Iwnz× you can use wikipedia to look for references but not as an actual source

What the debate about?

@Hamburger Guy ok

Isn’t hamburger a FE?

Flat earth

our point

Sure

it's a globe

No I'm not

Good

glove lol

I'm an a-earther

I play both sides

what

Ok

Apparently he somehow believes the earth is a globe and flat

Btw peer review means no spamming random pictures

yeah

@Zaz does that mean atheists believe in God and no god?

Alright shall we begin?

Well I agree on both models of earth, Gravity crushes any sort of planet into a ball because of the pressure. There is more evidence on the flat earth.

Can I see some evidence?

Yes.

I'm curious

No ive said that about a opinion in the middle of the spectrum

Sure

In reality I do have a side but for now I am officially a neutral party

Gravity points towards round earth

Just for now

we have pictures of earth as well

Yes

It's not CGI

not to mention peer reviewed methods of finding that out on the ground

For an atheist they are believing one thing not neutral or both

Earth pictures = cgi

nope

It’s been proven

can we see some evidence?

By billions

@Hamburger Guy what is your party then?

Sure

What proof?

Btw you obviously do not need peer review if both parties agree

by BILLIONS?!

@Zaz I'm a referee

@Muncher any links?

Hello globbies

hey fellow glober

If you really do have a party then its hard to trust you to be impartial

But you don't know my party

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GrihjP5tTTM

I admire the thiccness of our fellow bae earth

@Muncher is that a peer review

@Le boy earth too thicc

It doesn’t matter what your party is

As I said before youtube is not a source

If you have a party

Idk is it @Hamburger Guy

To thicc to measure it's thiccness

It draws you to be biased

You can check the description

neither is non-empirical non-peer reviewed self-research some random guy did

that's experimentation. in the first hand

hahaha

YouTube - Someone who has studied many sources to explain their beliefs.

Looking at the horizon isn't how the scientific method is used

USE MATH

SRSLY

that's a video that actually PROVES GLOBE EARTh

First of all, does everybody know what peer review is?

Did you not check the video yourself

With a bike and two sticks @void creature

Those are some types of experiments

Oooh Astra you a simulation earther!!!??

They do

Yes @Le boy

Alex Chertnik
Published on Aug 1, 2016
in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km.

in the description of the video

wait a second

:"in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km."

Oml

Ooh onether one yeey

he proved globe earth

lOl

@void creature it's not peer review so it doesn't prove your side either

It's a two way street

No need to prove its logical

Yeah but he just used "evidence" without looking at it first

I’m an undecided

I support both sides

It's not peer review so we pretend it doesn't exist

There's no reason for our specific planet to be flat while the 8 others are spherical

You’ve already said your a Flat Earther

I want evidence of flat earth

so far there's been none

Yes and the reason for that is gravity @Le boy

@void creature you gave none for your side either

Ik

You can't disprove gravity

You guys suck at debating

@Lays Ketchup Chips how about you prove it

Gravity pulls matter together same thing is happening in the quark

Oml I can prove it with my elementary school science lab

jesus christ

@Le boy peer review study please

https://www.popsci.com/sites/popsci.com/files/styles/1000_1x_/public/images/2016/04/bluemarble.jpg?itok=08uHXinW

Gravity will crush everything because it won’t have anywhere to go and the pressure would force/crush it into a ball

If the earth is flat

that's a photo of earth from space

Why can we not fly off the earth

Peer review study?

What's that?

https://www.popsci.com/sites/popsci.com/files/styles/1000_1x_/public/images/2016/04/bluemarble.jpg?itok=08uHXinW

@void creature that's not a reliable source

That chi sorry

And why doesnt gravity differ around the globe

That picture is fake

*cgi

Its .com

Wow

everything is cgi now

how is it cgi?

No

Yep

Not .Gov or .edu

why is it cgi

please

tell me

You need to prove it's CHI

Cji

Even .gov does cgi

CGI

No one answered my question lmao

Why>

NASA IS GOV

The way they take a fully sized image of the earth is by taking parts of it one by one

ANSWER THE QUESTION

They use CGI

WHY

do

they

use

cg

i

Sending the data down here then adding them together

To convey their beliefs

And how do you know?

what proof

is there

To get a fully sized earth

for cgi

I can answer so many questions

And manipulate us

Manipulate us for what?

It's hard to keep my mouth shut

and from what ive seen from the picture astra sent

aight guys the delivery man came

All the wind systems seem the same

It brings them money, power and many more things

gonna eat my burger now

EVERY BODY STOP

How about we refuse pictures as reliable evidence

Wait lemme get on my pc i type TOo slow on my phone

Bruh gimme some proof of cgi please

There are ways to prove globe earth without pictures

Let's move on

exactly Hamburger guy lol

Every earth picture that nasa posts

Even if they did cgi (which they don't) we can still prove it w/o going to space

Every space picture nasa posts

@Muncher we are moving on

Ive asked a question that if there is no logical answer to, debunks flat earth entirely

we've proven the earth was round before we went to space

And i have no answer

@Hamburger Guy Ok.

Flat earthers have no non edited photos either so we won't go by that

NASA does do CGI, but I believe it is just to add color

@Somebody doesn't matter we are moving on

Fair enough

Okay gonna ask

k back

Sorry for not replying I’m just walking on the road right now

Who goes first?

I will

Ill ask my question again

@Somebody those are space photos and they are not adding colors it was talen in a different electromagnatic spectrum

Oh sorry

taken*

@Le boy WE ARE MOVING ON

on what?

flat earth has not clean photos either

If the earth is flat we can we not fly off the edge

And why does gravity not differ across the globe

theresnt a lay earth photo

if the theory was correct theres no reason the government would show us such thing

NASA has clean photos.
Your just throwing in "oh it's cgi" without proof

sooooo

would be idiotic

No answer to my question again

@Lays Ketchup Chips we are not going by photos

whats your question

Yeah, I go by photos *and* math

?

done again and again

it proves the earth's curvature

@Lays Ketchup Chips can you prove the photo was untouched

It isn't guilty until proven son.

It's innocent until proven guilty

k stan lee

where's the proof of it being all poofed up and cgi'd

Exactly.

no evidence.

The globies acknowledged it

No we haven't,

the reason they add them together its because they are taken by satelates

unless you have proof?

So we have our first argument

Bruh

they are to close to the earth to take a fully one

Flatties, prove the photos were CGI

we all know they are

nothing to prove

@Le boy what side are you on

look at my roles

They aren't dude

Ok then

lays are u a flat earther ?

Duke it out in DM

I'll wait

im kinda confused