civil-debate
Discord ID: 538929818834698260
127,199 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 34/509
| Next
No it hasn't. You are assuming that the movement of the "planets" is caused by the same force that causes things to fall on earth.
That's where the evidence is lacking.
I dont have a better explanation. But my lack of a better explanation is not proof that your speculative mathematics provide one.
I think that the "experiment" used to derive the gravitational constant is bogus.
Without solid evidence of "Big G", the heliocentric model is merely speculative.
Iโm not asumimg it. It has been proven. We are able to measure the gravitation lull and orbit around objects. These equations have been created by newton himself.
Pull*
I gtg to bed
Iโm tired
Iโll see yโall tomorrow
The equations are not proof. You have to include a large number of assumptions to arrive at those conclusions.
bye
equations are not proof. obviously. what makes you think I dont understand the equations?
The American School system is garbage and needs a complete overhaul
why?
many obvious reasons
patriotism, fake history, multiple choice tests
there is no such thing as fake history
history is history
its already proven
sorry mate @shiro
lol
do you believe everything thats in the news as well? @MagicalLuuk
no
ur weck
then why do you assume the news in the past were correct?
stupidity
no
sorry
mate thats not how it works
how come?
example: 911 was a lie. it was shown in tv therefore ppl believe it and thats why it will be in the future history books. now how can you be sure stuff like that or similar never happened before?
9/11 was not a lie
My uncle was at the scene
Or one of my uncles
And he was nearly killed
One of the funnier things ive seen lately
@patrickcooper289 what if i tell you...it can be a lie.. **but many people died anyway**
@MagicalLuuk no explanation? sad
the school system is bad tho tbf
<#484514023698726912>
<:trolled:555217274907262976>
Gay Frogs- By Alex Jones
https://youtu.be/wkQcfkxWAZg
yes
It is good, lol
A classic
a modern masterpiece
True
earth is round iโll spark ya mum out
which was the bad word
spark
or mum
or earth is round
Turning the friggin' frogs gay!
itโs the water
**dO YOu uNDersTaNd THaT?!**
Not to be a troll or anything but I rll donโt think the earth is flat
thatโs not being a troll here.
We went to the moon.
Oh
Ok
If the earth is flat then how would heat dispersion work???
@Udo Do you think it would be possible to have slow motion effects live like in capricorn 1 given late 60s tech?
I can't internet search this stuff because it is too specific.
Possibly. The problem is, if I'm being honest, the later you get in time, the more easily it would be to hoax whatever you want on film.
In the Capricorn 1 movie, Mars landings were hoaxed by doing it live from the camera in a secret studio in the middle of some desert, slow motion effects were done live by some people in the studio who had direct control over what broadcasted to the public.
Generally, moon landing deniers claim the footage was all prerecorded, but I was just thinking about this and how plausible it would be given the technology at the time.
Just some food for thought I had for myself. I'm personally not a moon landing denier myself.
No one went to the moon. Look into it
Plenty of proof the moon landings are a hoax
Yes?
Easy if you just think
Its not like they did a good job of fakery
How far away would you guess the horizon on the moon is from the observer point of view in the above picture?
40 yards
But that doesn't matter. It could be argued they are on a hill
The point in this images is there is convergent shadows that cant be caused by a 93 million mile away sun. Its caused by local, electrical lighting.
I have an actual question, if NASA is this big fake machine, explain SpaceX and Russia space programs. with proof, calling it FakeX is an opinion and false without evidence.
@Popcornthattasteslikefish calling it real is just appealing to popularity. There is plenty of fake x evidence
Do you have some to share
@Popcornthattasteslikefish ๐ค didnt someone suggest to you "Jeranism's youtube channel" (earlier) for just one quick example, or nah? ๐ค
oh I didn't see that, thank you
--k .. ๐
Yeah, if I had a favorite for flat earth content creators, it would probably be Jeranism or ODD
The earth is round
๐
round like ball or round like flat circle ๐ค
<:lul:484994724118134784>
Sphere
so he crammed his post (emoji) in, before i sent my comment lol
๐
.
ok, well, @Jaxson
i says its flat
af
@โงMike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)โง<:fakenews:507995495982170112>
<:fakenews:507995495982170112>
<:fakenews:507995495982170112>
<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>
ใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
คใ
ค
<:trolled:555217274907262976> ๐ง
If anybody does why do you believe that the earth is flat?
it's not lmao
@Citizen Z Is this the right place?
Yes if you wish to argue about something. Thx
So i think that the horizon dropping below eye level with altitude is proof the earth can't be flat
Gtg. Working
K show me a horizon that drops.
Ok i can tell you my measurements, show you images, would that suffice?
I can show you footage from a redbull jump from 128 thousand feet and the horizon didnt drop
Didd that include a theodolite, and an accurate indication of horizontal eye level?
Have you heard of an apparent horizon?
Yes, but I'm measuring the visual horizon
That's the better one to use
Theodolites are only good up to about 400 yards
I can give you manufacturers specifications
You didnt do your research
wait do you know what a theodolite is?
it measures angles, not distance
sorry I'm a CE surveyor, you're wrong
The angles can only be measured accurately up to 400 yards or so
No you're wrong
yards isn't angle
Lol
i'm not using it in distance mode
No you're 100% wrong sorry
Its not accurate past 400 yards
It reports the visual angle between any two things in your view
And it can tell you horizontal accurately
Show me specs saying a theodolite measures a horizon 6 miles away
Then ill believe you
Gtg
This explains it well : http://www.johnsonlevel.com/News/TheodolitesAllAboutTheodo
It isnt' measuring the distance
Can you SEE the horizon through the sight of the theodolite?
then you can measure teh angle
And that's all you need
K where does it say accuracy
For distance
It's not used for distance
it's used for measuring angles
like a sextant
You cant measure an angle that far away
Youre wrong
A theodolite /ฮธiหหษdษlaษชt/ is a precision optical instrument for measuring angles between designated visible points in the horizontal and vertical planes.
No you're wrong, if it' sin your view you can measure the visual angle
Dunno why you're saying this
Just like i can measure angular size of the moon or sun
or an object out in the ocean
1 microrad is a typical resolution for the angle
@Hedwig - that stupid old video ๐ lmfao
who SAID it has to always be (EXACTLY) "eye-level" hmmmmmmmmmmmmm??
you mussa been tlkin to the wrong muhfkn flat earthers lmao!..
flat earthers say that
they dont mean EXACTLY eye-level ,
..as i just said, moments ago
it does not have to be Exactly "eye-level" ..but....just the fact that (when extreme elevation) that it (horizon) RISES UP AS MUCH AS IT DOES to begin with? Annilates a Ball earth (the size they tell us it is)
mkay
.
Lets go up! up up and away ..
lets go further, shall we
Lets go to 317,000 feet, mkay?...
@Hedwig take your Theodolite and pack it....
@โงMike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)โง how do you know where eye level is in that first image? is there any indication the camera is perfectly leveled?
b/c to make that measurement you need a theodolite
and there is none in that image, so try again
"eye-level" is an estimate, or an expression, commonly used
ok so this image isn't usable then
the one you posted
have i not said (explained) that yet, ..im pretty sure i have
--yes it is very usable
not if it's just an estimate
if
on
a
ball
you can't use that to prove level, if it's just and ESTIMATE
it WOULD NOT BE THERE
really?
.. ๐ผ ๐คค
what if that camera is pointing down
>>clear 60
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Cleaned **60** messages.
@Hedwig Well first there is the manufacturers own specs. You can get off their websites
Comparative study of accuracy in distance measurement using: Optical and digital levels
That PDF is the owners manual for the 600M one
Notice it says 100lux ?
Sokkia LDT520 Laser Digital Theodolite
LDT520 Laser Digital Theodolite.jpg
Please feel free to request a demo!! Call for availability and pricing!
Click here for LDT520 Laser Digital Theodolite: NR_LDT520.pdf & LDT520.pdf
Sokkia's LDT520, a 5โ digital theodolite equipped with a telescope with laser beam emission capability, boasts the worldโs longest laser range, class-topping dust and water protection,and a continuous operation time over 2.5 times that of its predecessor. The LDT520 is designed for directional controls in tunnel excavation, precise marking and alignment in construction and engineering applications.
It has to be dark to see the reflection
600m meters on a cvery dark day
Daylight washes it out
I doubt it is even very accurate at 600 meters
๐ผ Information on Theodolite specifications ๐ผ
Next we have what is called Spatial Disorientation & Visual Illusions which includes our visible horizon. Sometimes called the offing, this apparent line is where the sky meets the ground and is being perceived as an edge because of perspective due geographical slant and other optical phenomena.
Visible Horizon 1
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/462039366013812748/Screenshot_20180628-141432_Chrome.jpg
Offing
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/462038361121619968/Screenshot_20180628-141841_Chrome.jpg
Visible Horizon 2
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/462038361612222465/Screenshot_20180623-163225_Chrome-2.jpg
"In the offing"
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/462038360362582038/Screenshot_20180628-143947_Chrome.jpg
False visual reference illusion
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/462038359708008450/Screenshot_20180628-144334_Drive.jpg
Spatial orientation & Visual Illusions
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/462038361121619969/Screenshot_20180628-144237_Drive.jpg @Hedwig
Lastly, do you believe we live on a cylinder? If you think the horizon drops, it should be dropping in a 360 degree circle around you. 3 boats spread apart by say 20 miles should be at different heights.
<@561690854620659723> it says angle
Take a look. All the information is there.
I dont believe you are a surveyor or you would know this
Yes it is
Its max distance
Which is measuring angle
Lol
Show me specs for a Theodolite that is capable of measuring anything beyond 600 meters
Thats not accurate.
You are using the Theodolite incorrectly. Plus i dont believe you.
Im talking about measuring anything with a theodolite. Its 600 meters max.
After 600 meters the accuracy is not correct
Look it up
Its accuracy of the entire theodolite
Show me specs of a theodolite operatiing furthing than 600 meters
No its not just the laser
Thats what i said
Angles up to 600 meters
Show me specs of a theodolite operating beyond that.
Yes it will get you degrees up to 600 meters away
K show me the specs that confirm that
What paragraph exactly?
Thats not specs btw
Thats a wiki article
Visible points up to 600 meters.
The wiki article isnt giving exact specifications
Its not accurate after that
Listen. I know you're a fake. I know you are lying.
Bye
>>ban <@561690854620659723> lying
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned <@561690854620659723>
@Citizen Z yo why do you seem so good at debating fr lml
It wasnt a debate
It was me showing someone the information and them denying it
Plus them lying about their occupation
And they were Posting garbage wikipedia pages that were not completely accurate.
127,199 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 34/509
| Next