info-wars
Discord ID: 469490581899575297
4,990 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 15/20
| Next
and if you had a brain then you could've been an earthworm
10 Myl laaities. Wat nou?
@Deejay from Earth i gave @Sheamus my scale models of the earth and plane.
@MR VLAK Ja I saw them, I had to stop looking at them after a while as I was laughing so hard I started puking.
@Deejay from Earth so you are saying we cannot get the exact same flat horizon on the round earth model based on the data?
Or are you saying it is fake regardless?
Can't you read? Scroll back bonehead.
I dont care what you told other people. I am here engaging with you
Deejay do you remember that cad export you posted that had the terrible fps๐คฃ and you thought it was a camera on a ballon?
@MR VLAK Sorry you're not bright enough for that sunshine. As you have proven REPEATEDLY.
Sockpuppets! Sockpuppets everwhere!
Laser over water is fake. you cannot prove the laser was not pointed down and need to take defraction of light into account
@MR VLAK Visual videographic evidence you apocalyptic dingle-berry.
@Deejay from Earth as visual as a NASA video
@MR VLAK Are you blind, daft, or both?
Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum is on the attack!
@Deejay from Earth take a step back and think critically of what you are saying to me
@MR VLAK Yeah I'm saying you are a LIAR and a FRAUD and I can prove flat earth in a court-room in front of a judge. What else would you like to know?
Also you can see that they can both see each other on the 2 points in the video. If you really want to prove there is no curvature. Please point a stronger laser over water between SA and Australia. Or even SA and south America somewhere. Because then you will absolutely see the curvature causes the laser to not be seen on the other side. Think critically and stop crying when we use your evidence to disprove your own wayward believes.
@Sidius Your opinion is shit.
@Sidius And it doesn't matter
@Sidius What you think
Then the reciprocate is just as true deejay๐คฃ
#FraudulentOnlinePersona
#NASAbot
Cessna at Max Altitude (4.5km) and a Baloon at 114k ft. Note that Sketchup has segmented the globe a bit so just keep that in mind. It is scaled in meters. NOTE: The plane and baloon are not scaled, they are for illustrative purposes only https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/469490581899575297/477552996813635619/2018-08-10_20-54-57_-_Segment100_00_02.885-00_01_03.6741.mp4
i will just repost this
#NASAbot
@MR VLAK well done op daai. Ekt al gewens ek kon daai illustrate. Darm het daar mense gejoin wat kan.
@Sheamus you should give him the model + camera view so he can stop moaning that you are making a photoshop or something. TBH his photo had more aberrations than a 3D model, that fascinates me.
@MR VLAK Waar is die view uit die cockpit uit Dirkie?
Die camera clip uit want hy kan net in sekere intervals beweeg soos jy sien op die video. Dit is hoekom ons dit in n 3d rendering tool gesit het om daai view te recreate (Unreal Engine)
Nie met jou kamera op 'n angle nie
@Deejay from Earth kyk na die angle van die view... dan kyk as ek loodreg met die plane kyk..
LEVEL
Sheamus sin kyk perfect loodreg uit
@MR VLAK Shaemus se model is so real soos sy naam dude
Ons het die vleigtuid na 4.5km gevat want the 900ft was te min (net 273m of so)
@MR VLAK En moenie vergeet om vir my die horison view van 114,000 voet ook te wys nie.
SOOS AANGEVRA
EK het daai balon daar in vir jou, het dit ook vir hom gegee om in Unreal in te trek vir jou
die balon video wat jy gelink het het vir my baie na gelyk aan my video
@MR VLAK Hierso is hoe dit lyk as jy dit eerlik doen en nie lieg soos 'n brandsiek psigopaat nie. https://youtu.be/FmQO-YSrdBE
@Deejay from Earth dit is intressant ek sal stem. Maar die scale van die globe is helemal verkeerd in vergelyking met die balon
Dit skep n false ilusion
@MR VLAK Dis jou brein wat short-circuit en 'n false-illusion skep as gevolg van katastrofiese lae ik.
Gebruik jy nou jou Forum control rules hier? gaan nie werk nie. Insults gaan ook nie werk nie
#NasaBot
@MR VLAK Ja want jy is te dom om dit te verstaan.
Ek voel jammer vir jou
Cognitive dissonance is erg neh
Ek sal bid, Mag jou God jou krag gee om die waarhied te sien
@MR VLAK Ja God [as ons die bybel mag gebruik]...... sรช oor die 200 keer die aarde is PLAT....so........
@MR VLAK Druk jou hypocrisy in jou gat jy is a fake Christen. Die bybel sรช die aarde is plat.
Dis waar
stop arguing with deejay please
he needs his old man sleep
he gets cranky when he doesnt sleep
Let op ek het gese.. Jou God
@MR VLAK Gaan nou weg toe? Asb?
Nee
gaan jy weg
The Globe has NEVER been proven except by the church of NASA
@Deejay from Earth waar het jy die ander FE laat import?
@MR VLAK Waarvan praat jy?
IDK MAN
lol
50+ SPACE AGENCIES
13 WITH LAUNCH CAPABILITES
THOUSANDS OF WORKERS AND CONTRACTORS
PLUS HUNDREDS OF PHYSICISTS N STUFF INDEPENDENTLY PROVING EM
ALL UNDER 1 CONSPIRACY?
vs some religous nuts that takes the word of the bible as fact
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Wakey wakey poepol squad
chevron means a space rocket you lugnut
go read something aside form the bible
like idk man
YAWN
too much to be spending to issue gag orders
and court time to enforce them
No gag order. Just a shit ton of dumb people
@MR VLAK Firstly the BIble has been PROVEN to be accurate time and time again......
2ndly we dont NEED the Bible to prove the earth is flat....just ENTRY level common sense
IDK MAN
I THINK ID TRUST THE GUY WITH A DEGREE IN THIS
OVER SOME HIPPIE OLD MAN WHO LIVES IN SOUTH AFRICA WHO ARGUES WITH 18 YEAR OLDS OVER THE INTERNET
just sayin
Openbaring 7 vers 1- 3
EN nรก hierdie dinge het ek vier engele op die vier hoeke van die aarde sien staan, en hulle het die vier winde van die aarde vasgehou, sodat geen wind sou waai op die aarde of op die see of teen enige boom nie. En ek het โn ander engel sien opkom van die opgang van die son, met die seรซl van die lewende God; en hy het met โn groot stem geroep na die vier engele aan wie dit gegee is om die aarde en die see te beskadig en gesรช: Moenie die aarde of die see of die bome beskadig voordat ons die diensknegte van onse God op hulle voorhoofde verseรซl het nie
A degree he got from where?
Who's the famous South African Professor ... Cape Town.. Mark Ellis? He's a geocentrist.
ok, link me his theses on this matter
@Rooikappie nice, maar @Deejay from Earth glo dit is n disc nie n vierkant nie
and let me see his credentials
and his past institution
google it bra
ok
here u go
Not sure of the name.. hence the ?
your shovel and helmet
go dig
Dis sad as mense in julle eie bubble lewe ๐ ๐ ๐
If it is a sphere, the surface of a large body of water must be curved. The Johnsons have checked the surfaces of Lake Tahoe and the Salton Sea (a shallow salt lake in southern California near the Mexican border) without detecting any curvature.
god
dont make me bring up something not even deejay can answer
the water is curved
George.
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
he's a geocentrist
@MR VLAK Can you kindly show us ANY experiment how water is bent
not a flat earther
based on the relative size of the universe
@Rooikappie of as hle vas glo dis n halwe bubble waar ons in SA vir Australia kan sien van seevlak af๐คฃ๐คฃ๐๐
earth could be
earth could not be
wo fking knows
but regardless
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
disprove 2 of them
Still waiting to see the observable experiment of bending water........
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
im have 3 debunked portions of your shitty pancake model
pleasure
prove how 2 dont make sense
Using the wrong FE map to disprove a theory is not very effective......"strawman argument"
<:4028678259010437121:469993562218561536>
wrong FE map
?????????????????????????
theres only 1 way to be flat
2 dimensional
thats it
what, are you saying there is no universally accepted FE model?
by gods
you are something else
come on bud, you can disprove em
Firstly thats called retention..........
Now spin that drop st 1000Mph
a MASS of water finds its level, hence the reason we have spirit levels in construction......
if i put that drop on the dash of my car and drive at a constant speed what will happen?
Just as NASA, they change their minds every now and then as the wind blows
ok
show us how
like
asteroid impact?
aeronatuical engineering?
potential collisions?
eclipses?
Show us Australia from SA at sea level๐
@MR VLAK Surface tension jou poepol
i worked with NASA at a summer intern chemist program
and man
if they change minds at the drop of a dime
i wouldnt even have that position
Surface tension can not exist without gravity and intermolecular forces...
but come on
@Deejay from Earth ek waat ja. maar daai man het gese wys hom hoe water bend... toe doen ek
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
please
you cherry pick, i cherry pick
its only fair
@Sidius Show me a zoom from a satellite where people walk upside down in Australia
@ProTesTanT surveyors take it into account.
very miniscule at times
and defreaction
if suez canal is flat why cant i see the rest of the canal in the pic
??
@MR VLAK Theodolites are designed to only work on a level & stationary surface idiot.
@MR VLAK Its CLEAR you have NO idea what youre talking about.......
Its NEVER taken into account...... do some more homework.......... go talk to structural engineers
ok
i contact one
you contact one
Maybe I am a engineer
OWNED
Dumbass
@Deejay from Earth where did you go to school?
@MR VLAK If you're an engineer then I'm a Gynecologist & part-time stunt-man.
@Deejay from Earth then that makes me a flat earther and part time beggar
because how can they orbit if 1. the moon is smaller than the sun, both would lose orbit aorund each other and just bolt away
2. there is nothing in between the two to establish orbit
3. they do have axis around this point, then there must be an axis on the individual masses for different "faces"
have u done that with a ball the size of earth?
how about you look at the methane sea of titan
you know
@4rvp "IF" NOTHING. The law of entropy makes continuous perfect orbits impossible. Your model doesn't work - build a bridge and get over it.
another form of liquid
ok
what are the other laws of thermodynamics?
theres 5
๐คฃ @4rvp well tegnies gebeur dit letterlik opi oomblik met n bal die size van Aarde. Ons noem hierdie bal ook Aarde want dit is die planeet waarop ons huidiglik is.
Space is fake and Star Wars is not a reality series.
start
@Deejay from Earth if you think star wars was real you have more issues than problems
lees bietjie op oor "Geodetic surveying is surveys of such a wide extent that the earthโs curvature cannot be ignored."
Hier is sommer die Surveying subject se handboek as mense engineering study
@Deejay from Earth we do NOT have perfect orbits and thus entropy is infact correct and your statement above makes 0 logical sense.
@Deejay from Earth btw, thats in a closed system
i want u to go boil water with the lid on
and another pan with it off
tell me how it goes
@Sidius Liewe aarde hoe kry julle dit reg om almal ewe dom te wees. Gaaf. Verander die woord na SUKSESVOLLE orbits. Alles moet degrade. Jou model is fucked.
@ProTesTanT curve is still visible biblethumper
@4rvp Where did I biblethump?
@4rvp sorry about that. I Said that technically there is a ball the size of Earth doing exactly that experiment at this very moment. We call the big ball Earth too as it is the planet we are currently inhabiting.๐คฃ
Hey twot, where did I biblethump - ITS cleat from your arguments you have a subHuman IQ...... try and read the next sentence SLOOOWLY.....
WHERE DID I BIBLETHUMP..........................[or do you need to call NASA again]
as much as i'd love to link a video which disproves it
Show me the curve...simple
id get the response
"well you didnt do any of this"
You really belive this is real
LINK ME THE SOURCE MATERIAL THEN
REALLY?๐
SHOW ME
SOURCE
MATERIAL
NOW
@ProTesTanT๐
love the stars in you moon photo by the way!๐
and all your sattelites ๐
ok
OK
IT HAS
SATURATION
AND FUCKING HUES
STOP USING THAT SITE INCORRECTLY
4,990 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 15/20
| Next