Please don't melt my ice wall

first of all, 2,3,4, is note ven a pythagorean triple

@Norman please do not be anti-server

the sun when it stops will melt it

my typing is decaying already

u obviously arent seeing the point so ill just take my mercy elsewhere.

i wanna be tracer

just remember

no shadow opposite the sun

I love how all of the members here are called seeker of truth, or woke man. Lmao did you guys ever go into a physics class?

no shadow of the earth therefore

I am not seeing the point because there's no connection

what about widowmaker

Yeah...

I don't see it.

shadow of the earth upon what

And even then, It's coming in too fast.

And it's....well...

@Sheep of HAZeus shadow of the earth upon what

>no shadow of the earth

??? where do you want to see a shadow

I don't fuck**g know

the shadow of the earth if its eclipsing the once illuminated full moon right around that darkness funnel blip of reconvergence should be visible relative to that illumination zone in the sky

but its not its flush

its fully illuminated

@indio007 HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA you're the guy who always comes up with excuses for my experiments

That made no sense

meaning light is just reconverging. the shadow of the earth is not blocking the light of the sun

because the sun is inside of the earth

@Norman same here

dont argue with flattards they aren't worth it

The shadow of the earth is not blocking the light of the sun

I'm guessing most of you guys don't believe in vaccines either?

Wh

Since when does shadow block light

https://i.redd.it/dwehh9xzacr11.png

a shadow is made when something blocks light
not the other way around

diverging light from the sun lifting up parralel to the terminator reconverge opposite where it left from giving the illusion that the shadow of the earth is eclipsing the full moon if you beleive in heliocentrism. but its not. its just a darkness funnel caused by the radial reconvergence of light from the sun in the earth. bent back tulips of magnetic illuminative reconection.

duh im saying its not the shadow

no light is being blocked

Shadows is the lack of light. A shadow is cast when there is less photons in a particular space because of an object blocking it

its a reconvergence

hence there being no shadow in this picture

Alright, @CryingInGravity has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

for the billionth time

what does that prove, I really dont see anything but stars

no shadow. no blocking. only a reconvergence darkness funnel that the moon passes through

Umm....ok?

see that zodiacal band tracing the ecliptic?

shadow upon what... I really don't know where you expect a shadow

oh yes

Yes i see it.

i see it

o_o

people say its the shadow of the earth eclipsing the moon

im saying its not a shadow

the moon crosses through a reconvergence darkness funnel

the moon isn't even in view there

the moon is slower than the sun causing the phases

in this photo the moon is on the other side of thee arth

closer to the sun

Give up on concave, bro. It's flat.
A torus field naturally makes a flat disk, not a sphere or a concave plate.

when the moon is full is when its in that illumination zone

when its eclipsed its right in the middle of that illumination zone

Flat disk

Oh no.

2 madman.

the dielectric plane of inertia is not the flat earth for the billionth time

its what causes the doldrums

youve heard of that havent you flatty?

it causes the oscilation of the dipolar inner space

>the dielectric plane of inertia
let me... just analyze that

magnetism and inertia is about aether pressure not about infinite flat planes ascending forever

there is an equidistant capstone to all universal compression which polarizes the aether

Alright, @CryingInGravity has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

I must have said infinite, right?

...

Don't you dare condescend

Can you stop sending the same garbage over and over again?

it doesnt ascend forever is my point. bouyant objects stack. they stop at a certain point

because you live in the earth and there is an equidistant capstone.

the aether was disproved by the miechalelson-morly experiment

that is inside of the earth

no it wasnt

Who the hell said anything was ascending?

theres just no spin to the earth

thats all that proved

o_o

BRO!!!

Well....

without a dome your bouyant obejcts would keep ascending dude

The flat earth is non-rotating and stationary

and ive already disproven a dome

No, it disproved the aether.

Not moving

bruh

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 The earth is a globe.

yes

Nope

it is

because of triboluminescent fireball meteors and leonids scraping across the negative meniscus

making a u

No one has disproven the aether

Oh no.

what

how do you know it is triboluminescene...

Einstein made a theory to combat it

Nothing more

a picture of a horizon

So, A madman and a hard head.

them not getting any interference just means the earth doesnt spin not that there was no ether plus they did that experiment in his basement where there were obstructions to the ether drift

Fantastic.

vortices/hurricanes/cyclone fluid dynamics is only possible ini a stationary container

they deflect away from the lower pressure at the tropics at the dolrums

@Sheep of HAZeus DO you think the flat earth is rising like the stupid ass flat earth society says? Because no real flat earther says that. Ever.

Btw I’m currently Im in my first Kidush ever lol

towards the higher wind speeds in the poles

yall ever heard of the glober earth?

Whoops wrong server

@Sheep of HAZeus that's a wild claim, why don't they work

mad. im saying your bouyant elements in your atmosphere. not the disk itself

you know there's no such thing as absolute speed right

please stop reacting

flat earth chat is rapeing child

a spinning container would look like jupiter

with banding

boom

hence earth is stationary

Yes. Earth is stationary

Ok listen.

with vortices being created by the interaction of higher an lower wind speed fluid dynamics

The earth is a globe.

vortexes happen in a stationary concave container with doldrums

Pier Luigi Ighina proved the earth does not move.

Not a fuck*n disc.

Let me guess...

the earth is spherical concave. you live inside it

your outside is in and your inside is out

It's on the backs of 4 elephants on the back of a giant turtle too?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

the earth is a cube dumb dumbs

@AnUnknownRider That's a Buddhist belief.

No, That's Discworld.

pendulums during an eclipse going the other way proves earth is statoinary and there is ether and the moon is causing a relief in pressure causing an inversion in polarity of the pendulum

@yall niggahs dumb as hell Cubes are flat on six sides. Checkmate.

Obviously you have no taste in fantasy, Because you live in a fantasy!

pendulums spinning at the poles in sink with the celestial sphere throughout the day as the celestial sphere rotates proves a concave earth with an ether as well

guys the eart his a globe

stop denying it

you live inside the sphere scoobs

outer space is inner space

the universe is not infinite

@AnUnknownRider It's also Buddhist. Look It up.

it is finite and contained

I know that.

All religions and religious texts teach a flat earth cosmology.

Terry got it from Buddhism.

Hey @Sheep of HAZeus are you for real

Earth is round dumbos, antivaxxes tou should stop using kids as labrats

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 And they're all wrong.

All I see, is that the concave earth is literally globe earth, but with everything inverted, literally everyting.

@AnUnknownRider Prove it

Except for the Greeks and Romans.

Show me

yes

Why should i?

You won't believe it anyway.

@Sheep of HAZeus you said you were fake you lied

No flat earther does.

the earth is sphere southern flight paths prove it. the southern pole stars proves it.

i never said that liar

false witness is a sin dou chebag

You said they were wrong. I would like you to support said statement. @AnUnknownRider

how do souther pole stars prove concave earth?!?!

Can we go to new channel

Alright, @The Chucken Noris has been warned for '**Mass mention**'.

Ok, Let's go to the Greeks to prove it's been known for thousands of years.

This is too much for <#484514023698726912>

And I am more than willing to be proven wrong. But no one has proven the Globe to be correct. @AnUnknownRider

For the mad yes.

For the sane, The proof is already there.

@Sheep of HAZeus How do south pole stars prove concave earth...

The only thing they do is debunk FE, they work fine on GE.

@AnUnknownRider Two sticks doesn't prove anything when your own astrophysicists tell you that would also work on a flat earth. Nice try and nice job paying attention to your own model.

What is concave earth

And CE, I don't understand yet.

you can see them simultaneously from south america and austrailia

say i if ur a flat earther

do you even know the model you are trying to debunk...

they go east to west on one pole depending on which way youre facing it will flip from clockwise to counterclockwise

flat earth has no model

no one ok

@SeekingTruth I know right

pacman 4d flat earth is just as stupid

OOF

Alright, @FBI shaggy has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

they cant even begin to explain orbital resonance of the planetary vials moons

oh wow bad word usage

dumb farg

haha

@FBI shaggy language

Flat Earth had reality 😆 Concave has not one single scientific method experiment to support it. Flat Earth.. Does.

nah man fruck off

NOT A BAD WORD

I gotta agree with Mad

Ok.

madman i literally just showed you how star trails proves heaven is spherical

.-.

Now who here has heard of Aristotle?

meaning the earth is too otherwise you wouldnt see all of the celestial sphere as it spins

I don't know that you did, my man.

Yeah you don't evne understand the model you are trying to debunk.

seriously use some logic please

You don't see the whole celestial sphere, never.

you dont have one though is the point you should worry about

ive looked into the various possibilities

i tried to make my own model from the ground up

flat earth doesnt work

And even if you did, flat earth utilizes a torus field that has a spherical cosmos.

its not how electromagnetivity works for the plane of inertia to be the earth

Who here has a science degree say i

you have no doldrums

Ok, Well he was a Greek Philosopher, And he was the first to know that the earth was a globe

you literally cant explain anything

youre worhsipping a 2d map of a flattened globe

@Sheep of HAZeus FECORE Laser Level Experiments https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bV8hCkvT7gRFkoR6J0AY1mDwYfQR7PAg/view

I tried to, by measuring the angles above the horizon of the sun, as the day progresses. It made a straight line, and not a single configuartion of sizes and distances made the FE correctly predict my measured angles.

Explain that

cause eric dubay said so

yeh that experiment proved concavity

And in 350 B.C, He wrote a book called On the Heavens.

If there is a ice wall, donald trump wouldve built the wall already, you make dumb statements in a simmilar fashion to that.

however, Steven doesn't even understand the model/models that he is trying to debunk

SEE

Weird huh

https://youtu.be/iBn0tTjPNLM

That experiment proved concave?!?!?!?! WHAT?!?!?! 😆

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 ikr

^

Ur mom @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

okay ima go do somethin else for now tty guys later

Ya'll ignorant?