photons have an end

Uh by normal science, we see stars

Stars are light years away

uh by normal science you only do from the ground

Stars and space is not real

only hubble can view stars

lol someone has been watching too much Star Trek

XD

and thats prob cgi too

sorry

yh

how are you going to go anywhere

point blackness to point darkness

good luck

@BlueEyes There is not one possible way for you to prove a single statement you made.

not even planets are viewable

Lol I’m sorry that earth science classes have more relevant and proven facts than your “research”

find mars in any iss footage

lol

Stars are lightyears away? No possible way to prove that.

doesnt matter

@BlueEyes Incorrect

without a radation image processing and the cpu power

you cant nav

and if it breaks

your dead

Wait a second what’s it called again

the only star sin orbit observed come from hubble

The spectrum I forgot it’s name

nothing else can detec tthem

and hubble does not process anything

only captures

That’s what it’s called

The electromagnetic spectrum

great

good thinking

wanna see the result

of that spectrum

Sure

its problematic

infered

and VL

any star will turn the entire view white

Around the year 1991 I had an earth science teacher who told the class the the earth was flat and that he was forced to teach us a bunch of stuff that wasn't true.

The electro magnetic waves are what we use as evidence to tell the distance of stars

u see white or black

The electromagnetic torus field and spectrums only help to support a flat earth, more.

from the ground

zero issues

only hubble can see stars

no one else

and i mean no one

He said they use electromagnetic waves to tell distance of stars 😆 😆 😆

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

ppl went through every spectrum

😆 😆 😆

So do you believe in an ice wall?

yh

thats fromt he ground

in orbit you on the ground

You’re going to claim that you have footage of it probably

im going to mars navigating from the usa stars

hows that work

What I’ve yet to see is what is after the ice wall

once you go up

buh by points of ref

better miniturize the hubble

if you want a shot

@BlueEyes people have different ideas about what is after the ice wall

Wow, @Seeker of Truth. That sounded like an awesome teacher.

and pray it never breaks

So, what’s your idea of the ice wall?

and thats even if hubble is not complete bs

its prob fake anyways

nothing

i blieve in the simulation earth,

so we are kinda like an experiment

i dont care

find us the stars then in nasa footage

other than hubble

does not exist

you aint going anywhere

space is fake

@Derek Nelson He was cool... of course we all throught we was joking at the time... it went over our heads...
I am pretty sure that he also said that he would deny ever saying that because he could lose his job.

earth by nasa

real right

not obvious bad horrible laughable cgi

go ahead

say it

FAKE!

we don't live on a planet, we live on a plane

yh, its round

thats earth by nasa

but not a globe

the cgi is not even good

lol

There's no satellite that is that far away from earth

its like so bad

ikr

a plane that is flat, overall

i could probs do better

look at this cgi

also reality by nasa

if you think this is real

your blind

power?

They said pictures of earth are composite pictures, made by compositing a bunch of satellite pictures around the eart

the do chi, thats it

prove that it isnt

Most pictures of earth are CGI, because they have to be

I mean not neccecerally CGI

but pictures are altered

Prove that it isnt

<@413153787801501697> WHAT DO YOU MEAN....

the make it on a computer

cgi from 1968

cgi=computer generated images

exactly

it fake

if it had anasa logo how would you know

lol

CGI- computer generated imagery

<@413153787801501697> what do you mean by 'Power it"

40k sats

show us one

by a frickin PC

you could, yes

ever heard of photoshop

omg

You confuse me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d48kLUgkWno

What you mean power it, legit 220v cable and you're good

you cant post anything to make moon ballons real

sorry

do not care

to control people

i dunno you are the one who love smoon ballons

why you so mad

its fake

get over it

sooo...

Europe

yh

oh

mb

prove what moon ballons are real

Ok i get it

i dont care

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9OkbSAjsl8

that litteraky proves nothing

i just like the lulz

seeing you defend moon baloons

Yeah ik it's different

and space moon tin foil

is fantastic

😂

@!GPT what are moon baloons?

not that easy m8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ShauSWcTC4

any questions

Can we slow down with the spam?

moon balloon nasa fan bois?

***ATTENTION ALL AT THE ICE WALL LOUNGE!!***

NO ONE is to listen to a word ***"BlueEyes"*** says, anymore.

He/she deliberately ignored evidence and outright refused to analyze said evidence. On the completely baseless stance that any evidence we present couldn't possibly have any scientific backing or merit to them.

We encourage any opinions, but you must be willing to view and analyze evidence to stay here. This is a science-based community. Treat is as such or please leave.

I mean if something is inflatable doesn't mean it's a baloon lol

@BlueEyes

mk

No

😂 😂

@funkydong No

Not in the slightest

Same, wonder how objects are attracted to earth in a vacuum

I mean he might be one of those than don't want to "get down to your lever"

*level

Hi

Rate of fall is an observed phenomenon. Its not evidence of anything. @funkydong

We were just talking about flat earth

@funkydong I Don't ignore evidence. Why don't you provide evidence for your position and we can start from there. That's how debates work. You don't just ask an arbitrary question and expect anything from it.

Also, I do have a life and can't stare at this feed 24/7.

@funkydong No

Wait, gravity has mass?

Hmm?

You give us evidence for your things falling at a certain speed or rate of fall.

@funkydong Evidence, please.

Stop using words and back up your position with science.

Then we can begin.

I will not entertain your illogical ranting without scientific evidence. @funkydong

<#538929818834698260>

@BruhMoment Evidence of claim, please.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 the fact that objects fall in a vacuum

@funkydong Evidence, please.

Mathematics do not reflect reality.

all you done is still observed an effec tof falling ina vacuum

still not causality

fail

nice try tho

The feather can be seen with air resistance and so not at the same speed.

Nor solely gravity

also only proves when you remove the bouyant air di electric magnetism takes over

Ok but what causes the falling?

which we already know on a flat plan

Oh magnetism

@BruhMoment Math is a tool. Nothing more.

show matter attracting matter

not how many time you drop something

you can do it all day

still only observation of an effect

@funkydong Not my job to answer that. You made The claim. Demonstrate it.

Then explain it with scientific support.

Alright, @mine craf cid savig has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Well, we now need evidence of gravity, now, don't we?

Alright, @mine craf cid savig has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Alright, @mine craf cid savig has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

You say it is because gravity and now you must demonstrate why it is gravity and not anything else.

still just an observation of an effect even if they ar epink

yellow

no matter what

still not matter attracting matter

if you can go win the nobel

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 good point

world been waiting 600 yrs

GL

first off that expirment is from 1789

they didnt have vaccuums yet

much less knew space wa s avaccuum

so wrong

Evangelista Torricelli produced the first laboratory vacuum in 1643

@funkydong To be completely honest, you didn't exactly prove anything with that. It's a nice hypothesis, but you need to demonstrate that what you see on paper, works in reality.

no it hsnt