lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 939/4068
| Next
They wouldn't survive as balloons, so they would have to be created out of metal.
ok so you guys believe in moon ballons
LOL
That gif does not appear to be a rover, rather just two external balls from the lander.
you guys sure you wanna go with moon balloons
@!GPT How long are you going to keep this time-wasting / deny everything troll in here?
we can talk about tin foil technology of the 1960's
if it makes you feel better
It would be extremely difficult to create realistic balloons into the shape of the rover.
Falling on the moon is no joke.
It's difficult to get up in a several hundred pound suit in an unfamiliar environment.
My mistake the suit would way about 30 pounds on the moon.
By regular standards, gravity doesnโt work the same on the moon
Yeah
just laughing at you defend moon balloons
its funny
we can go over tinf oil rockets
I donโt see why you guys go talking about โmoon balloonsโ and not refute the main evidence that says the earth is round
if it makes you feel better
google tin foil technology
Being condescending towards other against your cause is infantile. It would better the world for you to encourage healthy debate with concrete facts and evidence rather than assuming a supercilious tone.
have a gap in the LEM just stuff some space tin foil
LOL
dont forget the space tape
So, basically, letโs have a healthy debate on why the earth is scientifically round or not
because you see a moon nasa is real
wow you guys really lov enasa
Yes, even though both sides view each other as entirely wrong, it is still needed to have a healthy debate about it.
at no ends will you go for nasa
i will walk 10,000 miles for cartoon earth
to the ends of the earth
There are a multitude of other space agencies around the world, do you discredit them as well?
Wait wait
hey
You guys are confusing me
you know what would be fantastic
Is Jadon a flat earthed
if one of those 40k totally real sats in geo orbit
Earther*
used a cam to look at the moon
that be great
Okay
So
Why do ships moving away from us, sink on the horizon
this is what we got for a sat image
its um fake cgi af
3d
sorry
google earth is cgi
i dont use cartoons for reality
space is fake
Google earth is a collage of pictures
But letโs focus on the main evidence here
what evidence
Why does a ship appear to sink when moving away from us on the horizon
how do you know we went to the moon
they lost all the moon rocks after being found fake
Letโs first explain that
and erased all the data fter problems with the fake data
so wheres your evidence now
@!GPT Your tone is no longer carrying any authority. I came here for civil, adult discussions, and all there is here are two children bickering away. Throwing half-assed insults is scraping the bottom of the barrel here. I think I speak for everyone here: this gets humanity no closer to a potentially prosperous future. What you are doing is actively degrading the mind.
moon ballons
lol
thats all you got now
Nobodyโs given me an answer yet
Sadly
Your erratic nature is the signature connotation of a troll.
You carry no facts and only exist to humiliate and degrade proven scientific fact.
richard
dont concern troll
thats a mute
pls stop
show me the footage from sats
Pardon me for going on a ramble here, it's just infuriating to what is going on.
mineyful#4764 (297484308325597188) is now muted for '** conern troll**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
All I see is 2 people yelling at each other and Richard saying things that Iโm not sure if heโs talking about me at times
its ok
hes gone
hes trying to TOS troll
he can go talk to staff
So
Letโs stop talking about balloons and work at the roots
Hereโs the first question
why
i didnt make moon rover ballons
on the moon
Why does a ship sink on the horizon
did I
When moving away from view
this is your thing your trying to convince me of right
im not believing in moon ballons
that son you
sorry
or tin foil technology
Iโm asking a legitimate question about the earth
i dont think it was adavanced enough for moon travel
Iโm not asking to hear about tin foil technology
maybe todays tin foil can moon travel
but certainly the tin foil of 1970 would not
and that son you
Why do ships sink on the horizon when moving away from us
The round earth theory explains it
or lets talk about balllooon technology
But I have not heard a flat earth answer
now perhaps today we can blow up moon ballons and drive them around
there is just no way the balloon driavable tech would do tha tont he moon in 1970
So, are you going to continue dodging the question?
and if you wanna go with that is on you
Because uh
we have doubts
Ok, I'm confused, which of you are flat-earthers?
The isro guy
Ok
it all depends on your faith in tin foil rockets
some have doubts
So basically,
i dont think space tape in the 1970 could hold rockets
im sorry
The flat earth idea canโt disprove the current evidence that the earth is round
maybe you have more faith in space tape then we do
well you see the tin foil
lets mention that
Weโre not concerned with the moon because all you have is speculation
Letโs mention the more important argument.
now some of us think that tin foil and tape a re a poor engineering choice
some just say nasa over and over
opinoins differ
and as well lets talk about space gaps
shall we
Jadon he wonโt stop with the tin foil, itโs the only way he can escape answering without switching topics or running
now we all know
that space gaps are crucial for pressure in space travel to the moon
it helps equalize out the pressure
but no worres
we got it covered withs pace band aids
and if thats not good enough
So basically, isro believes the earth is flat
we got moon balloons
But canโt provide a valid rebuttal
Ergo, the earth is round
i did not make the rover apollo moon balloon
this is real right guys
official nasa
go ahead say it
Weโre not talking about nasa
you guys like moon baloons
Donโt talk to us unless you decide to stop being a snowflake
Maybe tin foil protects from space radiation
Oof
you guys believ ein moon ballooons lol
defending nasa must get silly
So he provides an answer
Alright so this other guy says itโs because the object gets smaller
i have
show us sats
show us evidence we went to the moon
However,
other then tin foil rockets
In real view,
and moon band aids
no rocks no data
no footage
You can clearly see that the ship wouldnโt get so tiny that itโd disappear
It just appears to sink
use atelescope it comes back into focus
are binoculars curving too
hows that work
lol
Well, all lenses have an ever so slight curved bias from the lens, itself, being curved. @!GPT
We see sinking, not shrinking into nothingness.
Well actually now weโre just tossing opinions
Bullshit
So we need actual footage
I'll volunteer
But I want to be a trapeze artist too.
Though, I suggest you go. I already know it's crap. You seem to need convincing.
no, because they would just mind control and or replace you
YES!
drugs...
You can't deny it
Hmm okay, our eyes are not relevant enough to tell for this problem, Iโll give you the win in my book here,
But.
lol
There is other evidence
these trolls
For example,
go on....
<@413153787801501697> you need to do some more research
on everything
If the flat earther theory that the sun just goes around in circles above the earth
I'm so excited ๐
What's he got to prove this shit?
I donโt see how we donโt see it constantly.
And if it goes over and under,
and I don't just mean looking at the first few controlled results that google gives you either
Like how it appears
@BlueEyes Over And under what?
The earth
There's no under
The further the sun travels, the lower it seems to get
Who gave you that ludicrous idea?
perspective
So youโre one of the two sides flat earthers?
how is it meant to go under a flat earth ๐
big dumb
The sun sinks in our view
@BlueEyes WHO the fuck told you a flat earth has two sides?!?!?!?!?
the moon also gets 15%-45% larger different time sof the year
and the sun
like a flat earth should
Not sure how that works if it just goes in circles above
and you witnessed the moon a million times every yr
sun lil harder to tell
Something with electromagnetics
its not a mirage
Y is this so hard to understand, its not rocket science
swamp gas cant mirage the moon 30% bigger
stop believing lies
Thereโs two leading theories, one is the one track flat earth, like a food on a plate and an ice wall
only hubble can view stars
we aint going anywhere
give it up
space is fake
Or am I misunderstanding your views
@BlueEyes First off, the sun is far less powerful and far smaller than in your model.
Secondly, light doesn't travel infinitely far. The further away things are, any number of variables blocks our view.
does you front porch light brighten the entire state
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 939/4068
| Next