that is like

410

i’ve seen way better

@パートナーキラー let me know when you can replicate cloaking microphone cables ok

Because I don't believe they can go invisible

It's called wireless

unless it was filmed in a studio

Wireless

@Hobo Please show me the magical wired to wireless one milisecond transforming microphone.

It's called Bluetooth

https://mobile.twitter.com/markjarthur

that might've been upsampled to 1080, but i dont think that original footage was 1080p? (those screenshots from video)

Yeah you can see it perfectly

SCUBA TANK CHROMA KEY: https://imgur.com/a/GhI50Ja

if i take a "360p" video, and render it "1080" it aint gonna be true 1080p

@パートナーキラー Please can you explain to me why scuba tanks are seen floating around the ISS then when someone spots it, the ISS is revealed to be a CGI low quality rendering?

Why is the scuba tank diver NOT present in the CGI rendering?

cuz y’all paranoid

have any of you ever done a 3d video before

i rende rin 4k when you do the process it renders down to 360p

Kiwi want to be myhusband?

sure.

you need like 12k to get 1080 360

Alright, @Hobo has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Frick yes

<:lul:484994724118134784>

@パートナーキラー can you explain how paranoia can create scuba tanks floating around the ISS please?

every 360 vid you ever saw wa sprobaly done in 1080

360 renders down alot

i’m saying how y’all paranoid how all footage disapproving your theory is cgi

@!GPT - i do a lot of videos/making/videography, but nah not 3D or 360 yet..

https://youtu.be/h1SrZsIQZoQ

CGI ISS SWIMMING POOL: https://imgur.com/a/BXe4rnO

@パートナーキラー Please can you explain to me why there is a CGI green screen of the ISS at this swimming pool?

...lmao wut?

could you prove that’s what they use?

Yes

other than visual explanation please, similarities are too common to be true.

with a globe this big i could have millions of friends who have the same name as me. same goes with your evidence.

yes

alittude

lower right

@パートナーキラー you can only prove it with visual explanations

It depends heavily on field of view, yes. And conditions

using that fov on a sphere produces this

you cant even see the earth

https://youtu.be/IcwhwZr7_EU @パートナーキラー proves it beyond a reasonable doubt that nasa isnt filming in space but in water

yes it does

you said that

i just used it

With 175 degree FOV

wide angle lens use a 175 FOV

if were going for accuracy

brb

160 is the highest

If you go to space and actually proof it's fake then you'll win

@The Big Gambino how do they make space movies?

Can they have tech you dont know about?

Cgi

Live

You think they tell us everything?

@The Big Gambino How did the Russians make freefall effects in the 1920's please?
RUSSIAN 20'S MOVIE FAKES ZERO-G: https://imgur.com/0HyEECO

https://youtu.be/59GvVwu-Bzc

Plenty of proof

results in an ultra-wide 150º field of view.

most wide angle are 120 fov to 175

So you haven't looked into it? Youre just an auto believer? @The Big Gambino

You believe anything the authorities tell you.

Cuz they are much smarter than you.

@Citizen Z Oh my God the Authorities would NEVER lie to you, I mean apart from all of these times, but they had to in order to PROTECT us.

Address the video. You are moving the goal post.

https://youtu.be/IcwhwZr7_EU

@The Big Gambino address the evidence

150 degree lens

wide angles accent curves

@The Big Gambino stop being a persistent debate troll

in case you didnt know

How do bendy doors stop the air from the ISS from rushing out into deep space please? BENDY AIRLOCK DOOR: https://imgur.com/a/pRw9bjm https://imgur.com/a/iLcVjvq

Address bubbles in space, give logical explanations for bubbles and debri changing directions in a supposed vacuum.

this is why wide angle shows slight curves at the ends

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/801858/earth-billions-years-ago-flat-covered-in-water?fbclid=IwAR1HlDpAP9n1QPXIiZJrvCYatmLltOpDXNwsF2pq-D5UzDFiM90ogNm7L-U

not cause any earth curve

if it wa sso it would look like this picture

cgi vs reality

Fla

Flat

for this to work the Z axis should curve away fromt he eye

High altitude balloon most often show a curve, occasionally, some do flatten out by distortion.

alot ppl seem to forget spheres have 3 axis

not 2

Sometimes you have to sharpen the image to see curve due to diffused conditions

ya w elive in reality

not endless math equations for nasa

sorry

Earth is not a cartoon no matter howmuch you belief

*Green line around the moon.*

want a grea tlaugh

go watch starman spacex

and watch the tires

@Citizen Z outstanding find on the p-brane video

you can see green screen thru the tires

its funny af

5 hour timelapse. Clouds hardly moved

I can make about 3 more gifs out of this one video alone

@Human Sheeple yep. That proves beyond a reasonable doubt space is water

Citizen, random question, why did you turn off Global Emotes? (Assuming it was you and not Gwen).

its the moon orbiting earth for 17 hours

not one cloud moves

its funny

@Ætos someone posted a porn emote

cause we all know clouds dont move for periods like 17 hours right guys

That makes sense now.

on the entire earth

not a one

Technically though, someone could still do that if they had Nitro.

🤔

make a emote?

<:puke:507995473446174740>

No, use messed up emotes across servers

Nitro allows global emote use in all servers regardless of permissions, iirc

@Ætos try now

<:GWchadThonkery:366999788803325952>

Yeah, it works

@The Big Gambino did you examine the video evidence?

@The Big Gambino https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcwhwZr7_EU
Please will you watch this video and write for me a rebuttal as to why me, Citizen, Roskosmos, Gwench and p-brane are all wrong, thank you

@The Big Gambino so what

Examine the space walk footage

@The Big Gambino If you write a rebuttal for me I am happy to admit I am wrong

I havent gotten to evidence of how the inside stuff is faked

We are talking about space walks

Stop and look.

@Human Sheeple he has no rebuttal apparently other than "we are just wrong"

Watch the evidences

Hi again.

@flatsmack hello

honestly, i came in this discord as a 100% globe earther but now -_-

Maybe they are not faking the ISS in a swimming pool, maybe the ISS is not a hologram, maybe my floor is a giant ball, maybe rockets don't splash down in the Bermuda triangle, maybe men really did walk on the moon and there's wind that causes flags to flap, maybe Buzz really didn't mean to say we didn't go there referring to walking on the moon, maybe Apollo 13's command module wasn't really captured by the soviet union, maybe microphone cables really can turn invisible, maybe bubbles can manifest in space, maybe strings on satellites are just antenna, maybe light doesn't curve up despite being photographed and scientifically evidenced that it does, maybe mountains hundreds of kilometers away are visible due to super refraction coming level with the horizon, maybe governments don't lie, maybe spy satellites are real but they won't show us the footage to protect us, please show me I am wrong.

@The Big Gambino please show me I am wrong

these astronauts are better actors than my boi George Clooney **IF** they are lying

https://youtu.be/h_COQbeaCCE

Oh yes!!! We have some older members in here. 😀

OG 2017 ODD crew

Pre-faggot ODD

@Lil nugget they are terrible actors

Funny they have actor profiles on IMDB

ODD 🤔

ODD TV//ODD Reality

yt

We're the legit grassroots Flat Earthers

✔ ,,

Mark Sargant is a shill

Pat Steere has/had a dick

IPS is a scientologist circle jerker

<:lul:484994724118134784> ...

But Earth's still flat

Never paid them much attention

Aight genuine question, how do you people explain objects descending into the horizon when you move away from them?

This is for the skeptics

https://youtu.be/X-huF7fRlnA

@TurretCorruption optical slant. Its how light works and how the eye or lens works. When light goes to .02 degrees angular resolution its no longer resolvable by the eye.

Would you mind elaborating a bit

Im no scientist

hello fellow people

I can yes

@Bartek hi Robby 👋 ...

hello m8

wanna go out for a pint down tghe road

??

nah im good thx

@Citizen Z Omg that video. Look at that woman’s hair. It is clearly glued stiff as a board. That does not represent zero gravity at all. Fucking fake. We need a gif of that.

@Bartek - What brings you aboard

what is the ice wall

yh

what is it

the Coastline of Antarctica

is what it is

ice walls aka ice shelves

imagine i come from austrialia

and everyone there is literally so dumb

nah

Wait hold up

yes we believe "Australia" exists

That artist rendering on the ice wall

Has a curved earth

Im uhh

Befuddled here

It’s an artist rendering, yes.

https://iceshelf.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/img_2368.jpg

Would said artist be implying that the earth has some level of curvature, even if it may not be spherical?

https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/carlsbad-woman-wins-child-support-from-ex-husband-nearly-50-years-after-divorce

The edge of earth may in fact be curved round, though we can’t really see it ourselves from where we are.

you mean the live feed that stops every 45 mins for 2 hours

ya we laugh at it

https://beyondpenguins.ehe.osu.edu/files/2011/07/web_edgecorner.jpg

its cgi

we dont care

Fake

Thats a good point tbh, stuff like this isnt too hard to whip up in 3ds max

cgi is not reality

This is how angular resolution works physically in the eye.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459802853524111361/1_EN.png
Cameras work the same way.
The cones of the retina is a zoom in of the eye. If the angular size of the target is not enough to activate more than a single cones/sensor the object is unresolvable.
There are 3 ways to decrease angular separation.
1. Move the two separate targets further or closer together.
2.Increase the distance.
3. Change the angle of view.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459805458644074511/angseperation.jpg

First here is a demonstration of how angle of view changes the angular separation of 2 targets. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459806914331541504/unknown.png

For example in this image, as the stop sign's angular size shrinks from distance or angle, the image that prjected onto the retina also shrinks. Eventually it will reach such as small size the eye can not physically detect the light. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459808085436006410/refraction_cornea.png
A geometric analogy would be closing a pair of scissors. When the scissor tips are closer together than the spacing between the rods and cones of the eye then you get to see the target. The point where the tips cross from too close to normal vision is the angular resolution.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459817803038326784/unknown.png

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459818062858682368/65116694_resized550bbc_sg_g4_eye.png
When the angle of view becomes to much it pretty much goes parallel, but you lose sight of the ground before that. It's the same on the globe too but even worse because the angle of view is increasing quicker because of the curving away of the ball surface.

@The Big Gambino - Dude, ..go do an image search, ..and or go see just about ANY documentary on "Antarctica"

you'll see ice walls/ice shelves...

big gambino

95% of Antarctica's coastline is ice walls/ice shelves

if your just gonna argue

why are you here

To discuss I'm guessing

hes not

Oh, kk

@The Big Gambino stop.and learn

hes just here to win some fake debat epoint sin his head

reminds me of potato

Angular resolution for the eye at about 0.02 degrees

@The Big Gambino no. Its not wrong

eyes dont capture images from space

cameras do

@The Big Gambino listen

so again pointless math

Ffs

!mute @The Big Gambino

The Big Gambino#9728 (509890392955813929) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

if all you have is math excuses for nasa

Often, it does boil down to math

to win the debate you now wanna argue eyes send back images

do you realize how dumb that sounds

anyone got as good nasa math meme

i need one RN

*insert bruh sound 36*

can i find myself a flat wifey

The big gambino thinks he can just say, you are wrong. Without clarifying or offering a rebuttal of any sort to any information that has been posted. He is the epitome of a persistent debate troll

Let me get a better definition of him.

Alright, @Clapqn has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Alright, @Clapqn has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Alright, @Clapqn has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

i can be ur flat husband @BigManKacperek

im not gay

Alright, @BigManKacperek has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

1. “Here’s what I think” Troll
Hates everything you stand for and you’re wrong and he or she is going to say so for every piece you write or say.

be my flat husband