Can you maybe prove it with scientific evidence and scientific methods?

Not with the bible

I cant, sir. But I believe alot of science is real, just some of it exagerated.

i'd need to get a plane if you wanted me to proove it

Okay, well, do you belive that electrons are real?

or a rocket, an would have to go staight up or to the sides, but we arnt allowed to go the sides cause we will be shot down not allowed past the white wall. I know what electrons are, just forgot how it works.

the thing is

the people behind the curtains are in controll, they know the truth.

Look, how do you think are you writing with me right now?

through net

Yes, how do you think this internet is established?

would you like to tell me.

Well, you won't belive it, but the internet would not be possible, if there were no satelites

But before we get further into that

Why do you think is the globe model impossible? There must be a reason why you think that

i grew up believing the world was a globe & that there was no such thing as a firmanent.

its like you globe earthers forget that.

@ZeroT

I do not

But because you belived in a globe, there must be something that changed your opinion

well there was, the word Gravity.

most of my family & friends are globe earthers , its cool man.

just like they believe in Gravity

Don't you belive in gravity?

not anymore, its exgerated.

Explain what gravity actually is first

after that, i had more questions about flat earth, finding out gravity wasnt real. Dam

Then I'll tell you if I believe in it or not

Okay, well, there is a simple experiment to prove gravity

I know you're lying already

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment @Deleted User

@ZeroT How have you eliminated static charge from that experiment?

Look, if static charge (its funny that you bring up that argument, not beliving in electrons that cause static charge) had something to do with that, you would never, and I rewpeat, NEVER have been able to measure and define the gravitational constant with this experiment

It is veeeeeery unlikely that everytime someone performed this experiment the same static charge was on the lead balls

Plus

Charge is real, I still don't know why you think you need invisible charge carrying elves

You can discharge metal balls easily with ground wires

Air is a fairly good insulator

@ZeroT Show me this please

They would not charge up again

Why do you think does your outled have a ground wire implemented?

I disagree, you have lead balls suspended in air and they will have a higher potential difference to the ones on the ground, creating a net charge, creating a coulomb force, not Gravity.

That does not make any sense my friend

You do not magically generate static energy from pulling something up in the air

Observe, the higher you are the higher the potential difference

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/CMgpVadBpUv02N0VwJdCLyWXgnCruzinoGSFJz1YjGc/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419030767356739594/479026570413998080/Cavendish.gif
And look one is suspended in air, the other not

@ZeroT you wanted to say something.

Suspended on wood and insulative materials, NOT electrically isolated and even something wired directly to an earth copper bar in the ground would still have about 100 ohms of resistance

@Human Sheeple Your little graphic does not show anything

@ZeroT wait till you figure out space isnt even real.

Oh boy guys

the sun is acutlly much more closer then you think.

@Human Sheeple Therer is no magic nergy in the air man

When you pull something up

It's not magic dum dum, what do you think telluric batteries are

You give it potential energy

which is voltage

No its not dude

go back and learn 1st grade physics

look up voltage right now

You should do that

You do not generate voltage

By pulling something up

I suggest you read the article I send you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

Cavendish yeah sure, you should read the ACTUAL gravity literature

Okay guys have a nice day

Rose et al (1969) Rotating torsion balance with servo control of mass spacing
Pontikis (1972a) Resonant torsion pendulum with various attracting masses
Renner (1974) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Karagioz et al(1976) Evacuated torsion pendulum
Koldewyn (1976) Magnetically suspended torsion pendulum
Luther et al (1976) Rotating torsion balance
Mikkelsen and Newman (1977) geophysical and astronomical considerations
Yu et al (1978, 1979) Worden gravimeter
Sagitov et al (1979) Torsion pendulum with cylindrically shaped attracting and attracted masses
Page and Geilker (1981) Torsion pendulum with a measurement strategy governed by a quantum decision process
Karagioz et al (1981) Refinement of the results reported by Karagioz et al (1976)
Luther and Towler (1982) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Oelfke (1984b) Torsion balance with small intermass spacing
Cohen and Taylor (1987) CODATA value for G from the 1986 adjustment of fundamental constants
Speake and Gillies (1987b) Evacuated beam balance with servo control
Liu et al (1987) Rotationally driven two-body interaction with suspended-coil sensing system
Goldblum (1987) Relative measurement of G using spin-polarized test masses
Karagioz et al (1987) Evacuated torsion balance with magnetic damper

de Boer et al (1987) Mercury-bearing-supported torsion balance with restoring torque supplied by quadrant electrometer
Dousse and Rheme (1987) Offset-mass torsion pendulum with servo-tracking
Moore et al (1988b) Evacuated beam balance
Saulnier and Frisch (1989) Ballistic motion of test masses on a torsion balance in accelerative field of depleted uranium
Muller et al (1990) Gravimetry at a pumped-storage hydroelectric reservoir
Zumberge et al (1991) Submarine-based geophysical measurement gravimetric profiles
Schurr et al (1991a, b, c) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator with external attracting mass
Yang et al (1991) Gravimetric measurement of a large cylindrical oil tank
Taylor et al (1992) PPK formalism and binary pulsar timing data
Schurr et al (1992a, b) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Oldham et al (1993) Gravimetry at a pumped-storage hydroelectric reservoir
Walesch et al (1994a, b) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Walesch et al (1995) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Fitzgerald and Armstrong (1995) Electrostatically nulled torsion balance
Hubler et al (1995) Electromagnetic balance used at a pumped storage reservoir
Meyer et al (1995) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator with external attracting mass
Fitzgerald (1995) Electrostatically nulled torsion balance
Michaelis et al (1995/96) Mercury-bearing-supported torsion balance with restoring torque
Bagley and Luther (1996) Torsion pendulum with Kuroda anelasticity correction

@ZeroT relax

Then explain to me why there are six orders of magnitude margin of error for G and senior physicists agree G probably isn't even a constant and the gravitational formula is missing variables

the 1995 one by FitzGerald even admitted coulomb forces fudged the results

I will go and study for my finals now

You guys just seem a bit ignorant for facts and you do not know how science works

Have a nice day guys 😄

Yes, maybe some education would have been good for you 😄

you would know how to analyze correctly

Because you really are the ones that repeat what others tell them

https://youtu.be/YMO0qvzDMqE
Let me know when you've worked out how this works

Because you do not know how science really works

@Human Sheeple Yes, we know, everything on the internet has to be real ofc

science is a method that uses dependent and independent variables to confirm or falsify a hypothesis by demonstrating cause and effect observably testably repeatably, you can't show cause and effect of "gravity" can you?

I on the other hand can show cause and effect of charge and force

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/UtqtnkMkpxGfCaEcSnD2xY09pSGqGk-atWln8RP1ogg/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/454328933626806283/476083743338266624/Sequence_01_23.gif

Like so

We can show effect and describe the cause very very good. as I said we cannot explain everything in science right now

Well have a nice day 😄

@ZeroT you ok

Look @Deleted User I do have wasted about 6 hours in VC explaining how the stuff works and everytime I was faced with ignorance and no scientific evidence

But as Isaid

I have better stuff to do

better stuff, really. Like what

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bV8hCkvT7gRFkoR6J0AY1mDwYfQR7PAg/view
Scientific evidence of apparenly mostly locally flat earth under certain weather conditions

https://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php Scientific evidence vaccines are doing more harm than good

Scientific evidence light curves up not down in air

@Deleted User Studiyng for my finals

Mathematical proof the Globe model is wrong

@ZeroT yea, too bad what your studying is proberly exagerated lies too.

with all do respect, sir.

He's showing the institution he's a great parrot that can remember the dogma he is prescribed and shows no critical thinking

Well, think that too. I want to study medicine and whoops, we can prove those things really are real

I do think critically

pharma proving pharma works when they have openly admitted curing people is a bad business model = CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Remind me what the hippocratic oath is?

Everytime I see something, I ask myself if this really could be like that but, I do know science and this is why my critical thinking leads to the right conclusion

Yes, the hippocratic oath

I do not know it compleatly

So if you're honoring your hippocratic oath you will ditch all pharmaceuticals immediately

No dude

But okay

Do belive that

https://youtu.be/wY-owubmfNg

The CEOs who run Merck, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline all admit curing people is not a sustainable business model.

Funny that I know how your neurons work that simply just create those obscure ideas that you tell me here. But I know, you can't do anything about it because you are just determined like everything in the world 😄

There's been a murder
```I KILLED HIM```
You're lying I don't believe you

@ZeroT you can computationally map 80 billion nerve cells? I think not

@ZeroT no need to start a debates & then run lmfao

No dude, I am debating for about a week here

@ZeroT your not very good at it.

That might be your opinion

It's the opinion of the corporocratic elite who run the allopathic pharmaceutical giants that they make more money by giving people chemicals that makes them sicker not better

Your university gets money from pharma

Oof

@ZeroT you have no purpose, from what your roles say.

your a child lost in the devils playground.

he does have a purpose, he wants to earn a lot of money being a useful idiot of the white genocide program, sterilization through vaccines, abortion, birth control, chemically induced dumbing down of people, use of widespread pharmaceutical propaganda to make people think "this gas chamber is really a shower"

Modern medicine doesn't help people, they've used propaganda to make the public consciousness think natural plants with health benefits are "quackery" despite centuries of tried and tested results buried under a mountain of "buy more prescription" ads

no I don't

@ZeroT i can help you open your eyes

Oof

but whats the point

He does not want help

stay out of it

Hi

Im a flat universer, the entire universe is flat

oof

Ha

Im deadly serious, whats funny about it, the government are lying to us and we have flat universers all around the globe

Ok I know your messing now fam

K

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/533849702123438101/553889206208954378/50241599_1886335821478713_7642287420058107904_n.jpg

@The Gwench thank you

You are very welcome 😃

Feel free to participate.

howdie peeps

@^Kevin^ Hey. 😃

been awhile

how you doing?

been hanging out in 24/7 flat earth discord channel alot

@The Gwench rawr

@^Kevin^ sup bro

morning citizen

chilling ;0

I was looking at what that professor was saying

ended by insulting us

@PanosB3 <:butthurt:507983822244151306> sup noob

@^Kevin^ I haven't read it yet

Just woke up

☕

nice to meet you citizen

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids morning

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbWSJziGjFQ

He is funny sometimes

He is probably a globe believer, remember coming that conclusion when I looked at what he said at the beginning

He had a funny and interesting routine

I watched a stream of his once

He had tiki torches in the background

They started a fire

Lol

I saw it, but he was doing the show from the M-TV - masonic production

He didnt notice it

You saw the fire ?

no

Oh ok lol

This was like over a year ago

He didnt notice he caught his set on fire

I just remember him talking about who is taking the pic as the lunar lander took off or something along those lines

Almost burned his house down

I wish I had a copy of the video

Was the funniest shit ever

People on the live stream were yelling

FIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISF97zlqsA4

He didnt turn around

Desperation of globies

Good video

Lol

They must be stupid

The amount of profanity seemed like they were part insane

Fields are only slopes on the sides for runoff

Actually they have a slight slope long ways also

Drainage-1-Surface_FINAL.pdf

I need to review that

I thought it said they sloped both ways

Bbl tho

@GhostofNiccolo no field is build on a hill

I affirmed slopes are only on the sides right and left to be technical

Loool

@Ustink things would start to be hidden at shorter distances if you put your eyes in the grass

You dont understand how light works

When you figure it out let us know

James Gibson 1952

Look it up

@GhostofNiccolo sorry you are correct. The slope goes from side to side

They dont drain fields from goal to goal

Would make the goals unplayable due to flooding

There's the math

So if we live in a Truman Show dome conspiracy like what Mark Sargent believes, then are the stars projectors and much more land exists beyond us?

Mark Sargant is a shill

https://youtu.be/xP9n-NZEuK4

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/551975480945934372/553793191841890324/shitandcumtoad.mp4

@Human Sheeple So what?

So shut the hell up about strawman fake flat earthers I have a video of him and Patrick Tranny Steere admitting they are globers

https://youtu.be/PFfV-w5aONs?t=3285
Two minutes listen VERY CAREFULLY

```HYMN TO "R"
Our Eratosthenes who sticks measured the heavens,
Hallowed be thy name,
Thy circumference come,
Thy radius should be done,
As earth as it measures in the heavens,
Give us this day our daily shadows,
And forgive us for assuming the distance to the sun,
To give us the globe
R-men```

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/551975480945934372/553793191841890324/shitandcumtoad.mp4

I wasn't straw manning just pointing out Mark Sargent's theory on Earth.
A shill is someone who gives credibility to something without revealing that they are related, what is inherently bad about that?

They all got set up to control the Flat Earth Narrative about 5 years ago

They're globers who muddy flat earth proofs with strawman arguments so the globers have an easier time arguing against gas pressure gradients

I am Hilters evil missing twin, how may I help you? 😄

what came first gas pressure or gas pressure gradients?

How do they "muddy flat earth proofs with strawman arguments"?

@Human Sheeple Was this a question to me?

Optical slant

Show me that you measured three miles

Then I'll show you why

Angular resolution of the eye is .02 degrees

At that resolution objects become unresolvable

They are still there

Just not resolvable

The horizon becomes a line or edge

Yes it does

No