lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 3061/4068
| Next
i need to be veryfied
veryfied
words
You kinda messed up on the horizon
made it straight?
yes
@STรRMIE Because a 2,000 year old text says i should have a problem with them
Nah it aint straight
U might get fired
mhm
no
hey rigg
Itโs straight in the first image
Rigg is backing out nowhere
Now*
an artificial horizon will stay straight no matter what
Reasonable doubt to trust any high altitude footage
ISPRS Istanbul Workshop 2010 on Modeling of optical airborne and spaceborne Sensors, WG I/4, Oct. 11-13, IAPRS Vol. XXXVIII-1/W17. http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/1-W17/5_Yilmaz.pdf @Drewski4343
hi
Temperature and pressure effect it
So if the camera wasnt designed for high altitude its basically worthless to use as evidence
Does anyone in this server still believe in an aether
Some do
High altitude cameras certainly arenโt designed for high altitudes
Does anyone in this server believe in photons
Yes
yes
Yes
yep
yep
Who
Lmao
dUmB sHeEpLe sMh
When was the last time you dumped out the photons from your camera
Wut
when i used flash
Tf are you at now
I find it impossible that people could still actually believe in an aether
Lol
Thatโs good
@Citizen Z Aren't GoPros sealed? I mean, it probably would affect the casing in a strong vacuum, but there's still air density that far up in the video.
Well ppl believe we are spinning and flying through an infinite vacuum. So...i.mean..
i keep using flash but photons just keep coming out
anyone got a fix?
Light is a perturbation of the aether, photons are another deception
Doesnt matter if its sealed
Temp and press still effect it
Its got to be designed for high altitude
Otherwise we are wasting our time
Itโs wasting time to assume things about camera types without reason
^
Yes thats what you are doing. @GreenPixel
Assuming
irony
Ok then
it does matter if it's sealed, though. that's how people can survive the pressure in submarines...
Thats why its not evidence
@Rigg5 or do you actually believe in an aether, which has been disproved multiple times
If you turned off the heat in the submarine you would freeze for 1
yes, of course.
Then why do Flat Earthers use photos so much?
hi friends
Hello
hm
helloo
Photon is just a word
Its a point of light
i hav gneius whquention to ask
photons arent real now?
๐
onbly gjeinious can answer
@Citizen Z I mean, people also believe that we may or may not exist on either a disc or a plane which magically supports the sun and moon on set orbits but somehow is able to simulate the natural phenomena of gravity, which somehow also simulates tidal forces as well as may or may not having another layer of continents going out in a ring method or might just have an infinite expanse of ice, both models sound stupid with the right wording
what ss the idf
i don't think the definition of photon is "point of light"
Why do tidal nodes and high tides not match with the position of the moon
Photons are particles/waves, right?
Yep
They are both in some ways
@Superiorna_Artiljerija think of a building or boat or mountain as million of photons bouncing off them and coming to your eye
Trillions
Gazillions
the things are tiny Z it dosent matter much
like subatomic
They have no mass
Anyway @SiliconBassist and @AnUnknownRider God loves you and understands that many people 'know not what they do'. He sacrificed for you anyway. He is a God of logic and He is infinitely just. Anything you think seems like unfair judgement, he will make it right and perfect in the end. Wherever everybody ends up will make perfect sense. "For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." /end preach
big yikes
yikes
I need more coffee
ice coffee?
@TheRockisCookin a super position of waves
i am hilarious
Nah hot coffee
Dark coffee
latte
good for the soul
Also, do people here actually believe in density/buoyancy
Hot chocolate better
you probably need to down a few alcohol to deal with this
Or whatever they believe replaces gravity
We donโt do ice coffee because our ice comes from our tap water which has too much sulfur
oof
RIP
We donโt have city water
City water aint much better tbh
last time i was here there was no "replacement" for gravity, it was just straight up denied and left at that
all gud ๐
its truly baffling how you guys dont believe in satellites but directed energy weapons surely exist
City water sucks
Well, then an explanation for stuff we relate to gravity in the globe model
Gravity as a force is just an abstraction of Archimedes Principle
Even my sulphur water is better
I've yet to see a single one that's actually plausible
Gravity is unnecessary
It's cosmetic
@RidleyChozo okay, so what takes it's place
When you get a pit viper in the sink
How do you explain objects falling
thats some hot quality water
Light being bent around stars
Last time i checked gravity was law within a theory
they just do
Hi
Time being dialated at high altitudes
How do you explain helium balloons falling upwards?
Hi
>falling upwards
Physics lmao
Falling upwards Lmfao
@Shadowโ retardation of rods in a clock. Not very good evidence
Everything is laws within a theory
Buoyancy!
@Citizen Z you don't know how these experiments were carried out, then
I got coffee โ๏ธ
Yum
๐
I'm not talking about moving clocks by the way
I'm reffering to general, not special, relativity
As that's what actually deals with gravity
Sure it does
"no u"
What a comeback
Super cool info there
VwV
Check it out
That's a bibliography about again time dialation in special relativity
I'm seriously wondering if you know the difference
We sharing reading material?
oof I don't have image perms
now wait
yea?
@Citizen Z also
You never responded to me last time
if gravity doesn't exist, what's the explanation behind gravitational time dilation
I presented you an experiment and confirmation of GR
And you said "I've never seen it before so I'll look"
Then never talked about it again
What experiment
Who wants to talk about gravimeters? ๐
I do
nice
What do you think they prove
Have you ever used one?
Well they prove that mass attracts mass
And they measure that attraction
with a super duper sensitive spring device
They buried 5 tons of lead in the ground, then they used this super sensitive spring device called a gravimeter and moved it slowly horizontally over it. When more mass is under it, the spring compresses more. I'd show a graph, but I don't have image permissions, so here's a link to the tests they did. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC110440/jrc110440_technical_note_preparatory_tests_2016-17.pdf
I have never used one
Have you heard of the Allias Effect
No
Abstract
Conventional explanations for observations of anomalous behaviour of mechanical
systems during solar eclipses are critically reviewed. These observations include the work
of Allais with paraconical pendula, those of Saxl and Allen with a torsion pendulum and
measurements with gravimeters. Attempts of replications of these experiments and recent
gravimeter results are discussed and unpublished data by Latham and by Saxl et al. is
presented. Some of the data are summarized and re-analyzed. Especially, attention is paid
to observations of tilt of the vertical, which seems to play an important role in this matter
and recommendations for future research are given. It is concluded that all the proposed
conventional explanations either qualitatively or quantitatively fail to explain the
observations.
Thanks for the info
Haven't they failed to recreate this effect so far?
Yeah np. Ty also
I haven't read about in a long time
I know people plan every eclipse to try and recreate it, I just haven't heard of someone being successful.
The veracity of the Allais effect remains controversial among the scientific community, as its testing has frequently met with inconsistent or ambiguous results over more than five decades of observation.
@Citizen Z you do realize atomic clocks existed before einstein right
But I'll read more
It's still interesting
@Shadowโ they dont prove anything
still no answer to my question
whatever
@Citizen Z is that your best response
The paper you sent seemed to assume that all atomic clocks rely on the speed of light
I can easily show this paper doesn't negate anything considering we have atomic clocks earlier than einstein's theory was even developed and they worked without assumptions of lightspeed
I'm not even going to bother with reading the actual paper
Besides, they do prove that atomic clocks at higher altitudes (farther away from earths core in the globe model) tick at a different rate than those closer. In accordance with general relativity and with gravity.
Not to mention, that's only a single proof of GR.
I can name many, many more, and besides even if general relativity was proven incorrect it's not like density is plausible as an alternative.
Density/buoyancy as replacement for gravity is *easily* disproven.
A little common sense goes a long way
nice like/dislike ratio
A video could have a million likes. Doesnt mean its true
I have a good example of trickery in videos but many didnt see it.
ok
Let me find
I have a somewhat distantly related question. Should I put it here or in another channel?
So...this video, at first glance tends to give credit to some coriolis force. But all the lady is doing is a magic trick. She is pouring the water into the sink at in a certain side of the sink to make the water flow a certain way. Closely analyzing this and it becomes clear this is a trick.
https://youtu.be/4IIVfoDuVIw
@SiliconBassist you can post your questions in here.
Look at like/dislike ratio
Okay
The notion itself is true though
well, at least I know its fake
28k likes. That means 28k ppl were tricked
3.4 million views
That video was probably faked but the thing it was talking about does actually happen
Likely millions tricked
@Death9Reaper no it doesnt
I haved done the experiment with some friends in Australia and different parts of the world
If you pour water into a container it will stay in motiom for weeks
It does work
No it doesnt
I have seen it before
This mathematician debunked it
Miles Mathis THE CORIOLIS EFFECT DECONSTRUCTED : http://milesmathis.com/corio.html
There was this popular science account on twitter that made a lot of false explanations for things observed in videos. I forget what it was called
Don't weather effects rotate in different directions based on the hemisphere?
Do you just have that as a shortcut citizen
Lol
What if you saw that wasnt true?
I can show you
Nasa demonstrates
Not the best source i agree
@Citizen Z lmfao
I mean one example of it being different isn't going to change much, but if it were common that they were the same you'd have something.
But interesting
Is that really what you're using?
If you claim nasa lies then you cant use nasa as a source
I provide a test with high precision atomic clocks at altitudes of significant difference
It's a tendency, not a guarantee.
>>mute @Shadowโ
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **Shadowโ**#8303
Oof
To those who claim things fall due to air pressure: If air pressure is higher at lower altitudes, why do most things you drop fall down and not up? I don't want this to turn into yet another argument about gravity. I mostly just want to know your explanation.
Look at all the spins. Pay close attention to the dust coming off north Africa
https://youtu.be/h1eRp0EGOmE
air moves from areas of high pressure to low pressure
I'm not seeing any hurricanes..
Ah there's one.
Not just hurricanes
Look at everything
The only relevant one would be hurricanes and tornadoes.
The rest is just normal weather patterns interacting.
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 3061/4068
| Next