lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 2703/4068
| Next
are you lost Nerd?
kinda
Friend
well, Tejiu just answered you quite succinctly
wack
We call it fake because one it looks so fake. 2 the earth appears to be a perfect sphere in the photos when Niel dygrass tyson and the โscientific communityโ agreed itโs an oblate spheroid. 3 thereโs no stars and Niel Armstrong said he saw no stars but thatโs not the problem. The problem is when you have other astronauts going and saying they saw many many stars and planets. Inconsistent and lying. 4 the van allen radiation belts which they said they canโt go though but already went through so more lying. 5 they said they โlostโ the greatest achievement of mans kinds all telemetry data and the technology to go there. 6 the moon they say is 200,000+ miles away so the speed they would have to be traveling is absurd to and from. 7 itโs fake @Alexandre @ใตใคใซใซใญ
what
ohhhhh so this is flat earth
ahhh
ok
I have been somewhat put off the flat Earth theory by weak arguments like this
Thatโs the moon landing hoax not really about the flat earth. Was explaining to them why we think the moon landings were fake
Just some quick examples off the top of my head
im a round earther personally just because i belive that gravity couldn't exist on a flat plane
There are so many reasons that confirm it's fakeness it's overwhelming
and thts
"That
imagine one of us is first person to walk on the moon
sup
Heyo
isn't one of us going to turn around and say, hey, there's the EARTH
but alas no
how does it look fake
also i find it funny that the moon landing cant have been faked
How?
how the lights were parrel and not curved? just to name one
yes, they had the technology to go to the moon, but not to fake it ๐
2. its because we are looking at it in one percpective
you can see the flag on the moon
you can reflect lights from mirrors on the moon
thats why it looks like a perfect shpere
goverments around the world picked up transmissions from there
in 1969, a 238000 mile long telephone call was made with zero transmission lag
and the fact that if the moon landing was fake so many people would have to keep it a secret that it woludn't be possible
48 years later, transmission lags are experienced from around 400miles up
hhmm..
what
lampz i dont get your points
anybody that believes that deserves an award for being illogical and gullible sorry to say
rude considering you just repeat what the globe busters said ;-;
u call us gullible XD
you watch the globebusters?
me? no
yet you know what they are saying okay
a person made a whole 40 min video destroying their points @carlito
i watch people debunking them?
i never repeated anything from globebusters
eyyyy professor dave squad
that's a simple observation anybody can make
what
observation
go watch the moon/to earth telephone call yourself
you should also watch professor daves videos aswell and disprove it
then, go watch some calls of ISS footage
you can see for yourself that there's transmission lags
what
of course theres lag?
like even 6 to 8 second lags
its not holo communications like star wars
Itโs okay if you donโt. Iโll try to explain it more clear. We cannot land on the moon. We can only observe the moon. The moon is in the sky. When was the last time that you have seen with your two eyes not on tv or a movie but with your two eyes of something or someone landing on an object in the sky? You are too focused in believing we can land on balls in the sky letโs focus on whatโs already here and underneath. Or the ocean perhaps?
yes, in 48years the 'lag' technology has somehow worsened
why cant we not land on the moon?
so Jupiter is also in our sky?
also wanna talk oceans ships going over the horizon?
the moon also has gravity so ofc we can land on it
no, how about you first address the lag issue
one thing at a time
Because the moon isnโt something you can land on! Stop thinking you know what the moon is. None of us know what the moon is. None of us. We can only observe it.
HOW
we do know what the moon is
tell me how
instead of trying to deflect from the topics
the moon is a small object ***ON A COSMIC SCALE***
You think you know what the moon is
all your saying that we cant do that and this without any explanation @Lampz
that is going through space and is attracted to the gravity of the earth
and *you* think you know as well?
like how we are also on a ball spinning through space attracted to the gravity of the sun
you enjoy asking questions without digesting answers
you do to?
Iโve already said it. Look in the sky. Can you go and launch a rocket and travel more than 200,000+ plus miles through this van allen radiation belt that they said we cannot go through to get to the moon? They are lying and is very inconsistent
how can we not tho
flat earthers are also very inconsistent also if the earth is in our sky then wouldn't the tides be diff?
Oh so basically you already know the moon landings are fake you just wanna know how can we not in the future if we overcome the van allen radiation belt?
Or do you already think we landed there
what
i do think we did
what do you mean by "Van allen radiation belt"
yea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC5RalYWZ5Y this is my dad
watch this video please
Why do we know more about the globe earth model than the people actually believing in this stuff
how do yuo know more
jeeeez
all you do is assume
steveman do you play mc?
that we cant do that and thos
used to
You just ask me what the van allen belts are
and?
anyone that believes the moon landings are real has obviously done little to zero research
oh jesus
XD
alright how could it have been faked?
The van allen belts is said to be dangerous levels of radiation between the earth and moon where no one can traverse through
the tech in 1969 we couldn't have faked the moon landing
yes, apparently they went through a 'section' of van allen belts that was less toxic @Lampz they got lucky iow ๐
Oh so you believe that one video where itโs with paid actors and liars
the moon landing?
oh so do you have any proof its fake?
it sounds like you're repeating now
They went through a section that was less toxic by chance?
because no one is answering my question
by chance? they've known for a decade
yes, total chance.. remember they didn't even know of it's existence back then
๐
when they asked the astronots about the van allen belts
they said, 'what van allen belts?'
In 1958, Dr. James Van Allen discovered a collection of
high-energy particle clouds within 40,000 km of Earth.
Arranged like two nested donuts, the inner belt is
mainly energetic protons, while the outer belts contain
both protons and electrons. These belts have long
been known as 'bad news' for satellites and astronauts,
with potentially deadly consequences if you spend too
much time within them. The figure below, produced by
scientists from the NASA, CRRES satellite, shows the
radiation dosages at various locations within the belts.
so their tinfoil contraption then aimed towards a lesser dense radiation area okay gotcha
tinfoil?
what
lol assumptions again
i have never heard any explanation from those two
all lampz said was you cant do that and this
im still waiting for the 'lag' explanation
if we don't live in star trek holo, then how is it there was zero lag on the 248000 mile long telephone call
when was teh call
Which president called the moon?
When President Nixon called the moon. After Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's successful 1969 moon landing, President Richard Nixon placed a very long-distance phone call to the astronauts.
is there a vid
so that was in 1969
where i could listen to the call
i'l try get it now
kk
lol lampz just gave up
he couldnt explain anything
lol
theyre messing with my internet connection
sometimes there's a lag, sometimes not
how do you mean? @Xi Jinping who's they
Everybody knows the they
***who***
so they're singling out you atm
***WHO***
Creeper
maybe they used diferent equipment and tech to make that call
im not sure
CREEPER
creeeeeeper
AWWW MAN
im just wondering
why do you think the moon landing is fake
so we back in the mine
MY DIAMOOOOOOOOOOOONS
no
Creeper
k
lol we destroyed these flat earthers
i wonder if any fe's are anti vaxxers
all of them are
this server used to be active
i used to win a bunch of debates
now its dead
different equipment and tech?
tech that outperforms our modern day tech perhaps?
well, at least your 'im not sure' statement seems valid
hi guy
s
is here any1 who thinks earth is flat like my brooke
crush*
Ayy suh Yall beautiful ppl
hiwdy
U russian fr?
i wish comrade
๐
I donโt know why people think I like to debate. I want to help people but itโs like no matter how many times you try it goes back to winning or losing a debate. Iโm trying to HELP you
bryhg mOMENT
im.. A FURRY
lETS GOOOOOOO
huh
oh hi joji
hi
me flat earther 1!!!!
uh ok
becayse peppa pig in fortnite game man yesss!!!
uhhhh
okay
YAS
sinsy.#3348 has been sent to Muted for spamming!
lol
yare yare daze
they are probs using very high bugdet equipment
hi
oi
Hello
I'll physically fight whoever reset my hard earned bronze role
Honestly
No respect
uh okay
You should definitely back me up
Uhm, okay.
Thanks b
King James Version is wrong and False
Full of added and missing words
Bronze role?
You get roles for talking
Oooh
The bot thing
Uhh yeah that
Freaking Trinitarians
Fricking bronze
๐ค
<:cool:507986727953235970>
bruh
I agree Steve man dude
Bruh indeed
i finished jojo bizare adventure part 5
**BRUH MOMENT**
bruh wanna know what happens
Yeah man tell us
so
gio gio
over powered
and everything was destined to happen before the story start
yes
Yeah I have no idea what any of that means
<:cool:507986727953235970>
yeah same
V KรคT#0729 has been sent to Muted for spamming!
what.
the.
oof
is
this
Fake @Planet Earth
You are a false Idol, and shall be cast into hellfire
u cannot burn ur own planet
u will oof
this used to be a serious flat earth server
now it went to bad
ur a globe earther
u smart
He is a fool
nah
he is smart
The Earth is Flat. You are a false prophet, and a troll, and are thus Blocked!
&flatsmack @Planet Earth
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 2703/4068
| Next