@eletrick33 was that "gravity proof" cavendish?

idk well go with crystal shaped

how bout that

oh did you not watch the videos @Bino

i did

the first

and?

@eletrick33 the balls one?

and?

So how do you know the four metoer clusters have a magnetic field when we cannot measure it from the ground?

yeah the balls one

wtf

How do you know they have a magnetic field?

steven are u a flat earther ?

@eletrick33 step1 what is your observed natural phenomena?

octahedron

honeslty steven i cant understand a lot of the words u use

This is observation without experimentation.

@Bino the observed natural phenomenon is gravity

Octedecadronionaniandecahedron

ur gonna need to repeat urself like 4 more times at least

@eletrick33 no no ahahha, in nature where do you see horizontal attraction

Did you fly up there and stick a magent near each meteor cluster?

No?

@jeremy So particles attracting particles ends up with crystal shapes?

He sounds like a mumble raper at this point

So how do you know then?

Rapper

Oof

i never said that

listen i got particles that attracted particles under my couch its a dust bunny its not spherical

@jeremy You said let's go with crystal, no?

They dont have enough mass

i thought u said waht shape is water in space

Or densirty

Density

Non magnetic meteorite

@Bino when mass attracts mass thats called gravity, gravity is what makes the moon orbit the earth, gravity is what makes us orbit the sun

Yes

steven are u a flat earther

@jeremy I said when particles attract particles, what should be the shape of that bigger cluster that forms

How do non-magnetic meteorites form?

idk do we have experiments showing it

Stop swearing

just get out dude

@jeremy Yes, water droplets for example

central primer field?

@eletrick33 you didnt answer, where is your observed natural phenomenon

WHAT HELIX

What hELIX

what droplets are being influenced though i gave u an example of water in a container but u said it was being influenced

when are water droplets not being influenced

give me an example

@jeremy Yes, contained water is interfered

ok when is water not being influenced

hey thats plasma

dont say space u cant have water in space its too cold

@jeremy Near the sun also?

So let me get this straight, you think there is a place, you don't know where, that is in the center of two invisible bowl shaped magnetic fields with holes in them where magnetic implosion converts aether into energy into matter then spits it out.

So why can't I see them?

Why can't I see the octahedron?

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45160722

how far from the sun

@Bino wdym the observed phenomenon is gravity

also would u like to see the trajectory of that rocket

back down to earth the rocket goes before it even got to space

Why can't I see the dark waters of the celestial sphere?

@eletrick33 you clearly dont understand, that is not the observed phenomenon

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

that roockets trajectory is going to the sun

thats the name give to the assumed cause of the effect

@Bino then what is it

No jeremy its using the earths gravity to get out of orbit using the least amount of fuel

@eletrick33 then whats what?

no its coming back down to earth before it gets to space

ugh

the rockets not even higher than a commercial plane

@jeremy That rocket seems to go up in that picture

it goes up then back down

No its circling the earth using gravity so it saves fuel

definently not getting higher

@jeremy no

@eletrick33 scientific method, step 1 - observed natural phenomenon, for your experiment that would have to be horizontal attraction

ur out of ur mind if u believe that rocket is going to space

And you think it goes down because the earth is flat

@jeremy Earth spins, that is what you see

No

T

But surely with sufficient elevation the up curving refraction of the dark waters above should be visible below me

earth spins thats what i see lol ? dude dont u know ur globe magic that atmosphere moves with the spin of the earth

@eletrick33 if cause, then affect

Gravity moves the atmosphere with it

Ts called relativity

@Deleted User thats an assertion

space is fake guys im sorry to burst ur bubble i used to love star wars and star trek too

Proof?

ughh

@jeremy What evidence you have that the space is fake?

u dont think i loved all those sci fi space movies

gas pressure without a container, there needs to be something for the gas to press upon, gas PRESSure

well for one the rockets never get high enough to go to space

yeah im pretty sure we use einstein’s law of gravity because mass curves spacetime which is what einstein’s law states

spacetime is a myth

@jeremy Proof?

Proof jeremy

i just showed u the pic all rockets take that trajectory

@eletrick33 you will have to then discard Newtonian gravity

so yes we did in fact abandon newtons law of gravity in favor of einsteins

@jeremy Ok, no rockets, give me proof

@Bino which we did

Jeremy didnt u use perspective as an argument for the horizon

So you're asserting something is there that we cannot see, there is a plausible reason why we cannot see it, agreed.
But how do you know it is there?

@eletrick33 you havent though, you are still asserting that mass attracts mass

this is getting really annoying

no rockets go up but then they come back down before they get too high u can see it in all trajectories

^

Um

@Bino Do particles attract each other?

BEAM ME UP SCOTTY: https://imgur.com/a/rfm499E

Bit of a bold statement

SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH NO ACCELERATION ON BOOK SHEET: https://imgur.com/dHaqhC9

CLIMBING HARNESS: https://imgur.com/a/b0WYLH3 https://imgur.com/uROdUZw https://imgur.com/BsfPxhG

MIKE DISAPPEAR: https://imgur.com/a/9ytMmRn

SCUBANAUT: https://imgur.com/a/T0mDXzX

SCUBA TANK CHROMA KEY: https://imgur.com/a/GhI50Ja

CGI ISS SWIMMING POOL: https://imgur.com/a/BXe4rnO

ISS FEED THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL: https://imgur.com/a/NeSI64e

CLOAKING ASTRONAUT: https://imgur.com/a/5ydDT5G

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThduRhb7V1A&t=52s

BURAN SPACE SHUTTLE IS JUST A JET PLANE: https://imgur.com/NRc3oc5

TIM PEAKE CGI GLITCH: https://imgur.com/a/llWLg5v

sheeple show them the iss cam of the day the earth stopped moving

THUMBS IN VACUUM: https://imgur.com/a/ZuOu958

APOLLO 11 SHADOW ON THE MODEL MOON: https://imgur.com/7d7TrNd

@jeremy But you don't believe in the ISS

APOLLO FLAG WAVING: https://imgur.com/a/X5tpR1K

APOLLO FAKING THE GLOBE DIM LIGHTS CABIN WINDOW: https://imgur.com/a/q1xOIex

https://imgur.com/a/NeSI64e

APOLLO SOUTH MASSIF HILL PROJECTED BACKGROUND: https://imgur.com/o9s9VkQ

STRINGS SEEN DURING APOLLO DOCKING: https://imgur.com/a/107rvIj

that is one more reason i dont beleive in it

GIRDER STEEL REFLECTION: https://imgur.com/a/49bG3Gr

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Bino has been warned
```
reason: Duplicated text
```

BENDY AIRLOCK DOOR: https://imgur.com/a/pRw9bjm https://imgur.com/a/iLcVjvq

SATELLITE ON A STRING: https://imgur.com/a/fNCXTE5

GEMINI PROJECTED SCREEN EARTH SPINNING WRONG DIRECTION: https://imgur.com/a/w27xcFk

CARD FALLS ON ISS: https://imgur.com/HYKyd5D

JAXA CGI EARTH RISE FAKERY: https://imgur.com/4L3SR8A

SATANIC RITUAL ON THE ISS: https://imgur.com/a/eeg4s6S

@jeremy So the earth didn't stop spinning?

THE RAPID MOTION AND COLLISIONS OF MOLECULES WITH THE WALLS OF THE CONTAINER "CAUSES" GAS PRESSURE: https://imgur.com/a/IoZI0kk
BALLOON ROCKETS DO NOT PUSH OFF A VACUUM: https://imgur.com/C8Y0NCn

BLUE SCREEN PARABOLIC FLIGHT: https://imgur.com/a/ajckYQv

the fakery is part of the reason i dont believe it

RUSSIAN 30'S MOVIE FAKES ZERO-G: https://imgur.com/0HyEECO

@Sheep of HAZeus The ISS is real?

https://imgur.com/a/NeSI64e

@Bino i guess i better pic my wording better

yeah, dont worry

WHAT THE HECC

@jeremy Ok, NASA lies, no ISS, proof of no space please

holograms

The russians couldnt fake the light from the sun tho

METATRON CONTRACTED FOR FAKE HOLOGRAPHIC UFO IN JERUSALEM: https://imgur.com/a/HWhLVJO

UFO SEEN IN JERUSALEM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSZ2mSnaC44

that last gif looks really cherry picked

yes all we know of space is objects and lights move above us

HOLOGRAPHIC SPACESHIP JERUSALEM 2ND ANGLE: https://imgur.com/a/BQPByaH

ROTTENCORE PROJECTING HOLOGRAMS COURTESY OF METATRON: https://imgur.com/p4EWTdN

like its actually sped up

@jeremy That's proof it's non existent?

no

Sheeple likes to use the argument that because something can be faked it is which is why every picture he posts that prove its fake are totally hypocritical

their is obviously no proof

What about the moon landing

the moon landin lol

Probe it was fake

Prove

im 99.9999 percent sure it was faked

Proof

if i had proof i would be 100 percent sure

i can point u to a lot of evidence we didnt go

So how did they do the lighting

how do they do special effects for movies ?

@jeremy Can you prove it's impossible to go to the moon?

No no your missing the point

teven how do u explain tidal nodes then

steven

How did they do the lighting

@Deleted User exactly one of .gif files he posted was of the earth spinning and it was clearly sped up because no way in hecc does the earth move that fast also at the end it says “looks like someone forgot to spin the earth” when it is very clearly spinning. cherry picked

also nice pfp

idk how they do lighting for movies

The moon landing footage shows lighting like rays

Couldnt be done with conventional lighting

u know nasa has a fake sun right

wot

They didnt have the technology to make that lighting

https://www.google.com/search?q=nasa+fake+sun&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS780US780&oq=nasa+fake+sun&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64.1526j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

your telling me that they have a fake star

oh u know what tech they did or didnt have then ?

@jeremy amphidromic system, that's the explanation to tidal nodes

Yes they didnt have lasers that could make light like that

what system is that

idk how u would know what tech they had or didnt have

can u prove they didnt have that tech

lol

Well first of all lasers were hugely expensive

But the were huge and bulky

@jeremy You can read about it, use google

They needed thousands to make a light

in tidal nodes their is something magical happenning to counteract the sun and moons movements nonstop

Which would cost a shniz ton of money

dude the moon landing technology they were using back then was incredibly weak and i think lasers werent even invented yet. dont quote me on that

i like magnets

Plus they would need multicolored lasers that are white

on a phone is more powerful than the technology they had

Which are ten times mor eexpensive on theyre own

u could get perpetual motion from a magnet ... well perpetual until the magnet loses its magnetivity'

Meaning it would probably be more money then the us even has

Or had

So explain

these are such shilly arguments

are u still going on about them not having the tech to fake a sun

Yep

Now explain

you cant get perpetual motion from a magnet

well we have a fake sun now do u know how long htey have had that tech for

i said not perpetual but until it loses its magnetivity

Nope im talking about then not now

Explain

how can the sun be fake if its always been there

so u know what tech they did or didnt have in 1969 but u dont know what tech they did or didnt have in the past 5 or 10 years?

Yes we do and to make a sun like that back then would have been enormously expensive

It would have been cheaper to literally just go to the moon

if going to the moon is even possible

Well it is cause they did it

it is we literally have the technology for it

they were actual people watching the rocket lift off

we dont have the tech to go to the moon

Yes we do XD

it was broadcasted all over the world

are u serious

yes

i am very serious

u think right now we have the take to take a man to the moon?

we have the tech

Yess

yes