lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1850/4068
| Next
Gravity or ice crystals... Can't go wrong
yeah
well gravity is the biggest thing no ?
depending on what u believe
GEOCENTRISM ROTTEN-CORE FIBER OPTIC GYRO DEBUNKED: https://imgur.com/vwbl0gF
gravity is a force that is so weak that it doesn't exist XD
It's the main one in most cases yes
@Seeker of Truth what's holding you down?
im not learning all this math before someone proves to me mass attracts mass due to their mass
my composure
^^
not gonna waste all day with some ridiculous math
You been eating all the pies @Seeker of Truth
(my composition)
Ahh
That old chestnut
and my interaction with the mother
@jeremy Have you ever asked for evidence of that?
or The World rather
yes all the time
i usually get balls on a blue sheet or a guy in a barn 100 years ago
one time i got shown a clearly fake videdo of some large balls attracting to each other
Why do you not consider the cavendish experiment to be evidence?
an experiment needs to be repeatable right
Yes
yeah so wheres the reapeated stuff at
show me a video
repeatable all the time
not some of the time
burrito u got any experimentsd on video showing mass attracting mass due to mass
Check DMs
It's only in the cavendish party trick. We don't see it anywhere in real life
Explain that
And the tamarack plumbob mineshaft experiment
And why slinkys drop top to bottom
While you're there
For a slinky to drop top to bottom, it must have a force pushing it down
Make all the excuses you like
burrito gave me that
burrito do u have any more videos or just that one is their a lot of them on youtube ?
I've seen people post lots of different ones
idk i searched for it and got like 2 or 3 that looked like they repeated it nd then a whole bunch that said cavendish debunked then a whole bunch of the balls on sheets
The balls on the spandex sheet is a different thing entirely
Perhaps you should just watch the experiments, look at the results and see if they are consistent with the masses attracting
how would i know if their was anything wrong with the experiment
You could try repeating it
Or you could look and see if there are anomalies in the results
is their any real science ones in a lab the one u gave me the guys got a 2x4 duct taped with bowling balls ?
afaik properly done lab experiments generally aren't presented on youtube
idk i feel like gravity is so important and their is like a couple videos maybe proving it maybe not
So the logical thing would be to repeat the experiment yourself and see what result you get right?
i dont have room for tha tin my house
Then I guess all you can do is look at other people's results
so ur convinced mass attracts mass due to mass?
@jeremy What's mass?
I'm just presenting some evidence that i've seen
It appears that when you do a test with sufficient precision, they do attract each other
HAMSTER WHEEL ZOMBIES: https://imgur.com/367s449
INSECTS WALKING IN CIRCLES: https://imgur.com/RrRVIgI
idk sheeple
all that math is too crazy for me
@jeremy Great so stop using it, it's there to try to say weight isn't weight because of murr glappity
There are plenty of people who are willing to explain it to you
It does make sense if you listen
i just think their is a lot of stuff that determines what something weighs and i dont see how their could be a set formula for it
If you knew about the things that determine weight, couldn't you account for them?
maybe
science cant solve a 3 body problem and this weight thing sounds way more complicated
The 3 body problem is very maths-heavy
but idk
3 body problem is impossible
It's about what a system of 3 orbiting bodies will look like at any point in the future, based on their starting position
There's no analytical solution for it right now
Weight is just the force things experience towards the ground
yeah but dont we have satellites out there that are being affected by 3 bodies?
they must have solved a 3 body problem to have satellites no ?
Yes, the trick is to make some assumptions that simplify it
i know how they do with assumptions
It turns out that if one of the bodies is really small, like a satellite compared to a moon, you can consider the gravity of the satellite to be zero
And it becomes practically identical to a 2-body problem
ok what about the sun moon and earth how do u fit a satellite into those 3 bodies
remember the sun and moon are moving trillions of gallons of ocean water around earth right
but not the satellite
suspicious to say the least
Remember that the oceans have much bigger masses than satellites, so they experience a much bigger force
For all i know the sun and moon do distort the orbit by a few meters, I don't know
I have this one which is pretty funny
yeah im not buyin these cavendish experiments
Seems like the best thing you can do is test it yourself
If there's something you don't like about what other people have done, you can fix it
the oceans way more so gravtiy of the sun and moon affect it more that doesnt make sense to me
Well it's mass attracting mass remember
The more mass you have, the stronger the attraction
yeah and the satellite is mass
Me neither. If it was something that happened naturally we would see it everywhere
wouldnt u figure the less mass the more it would be affected
Who replaced ya? I thought ODD was in charge.
But with less mass comes less force
does anyone know the trig problem for how 2 people on earth calculate the distance to the sun ?
Where have you tried to observe it and failed @Rudi?
You need good precision to be able to do it properly
Great replacement? That is really sad. You were admins?
I've never observed mass attract mass in nature as such
@jeremy It comes from measuring the angle between the sun and moon at certain times of the month and doing trig with that
Where have you specifically tried to observe it?
we don't see big rocks roll together or nothing
Do we expect to?
The force is weak and would be overpowered by friction after all
If mass attracts mass yup
^
It's important to look at what we should expect to see before declaring that it's not there
and we see it nowhere
Unless you get the precision you need to see it
that's your claim
Not seeing something in a place where you don't have the precision to measure it doesn't really prove anything
I know
im thinking 2 people on earth calculating the distance to the sun would come up with the excat same distance for the moon
burrito planet sounds like heaven
Holy shit. I had no idea controlled opposition
Oh are you talking about just measuring its angular size?
FECOre is fake?
triangulating the distance to the sun on earth with 2 people
the trig problem
?
They haev a 501c(3) and are obligated under law to protect the mainstream narrative
Oh that's a 3rd different thing ok
Could you explain what you're talking about a little bit more?
i heard reds rheteric before finding the distance to the sun with 2 people on earth
What result did he get?
501C4 is tax exemption.
i forgot prolly 93 million miles
i cant find thatvideo again
Rottencore?
but the process he used you would have gotten the same distance to the moon
What process?
2 people different areas measure the angle to the sun at the same time
somethin like that
Hello
How are we all
Using parallax?
idk imma have to find the video
We used lasers to detect moon
Distance
i dont like that dude i only heard him doing that cause he was debating a flat earther
@Star Speckled Mantle ๐ "ping"
sharks with laser beams
ah yes
`but the process he used you would have gotten the same distance to the moon`
i guess the only way you can know that is if you take a second person and try and apply it to the moon
we used lasers to detect the distance to the moon but the laser beam reflectors is proof of the moon landing
Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas
Above you is cold
So the speed of light will vary
how cold was the gas sheeple
Below 1K
and how cold is space
Space is fake
and gay
i know but how cold do they say it is
about 3K iirc
The atmosphere doesn't get that cold as you go up though
As you probably know, space is already very, very cold โ roughly 2.7 Kelvin (-270.45 Celsius, -454.81 Fahrenheit).
1. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE BODY: https://imgur.com/a/uIY067X
2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/i0Cww6Y
3. APPLICATION OF PRESSURE VECTORS https://imgur.com/a/g6eAkG6
4. APPLICATION OF VISCOSITY TO THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/a/5KomCOu
Well this is just full of spam now
5. APPLICATION OF DRAG ON THE BODY: https://imgur.com/a/wzaen55
@jeremy Do you know any other servers?
6. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-STATIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/pfqfVww https://imgur.com/Gzv5QgW
7. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/LvRVZ5E https://imgur.com/jOD7MRW
8. MID AIR RIGID BODY COLLISSIONS: https://imgur.com/35uk4mn
na im just in this one
9. WAVE PROPULSION: https://imgur.com/BOi8zNF
10. SUPERFLUID AETHER MANIPULATION: https://imgur.com/xit3TfA
DMs?
na im good i spend all my time here
Kinda hard to talk with a pile of gifs being spammed
It happens sometimes.
can go to civil debate
but it doesn't take that long and there are good memes among
earth moves at 1.3 million mph according to the globe
Thank you
thats just one directions other directs are a little less fantastical
How can it move that fast and we not feel it?
gravity
Because we don't feel speed, just acceleration
lol
the speed isnt constant though
But the acceleration is actually quite small
maybe
If you try and figure it out it's actually quite reasonable
na im not doin crazy math
math does not equal reality
It's just a quick division but ok
i loaned u a million dollars last week and a million dollars yeaterday so you owe me 2 million dollars
math is perfect give me my 2 mil lol
wat
just saying math isnt reality
just cuse math works it doesnt mean its reality
No, only the maths that has been shown to represent reality gets used
all this math drives me nuts cause im doing math for things i dont even believe in
Can you clue me in to what's going on
I am here. Would you like me to speak? I am eating lunch
is gravity real?
define gravity
I have
are pink unicorns real
The whole idea of maths is that it's just a way of describing reality
Joshy from Memeulous
no sh eeple my unicorn farm has never had a pink unicorn
The video
lol
So are the linked videos evidence against gravity?
the mermaids sometimes get pink scales though
LOGICAL FALLACY: SHIFTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF: https://imgur.com/tSgXe5B
they are just gravity eperiments
@I Scored 12/50 Burden of proof is on YOU to provide the scientia of gravity
people trying to prove mass is attracted to mass
What's mass?
lol i know sheeple
mass is weight right
This is a lot to take in.
What does that even mean
Mass is not weight.
thanks mike
Correct
All I know is if I throw most things up in the air, itโs gonna come back down
They are
That's how that works
<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Star Speckled Mantle ๐ has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```
Joshy is a nasty person
can u have mass without weight
They try to claim weight is mass x acceleration caused by "gravity"
they don't know what mass even is.
they don't kknow what gravity even is.
Weight has been known since ancient times....
Archimedes Principle works and they designed ships with it for millennia....
Sooooo yah
Mass is how much you 'weigh' regardless of gravity
so amss is weight
mass is weight ok
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1850/4068
| Next