Lol I can imagine

Someone came back to life

The last hour of work is always so tedious and miserable

<:vError:390229421228949504> **AstralSentient**#7807 is not muted!

But I came up with something

I found out I am actually the earth and you all are microscopic and live on me

Hello, fellow flat Earthers

I’m not a flat earther tho

hello uWu @Dude

I am

Hello @6ees

hello 👋 @cocobanana

👋🏻

I'm tied of, listening to the Medias lies

The Earth is flat

The earth is me

@Dude im not even sure what the media is lying about at this point

the media govt they dont lie just believe everything they say everything nasa says and keep consuming

u are a spec of nothing in infinite universe a universe where the space and everything in it came from nothing just keep consuming and producing waste

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do5l1Vvzl5E

just listen to lawrence krauss

he will explain to u how everything came from nothing in that video

@jeremy are you a theist?

idk what that means

Her name was lola

Do you believe in a god you can know? Like are you a Christian/Muslim etc?

when i believed science was telling me the truth i didnt believe in a creator but since i heard lawrence krauss explain how everything came from nothing im starting to believe in a creator since it makes more sense than everything came from nothing

someone created something or something came from nothing

which one sounds more reallistic to you

@jeremy I believe in a creator too.

The age old question is where did the creator come from

not my problem

maybe he was created or he evolved from nothing

is his planet a sphere ?

Then how is that different from the universe itself

So you’re a deist then? Like you believe in a creator but not one you can personally worship or know? @jeremy

I’m not trying to argue. I’m genuinely just curious where you stand is all @jeremy

if our creators planet is a sphere then evolution is possible i guess idk how it works in the creators world who know s

yeah deist sounds good well go with that

Personally I'm a skeptic. I'm open to the idea of a creator if compelling evidence was put forward, but if they exist, they seem content to appear non-existant

Or perhaps they're dead

if the earth is flat it was most likely a creator

even if its a sphere and we go back to everything came from nothing or everything was created by someone ...

Then again, we may very well be living in a simulation made by a far more advanced race than us who has nothing better to do than watch a simulated universe

@jeremy wouldn’t the vastness of the universe reinforce the idea of a god that finely tunes everything?

my personal opinion because this is waht i would do if we were an advanced species is i would either have many computer simulation earths running or actual physical earths in petri dishes in a warehouse somewhere to study them and or exploit them

unless u believe the space agencies we dont know anything about outerspace

ur assuming outerspace is vast

What about the theists and deists like yourself who affirm the space agencies?

?

i dont believe the space agencies at all

No I’m saying what do you think about those theists and deists who do?

ur saying what about religious people that believe nasa ?

Sorry I guess I worded that weird

they have been lied too and indoctrinated since birth so i dont blame them

@jeremy but there are people with your same idea of a creator that believe nasa

i know

my creator and their creater is differrent i think

my personal opinion because this is waht i would do if we were an advanced species is i would either have many computer simulation earths running or actual physical earths in petri dishes in a warehouse somewhere to study them and or exploit them

how many people think that lol

So you think the earth is a simulation?

or a real physical place in a petri dish

could be either one

we could be sitting on a sphere in infinite universe that came from nothing im not sure

Why would they simulate a flat earth and then also try to convince you it’s round? Is the real world earth round?

they could simulate a flat earth and the people they made or came to be could fool us that has nothing to do with them

like i sadi they would study us their is prolly other earths that they know its flat maybe

maybe the other earths less corrupt people are in charge idk

FLAT DEAD REDEMPTION EDGE OF THE EARTH: https://imgur.com/THm8tuQ

Right, 2019 still modelling the Earth as flat in Games

surrrreeeee

@jeremy if you are using simulated logic then can you believe your own ideas?

its probably a dome cause how do u have a pressurized system against a non pressurized system

?

i didnt understand that last thing u said

If everything is a simulation then isn’t your mind also a simulation?

u ever go in a video game run in a field and hit an invisible wall u cant get past no matter how hard u try

yeah sure my mind everything could be all simulated

we could also be real physical entities in a petri dish

I've put a lot of thought into the idea that my brain could just be a pre programmed sequence

ur questioning free will ?

But then I conclude that whoever made my brain is a terrible programmer

lol

@Aquillon Blame mom and dad

Every day, my dude

i feel like a lot of my questions could be answered if the space agencies didnt lie or they let us explore antarctica freely

You could privately fund your own expedition

no u cant

u ever heard of the antarctic treaty

noone can go there unless its a guided tour or to the science camps they dont let u run around at ur own free will

Or your vessel is registered to a non-signiatory nation to the treaty

@jeremy well it is very dangerous there

ok who cares about dangerous

@jeremy yeahhhh hypothermia. No big deal right?

was it dangerous going to the moon or chris colombus sailing to america its dangerous crossing the street driving a vehicle is super dangerous

@criticallyred They don't give a shit about you, if they did they would have banned sugar, cars, tobacco, oil, alcohol, porn, fluoride, vaccines, homelessness a LONG time ago

Hello

@Human Sheeple how do you ban homelessness

we have clothes heaters all kidns of gear we could bring are u saying we cant survive in a cold climate ?

@criticallyred By rehousing htem

red ?

By giving them jobs

@Human Sheeple I hunk that’s a different discussion

red we cant survive in a cold climate ur saying lol ?

Nope it's relevent, why is homelessness even a thing?

@jeremy yes but exploring it on your own is a different story

@criticallyred How many homeless people do you let sleep in your house?

Antarctica is exceedingly cold

we cant explore it on our own if we could though im sure u could get the gear to survive in a cold climate

@Human Sheeple I’m not able to let them. But I give them a little money when I see them ask for it.

It's dangerous for homeless people to be homeless, seeing as you actually care for people's well being, please can you rehouse some homeless people?

I have no means to rehouse people

Sure you can, you can open your door for them, let them use your shower, eat your food, sleep on your couch

@Human Sheeple I’m not able to do it myself but I’ve donated and given money to beggars as I’ve said

I can barely house myself

@Aquillon Yes you do

are u saying its so cold 100 thousand dollars worth of gear couldnt keep u alive ?

@criticallyred You're unwilling to help homeless people

You could let homeless people into the place you stay

But you choose not to

So don't give me this BS about "ohh we can't go to Antarctica because it's dangerous" you don't give a shit about other people's safey and well being stop pretending like you do.

Yeah because I have bills to pay. I can barely afford to feed myself once a day and keep a roof on my head and get myself to my job.

I'm not gonna bring someone into my home just so they can starve indoors

That's just the illusion of helping

@Human Sheeple so Antarctica is a hoax because I didn’t let a homeless person in my house. Got it

@jeremy pm me if you wanna discuss that I’m about to leave work

we can talk later in here i mean i dont think it would cost too much for some heaters some cold climate clothing idk encloses vehicles that can drive on snow

a cold climate being dangerous is a terrible excuse for not letting us explore antarctica freely

@jeremy they’ve already flown over the continent and circumnavigated it

sure they have

<:hahAA:358306291070009345>

look at the last person that got credit for it

Sad times huh @Aquillon

they didnt even do it

Nah, I get by overall

they went to antarctica and turned around

were changing the subject though

Just can't afford to bring in another resident unless they got that money

im happy to take it to north south circumnavigation

obviously east west can be done on both flat and sphere earth

north south cant be done on flat earth model

Cute

The UK has found that there's cocaine in their shrimp, in other news

@criticallyred No but your grounds for "they don't let you go to Antarctica because it's dangerous" is utter BS because they obviously and you obviously don't care about other people's well being

we jump out of airplanes for fun danger is our middle name

beleive me ive seen it

Wrong, it was Minecraft Steve default dancing

you right

we do dangerous stuff all the time so

@jeremy So go down to Antarctica then

lol

Oh wait, you don't have PERMISSION

We do indeed, but reading the treaty, it's not hard overall (money aside) to not break that treaty

Yes go on a Kiribati or A Cyprus Ship

Or a Mozambique ship

Don't try to claim it
Make your findings openly available to everyone

Or that

Only 59 signiatories

That works too

Hello

And then when you get there, *do* claim it and be the ruler of the penguins. That's some life goals right there

Once you're off the ship and on mainland Antarctica without permission, you're on your own, if you encounter a JSOC team or an F/A 18, good luck!

It's also the cleanest continent!

ok

I mean hey if they fire on your ship you can be the focal point of a war

sheeple yesterday someone tried telling me they cross the border illegally from mexico to us all the time antarctica is the same thing

That'd be a neat legacy

i have people tell me we are better at human space travel today than we were in 1969 lol

all kinds of craziness

As in manned flights?

human space travel

people traveling in outerspace

their is really people out there that think we are better now than we were in 1969 when it comes to humans traveing in space

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Aquillon has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

Mb

@Aquillon: I mean if they want to say 💩 doesnt kill entire crews as often, then yes? But sadly, no, we haven't gone farther than the moon with people so space travel is just disappointing for me at the moment

Ye

Thank

well thats if u think we really went to the moon

But hey, sign me up for that one way trip to Mars if it happens in my lifetime

*doubtful but I can dream*

when i see a rocket take off then come back down towards earth before it gets very high makes me think we either arent or cant go to space

somehow nasa has better tech than the military cause the fastest missle is mach 5 but nasa can go mach 22

we spend a lot more on ways to kille ach other than space travel so money is no excuse

nasa knows magic thats all

lmao

you think any missile needs to go faster than mach 5?

well it only goes mach 3 now but they are planning to upgrade it to 5

Mach 22 for an ICBM is just wasting money

not a choice

that's just how the trajectory is

Also that, but theoretically if they could, what's the point?

too hard to intercept

Fair enough, but would it be cost effective in the long run to even fire one

NASA rockets already aren't cost effective

That entire organization is an expense, it never really turns profit, monetarily at least

ICBMs are very cost effective if you put nukes on them

far more effective than bombers or cruise missiles

Not if the enemy has multi kill vehicles

kinetic interceptors are just propaganda

a full scale attack is impossible to stop

and you only need 1 warhead to get through

the best an ABM system can hope for is to stop one or two ICBMs

https://youtu.be/KBMU6l6GsdM

They throw a bunch of these up

like north korea's arsenal

insufficient

you need 100% reliability

and need to be able to distinguish decoys from warheads

which is very non-trivial

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6MOaECL6FM

so its not important for missles to go fast thats ur theory ?

they go mach 3 they are gonna upgrade it to mach 5 why isnt mach 3 fast enough ?

why dont they just go mach 22 like nasa does

why would they upgrade it from mach 3 to mach 5 when they could just make it go mach 22 im not a military expert but i think the faster ur missle goes the better no ?

ballistic missiles will go mach ~20 no matter what

because they are ballistic missiles

if you want to throw something at a target halfway around the world you need to throw it at mach 20

if you have a cruise missile that's a different matter

because it's affected by the atmosphere

so it can fly with wings

but it also needs constant power to keep flying long

unless it's a hypersonic glide vehicle

the fastest missle is mach 5

what missile are you talking about?

ICBMs go far faster than mach 5

missles in general no outerspace fantasy stuff

ICBMs go mach 5

some HGVs go mach ~10 iirc

Peak speed for an ICBM is in the ballpark of 6-7km/s (any faster and the payload would go orbital), and it takes about 10 minutes to accelerate to that speed. New York to Moscow is 7500km

fastest ASMs are about mach 5

nasa goes 17500 mph

icbm not even close

nasa goes ~8km/s for orbit

so it is close

no nasa goes 17500 miles per hour

convert that to km/s

28,000 km per hour

not kilometers per hour

kilometers per second

are u saying icbms go faster

icbms go 6-7km/s as you said

orbital velocities are about 8km/s

or they would go orbital lol thats funny

7 < 8

17500 mph is 7.8232 km/s

ok

ICBMs go 6-7 km/s which is slower if you are capable of doing arithmetic

so the icbms dont go as fast on purpose or it would go orbital

yes i understand what they tell us