enjoy the safety

where the proof?

its documented by the court

@Bacon dont

all the suit names are included

Don’t worry. I will

@Bacon Oh, yeah? That means nothing. Doctors tried getting me to inject my child on the first day if life and within the second hour of being born.

and the judges ruling

for BONE VIRUS

100% safety

And?

yup sure

What about it?

o boy

Doctors doesn't mean they are reliable or knowledgeable of shit. @Bacon

anyone agree that this substance called Anti-Vaccines and Flat Earthers cause cancer

ya ask the doctor will this give me the dreaded deadly safe bone virus

he will say no

but he dont know

Are you serious? That’s just plain ignorance to decades of hard work they had to do in order to get there. That’s just disrespectful towards them

just because someone is a doctor doesnt mean they cant spew out random bullshit like everyone else

@Spookington HI BABE

@Bacon You're deliberately blind to corruption in the medical field. That's extremely arrogant of you.

*kms

alex pray you dont get safe bone virus

It’s not random. That’s what you don’t get. It takes years of training. Years of study. Days of scanning to figure out what happened

like the thousand othe rppl

GL

so can i take heroin

There’s corruption. Of course. But you can’t say doctors just spew out facts. It’s the knowledge of decades

i guess you just love injecting stuff

Alright, @𝐼𝓁𝓁𝓇𝒶 has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

@Alex. @Bacon

You can’t judge doctors. You and I don’t even have 1% of what they learned in their years of studies

@Bacon Except the fact that many nurses and doctors don't know the risks of vaccinations and tells you there's nothing to worry about? Tell the doctors that tried to inject my hours old infant with toxic chemicals.

Especially not in such details

@Bacon I can judge

enjoy the bone virus

GL

i hope it fights the flu and doesnt give you a bone virus

I suppose they had decades of research to support their decision to risk my child's life, did they? Or were they just blindly following the paradigm?

Newborns are very futile to diseases because the immune system isn’t fully developed

giving a baby bone virus

guys

prob isnt good

is the earth realy round?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 it's disgusting you'd rather risk your child getting a deadly disease than autism

im here for the truth

Many autistic people are smart

@Bacon I can judge whoever the fuck I want. Don't presume to know a field enough to tell me not to judge them. Who do you think you are?

i could be wrong

Leave the bone virus alone for a minute lmao. It’s not the only thing in the world

Children of engineers

but i think giving babies bone virus cause ther eimmune system is new is a bad thing

@Hamburger Guy It's vile and disgusting that you'd blindly believe what people tell you than be bothered to get off your ass and research.

A son of doctors. I see the hard work they put into their jobs. I know a lot of doctors. Most are always very kind. Very dedicated to their jobs. Not all, but the majority are

im sure they infect tons of ppl with bone virus

and do great jobs

still giving ppl bone virus

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄. I am assuming everything you say is correct... I'd still get my children vaccinated

nasa are inter dimensional child molestors

What do you have with bone infections. If it was as common as you’re saying it is, how come 90% of people don’t die from the 100% fatality rate of bone virus

so 10% die from bone virus

and thats fine

They don’t

like I said GL

@Bacon That may be. But that doesn't excuse the fact that they can easily just go along with a popular paradigm due to a fear of losing their job or being ridiculed by others. Or out of pure ignorance because they believe what they are told.

earths flat right

I don’t know a single person who died due to bone virus. Just heard of very few

it cant be 100% effective and kill 10% with bone virus

"Newborns are very futile to diseases because the immune system isn’t fully developed"
actually, immune systems are not completely developed until after their first birthday. if you actually wanna take the time to read real scientific data, read this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707740/

@Bacon

thats not how it works mate

@Hamburger Guy

Ingredient list

Shows aborted baby tissue as an ingredient.

That ok?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 are you not listening to me

@Alex. was that supposed to be a supportive comment, right? Cause I’m confused with all this

no.

I'd rather have autism than polio

@Hamburger Guy You'd still vaccinate even though they contain aborted baby tissue?

Lol

@Hamburger Guy Ignorance of polio

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 you don't even know its hluse

Use

Even if it does, I’d rather live than die for an already dead baby

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.space.com/amp/earth-atmosphere-extends-beyond-moon.html

@Hamburger Guy

Or st least risk myself

@Hamburger Guy ***I DON'T NEED TO KNOW THE FUCKING USE OF ABORTED BABY TISSUE!!! IT'S FUCKING WRONG, REGARDLESS OF ANY USE!!!***

@Bacon You're vile and cruel

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 then I'm guessing you don't eat marshmellows

No. I’m not. I just don’t get stuck on dead people and move on

You’re confused @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Nothing, and I mean ***NOTHING*** justifies the murdering of babies.

And perhaps mentally challenged

Nothing

And? They don’t murder the babies to make vaccines

what

It’s the woman’s call

@Bacon that makes It ok, does it? Fucking evil swine

we eat meat

@M. Stone Not confused. Informed. https://youtu.be/NACBHtFMllA

we literally kill and consume animals

It doesn’t make abortions okay. But risking your own life for someone who’s already dead is just plain stupid

@Noodles Doesn't make the killing of babies ok.

@Bacon Your willingness to turn a blind eye to something so horrific says a lot about your poor character.

http://www.jennymccarthybodycount.com/

Alright, @Alex. has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 do you think we especially kill babies for it

k well

lemme rephrase

i suppose abortions are part of it

abortions are the parents choice

@Bacon You aren't understanding this, are you? You can't have vaccines without the baby tissue. Stop killing babies and stop injecting foreign DNA into human babies.

are babies even sentient

it's wrong to kill a child

@Noodles it's a life.

No. It does not. I don’t support abortions. I support keeping people that are alive alive, and embracing the dead because they can’t come back to life

https://youtu.be/Dus54BmqPF0

i suppose it is

but we kill and eat animals

So the least we can do is to keep the healthy people and babies healthy

without anyone's consent, really

I don't give a fuck what people think is sentient. ***IT'S A FUCKING LIFE!!***

so

you wouldn't kill a fly

Injecting our bodies with foreign DNA is not healthy

lol i don't know about vaccine ingredients

Unless proven otherwise

just what is okay and not okay

Which it has

Leads to auto immune disease

There are medications for that

Hey I left for a while are we still on the topic of polio

abortions

im not against vaccines, however just bc we think something is good and healthy for us now doesn't mean it cant be proved unhealthy in the future.

You don’t need to tell me about that. My uncle passed away less than a month ago due to an auto immune disease he had that lead to liver failure and 2 years of suffering

Eff that. Live on medications due to the complications caused from vaccines. The pharmaceutical companies should just love you @Bacon

The way I see it, abortions will become obsolete in 20 years due to genetic engineering getting rid of all genetic diseases

@Bacon Then You need to support natural immune systems so humanity can progress with stronger immune systems that are ***NOT*** DEPENDANT on modern medicine. Because when you pump a new immune system with synthetic pharmaceuticals, that immune system would become dependant on what those pharmaceuticals produce in your body, rather than your body naturally producing whatever you are introducing to it.

would you rather take what, besides being paranoid, could supposedly help you live or just die sick?

No need for abortion

i think pharmaceutical companies make loads off you but i still think they produce actual medicine

though it can be corrupt, no doubt

@Hamburger Guy Genetic engineering? Are You fucking kidding me? That's some vile and evil shit.

With all due respect, his condition kept worsening. And you know when he died? When they had to cut him off from the meds because they discovered his disease caused him brain trauma that would’ve left him vegetated

So where was the immune system then?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 I knew it

You are the type of person that would execute socrates

How is genetic engineering bad?

I suppose you think gmos are good, too? @Hamburger Guy

@Noodles of course they produce actual medicine. But never a cure. Big pharma doesn’t make money off of healthy people or dead people.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 duh

Piss off

Lol

sounds fair

It cures disease to a certain point. After that, you use them to elongate your life as much as possible

^^

also, i thought there were cures

hint hint, vaccinations

jk

@Hamburger Guy Literally less than seconds of research

still though, aren't there actual cures?

Yup. @Bacon is s shill hired by big pharma. 😡

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 you need a study libtard

GMO's are good, man! Trust your government!!

I don’t think he’s a shill, lol.

i mean rats are invasive rodents

rats, not humans

There really aren’t many shills.

There are. But but not all diseases are curable. On top of that, vaccines are usually meant to prevent the diseases before they happen. They’re meant to prevent, not to cure (most of the time)

note we don't test gmo's on human beings

like the rats

Lmao I’m not hired by anyone

Not many on this platform, rather.

someone didn't get tumors, the rats did

@Ætos He is. He is a strong proponent for medications that don’t cure.

@Hamburger Guy I'm nothing close to liberal so shut your fucking face, cretin. Keep your presumptions to your damn self.

I’m just in my bed in my hotel room in Krakow

also lol why do i still have the new member role

@Noodles Oh, so this couldn't possibly affect humans the same way, eh?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 you are a libtard if you are that stupid to google search and say SCIENCE RESEARCH

I couldn't see why not.

though,

has it?

Gwen, while the second half of your statement is correct, it doesn’t demonstrate the first half.

assuming we have this information at our disposal, why would we risk giving people tumors

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 its called Google Scholars or Nature

what do we gain from harming people

sounds more like a loss than a win for everyone

There is a distinct difference between supporting something you believe in and being paid to tell a lie.

it's actually pretty easy

Rats are used for research. They don’t except them to work right away. They perfect it over the years to the point they can release it to the public

@Noodles hows that?

@Hamburger Guy Nothing of which I am. I literally used that as an example. Example. You're the idiot who misinterpreted it.

if it's not subtle, i wouldn't want to release a medicine that just gave people tumors

though that's not a thing

So if you search rats with stuff after vaccines or other stuff, don’t expect it to be a miracle pill

rats are for testing, again, not the humans

basically what bacon is saying about the rats

you can't work miracles on the first try

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 am i talking to a wall?

yall still on this topic, wow

1 successful attempt means nothing. You do hundreds of experiments

@Bacon Seeing rats affected this way should be an automatic "fuck this start all over, hell fucking no way would we ever take this beyond rats."

@Hamburger Guy You're an idiot. Talk to yourself.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 I need a study proving it was GMO food

and the dose

who's to say we didn't start over

or like

improve

My parents are oncology researches. They’ve been working on the same research for the past 15 years

and the time frame

I'm not giving you shit after how you behaved.

rather than just giving the people that after we've seen the effects it had on the rats

Do your own research

why would you even jeopardize something like that

can i see their research reports then :) @Bacon

literal tumors

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 don't tell me to do my research it's your claim not mine

Not really. It’s mostly secret stuff since it’s for a patent. I may be able to get some though

Did this chat chill

ok i dont believe you then

Lol

@Hamburger Guy I'll tell you whatever the hell I feel like. You're the one who said they were good.

I can tell you the focus of their research is the protein called Clotho

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 ok fine I'll DM you

I asked if you thought they were good.

I made no absolute claim

why does anyone give a <censored> about a <censored> rats their incredibly invasion and have destroyed many crops which ruined the farmers income i see no reason to care for them

I got muted.

@Bacon so they dont study immunology of any kind then

Have a good night.

They’re animals nonetheless. They should be cared about. However, they are crucial for research

That I won’t say

ok well even if you were to say they do, you'd be lying. Klotho is a co-receptor for bone minerals and vitamin D metabolism

Also you need to remember I’m not a doctor. I don’t know what their work is about in detail. Just very, very basic stuff they use

That what they’re researching. Another purpose that could prove useful

then dont use them as your evidence for claims if you dont know what you are talking about

I said I didn’t know their work in details, and I didn’t go into details. I used what I know for sure

YES UNMUTES

Look what I found @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/journal-retracts-genetically-modified-corn-tumor-rats-study/

getting warmer....

I love this debate. First one where people don’t suddenly bring in the justice of god and whatnot to support their claim

The actual study...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691512005637#FCANote

@eletrick33 I only used them as an example. Not as direct proof of anything. However, if you were testing with rats and GMO's, regardless of the dosage or amount, and the rats you were testing with grew enormous tumors, you would likely cease all testing or tested to see what caused the tumors. The latter is extremely torturous and wrong. The fact that they grew tumors, at all, should be enough to reconsider testing with whatever chemicals they were using.

Seeing what causes stuff are sometimes equally as important