very, apparently

if you try to go south on flat earth, you'll end up varring off course and end up going south in a straight line from due east or due west

See you will only gain altitude if u constantly keep on increasing the thrust

try this in a helicopter, you'll end up proving flat earth just using a compass

I don't increase the thrust, u travel at a constant altitude

The thing is, I have and am going to be doing experiments like I already have to prove or disprove the shape of the earth it is mainly for me and not for others really @Toothcake

As long as I can prove it you know

A constant height above a flat non rotating surface

i fly helicopter sometimes, its tons of fun, every1 should try it

@Soldz (CF) How do you account for the Problem of Induction?

no shit you stay level, sheeple thats what we have gravity for

What's that?

Got any proof of it?

yes

such as?

@Human Sheeple yeassss

Gravity waves!

guys... planes don't need to tilt up to go up the wings generat upward force by design; and by going faster they fall/rise more based on air flow around wings....

Can I buy some gravity waves please?

Experiments proving relativity

@Toothcake The problem of induction?

Can I buy some relativity please?

@Human Sheeple you have got to be kidding me right!!!

Nope, you're selling bullshit

do some cavendish like this guy did https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QdifwJ31ig

Do you even know how we tested for relativity

Human Sheeple, do you konw what a shill flat earther is?

nothing is stopping you from trying it on your own

i have a 12 ounces of relativity, how much do you need?

@Soldz (CF) You cannot presume an experience of yours will hold up in all cases by experience alone. Every repeatable scientific experiment is thus not valid until it is validated; which lands Science in an infintie regress. Look up David Hume

use metric pls

based on the definition of a shill flat earther, how are you not one?

https://youtu.be/q_e_tT1d0Dw?t=75
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
SO CHRISTMAS BAUBLES HAVE LOTS OF MASSS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

@Toothcake Thats true

You guys are so gullible you think mass attracts mass and you believe that Royal Society Occultish Henry Cavendish in his wooden box OMG I'm dying here

@Soldz (CF) `P H I L O S O P H Y`

@Human Sheeple shhhh they get defencive when you call out there "big" old brains

@Toothcake But if I continue to repeat it in different areas, for example the *curve* like I have I will find out the truth

the cavendish experiment was faulty

@^Kevin^ Mark Sergeant, Patricia Steere, Jacob Vigil, Tyson Miller, Mick West's Dad, basically everybody at FES and Flat Earth Asshole

@^Kevin^ explain why

@Soldz (CF) Perhaps, but couldn't I always ask for more evidence? If you're relying only on that *which you have experienced* any new hypothetical requires a new experience.

some on that list are shills

Penguin face even admitted he was a shill

others that I can't identify is probably because I haven't been exposed to their nonsense

@Soldz (CF) This is why the Philosophy of Science exists: one has to prove on a non-empirical basis empiricism is justified. Until you can do that, experiments don't mean much.

Look up Metatron

sheeple those are clearly unstable
the steup is wrong

steup

ugh

setup

@Toothcake I'm not only relying on that, no there is much more but you have to remember that if one thing fails in a theory the whole thing could be wrong as well simple as that

Yes

https://youtu.be/udn_9KPEZK0

That's why the Problem of Induction is a glaring, problematic hell of a problem.

I suggest you try with proper materials, sheeple

Like you globers just like to reassert already debunked claims about Cavendish, Big G isn't even a constant

stop drifting when you get cornered holy fuck

stop saying BIG G, gravity is not GOD

@Soldz (CF) As far as philosophy-types are concerned, pretty much everything said on this server about math, science, or whatever random lines-shadows or satellites is effectively unjustified nonsense. Solely because Induction. Rise above; be better.

kevin you crack me up

I'm not cornered at ll, you're the one asserting the invisible elastic band holding my feet to a ball shaped floor spinning wobbling twisting tilting oscillating corkscrewing around a burning ball of gas 93 million miles away

GRAVITY

You don't actually have any evidence of mass attracting mass do you?

You have evidence of objects attracting objects but I can do that too

you should be concerned since your setup is flawed I suggest you look up a proper experiment or do it yourself

with led balls

lead

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/UtqtnkMkpxGfCaEcSnD2xY09pSGqGk-atWln8RP1ogg/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/454328933626806283/476083743338266624/Sequence_01_23.gif

I suggest you do it yourself with teflon coated hexane filled balls in a vacuum chamber in a faraday cage to eliminate lying globers blowing on the balls

@Toothcake I wouldnt say everything regarding math or whatever is nonsense

@Soldz (CF) Smart lad

@Soldz (CF) Quite right I say the globers need to measure their globe

some math is valid, that doesn't mean that fake math isn't used to fool people into believing false paradimes

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/471461677791969307/476905585447534614/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20180809031040.png

But yeah, please don't take shit for granted. Study, really study, and study *philosophy*. Step outside of the napkin-math circle-jerk. This shite ain't real mathematics.

Yea , lol get the big measuring tape <:why:492975944445853696> @Human Sheeple 😂

give a man a dime, he'll not have anything to buy, give a man a buck, he can make fake math to create a paradime.

I'm all for maths when all the variables are accounted for, assuming Earth's a sphere to prove it's a sphere is circular logic

they use circular logic to jump to a false conclusion that the sun is 93 million miles away

Kevin complaining about circular arguments

That is master-troll

I don't think China can produce that many tape measures @^Kevin^

hey, I don't promote circular logic

Smh

"Truth is GOD."

"AND THEY'RE FACTS"

GOD decides the rules of this universe and the ultimate truth

that doesn't make GOD truth

Cuz God is non existent

GOD is proven to exist

"proven" huh

just because GOD decides the ultimate truth doesn't mean he is that truth

Well Baller, if you ever want to hear an argument for God that isn't pure bullshit DM me lad

if I decide on pudding doesn't make me pudding