So, Nothing?

Nothing what? @Technomatrix

If you think you can see nothing but a flat 1,200 miles on a sphere earth, you’re crazy. https://youtu.be/hobnOTKIjWE

Y'know, the conversation and the demand for sources

you can see the curve in that image.

And you’re crazy.

Let's have a peak at the vid

the atmosphere.

if I could send you images i'd show you the apparent surface curve

I wonder why he had to use a gray filter on that video though. gets rid of color and makes stuff harder to see in distance

I can hardly discern the horizon

I thought all infrared was b&w

It looks pretty flat, but that is expected, it is in a relatively local area

Scale.

The clouds or whatever make the horizon jagged

Demand for sources? What about the sources you need to support your globe with scientific method experimentation?

A video, posted in the comments that deconstructs the original video and proves it wrong (apparently). It's in English subtitles I think.

https://youtu.be/oXd1EWhhKwc

@Derek Nelson

Please provide scientific method experimentation for each of the above.

Who are you talking to? @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

That vid actually debunks the flat earth twofold

Which vid? @Technomatrix

The one Derek provided. And what you provided

Any of you globe earthers. Good luck.

Well we'll see what he thinks when he returns👍

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 and I'll be the first to say I won't be taking part in that as I'm not a scientist

Sigma Octantis would be easy, for observatories in the southern hemisphere.

It is constantly observed, so they plotted it all out

Except, it isn't.

They only see stars around it.

What's the deal with people in the north not being able to see stars in the south? Surely we'd all see the same stars?

🤔

They haven't seen the actual star, itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQGjNu6Inak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67f2KpJAr7c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw8HjZwMmzg

if the earth is flat explain that

If the stars are so high up, surely everyone would be able to see the exact same stars

@Atag You don't need to be a scientist to do research.

They do see it

I actually found a picture

@Atag Wrong. That's not how flat earth works.

Why can't we see all the stars then? Does the darkness of some areas make them unseable?

Man, you guys only prove that you haven't even tried to learn about the flat earth before coming here and spouting ignorance.

Perspective?

Dude what is wrong with educating people

I don't understand why everyone gets so triggered when someone doesn't know something

<:mad:507991428924964867>

depends on what is being taught

whether truth is being taught or lies

No up curving refraction

@Atag ***YOU ARE NOT EDUCATING PEOPLE IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND BOTH SIDES!!!***
You can't even provide scientific method experimentation for anything you believe. Stop with the crap!!!

The biggest question should be - what shape is the universe

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JjOCCOlx1Y4&t

@Human Sheeple How could an equatorial mount work on a flat earth?

Here, learn something.

FLAT EARTH EQUINOX: https://imgur.com/a/TyeNtO8

like this

I wasn't talking about me educating people, I was saying what's wrong with FE educating people because you all seem to get angry when we don't know anything. But yeah, seems like you totally missed my point @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

How can an equitorial mount work on a globe earth when light is shown to curve up in air?

Because it compensates for the rotational axis

the only thing that rotates are the heavens / firmament overhead

And that gif is exactly why flat earth makes no sense in regards to the equinox

Hello up curving light? Are you just going to deny science?

@Technomatrix You mean it makes no sense... ***TO YOU!!***

Ya, unfortunately, there is no atmospheric refraction model that can account for that

MODEL

how about snells law

that's proven SCIENCE

There should be a survey for the amount of people that actually understand the images you send

cool air above, warm air below, light is shown to bend towards the cooler gas, i.e. UP

Yeah, but you need an atmospheric model for the overall distribution of light from above

And flat earthers got none

For that image

@Atag So what you're saying is people choose to believe in the globe because they're too stupid to understand flat earth yet are quick to state flat earthers are stupid?

@Technomatrix Instead of blindly assuming we have no evidence for a certain topic, how about you get off your lazy fucking ass and do some actual research into looking for exactly that?

@Human Sheeple what I'm saying is that even if a globe earth person was sending detailed pics like you, the average person isn't going to be able to understand all the equations etc. Meaning that most of the posts go unnoticed

I do. I've been into this flat earth stuff for awhile now

That's a nice image

It is

I remember you back in 2016

I don't need a model, I have SCIENTIFIC DATA

I wasn't around in 2016, that was '17

You on the other hand need a model to reinforce your cognitive dissonance

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Remember week one of ODD I kicked this guy's ass on 9/11

Alright, @Hobo has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Ah yeah I remember when models were so last year, who uses models?

You do need a model to compute values for the atmosphere as a whole

You lot need to calm it with the graphs