you just proved what flat earthers do @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

.... Ever heard of Louis Essen?... I highly doubt you have because he was conveniently silenced over 40+ years ago ! "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"? A member of the National Physical Laboratory of the UK from which he retired in 1972 after being quietly warned not to continue his contradiction of Einstein's theory of relativity. _"No one has attempted to refute my arguments, but I was warned that if I persisted I was likely to spoil my career prospects... the continued acceptance and teaching of relativity hinders the development of a rational extension of electromagnetic theory."_ - Louis Essen F.R.S. "Relativity and time signals", Wireless World, Oct78, p44
-- What about (freemason) "Sir" Isaac Newton→ (a 33rd Degree Mason), .. Isaac Newton, who's said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with his theory. He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve of his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to "prove" his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called "infinitesimals" which have never been observed. Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with fringe" mathematics. Newton, by the way, was far from a secular scientist, and the bulk of his writings is actually on theology and Christianity.

>im depressed
>its depressing (at first), to realize you've been lied to your whole life ....

Newton was a 33rd degree MASON..
sir Isaac Newton was a member of lodge 859 in Cambridge.

Yeah, the elephant may balance on its trunk _IF_ the equation was followed to its exact variables

stop spamming, explain buoyancy

thats not spamming kiddo
.

well smart people back then were usually rich and powerful, as rich people could afford education

.........

u clearly dont know what spamming is then

smh

can you explain buoyancy or not

Panzer's right you know

ok forget about maths. Do an experiment. Ill show you how. Get different density liquids. and the same mass. with the mass calculate the time it takes to go down. Plot time against density of liquids on a graph. The gradient you work = 9.81

what a conincedence

oof

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e8/36/da/e836da002f4559ea94b6a875c759b8d2.jpg

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

you cant

gotcha

dat "gotchya moment" <:lul:484994724118134784>

..when

Good job, you figured out that objects with larger density are influenced by gravity greater then objects of lower density

<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>

when i asked you to explain something that you mentioned but instead doing that you decided to divert

its almost as if the entire theory of gravity works on this priciple? <:lul:484994724118134784>

ikr

so i conclude you have no idea what buoyancy is

i told yous what "Gravity" is

that picture prooves there is rgavity

earlier

i mean all your pics proove gravity

derp duhh derr 🤤

ah look, he insults you when he has nothing

ikr

scroll up

too ez win

thats basically fe

scroll up

these flat earther need more research

need repeating?

no, mike
*you* scroll up
and re-read how many questions we've asked you that you didnt answer

If buoyancy is a the only force, why no matter what density gradient there is, is it capped at 9.81m/s?

This entertaining to watch

ye

why 9.81

why not 12

why not an infinate range?

i'd say its Intelligently Designed that way

from who?

_gawd did it_

did god just say

oh

Nunya

9.81

nunya fkn business <:lul:484994724118134784>

why can't it be 12

LOL

see

he's lost

right, im off then

see you

yea bye

@werm you are muting a mod, you are banned bye bye

>>mute 480449309741940766

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **madlad**#0907

there is no earth, its a cat. get wrekt

Fucking retard

sorry @Human Sheeple but it seems you went extra salty

lmao whats my tag "not here to learn". Some mods on here really dont like me disagreeing with them

Sorry about that @ibyghee I just hate people who assert gravitygravitygravitygravity and when I ask them one simple question, please show me how to manipulate acceleration by manipulating mass, they can't do it and melt down

you cant manipulate acceleration unless, you manipulate the density around it

which is the equation of bouyancy

even then

you're not manipulating gravity

just the force of bouyancy

the thing you people buzz off

and I also you the same question, why is the gradient of bouyancy 9.81

the same equation you ppl believe in

So you don't have proof of gravity then, it's just a theory?

it IS a theory lol

Well, moon has less mass than earth right. So drop a ball on earth, then drop the same ball on the moon and watch how fast they fall.

there is defintley a force pulling down. so far by experiment its relativity

and the bend in time and space

@Send Pic of Main Hull Can I see your mass measurements please?

produces gravity

@ibyghee show me how to bend time and space please

with mass

using cause and effect

Alright, @Send Pic of Main Hull has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Show me please

maybe the Electromagnetic charge is "set" at a certain suttin suttin to make things 'accelerate' at 9.8m^2 etc

What?

you just did

you're beding time and space

bending

How do you bend time and space

and or, ..the ..pressure in the aka "Atmosphere" does it
or a combo of both

Show cause and effect please

you are doing it right now @Human Sheeple