dank-memes-only
Discord ID: 463059337162653716
12,900 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/129
| Next
6 is an 8
dont know what 5 is but i think that might actually be a troll
wait i think 5 is a 6 or a 9 turned on its side to troll you
you lot with your colorblindness test missed the joke
yep i sure did, didn't know i was gay until that test
Unrealistic. Merkel never smiles.
What the hell? Where did the wammens go?
@Timcast give us back our improvised trap channel, oh almighty beanie overlord
Lel
So assimilating is racist now?
Plz tell me why you can be a proud black man but how being a proud white man is racist, bigoted and right wing
because reasons
but in general being proud of the color of your skin is stupid af
except if you tan a lot ๐
https://pp.userapi.com/c638721/v638721087/5407d/ai-x1_MxxQM.jpg https://pp.userapi.com/c638721/v638721087/54550/ugcxAImkvYE.jpg https://pp.userapi.com/c638721/v638721087/54440/fRBMK7K1hCo.jpg https://pp.userapi.com/c638721/v638721087/54309/h0qgqYGbPWQ.jpg https://pp.userapi.com/c638721/v638721087/540d0/8Ipw-yVLXgs.jpg
It's called CoC
that's what you're looking for
Maybe TiTs
@silvertree If you changes feminism to socialism it could work for the alt-right or far left. If you changes it to nationalism it could be the NSM.
Check out my shitty meme i just made, you might need a license to share it in the EU so be careful lol
jesus christ
honestly these people probs think that if a Civil War DOES occur they will be safe, and tbh thats unlikely knowing how civil conflicts tend to go
but i hope to god we dont get to that point
If a civil war were to occur, at least we wouldn't have to deal with them anymore.
probs not but we could also potentially get worse people
the parallels with V for Vendetta with this stuff doh
like UK is becoming more authoritarian and the US is talking Civil War
To be fair, the US has been talking Civil War for three, going on 4 years now
truuu
like Texans and Californians talking succession
Hey, I'm all for CA seceding
Californians need not secede the fault line will do that for them lel
theyll just break off and float away
Removes a bunch of blue votes, removes Hollywood, removes generally the worst faggotry.
By the time they realize they were importing food we've got them taken over
See ive got no problem with Blue Votes but when its regressive blue then yikes
There's really no difference at the moment
Dems have their head up their ass atm
Probably literally.
Wait, no, that's someone else's ass
lol
they just need to get back to their og principles but thats easier said than done
What are those, anyways? Basically this is all I've ever seen of them, if they were different in my lifetime I was too young to know
tbh its hard to say cause it changes with the ages but ultimately they are largely based on small L libertarianism in regards to individual choice but with more government involvement in the market and stuff i guess
That's not really small L libertarianism
Well big L is More free market. at least in the US
The way I see it, their position changes with the progressive position. Used to be pro eugenics and racist as fuck (hell, still is, just calls it something else now).
yea they had a paradigm shift that changed their demographics when JFK and LBJ where around and stuff
Nixon was another occurance
^
I think that progressivism isnt inherently bad its just been co-opted by marxists and their weird alliance with corporate bougiouse
As a good example of older progressive positions, by the way, I'd encourage you to look up the origins of Planned Parenthood
I'd disagree on that. It's always been a shade of shitty
Oh yea i heard about PP forget what it was, legit just escaped me
Need a TLDR?
sure
TRAAAAAAAPS
Basically, the founder, woman by the name of Margaret Sanger, supported the legalization of abortion as a way to get rid of black people and those with genetic defects. Supported "parent licenses" too. Now look at where abortion clinics tend to be located
Just my profile picture
Keep in mind that this was just after the turn of the century, so her opinions weren't looked down upon quite as much as they would be today
uh, random space stuff?
You'll excuse if I don't take fundamentalistdeceit to be an impartial source.
Regarding the support of eugenics, even the wiki admits an overlap, quoting from
While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit.
I linked the source, see context for yourself. I find it to be an unacceptable breach of bodily integrity, no matter the benefits.
Looking for the source on the parent license thing. I've seen it before, can't find it - all the results are recent articles in support of it. Hang on.
I'll do the rest first. I'll concede that the famous quote is misused, being in reference to people mistaking her intentions, but the fact remains that her work re: contraception was focused on minority communities as they fit her criteria of being "unfit", even if this was largely due to economic conditions.
12,900 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/129
| Next