@ZetaBlues That's because the non-Jewish communists are just useful idiots. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4kHiUAjTvQ

@Deleted User You must know how to shitpost in several languages by now

I don't and don't claim to.

Jews Behind feminism.

These (((cultural marxists))) planed to distory the west.

@Aktriaz Don't you have anything better to do then post degeneracy?

do you have anything better to do than post sourceless images that nobody has the time to read?

If you read what I post then you would see there are sources.

So if I put "Aussie is a gayboy" on a jpeg image and post it here is that suddenly a fact?

I post what I post to prove what I'm saying.

and I'm just posting art for the the pleasure of the cultured eye.

I wouldn't call degeneracy art.

you clearly have no taste

This is art.

so is this

true beauty

How can you even compare the shit you post to art?

beauty is in the eyes of the beholder

I think you need to look up the definition of art, aussie.

so is art

Degeneracy in the strictest sense can be called art but it can't be compared to real works of art.

you would call depiction of war and death art.

those are some fine apples you have there

but I think I'll still enjoy and share my oranges

Yes works like the one I posted is art because it is depecting something that is worth more than simple fap material.

wholesome mpreg is not for fapping you sick fuck

*your true colors are showing*

but depictions of war is simple fap material to autocrats

I don't know and I don't want to know what you degenerates get upto with that crap what I don't want to you to do is call it art because it's not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc&t=1s

as are holy depictions

because you've told me not to do something you do realize that I'm just going to do it more, right?

you're taking me too seriously aussie

Depictions or war show a country's history which I think is more valuable then degeneracy.

@Deleted User are you saying you don't shitpost?

Aussie is a filthy normie

old news

depictions only of the approved versions of events

@ZetaBlues I don't shitpost in other languages.

recorded first hand accounts are much better than propaganda

I don't care if it's of historical events or of fiction but degenerate crap isn't art.

but propaganda is degenerate crap

I know Jewish propaganda is degenerate crap, what's your point?

@Grenade123 For the record propaganda is the promotion of a course which means propaganda is only bad when people who are promoting bad things are creating it.

bad is subjective

bad is simply the opposite of the side you like

For example if someone created propoganda which promotes the nuclear family that would be good propaganda but if someone created anti nuclear family propaganda that wold be bad propaganda.

Yes I think propaganda which promots communism, anti family, feminism, degeneracy and white genocide is bad propoganda.

@Grenade123 I'm sure you also think the promotion of anti western propaganda is a bad thing so what is your point? You and I feel the same about propaganda which promotes things which we see as bad.

our definitions of "anti-western" propaganda differ wildly

and genocide is bad, period.

The point is the same we both don't like it so what's your point?

we both don't like propaganda.

It depends what the propaganda is promoting.

the spreading of lies, half truths, highly bias conclusions that do not have data to support their causation.

This for example promots the building of the wall on America's southern border which would be good for America thus it is good propaganda.

As I said earlier not all propaganda is based on lies and half truths. Propaganda is just the promotion of an idea, policy, ect.

"information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view."

biased or misleading in nature

I think that you think that people who think like me have to use bad tactics like lies and half truths means we have but don't because we are on the side of truth.

building a wall is based off of speculation, with no evidence showing anything much greater than a fence, which already exists along significant portions of the us boarder.

you use correlation to equal causation.

your typical line of thinking is what made people believe TVs themselves made people fat

You will be biased to towards pro liberalism propaganda. Propaganda isn't a bad thing it just depends on what is being promoted and how.

also is lazy, stopping at answers that feel easy, rather than keep digging to the root cause.

I was using the build the wall poster as evidce that there can be good propaganda.

you share much with the judge who wants to ban kitchen knives and liberals that want to ban guns.

Do you think most people keep digging let alone even care about politics most people don't.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/09/18/only-36-percent-of-americans-can-name-the-three-branches-of-government/?utm_term=.bb63104d7823

and so i should listen to the people who stopped digging and just made up answers because it was easy?

People need to be lead by good people insted of bad people.

to some you are good, to others Bernie is good. who gets to decide who these "good people" are?

Most people just care about their jobs, friends and family they don't care about foreign policy, economics, military, ect.

The thing is most people aren't free thinkers they are followers which is how a functioning society just works.

must people are not raised to be free thinkers

that would be dangerous wouldn't it?

You can't have everyone be a artist, poet, ect. It's just the way people are. It doesn't matter if you rase people to be free thinkers becasue most people won't be even if you raise people that way.

Most people just do what everyone else dose and what the leaders of a society say is good.

and how do you determine who are really "free thinkers"

poets and artists are hardly free thinkers.

If you have good people ruling a society most people will be good that's just the way people are.

take some drugs and anyone can write

what is "good"

People who think for themsleves are free thinkers.

good for me can come at the expense of you

so what is good

What creates a working and moral society is good.

that doesn't mean it is good for me

or even my family

Do you want to live in a society which works and is prosperous?

yes, but what you define as "working" can leave me and my family behind.

invading and taking local resources rather than setting down roots and figuring things out was a "working" and sometimes "prosperous" society.... except for those invaded

I think societies should be homogeneous so I don't want to have foreigners in my country and I don't want to expand and invad other countires so what's your point?

that would be require kicking me and my girlfriend out of my current country. Anyone who is "mixed" would no be without a society. THAT is my point

Survival is the most moral thing that any group can do so if they need to take other peoples resources so that they can surive is moral.

its also the lazy route.

i could stop doing work

then just kill everyone around me for "survival"

I think mixed race people should be sterilized.

everyone is mixed race unless you can define how far back you need to go

I mean groups not individuals.

Don't give me that crap mate. You know there are races.

how many are there? where do you determine exactly where they came from? and much "tainted blood" do you need to be considered mixed?

and groups are made of individuals

im mixed, scottish german

you cannot have a forest without trees

Yes there are some edge cases bt that dosen't disprove the concept.

edge cases that are not handled means a flawed design

sometimes it means you need to add, othertimes it is evident of a major flaw

If you can disprove race go right ahead.

if you can define race, go right ahead

you are the one making the claim there is more races than human. Prove to me that an Irish Wheaton Terror and an American Wheaton Terror are not the same species despite different coats and related allele. So me the genetic markets, and how much of them you need to be a specific race. Show me how humans born in russia (which covers a large part of asian), Germany, Nordic countries, and the EU are all the same race despite being wildly different.

The subspeciation of humans. A race is a grouping of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into categories generally viewed as distinct by society.

i think the irish weaton terror is probably a different race of wheaton terror than the american

"social qualities"

good, so the Americans are a race.

and the wheaton terror is probably a different race of terror than the russles terror

and the terror is probably a different race of dog than a labridor

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/85/5b/50/855b504e5e3c95c791aeb903b55f3d83.jpg

Irish on the left, American on the right.

just like ashkanazi jews are a different race of european than germans, and europeans are a different race of humans than africans

my parents had one of each, they were the best of doggos. the American one pasted away a few years ago, the Irish one is still hanging around

Ethnicities aren't races.

yes they are

then what is a "social quality", because that is not genetics.

the scots are geneticly and phenotypically different than the romanians

The point I made with different breeds of dogs is that it's the same with Human races.

and they all came from wolves.

The social qalities come from genetics.

yes and the number of human races which exist depend upon the genetic/phenotypic/geohistorical ansestory of the human

and they all suffer from major inbreeding which is why most dogs suffer from various genetic problems

if you are suggesting we "strengthen the human race" by increasing the prevalence of recessive genetic disorders, i'm all ears

actually geneticly speaking there are also domenant genetic disorders too

like sickle cell

there are also recessive benefits such as pathogenic resistances such as the europeans now have against the black plague

Yes because alot of dog populations are small they suffer from inbreeding, human races each have thousands or millions or even billions of people so inbreading isn't a problem.

yeah, but inbreeding increases the prevalence of recessive genes, making it more and more likely for any member of that inbreeding group to have it materialize.

yes but breeding on a national level without internation interference isint inbreeding

inbreeding is a matter of scale

as is race mixing

as is the defintion of race

i disagree with aussie on the scale of race

the anglo is the eternal enemy of the celt

Yes mixed race populations if it happens on a large enough level you create another race like the hispanics.

you have yet to tell me the various races and the exact genes that make them up. Why am I, an Irish-Scottish second generation American at all the same as a Russian.

Anglo's are an ethnicity not a race.

anglos are a race

they are geneticly and phenotypically different than guals

Yes @Grenade123 you are a mix of many ethnicities.

gauls*

your a mix of many races*

ethnicity is just a jewish trick

okay, but than what RACE am I? and is it the same as a russian?

so that the normans can reinvoke the harrowing

Do you think the differences between the Anglos and French are as big as the differences between Anglos and the Japanese?

@Grenade123 You are white.

anglos and japanese are different races

white is a color

Russians are pretty different than me. They even have their own way of squatting.

The white race is a race just like the asian race is a race and the black race is a race.

russians are slavic, another european race

much better tolerance to cold, not as intolerant to sun

@Grenade123 The Chinese are even more different to you.

and so are russians

depends on which russian

Do yo guys think Asians are a race (the Chinese, Japanes, Koreans, ect)?

slavs are less different than you than chinese, but more different than you than celts and normans

are Indians a race?

Yes they are.

though id argue slavs are as different to celts as the italians

and maybe even the iberians

are Mexicans a different race?

Which Mexicans are you talking about?

the ones from Mexico?

fine, Hispanics

There are Whites, Hispanics, and the natives are the main racial groups in Mexico.

It bepends on which you think are Mexicans. I think the Whites are the Mexicans because they built the country and created it while the Hispanics were a large labour force and the natives did their own thing.

iberians arnt white

yes they are mate.

spanish are very mixed with northern african

20% at times

where did hispanics come from?

Some are yes but most aren't.

its almost never 0%

Hispanics are a mix race of whites with the natives of South and central America.

so Hispanic isn't a race

hispanic is many races

as is "native"

The natives are the peoples who lived in those areas who were there before Europeans.

which had multiple groups throughout the greater geographic region of mexico that are/were genetically, culturally, and phenotypically independent from eachother

But not racialy different which is the important one.

i just discribed racial difference

Phenotype is not racial is more ethnic.

@Arch-Fiend Aren't you the guy who thinks that Anglos are a race?

So don't tell me what race is.

@Arch-Fiend I suggest have a look into race realism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L6vraY2OW8&t=1s

adhominem

im a race realist

It's not an adhominem when you said it.

your the one using adhominem

Clearly you aren't a race realist because you think Anglos are a race.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem your arguing that because i believe something im wrong for arguing something else by implying my first argument is a character flaw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeb09GS7ids

fits the definition of a race

I'm not using ad hominem because you said that Anglos are a race.

No it doesn't.

whats a race?

The subspeciation in human populations.

Like breeds of dogs.

if a race is OF human populartions, then saying race is a subspecies isint a definition, its a synonym

Do you know what subspeciation is?

define how races are classified

i dont need to know, you need to provide a defintion

The subspeciation of human populations.

subspeaciation is a synonym of race

if your defining one your defining both

dont give me a picture, use your own words if you want anyone to take you seriously

Race is just human breeds like dog breeds are just dog races it's that simple.

a defintion that uses similes is a poor definition. similes and metaphors are ment to be used as reinforcements to definitions that can stand on their own to someone who understands them within their context. if you take the simile you used in that defintion of race away your left with "race is just human breeds" which means that breeds are also just a synonym for race as is "subspecies"

do you not even know what a race is?

Yes it just a term for the subspeciation of human populations.

are you fucking trolling me?