shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 81/343
| Next
It's all good mate.
no wait, Sweden and Germany are muslim countries doing better ๐
It's true that Israel is better than muslim countries but muslim countries don't protect their bad behavior onto the west.
didnt half of them pay Clintons election?
not to mention all those refoogies committing crimes 'n seach
SA paid the clintons a lot.
Alot of shitty people funded the Clintions.
Yes
A lot of shitty people LOST MONEY on funding the clintons ๐
Soros mainly.
Fuck (((Soros))).
agreed, he's a bastard
Lol he is just old silly man trying to do what he think is good
Soros is hungarian?
Ye he is
But they are not very proud of him there
he's smart enough to know many of the things he does aren't good
that said, i don't consider him to be the "evil globalist king with his legions of blind leftists"
its like the people calling Trump a stupid idiot and deranged, and crazy
These guys are more clever than that, its all just an act
he has the right to waste his money on whatever he wants
I don't think that is a problem of the current system
people tend to get too simplistic on these things "It's all because Soros paid ya" same as "You have that opinion because you receive money from Oil companies, somehow!!"
exactly, that was the point i was trying to make
people either say he's harmless, or satan incarnate
To me he's just a business man who does what he thinks is best for his investments/companies/wealth
Its just that i think he's a bastard because i disagree with many of his policies ๐
the pyramids were not built with slaves, science has known this for a decade or more. building the pyramids was seen as one of the most important projects to the nation and people were payed well and honored to participate
and look how egypt ended up
They didnt follow the pyramid slave labor ritual so they got canned by Osiris
Slave thyne pyramids people!
@Arch-Fiend do you have a good source on that?
There are a ton of weird conspiracies surrounding the pyramids.
And ancient Egypt in general.
Citing ancient history seems to be a bad idea given how often we prove ourselves wrong outside very general statements.
its clearly aliens and sorcery
Ancient Egyptians were furries, and we all know not underestimate the thought processes of furries
Itโs quite simple. Nature does not allow things that serve no purpose. Itโs with this firmly in mind that I offer the followโฆ the female orgasm doesnโt exist. Itโs a myth propagated by women to exert control over men. Let me explain.
The male orgasm is what releases our sperm into the female (or onto or all over depending which porn you prefer). There is a point behind it. The so-called female orgasm doesnโt release an egg or even help the mating ritual along. Itโs superfluous to act of intercourse, window dressing. Evolution wouldnโt allow it. So why would females pretend to achieve this โstateโ? Now thatโs the right question. Itโs all about power over males. So many girlie-men these days are concerned about their partners โsatisfactionโ. The women put on these elaborate shows to either reward or punish their man.
A study done was done in 1977 by the Reproductive Biology Research Foundation at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Washington University in St. Louis where they recorded some of the first laboratory data on the anatomy and physiology of human sexual response based on direct observation of 382 women. Their findings on the nature of female sexual arousal and orgasm would have dispelled many long standing misconceptions had not the National Organization of Women (NOW) stepped in and made sure that everyone at the RBRF clammed up. Somewhere tucked safely in a vault in Missouri is proof that females canโt have orgasms.
So my message is clear. Women, enough with the theatrics ok? Iโm not handling out any Emmysโฆ just lay there and take it like a wildebeest will you? And guys, donโt let your girl play with your head. Do like I do. Just get in, get out and plant the seeds of the next generationโฆ hopefully one that doesnโt have to live under the dark tyranny of the female โorgasmโ.
Christ, even the second sentence is wrong with a single observation of the fact that men have nipples.
Repost =p
So, I repost. Does it stop the post from being epic? I think not.
her twitter is protected now. i guess she can't take constructive criticism.
or she now has enough tweets herself. who knows
Journalist gets OWNED by her OWN LOGIC.
No, but seriously. What a shit show.
Did journalists cry foul at Snopes?
snopes ๐
It's not desirable.
imo, they're no different than a blog site that does their own research anyway to me.
i'm not sure that snopes does any research
What you get when you have an Australian style immigration system. You just get Aisan domination.
The idea that Africa is sophisticating at the same time that their population is exploding compared to Asia and the West is ridiculous. Its the very ignorance and lack of structure that breeds unsustainable reproduction rates, which Africa has had for the past 40 years.
Africa's population is exploding because of increased access to western medication & their birth rate remaining steady. Where in the past a majority of these kids would die from malaria before they were 5, they're now surviving in record numbers thanks to organizations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
And unlike many western nations & Asian nations, Africans aren't financially punished for having children
Even with high birth deaths, countries like Nigeria tripled their pop in only a few decades. If they were truly sophisticating their repro numbers would be in decline due to work and life goals, like in the West and Asia. Their cultures are still very different.
Is a negative birth rate sustainable tho?
Kinda. As the population goes down demand for labor goes up & people can afford to have children again
Things do tend to sort themselves out.
But they can't, because that takes at least one more person out of the labor force for at least a year or 2, preferably 10-15 at least. And it will take probably at least 14 years for new labor to enter the work force. So while families can afford to have children, companies can't so they will have to shrink.
It's an odd problem
Well, it's a race condition really, who can win. Jobs still around needing to be filled or new work force
But I guess life is a bit of a loop of growth followed by death
Not necessarily. Thats where jobs can be outsourced. It does create a problem in and of itself.. the jobs here become more qualified, making barriers to entry especially for the mothers who left to have children in the first place.
Life was simple when women where not allowed to work eh?
amirite
JP proven right again, we are still working out the unintended consequences of women being allowed to work
I mean, technically the state should have a stake in seeing positive or neutral birth rates. Which would consitiute taking over as the company to give a mother supplemental income. But that fucks with the market a bit. It would start to free up space for labor competition, but also basically allow companies to start at half the salary they should be offering
Hmmm, I wonder what a 100% tax break to married mother's would do?
If we want to uphold the convention of marriage and reproduction, yes. That tired old horse we keep beating. The progressives wanna move past that. Both ideas have merit but whenever you want to change something for the better, its the road paved with good intentions that leads to hell.
tax break to married mothers? Fix the black issue, no doubt.
Larry Elder would be happy.
Would go a way to helping the problem of needing to incomes to support a family.
Two*
The problem with marriage was two fold. 1) it was tied to religious norms, which it shouldn't have been. At least the governmental side of things, 2) it carried too much not related to reproduction.
I'm sure that would create its own discriminatory EOC for males issue and they'd end up making more money *again*
Religion should have been separate from state, yes, but its sorta tied to the culture that moved wester from Europe. Can't really break those norms when they're part of the bedrock.
A 100% tax break contract for 2 people who have conceived a child for 18 years if they remain together. For those 18 years, financially, you are one unit. Only 1 18 year contract allowed for any one person. May be extended for subsequent children with the same person for up to 3 times.
Something like that
Sounds like a lot of rules, man. What're ya some kind of socialist?
lol
@zero_consequences the government side of it didn't need to be called or remain being called marriage.
Lmao, well that's if we want something the state does. And that is a big if.
But basically it's saying you can only get this tax break for 1 couple so long as they remain together, and you can only get it up to 3 times.
3 times per person.
I'm not religious but I know it creates a structure for life that progressivism lacks so I tend to side with conservatives on most issues like this, even though they believe in a man in the sky and that they'll live up in that sky with him.
Basically, the only important part of the idea of marriage is having two parents until you are at least in your late teens
Would marriage counseling be part of this process, and is it sponsored or funded by the gov? My folks tried that a lot and they had very little incentive to stay together other than us kids.
I don't care if you wanna believe in God. I myself do believe in a higher power. I just find it ridiculous that anyone thinks some guy 2000 years ago got it all right
@zero_consequences it's a tax break. It's basically a gift for staying together. Want to split up? Fine, you lose the break. Want to have a second kid with someone new while in that 18 contract? Fine, he doesn't get a tax break, and if you split from the other guy, neither do you.
positive reinforcement. You do what we need you to do, enjoy the gift. Dont want to? Fine. Be like every other average Joe.
Deserves scrutiny but I like it.
This could be extended to adoption and maybe even same sex couples
Tax breaks are always a better route than government programs anyway.
Less is more
It would be easiest to start with biological parents first
Adoption is pretty hard to do from what I hear so I doubt there'd be much manipulation there.
Same sex couples are still on the fence. I think not enough data.
Although I think it's less the sex and more the role that matters. There are single parents who turn out perfectly fine kids it's just very hard
The phrase "it takes a village to raise a child" came from somewhere
But the tax breaks have an added bonus of defunding the government ;)
yeah, until some politician decides that tax breaks for all wamen is a right, and they'll make the rich pay for it or something
So much of a right, that their patriarchal husbands must pay extra in taxes. There we go. Back to square one.
Lmao
So there was a limit on 3 per person, the idea being a 1/3rd growth rate max. This limit could be raised or lowered in theory to speed up or lower the cap. The idea being any chance applies to everything going forward. So if the limit was 3 but you have a 4 the kid still under 18 (or 15 may be better), and they raise the limit, you can apply to get a tax break for the remaining years, and it aims to encourage those who stopped at 3 or under to have another child or two.
Maybe allow people to offer up their limits to others. Since it's basically a per person limit, if people who don't have or want children want to basically transfer their limit to someone with a child already over the limit, they can. So a family with 3 kids has a 4th, and they can get two other people to sign off, basically saying "this child is being used in place of my own". Allows for more personal choice while trying to keep the birth limit sustainable.
Its doubtful this country will have resurgence in religion barring any rapture, so the large family size that went with it is likely only left to new immigrants. Having a cap would be good.
financial cap anyway, for those tax breaks. people can have as many kids as they want I don't care.. but hopefully this would also break some of the funding to welfare to single moms/married poverty.
Well in my experience, poor people, regardless of religion, have lots of kids.
The Bible belt isn't exactly rich, and inner city bitches aren't having 4 kids with 4 baby daddies because Jesus said so
We all fuck at the same rate (more or less), but if you have the responsibly to want to use contraception, you will probably not end up poor.
I think it's more about education than income.
Generally wealthier areas have a better educated population.
if you have large companys shrink you will have small bussinesses increase to meet the demand for labor. small businesses suffer most when large bussinesses monopolize on both the workforce and the consumer base. as the workforce shrinks, the company shrinks, it cant afford to reach as many consumers, consumers in areas that cant be reached rely on local small businesses. fluctuations within the market have a weaker effect on the economy when you have less monopoly, this creates a more stable local envirnment where people settle closer to where they are born, communitys grow stronger, this reinforces birthrates, this feeds back into the economy and you see a new boom as businesses try to meet the demands for work and production.
the monkey wrench in this process is outsourcing and foreign labor which is used to prevent this process because it means there is a period of depreciation for large bussinesses and they have the power to try and do anything possible to prevent perceived loses
this is compounded by the welfair state
when businesses are free to do whatever they want without limit they are free to choose who benefits from their system. if the population has a problem their natural instincts to help their fellow man will be overcome by a need for survival and its easy to justify the slow neglect of your native population for another by thinking your just treating all humans the same
i needed that dugamar thank you
lmao yes thank you
Did I troll gud?
you didnt troll
you made a valid point
and he couldnt handle it
<:vallekek:444556527660040203>
I got a good chuckle.
Is he trying to shame you for having only a few friends? What a jerk. A racist jerk, apparently.
I hate Twitter. ๐
followers aren't friends
he knew the only way to stop people seeing it was to delete his own tweet.
I got 5 likes on it in just a few minutes
it worked, nobody will see it now, lol
I'm "harassing" him, by making literally the EXACT same accusation he made against Elon Musk... except mine was MORE accurate, lol. And I'M the troll?
What a douche.
welcome to twitter
where everyone is an asshole
How do people even watch Infowars I cringed at that video so hard I couldn't make it through. We are really in dire need of alternative news if that is what people watch that mistrust established media....
yet our supreme exalted cabinet leaders all seem oblivious to that
(((ROTHSCHILD)))
fkin jews amirite
@LEER Yeah, I don't know how people regularly sit through entire videos. I've also wondered how many take Jones seriously, and how many are simply entertained by his antics.
Didnโt she shame delete this?
lmao
wow that is projecting
"oh yeah, the last star wars movie was divisive, this one has had a major troubled development.... it must be because of race. nothing else."
starwars was already dead to me after 8 so this is just rot
same
agreed
i'll take a look at it through a streaming site to decide if it is good or bad.
that said, despite being a bit more predictable than it needed to be, i didn't think rogue one was all that bad
moviewise? no
Lorewise, it screwed over Kyle Katarn's main contribution to the Rebels
unforgivable
well they did throw out the EU
and i don't blame them, there is some major crap out there in the EU
theres many things wrong and crap about the SW EU
But Kyle Katarn wasn't one of them ๐
The Thrawn Trilogy is awesome as well
and Darth Plagueis
Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis The Wise?
it's a great freaking story that the idiots at Disney didn't like
Thrawn is pretty much cannon now, and no one but Timothy Zahn seems to be allowed to really write him. and this is all for the good
yup
I like the Thrawn novel that came out last year
It's not a story DISNEY would tell you.
haha ๐
looking forward to this one as well
aw jesus
it's not fake, is it?
you know shits gone down the drain
when you cant tell anymore
is the kid fined that?
@Dr.Wol i knew shit was going down the drain when i couldn't figure out which article in a line-up was from the onion
@Grenade123
(The joke)
You
Box office flops are a good thing.
finiing for bullying, isn't that fining for free speech
ahh thaat's not US
haha
wait, it does exist
ugh
(insert shit thing) hereโs why itโs a good thing. Am I a journalist now?
media publications are dying a slow and painful death - and that's a good thing. That IS how this headline generator works, right?
You have to put a shitty thing in the title not a good thing.
last jedi was released - and that's a good thing. better?
(seriously: i don't think media publications going out of business is a good thing, them doing their f**king job would be)
Well they arenโt doing their job so the next best thing is them going out of business.
last jedi wasent a flop
though it was a failure for public perception
last jedi was a flop, because it turned people away from the franchise
Its good sales stem from people not being ruined by force awakens yet
yeah thats not how flops are defined though
i agree thats what happened, its just not how the words are used
last jedi was not in the flop in the sense that it did not make its mone back, its worse: its a flop in the sense that it reduced the amount of money made by every single movie released in the franchise that will come out in the future - see solo.
in the long run it would have been more profitable for disney to to decide to not release the move the day before the premiere.
(except if they decide to just not release any more star wars movies of course)
i tend to refure to that as "it killed the series" rather than using a specific term that actually means something else. im not a grammer nazi im a diction nazi
<:GWnanamiSataniaEvil:407589583404924928>
HH dropping the truth bombs
also joshuatopolsky
of engaget
the verge
etc
its not that i dont want to live on this planet anymore, its more that i dont think i live on the same planet anymore
reading "its the jews, brother" in hogans voice is pricesless.
The HH almost gave me a heart attack, until I relized that were his initials...
what the hell else would hh mean?
lol
heil buddha
Can be a neonazi dog whistle in germany, having 88 or HH somewhere... but I don't hink Hogan meant it like that
But you bet there will be some stories about that in some newspaper :D
Roseanne, a number one tv show, the first in years for ABC, has been canceled over supposedly racist tweets.
http://archive.today/h4jla
i still want a recording of "its the jews, brother" in his voice. i need this on a sound board
my parents have HH at the beginning of their license plate
then again, so do 750k people living in the same city ๐
If I were Elon Musk, I would send my critics little statuettes of middle fingers carved out of Martian stone.
Yesโฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ
@ZetaBlues Some lawmaker in Pennsylvania wants to fine the parents of bullies. http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/378180-pennsylvania-state-lawmaker-to-propose-fining-parents-if-their-child-is
I'm not sure how I feel about that. It might be a really good or really bad idea.
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 81/343
| Next