shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 70/343
| Next
I used to disclaim humanity on a personal level, too.
also, out of curiosity, are you black, Arch?
im not spanish im egyptian
Spanish?
its a highlander reference
Ah.
Well, that was lost on me. I didn't watch Highlander (as much as I should have)
im a scottish german mix
Ah. I wasn't asking for a full pedigree, I was just wondering at-a-glance.
whitey!
you seemed to have a unique take on the black ghetto.
i kinda just listen to them and take what they say for granted
honestly, any sort of ghetto is problematic.
by definition, a ghetto is an exclusionary community.
what about an abandoned ghetto? ๐ค
yeah i dont think the ghetto is a good thing
Well, the Ghetto was originally a Jewish thing.
but i dont think the solution is as simple as "well stop the moms from getting food"
I do think the solution is as easy as that, particularly in the cities. Don't give them currency for food. Give them food.
i mean their wellfair provides them everything if they dont work
and they dont work
i don't think its a single-fix solution either,
But right now it doesn't work AND it strains everyone else who pays taxes
And as its set right now, theres no goal of improvement because these people have little incentive to
give welfare for the able-bodied a wind-down period
lets say, food stamps.
For a certain period, you're eligible for food stamps
they are deoendent on us. cold turkey is not the solution to this dependency when 4 of the 5 needs are what the dependency meets
after that period is up, you're instead sent staples.
Rice, beans, potatoes. Not left to die, but not left comfortable.
but thats the issue, they're dependent on us, and our current solution to it, is to give them more of the same, so they become MORE dependent
The next worse thing to an addict is an enabler.
you are kinda assuming jobs will just spring out of nowhere in these poor communitys where no ones spending enough money for jobs to exist and then your lowering how much money people have till they need jobs
Which poor communities are we talking about?
you know, the ghetto ones
Those are usually in the inner cities.
High crime and high population go hand-in-hand.
That's not to say smaller populations can't have problems
but in a big city, work is usually available. Especially right now.
Right now, we're in a deficit for employees
it actually isint a 1:1 ratio if you consiter europe
I live in Texas. Service stations are willing to pay $13/h if they can just get the employees.
its more high wealth inequality high crime
they're only obligated to 7.25
and citys are wear wealth inequality is most distinct
because you have the rich who own the city living with the poor that cant own the countryside
If you're making $30,000 sustaining yourself, I promise you, you generally don't worry too much about someone making 200,000.
Higher income does not lead to higher happiness.
There's a certain median income of comfort.
the poor can't afford things because they're being forced to pay a lot "for their own good" etc
anyway
shit like Obamacare's individual mandate and the like.
(SO GLAD that's gone!)
that, and the fact taxes are generally higher in states with large metropolitans
i legitamently think the inital reaction to having less money the ghetto will have is to steal
so your solution is to strain the taxpayer by forcing them to pay-off these criminals,
Who still steal regardless
If it kept crime rates low, i'd be right there with ya
sure but you dont have confruntations with people with guns
you wont have more criminals than police officers
The core issue is that those who leave the intellectual plantation and try to strike out for themselves are ridiculed.
I've heard it said that the true white privilege is not being expected to think a certain way.
And it strikes me as true
as we're the ones who have been set up as the strawman for other groups to hate.
The criminals are still there, you just pay them before they draw a gun on you,
They still rob you regardless that way
And Rye, you refer to the issue of "acting white"
i think you should ween them off wellfair but you need to fix the people your forcing to live a normal life who dont know what normal is who have a 40% rate of not knowing how to read or write
'Race Traitors', 'Uncle Toms', and 'Coons'.
They've got racial epithets for them.
yes, that is a huge issue for them
Even Michele Wolf at the White House Correspondence Dinner went through a list of possible names to call a 'woman who disappoints other women'
likening it to a term like Uncle Tom.
You can counter that with Memes though,
If being "gangsta" and "from the hood" etc is considered gay/loser-ish
then black people wont want to be that ๐
Remember: The true OG was a white guy in miami, and black people stereotypically know that.
i thought the OG's were mobsters from Sicili Italy?
Eh, scarface is at LEAST a close second.
but Scarface was from New York, and ruled Chicago, not Miami
did he?
Scarface = Al Capone
ugh. I get that and Vice City mixed up.
sue me.
but you're right,
We should bring back mafia slang
call everyone a "Friend of ours" and give people new shoes
and bring back wiseguys
Should we also tell the local gangbanger that they're culturally appropriating?
I'm well overcooked. I need to go to bed.
we should give them our regards instead
and go sleeppeh
Off to take a dirt nap, then.
Is it bad that I consider a girl who appreciates their Second Amendment right especially attractive?
No.
Tim said in his video 2 hours ago at 33:05 that there was a video that showed 73 instance of Antifa attacking people who were not Nazis. I can't locate the video. Does anyone know where I can find it?
I'm thinking that's a video he's working on.
I just watched an entire video from 'Peter coffen'. He was attempting to criticize JBP. Anyone else watch that one?
(not a recommendation, BTW)
no
if I saw something from him I would probably run in the opposite direction
if you've ever taken one look at his Twitter
I didn't. His video came up automatically.
I caught where he was going, decided to hear him out
And I got... Opinions... Of that guy.
I listened to it halfway through, remembered I'm youtube red now and need to be more responsible with my viewing, finished anyway.
Hey wondering. The gaza "protests", how many dead so far.
Hamas claims they lost 50 members
@RyeNorth Did you see the ContraPoints video on JBP? I liked it. Entertaining/informative.
No. I didn't.
Lunatic.
and when they do representation, the comics don't sell.
I lost any respect I had for him as an opposing voice the moment he said in the video I watched that he actively deletes comments he doesn't like.
I mean, I heard his whole rant out. Then he became a hypocrite. Then he became a censoring hypocrite.
Nah, there's east germany on there at 2018. There's even less Free Speech there than in the West
that's big antifa territory and neonazi territory at the same time.
๐ค
makes sense. one knows how to dilligently work and keep fit, able to hold his own, the other is lazy and wants to be pampered
So there's a chemical means of political control?
Before this decade is out we will see mainstream publications advocating voluntary castration.
Not merely vasectomy, but complete removal of the testes.
but have you consitered the chad national socialist?
removal of the testes is not chemical
@Atkins if you account some websites popular with the left as "mainstream publications", i'm pretty sure some of those already have suggested castration
@Neja damages the production of testosterone, which is chemical
What is Tim's opinion on onions ๐ณ
that sounds like a bunch of bias research tbh
i eat onions all the time and i havent seen much effect
onions are in a lot of diets, and by diet i dont mean thing that you do to lose weight but the actual defintion
because they make food taste better
wait, this doesn't specify anything so does that mean it increases sperm production in females O.o
it just says genitals
i believe it
You can't really take one study as the truth. That doesn't mean you can't consider it either.
Also,
>TFW female and like eating onions
How come I haven't jizzed yet
onions: humans way to reproduce by budding
iron actually has more to do with ejacing
anyway moving on
have you done personal research into this?
4chan said only raw onions tho ๐ณ
@Grenade123 dude, you reverse the causality. testes produce testosterone, hence the name. it's not chemical castration when you physically remove the production facilities. it's chemical castration when you inhibit or destroy the testes with chemicals while they still remain in your body. chemical castration is not defined solely by the result of having less chemicals produced by the glands. sort your causality out
ive never been into castranix's. not my fetish
Switching to another topic, considering the recent BS with Spotify refusing to promote certain artists they don't like, I decided to look for another streaming service, and I gotta say. Deezer's not half-bad.
Oh god I hoped no one noticed that typo
But yeah, I'm gonna shill for Deezer for those who want to get off of Spotify
i like this reaction image
i will steal it for meme purpose
you may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_BlPHmfHnnI4/S8QV97PZJQI/AAAAAAAAC3U/kTuIBUt-NAk/s1600/shrek-forever-after-movie-image-18.jpg
onions coming in with 4% of your daily protine for the win
and not really a good source of any vitamines or minerals
good diatary fiber though
more fiber than calorys so it could potentally kill you if it was all you ate
truely the miracle food
ARE YOU GUYS **AWARE** ? ๐ณ
im disapoint that there is no "vaccines" "florine" "monsanto" or "gay frogs" there
or psychic pedophile vampires
im curious about this dragon court
i do like dragons
also kinda surprized theres no "kkk" either
ANOTHER ONE ๐ณ
do love me some elusive cock goblins
i disagree with the catigorization but i give props for the thouroughness
Something along the lines of 'Furfags are generally a bunch of lefitst cucks so it's more like they're severely biased and shit'
What about Nazifurs?
Ironicly a lot of "left furs" are also getting Banned
Friendly Fire
I bet at some point FA will ban big boobs too, because misogyny and objectification blahblah
their CoC is swelling with hard "progressive" bullshit, so that should be on the horizon
it's just so weird to see a fetish art site include more and more of the restrictive authoritarian politics that eventually have to lead to the very puritanism of the authoritarian left. i guess it's run by the sex-positive kind though, for now
shadbase for life?
I don't care for Shadman's art, but I do have to give him credit for not giving a fuck about who he pisses off with his art.
I'm trying to think of the very concept of a sex-negative furry and it just doesn't compute. Unrestricted intimacy is just such a vital part of the fandom I can't even.
its a weird time
i have met a furry who wasent sex positive for psychological reasons once but i think thats another thing completely
in a time of true chaos, nothing makes sense
furries must be eliminated
i consiter humans to be furries though
im fine with killing all anthropamorphized ww2 bombers though
is that the new silent hill?
I heard the T-pose is wacist now
You know that the taur-supremacy will eliminate us all anyway
Everything is sexist
everything is racist
everything is homophobic
you're sexist
and it's up to fourchan to point it all out. ๐
euthanize yourself
@Neja Testosterone is the chemical they were talking about. Lower the testosterone level relative to estrogen levels to make men more feminine. That is the chemical method. There are a few way to do this, one would be injecting estrogen, another would be castration.
castrations has a very different meaning to a metal eating lifeform
castrations has a very different meaning to a metal eating lifeform
tmw discord totally loses its shit when your trying to share a dumb dad level joke
it happens T_T
@Grenade123 Sorry to be so blunt but your understanding of this matter is very halfwitted.
"Lower the testosterone level relative to estrogen levels to make men more feminine." You don't even know what the estrogen levels of human females are, or you wouldn't phrase it that dumb.
Castration is not a chemical method. It has hormon level changing effects because the bloody T-factory is gone. That is a physical process. You then get the expectable results and therefore should substitute testosterone; when we speak of "chemical castration" we refer of the destruction of the T-factories, the testes. In both cases you don't have functioning testes anymore. That is the castration; not the resulting hormonal levels as you framed it. Hence reversed causality on your part
im trying to find the origin of this castration conversation just to figure out what its actually about
First it came up in recent memory was in a conversation with a dyslexic natsoc promoting eugenics.
'Eugenicist, castrate thyself.'
weird fetishes these ethnonationalists have
There is no fun without nonsense
this just isint really a good punishment for a government system to hand out, lowers your lifespan unless you take hormone suppliments because both testosterone and estrogen are vital chemicals in the natural homeostasus of humans. additionally it doesent stop the problem it only stops repeat offences, has no consiterations for the psychological effects that could lead to creating worse behavure. and it doesent stop first offences just like the death penalty doesent stop first offences
You seem to be rather invested in this topic, Neja, what's your interest?
doesent really work with the idea of creating productive members of society
The crux of the argument the person I was debating the matter with was one of genetic fatalism.
@RyeNorth I'm what the neomarxists would call "TrueScum".
MtF with the real issue and a deep interest in the science of this crap because I wanted for life of me understand this crap and find a different solution
They were saying that criminality is genetic. Their intent wasn't to rehabilitate, it was to eliminate faulty genes.
i kinda think then if they were saying "castration" and "chemical" they were using code of zyclon b
I was politically active for the past ten years, party work; we were very science/facts oriented back then, until the activists and other corrupt and corrupting people flooded the fun and then you get accused of and being dismissed as just another white cis male who wouldn't understand the problems of transgenders (transtrenders without dysphoria), while they just didn't know that you had the real issue, just didn't tell anyone... but I digress. Rough enough background?
I mean, nobody here really counts oppression points, that's not what I was getting at.
But yeah, it clarifies why the topic seems to touch a nerve.
"criminality *is* genetic" is the phrasing that leads to dangerous legislation by dumb people and tyrants alike. That there're hereditary components to criminality is the more precise phrasing. Having hereditary markers doesn't mean that they manifest themselves. Like Psychopathy, which also has hereditary, genetic, elements to it, it does need to be "triggered" to take effect.
Well, the genes that they're looking at refer to 'violent tendencies'.
The thing is, violence can manifest itself in multiple ways.
When you think of violence, you think of assault, murder, things like that
you Racist cause you like Racing Games
Eh, I'm not here for oppression points, to the contrary. It was just really eye-opening to be accused of something based on the fact that I merely asked questions about retarded positions like "We want to give the trans extra bathrooms!" - Why? To make them feel more excluded, like they're invalids and need a special handicapped bathrooms, while actually they might just want to be treated normal and not even be noticed? - you get the transphobe label for that. I asked back then if they even asked transsexuals, and that was the worst trigger for them.
the bathroom issue has always been weird to me. no one stands infront of a bathroom checking your drivers loisence
I know that's the truth. In general, unless someone's trying to actively prove a point, they generally just want to be left alone.
there's a huge chasm between those who want to get extra special treatment all the time, and the least of them have actual gender dysphoria; and the ones who just want to live a "normal as much" life and go unnoticed. the latter just don't sacrifice their functioning life where noone knows they're trans. Because why the fuck would you tell that to anyone but the inevitable closest ones?
I know way too many of the "in hiding" (for lack of a better word atm), transsexuals, to believe in any way that all these loudmouths have anything profound to say about us, much less speak for us
it does kinda bug me to be refered to as having a mental disorder though
there's a really good statement about all of that by Jordan B Peterson actually, in an interview from summer last year. I name that because he basically regurgitates what I (and probably some of the others who wrote him) wrote to him regarding that issue, just in a more sophisticated and concise manner. Was really lifting a weight off my shoulders to hear that
well, yeah... @Arch-Fiend It is certainly an anomaly at least, and it causes problems. To find less unnerving terminology for that, is a side issue to me... I'm already autistic, and had to learn to cope with that so ๐
I think it was somewhere around the middle of this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YC1pvjyKYr4 But I'm not sure
I mean, "Mental Disorder" is pretty watered down
Considering that it can be anything from ADHD, Autism, Dyslexia, Schitzophrenia
well to me ive never had a negitive experince with it. though ive remained hidden so far. but in having never had a negitive experince i have a juxtiposition when its refered to as a disorder because my life feels more order this way
yeah... I understand the term as "some neuronal parts are fucking some things up", which is true for most people actually ๐ In this case some parts of the brain just... decided to develop into the wrong direction
It kind of comes down to just differences.
technically it IS the brain that's wrong, because the body just follows the genetic blueprint. Brain development, sadly, isn't just bound to that though
I've got ADHD and OCD (which, for the most part, I control and use as tools)
So, I mean, having a psychologist call things disorders is one thing.
It's a completely different thing when someone starts using the term politically.
A good friend of mine, one of the first people I told about my issue, surprised me with him having it too, just that he never told anyone. is the best family father i've met. and the awesomeness of his family (which is some luck too of course) really balances that out
hey, if the dysphoria isn't plagueing you too much really, I'd suggest trying the non-transitional route in life <.<" a functioning loving family can alleviate a lot of the subtle pain the dysphoria causes
my message didint get through
"theres also a bit of an existental question to whether sanity exists and mental order is even a real thing consitering what is a "typical" brain anyway? there arnt really perfect specimines of any creature because beyond clones no living thing is exactly the same as another outside incredible low probability"
I mean, JBP kinda touches on that pretty frequently, too.
yeah, essentially you could say that everything deviating from the statistical average, the normal, is a disorder, even a positive thing. There are positive sides to autism, if you're lucky and really just a high functioning one with few detriments. It happens in many math and physics and IT departments of universities. and yeah, OCD can have positive effects too, if channeled properly ๐
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 70/343
| Next