(A commandment) Not to give occasion to the simple-minded to stumble on the road (Lev. 19:14) (this includes doing anything that will cause another to sin) (CCN76).

(A Commandment) Not to castrate the male of any species; neither a man, nor a domestic or wild beast, nor a fowl (Lev. 22:24) (CCN143).

Hey, I think everyone would be aight with thatb

Seems like that would be at odds with religious judaism.

Shit, I gotta head to bed. Seeya man.

(A Commandment) Not to commit sodomy with a male (Lev. 18:22) (CCN116).

Seems like these two groups should be getting along a lot better than they do is all I'm saying.

weed is fine in moderation

and it works wonders in medicinal scenarios

Easy solution to controlled substances.

All significant mind-altering substances are legal.

bingo

In a court of law, willful use of significant mind-altering substances, when proven, may take the place of 'Mens Rea'

I.E. if you can prove someone willingly got drugged out of their mind, you need not prove intent.

You did drugs, drove down the sidewalk, and killed people?

You think you weren't responsible for it?

Guess again, bucko. It's not manslaughter, it's murder.

We need a return to personal responsibility.

That's just my opinion on that.

@RyeNorth you are kind of misconstrueing a lot

I mean, I don't know that much about Christianity

but I know enough

(and the only relevant sects are Catholicism and Orthodoxy)

you know, like, it's not just sola fide, tradition plays a role too, which they were granted the permission to do

and also jesus made a new covenant with humanity so many of the old commands were made obsolete.

it's still really useful to understand judaism and the culture to get deeper in it but it's def. not essential

@WHAT Can you specify which old commandments were made obsolete?

Or where Jesus made this new covenant with humanity that bypasses Jewish law?

literally all over the new testament

Then it should be easy to cite.

ill just link a page with all of it that i found

http://www.christianbiblereference.org/faq_OldTestamentLaw.htm

"The teachings of Jesus, the Council of Jerusalem, and other New Testament teachings (John 1:16-17, Acts 13:39, Romans 2:25-29, 8:1-4, 1 Corinthians 9:19-21, Galatians 2:15-16, Ephesians 2:15) make it clear that Christians are not required to follow the Old Testament rules about crimes and punishments, warfare, slavery, diet, circumcision, animal sacrifices, feast days, Sabbath observance, ritual cleanness, etc."

and I'm no biblical scholar, heck, I'm agnostic, and I bet there are certain rules that are still followed and some that aren't. But the best blanket statement is that Jesus released people from the old law

Well, I mean, aside from the fact that it's in the bible that no prophet should ever take away, nor add to the commandment... It's incredibly likely that a lot of this is poorly translated.

I mean, I can give examples of poor translations within the new testament.

And I don't just mean 'Decearing Egg Preparation' levels of poor translation.

I mean things that weren't understood at the time that translations were made.

For instance, Matthew 26:34 refers to a rooster in the NIV.

Concerning Peter's denial of Jesus, he says that he will disown Jesus three times before the rooster crows.

In the area where this biblical event occurs, there would historically not be any fowl kept there. No roosters would be within range to be heard.

that's such a lame point, I mean, seriously

It's really not, though.

It's an example of the flaws in translation.

nobody has said anything about taht

that

What that line is actually referring to is the temple crier, because the words in their original translations are the same.

literally, I can't find anyone talking about what you're saying

i did just find what you are saying

and the word literally also translates to man

so it would be, if anything, a failure in modern translation.

And yet, in any cinematic retelling of the event

You find Peter deny Jesus three times, and then a rooster crows.

a failure which is completely inconsequential because no doctrine lies on the fact of whether a rooster crowed or not

It's funny how these things work themselves into perpetuation.

6 But now Jesus has obtained a superior ministry, since the covenant that he mediates is also better and is enacted on better promises. 7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second. 8 For he finds fault with them when he says: "Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, 9 not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt. For they did not continue in my covenant, and so I showed no concern for them, declares the Lord. 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 11 And they shall not teach, each one his neighbor and each one his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,' for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. 12 For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more." 13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
-Hebrews 8: 6-13

I was about to post that @Deller

It is actually in the Bible that Christians are not to be beheld to the old covenants with God, and that we were forming a New Covenant with Christ

yup

Whether you want to take it as fact, translation error, or however you want to interpret it is up to you, but it is there

Jesus established this New Covenant during the last supper when he served the first Eucharist

I went through 12 years of the catholic school system where religious studies were weighed equally with Math, Science, and History. I may not like organized religion, but I very much understand it.

Well, I'll concede that this is past my understanding, and past my curfew to actually do further research (work in 5 hours)

gotta get that cheddat

cheddar

So that fake news law here? Can be jailed for u p to 6 years. New govt wants to abolish it so thats good.

Irony is that the previous govt wanted to suppress pro opposition news, but now the current govt can now use it to suppress pro current opposition if they wanted to.

assume any laws passed are designed to jail or incriminate current opposition to the party responsible for drafting or passing the bill.

https://s.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/weta_alistairguns1.jpg

@wacka yeah, but it can spew bullets well

Gimme

Gimme gimme gimme

The Gaza Strip Tennis Tournament, Is really taking off this year..

It's very ironic that many leftists are on a huge nazi hunt but somehow support this.

while i agree with the meme, i wonder how many people know that the scene that character is in is an example of them acting irrationally because reality is contradicting what they learned dispite reality actually acting unrealistic in that episode too

yeah

most of the time I've seen that meme it's with a hint of irony or absurdity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZwkPQIjg8g

Owen is great.

i met someone today who has said that adyne paladin was never doxed

so i cant meet anyone worse today

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/420670122328326144/444847930831011840/1525925344123.jpg?width=573&height=573

So how many dead so far?

Remember pallywood is a thing

>antifa

>libertarian

HAhahaha

Ayden paladin was doxed so hard you could find out everything public.. but there wsssnt much embarassing stuff there so they made shit up instead

The undoxables

Hitler was authoritarian center

yet he's on the Authoritarian Right in the graph

Antifa on the Libertarian Left is just ridiculous too

That graph isn't accurate regardless.

It should be turned 45 degrees.

that would be more accurate for most but the nazi one

I mean like

In general, not in relation to the edit.

https://i.imgur.com/QpSHUkH.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/2QlfFEx.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIbg7oiXECE

lel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2f5e_VgZkY&t=0s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORp3q1Oaezw

TED

I'm subbed to them just to dislike videos, pretty much

i like that video

the more venomous SJW types could learn something from that

Daryl Davis is an amazing person. He has a documentary out, Accidental Courtesy, on Netflix about how he's convinced a bunch of Ex Klansmen to leave the Klan by befriending them. This world needs more people like Daryl who actually want to end racism with kindness & not hate

Wow.. that video was good

I'm astonished the lefties let him speak at TED

There's a TED talk by at-that-time Dutch commander-in-chief about how his tool of choice to better the world is the gun

I saw that one too

There are some great Ted talks out there. Funny ones too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjhS72-KATs

https://youtu.be/dJlu6tuVZ28

the dm of the D&D group im in made a picture of our party today i wanted you guys to see it 😄 https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/419595025396269058/446083926365044736/623.png?width=770&height=444

we need a hobby text channel

I want to nerd out and shill my gay art but it feels wrong to do it in the shitposting channel

the look on that elf's face

im that elf xD

"don't touch me"

thust me if you knew the shit that big fucker does, that face could never discribe it

trust*

well he looks like a big dumb fighter

barbarian actually

difference?>

lmao

more specialized

i know the actual difference

i was joking

i play myself

hes basicly the star of the party if only because hes absolutely insane, and hes the noob

oh good

Leroy then?

he makes leroy look like a pussy

oh shit XD

sounds like a headache

hes not smart enough to be as sane as leroy

sounds the like exact type of person my usual rogue would send in to distract everyone, then go off an steal something

were having 2 sessions this week because last week he was temporarly exiled from the party for trying to be diplomatic with a necromancer we had prisoner by trying to insenuate the necromancer was a necrophile then AoO's him when he turns his back then brings him back to contiousness with a health potion then chases him down and hacks him with an axe to below 0hp AGIAN then trys to hide the body then lies about doing it when the party shows up a few seconds later

he did this infront of another party member who later squeels to the rest of the party

what the hell

okay, look 110% warranted

negitive int mod negitive wisdom, chaotic """""""good"""""""

our 3 options were kill him, put him on a leash, or send him on a "finding yourself" quest that will probably kill him

i would vote for the leash thing

make him your attack dog

as did i

like a police canine

but the latter seemed to fit what worked best with the party

"there is a person you don't like. go get him boy! go get him!"

the problem was he was in this middle ground between a normal person and sloth from the goonys where he can still argue for self determination just every once in a while he is a psychopath

not retarded enough to have on a leash not sane enough to leave around children

or anyone for that matter

need to put him on another plane where he can go around killing shit as he pleases, then you can just call him in for a fight

also he always rolls high on charisma checks, except ironicly the one time he was charmed

why has not murdered the party yet?

i keep trying to get him to attack one so that we can justify killing him but his player is wise enough to recognize in every fight the party has been in, we are the ones still alive at the end of them

i must admit recently ive become a devil on his shoulder specificly to ramp up his fatalism

lmao

mention every time he can attack of oppertunity random bistandards, every time he can get a cleave attack on his fellow party members

hopefully this will either get him killed or give the rest of the party the oppertunity to have him change his character just slightly enough to stop risking us all being arrested

Feminsim BTFO

Impossible.

Just saying.

I was in to it, then I suddenly hated Anime.

2 nukes weren't enough

I mean, he's not wrong about the EFF and the Black Panthers.

I just wish he'd realize that the alt-right is reactionary, not revolutionary - that Identity politics unites, emboldens, and entrenches your enemies.

I told you I'm not alt-right, I'm a national socialist.

are you not an ethno-nationalist?

Yes I think that nations should be homogeneous.

So you fall under the alt-right umbrella.

The thing with ethno-nationalists is they think once we make the west all white again all our problems will be fixed which isn't true.

I'm not a Christian. I just go to church on sunday, believe Jesus is our lord and savior, pray to god on a daily basis...

Don't put your labels on me.

Also, socialism has been tried. It doesn't work.

but rye, this time it'll be REAL socialism!

I can see where the confusion comes from but the alt-right and national socialists both think that the should be all white but we disagree about how our countires should be run.

Altright : Christian :: NatSoc : Lutheran

National socialism isn't communism.

Communism doesn't exist.

Socialism is the road taken to Communism.

which is never reached, since it can't

I can agree with how you defined it Rye. We are like different denominations.

But that still makes you alt-right.

True but like different groups of christians we dissagree about alot of things.

Oh, certainly.

I mean, the Irish were literally blowing each other up over disagreements.

So, what are your solutions PAST the removal of undesirables, then?

I think the alt-right dosen't describe enough about the factions.

White nationalism, insane political philosophies.

I don't want to use terrorism like the Irish.

checks out.

Got a problem with the irish, m8?

White nationalists think that once the west is all white it will be all good which I don't think.

The Irish are fine.

You've said that.

What are the problems you foresee?

Alot of things is there anything in particular you want me to talk about?

I mean, I just opened the floor for you to sell me a brand of socialism. What's your utopia, and how do you get there?

🍿

I'm not a person who belives in Utopia. I just think national socialism is the best system. I think that because it worked quite well before WW2.

Germany was cured of the Grate depression in two years while it took America almost ten years.

That's an anecdote.

What are you proposing?

Or do you actually not know anything about core mechanics of the ideal you spout?

Look up the Reinhard plan the numbers don't lie. Germany got seven million people back to work in two years.

Bruh, with dodges that good, you need to take up boxing.

Dodging in a setting here, though? Kinda weak.

This video outlines what they did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r9Z-hTn1r4&bpctr=1526451522

I didn't ask for a video

So what do you want?

Rye North - Today at 12:39 AM
You've said that.
What are the problems you foresee?(edited)

Rye North - Today at 12:45 AM
That's an anecdote.
What are you proposing?


Oh, I don't know.

I was showing that it worked once so it could work again.

I didn't ask if your plan works

I asked what your plan is.

I didn't ask you to link me shit about your plan

My plan is to organize with people who think like me and organize a political movement.

I asked you what the tenants of your plan are, past exterminating or eliminating those who are 'inferior'.

During that period, Germany just had Hitler- one leader.

Sure, you can find that one guy who's *heart is in the right place* (can't believe I'm saying that), but he's going to have to retire one day. And then you need another ruler.

And then there's a dice roll. Do you get a good guy, or do you get a bad one?

A good leader in a good system will only maintain and improve. A single bad one will bring your entire system crashing down. Just one is all it takes.

This is why "communism" fails. One crazy guy gets into power. It's simply inevitable, and it's effects are irreversable.

Hitler's heart was never in the right place. his brain, however, found it's place splattered on a wall.

Here is what I would do if I ran say America.

mostly meant that for aussie's perspective

My comment was mostly for my own enjoyment.