shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 58/343
| Next
If this weren't in the US, I'd say that the courts had much more serious issues to weigh judgments on.
There are people saying some *very bad* things on twitter, these days.
I mean, if you hang your memorial on someone else's property, you can't really get mad when they tear it down and tell you to gtfo.
you're basically vandalizing their property if you don't get permission first
"Aw, man. Tim's about to zoom in again, I can just feel it. Gotta clean up for my close-up!" ~ Betsy
Is Betsy his cat?
Cuz I noticed sometimes during his videos the camera veers off to the right and zooms in on that cat on the couch
Emily's, I think.
Tim should start a video with the cat under his beanie
Or he can get a seperate "cat" beanie for the cat
Betsy definitely needs her own beanie.
good idea, Tim should just fill his appartment with beanies on all the furniture
add 1 beanie per video
circle around his chair, charressing a beanie and going "ah, viewers, i've been expecting you"
Ooh, sounds ominous. ๐ค
nah just potential beanie-madness ๐
Tim getting a beanie for his beanie
a vid where its the beanie presenting the news, and Tim isn't in the picture
the beanie changing after every cut to some news story
isn't it "ah, viewers, i knew you'd come"? ๐
no clue ๐
Oh, the beanie's talking now? Wouldn't you miss Tim?
Tim IS the beanie
the body he's controlling is a guy called Huan Huamanoz
๐
Okay, I'm new to this storyline, lol.
Tim the beanie is a beanie that can control the mind of whoever wears him
and he will use those host bodies to report news
liek how Superman is Clarke Kent, the reporter
So he's currently a dude named Huan? Are you making this up as you go, or is it well-known background info around here? ๐
Both
the Huan part i made up,
That Tim is a mind-control beanie is a bit more common
from a rumor i started ๐
Now that you mention it, I seem to remember some references in the YT comments.
So what you're saying is you're a troublemaker. ๐
i'm a human on the internet, nothing more needs to be said ๐
Gotcha.
Every time I try to call a government agency, sit through half an our of menus and being put on hold and bounced between departments, only to finally get someone that speaks English as a second language...
...the more I want that ethnostate.
during those times i wish i was Stalin
There is a new fad going around involving clear coffins.
Results? Remains to be seen.
<:Kappa:327142715592540171>
I was about to ask what that circle was on the picture you posted
I just remembered.
So a buddhist monk walks up to a hotdog stand and says "make me one with everything."
So why did the half blind man fall into the well?
He couldn't see that well.
So a dyslexic man walks into a bra...
Lol, we need more Hitler trap ecchi for trolling purposes.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/345659033971326996/367200478993580042/Steve1.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/345659033971326996/367200480276905994/Steve2.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/345659033971326996/367200481589854211/Steve3.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/345659033971326996/367200483426697216/Steve4.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/345659033971326996/367200484290854913/Steve5.png
What was that saying? The fox with no tail telling the others to cut theirs?
Actually not a saying, a fable
i dunno, a saying is "A fox might lose its tail, but not its tricks"
Lmao
You can't run, he knows everything about you
I am immune to the Zucc's robomagic
***I have no Facebook account***
they track you on everything that has a like/share JS
the joke
you
That's why I use firefox loaded up with script and cookie blockers and such.
communication is key
this place is dead enough for me to leave
I don't even understand why I ever got mod in the first place
@Timcast YouTube's captions seems to think you are talking about some kind of anti-furry network or something
those damn furries
we need an anti-fur international network!
Plz no
jim did it
the absolute mad man
mad laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad
ah thanks, a link to gab, your putting the barrel in my mouth me for ๐
well their agenda is pretty damn obvious now
It's funny how these 'chemical attacks' keep happening at the most convenient of times.
And just like before, when I saw footage of the responders to this 'chemical attack', I couldn't help but notice their complete and utter lack of protective equipment, especially even something as minor as wearing *gloves* while washing the 'chemicals' off of children.
tbh, I never believed any of the chemical attacks weren't inside jobs in some way
all of them were convenient and with odd reporting
convenient, at the perfect time, by the "boogieman" and oddly unexplainable
eeyup.
<:eeyup:327220779576066049>
horseshoe theory confirmed
*Sigh.*
are we done for @JadenFrostwolf
Nah
Russia will bitch a little but not do much more besides that.
is this spec ops the line
are we the "heroes"
Let the regime change which will eventually lead to another islamic caliphate begin, I guess.
ironically i just finished spec ops the line
jesus
Nah this attack wasn't targeting a regime change. Just chemical weapons facilities. If it was I might be more upset.
"Chemical Weapons Facilities", yeah.
So what do you think they were targeting?
dident syria give their chemical weapons over to the un a few years ago?
you know because the un is earth mom and "i learned it by watching you" isint an excuse that will fly
UN seems to be pretty bad at what it does in general.
even if it was syria, and not more likely the usa funded isis, then i still say who gives a fuck
its not the job of the united states to fuck around with this sort of niggatry. dispite having done it for the last 30 years
this is the most meaningless war weve ever been in, and we went to war with spain once for sinking our own ship
Yeah the US needs to stop fighting everyone else's wars. Nobody can fix the world.
i think the vetrenes of the australian emu war probably think what were doing is retarded. atleast they saw that as an invasion and it was technicly on their territory
My real issue is that every time we intervene, things only get worse. Typically, governments get replaced by islamic caliphates which are just horrible, and *should* be the targets of regime changes.
But the US keeps going in and ruining these otherwise secular governments.
Did it get worse after the first time we fired missiles? I think it didn't change much. Expecting the same with this.
i dont even care about it getting worse, im american i hate being pushed into a war i dont care about
wars without meaning kill a nation's spirit
If it turns into a war then yeah I'm against it. Just don't think it will.
the fact you dont even see bombing someone as an act of war says a lot about the way the last 3 generations have been molded by the niggatry of the modern world
this is a war, america has so many wars that its hard to even call this a war but yes when you launch missiles on someone, kill people and destroy infastructure thats a war, its not just some kids playing with fireworks
the responce of most of these countrys that the usa bullycides just usually isint strong enough to call it a war unless the usa sends an invasion force. because the usa only fucks with nations far far far less equipt to actually retaliate in the same way
Hopefully this will be just like the last missile strike: all smoke and mirrors and the base in question getting back to being up and running within a day or two.
Kabuki theatre.
so wait, the dems and msm actually support this?
Well they hate Russia so attacking a Russian ally is something that I can see them being happy about.
but they hated russia as a plot device to cover up their incompetence at losing the election
Right but there are plenty of people who actually believe the whole Russiagate conspiracy.
savages
The mental gymnastics are crazy now. >Trump is attacking Syria which might start WWIII with Russia to distract people from his lawyer because he collided with Russia to help him get elected president
๐ค
well if you're in the mindset that Trump is an unstable narcissistic crazy person
that wouldn't be that weird
the fact people think a person like that would make it that far is insane though
@Arch-Fiend its not a "war" because it has not been declared so by... is it congress? the house? one of those. But that means nothing because some law change a while ago, around Vietnam or Korea, sometime around there, basically meant the president could do military action without it being "war"
instead its now just using military weapons to destroy things we don't like in "insignificant" countries.
in other words, so long as you are not bombing a country "who matters" its not really war evidently
The way I see it is it becomes war when both sides start attacking each other.
pretty much boils down to "Its not a war because we say its not" ๐
and when there is more than 2 sides, i believe its called a cluster fuck
and yes, exactly
it becomes war when theres an actual declaration of war by whatever side makes it to record history
well, because we say its not and because no one else says it is
basically if no one really important gives enough of a shit to call it an official war, then its not
which is why i doubt the syrian thing will result in more than syria being levelled in a US-Russia pissing match of "we dislike what you are doing here but don't give a shit enough to call this a real war."
i really don't think Russia or the US really have the balls to declare a real war. It much easier for them to just piss each-other off in a passive agressive way.
Especially over something as trivial as Syria.
the only problem is that passive aggressive on the scales of countries so large as the US and Russia it involves actual aggression.
but when, in the last like 30 years, has the US and Russia not been doing this exact same shit all the time?
To be fair, Missiles Launched isn't exactly passive.
"passive" in terms of not out right declaring war or attacking mainlands. Basically if there is not missiles landing in the US, Canada, the EU, Japan, Korea, or China, its passive aggressive.
Although I supported him, missile launches on Syria was not what I voted for Trump for, and really wish he'd stop...
did you really think he would be more than a man child?
I mean, Hillary was actively courting war in Syria as well
Trump wasn't at election time
lets face it, trump didn't win, hillary lost.
I mean, kinda true.
Trump campaigned better according to the rules of the election
in a certain light, sure
But he did beat all the conventional republicans
That, as well.
its not really hard to beat trump, but you need to basically hate both sides to do it and have a spine.
the have a spine part is the hard part.
given most politicians are invertebrates
You underestimate the power of the Republican and Democrat parties.
Particularly in the Democrat party, someone who openly hates the Democrat party can never get the nod, due to the system that decides that.
And to members of the Republican party, the GOP has a meaning to them, even if their members don't reflect that meaning
Basically, a change has to come from within
Trump was supposed to be that change
And in particular, I don't think the democrat party will moderate any time soon
but see, the democrat party is imploding, and the Republican party has always had a problem with public speaking
they usually pushed too hard on the religious angle and i think that usually costs them
I know that, in my area, the Libertarian party is actually planting itself in the local Republicans.
not a bad idea, given how far the left is going extreme
Like I said, it's the way it has to happen
The Republican party is far more open to it than the democratic party
Democrats are too fringe issue and SJW
Republicans are too old-world and christian
AKA, both aren't looking at solving things and religious
The Republicans have been on a secularizing trend for years.
nah, thats just the media
theres a reason trump chose pence
Well, yeah.
Trump won before he chose pence, though.
Pence was meant to secure the religious vote, and is one of those deep repub snakes
They need that Bible belt
You absolutely just highlighted what I was saying.
they need the bible belt to counter the mexican tide
You mean California?
Illegal immigrants aren't supposed to eb voting
I mean, southern California is basically Mexico isn't it?
And legal mexican immigrants actually trend republican
Well of course. Wouldn't you be pissed at your friend if they got the same shit you did for no effort when you tried hard?
Implying all mexicans are friends?
Isn't that standard issued racism?
Jokes aside, yeah.
Lmao, you know what I mean.
in the words of that woman on that show
Without mexicans, where are you going to find a toilet cleaner for your house?
That was good damn glorious
I think it was the voice?
i have no idea
jeeze...
lemme see if i can find it
yes
that one
especially that "Oh.. thats... Nooo..."
she realised then that "This is not salvagable"
๐
And yet
she kept talking
there's a point where she should've just taken the L
as the ~~kids~~ Youths say
like i've said before. There is very few if any people who have a real hatred for another human being or group of humans. There are mostly just people who hate a part of themselves that they project on other people rather than acknowledge its them who needs to change
because change is hard
Also, I had this thought the other day...
When the fuck did we allow people to start using the term 'Micro-aggression'?
i have no fucking clue
And why did we let it go?
i think it was the day we stopped calling people who said that a pussy-ass communist
around the same time they changed the term racism
2015 was when i first started hearing about it
Well, yeah
but what I mean by that
is that it changes the definition of 'aggression'.
naw, micro-agression was around in 2014 or 2013.
Yet another word being changed right under our noses
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 58/343
| Next