shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 32/343
| Next
get pozzed
plebbit
everyone who uses that horrible fucking website needs to be sent to a fema camp
SANDY HOOK WAS A FEMA CAMP COVER UP
yes
sandy hook was how they took care of the people evacuated from wtc7
Thank you friend.
Thank you friend.
Thank you friend.
you made me giggle
take your stupid ping
<3
can you get tim to market a beanie?
"too cool for the pool"
"Pool's closed"
"Fake news"
I want to send some back in time
"Can't fool the Pool."
"Don't be a Tool" ~Tim Pool"
Whatever you do you are racist so why not just join the alt right?
Looks like merit based immigration lowers wages.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/679020
https://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr16-857.pdf
because the alt-right's ideals do not align with my own?
lmao, if we do merit-based immigration ==> lower wages
if we let everyone in ==> invasion
If you take taht flow chart and replace the word racism with "globalist cuck", you have what the Alt-right views the white people as
Maybe both factions are just of shitty judgmental people
the alt-right and the alt-left are the same type of people
"crazy weirdos think youre racist, why not be an extremist yourself?" justifying youre own ad hoc existence lmao
THEN WHY DID YOU APPROVE IT
my arguments for the far left and the far right is that you live in a world that pushes more people to become far left or far right reguardless of what the system you live in says it actually is, itself. consitering the system you live in cannot appease the far left or far right dispite what it might try it must be assumed something is causing the far right and far left to grow
if people living in the current system slowly begin to dislike the current system in greater and greater numbers this is often an indication of those people's needs not being met
They'd have to admit that a female gamer killing a male gamer in online games is also rape, then.
Mate you need to understand that (((they))) just want to destory males.
__Dictionary__:
"Definition of rape
1 : unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception โ compare sexual assault, statutory rape"
__SJW__:
"Power + Prejudice = Racism.
Prejudice - Power = Colorism."
Navigating the minefield of such ideology, the proper formula for "Rape" could be, @JadenFrostwolf :
Power + Forced Sex = Rape.
Forced Sex - Power = Genitalism.
But who knows~
๐คท๐ฝ
Are people really taking my comment that seriously? lol
That article's author probably would, @JadenFrostwolf.
hehehe
silly thing for japan to do, they dont have enough sterial people in the first place
that is no reason for having people you don't want having kids, well, having them
doesn't that go the lines of the europeans saying refugees are good because they reproduce more?
refugees arnt citizines
though, males who have their penis's removed will tend to be sterilized anyway
this might be a preventitive messure against genital transfer opperations which will be posible in 20 years
well its posible right now, just not very implamental yet
personally while im a transexual i want to keep my squirtgun because i havent figured out if i ever want to be a parent or not. i dont think this messure that japan is taking will have any long term benefits for them
I deleted all of my memes.
were you put on the SPLC's hate watch list?
And did you call them
I don't think so.
I should check to see if I'm banned in Israel.
yes
>personally while im a transexual i want to keep my squirtgun
@Arch-Fiend rly? ๐ค
finn being force sensitive would make the next movie better consitering how many force users they have left (hint its not many)
@Arch-Fiend kill my curiosity. How do you identify yourself politically? do you believe gender is binary?
okay, so I just quickly read over that Japan thing and all I could think of is "so... Trans people are angry that Japan wants then to fully commit to transitioning before being allowed to do so."
i usually just consiter myself a female even though i have a penis, or shemale, but mostly i just dont really care because unless im naked or tell someone people will just think of me as as they will. as someone on the internet i think you can understand that our interactions within this annonymous space render our identitys in the hands of others to forumulate based on our interactions with them and what little details can or will be provided to them in order to render an idea of us. i apply that to the physical world as well because the way we formulate the identity of others here is based on what we have learned before having access to the internet thus steming from a more fundamental psychological mechanism for identifying traits
basicly my philosophy on the matter is that "this stuff isint hard to figure out, its just people who cant help but spend far to long thinking about it lead to the most issues reguarding it."
i dont believe gender is binary, i dont believe gender exists, i think human sexual characteristics are bianary, but i also believe the flesh is weak and the blade is sharp
when you said you wanted to keep your "squirtgun" I assumed the swap was the other way around
cant really call a vagina a gun
I don't think there will be any good for society to consider gender non-binary
@Arch-Fiend here is a question: if gender =/= to sex, then what is gender to you (aside from not existing)? It seems to be a more or less recent divergence between sex and gender.
i consiter gender nonexistant and also communist propaganda
but what is it?
because it used to mean sex
but if it is not that, then what, exactly is it?
i mean if you have a definition for it then its your definition, i dont have a defintion for it
Thank you friend.
gender is a very new word
okay, let me rephrase, what is the gender that you say doesn't exist. I don't think you can say something doesn't exist if you don't have a definition for it.
nah, gender isn't a new word. Gender is also useful in biology and science. If you deny gender you will go backwards in many many areas
stats also become shit
i think gender to the people who invented the word means to discribe social and psychological sexual characteristics
so like gender roles?
rather than biological sex
if thats what they think
@.B please don't confuse things in this conversation, biological sex, as everyone here seems to agree, does exist and is binary. Unless you count more than just humans, then there is like 5.
unfortunately social and psychological sexual characteristics have to many veriables in my opinion to be solid scientificly. some are, because they are influinced by the hormones produced by our brains and also by the different needs birth givers have in society comparied to non-birth giving of the species. however when you throw culture into the mix gender roles become slightly more complicated
i wonder how many of these SJWs don't believe estrogen and testosterone exist
@Grenade123 I don't think I'm confusing it. Medication is gendered, stats we use to make up laws, are gendered. The left is also trying to redefine "woman" and "man".
pretty much all of the time you can tell that women wont be in extremely dangerous or certain death roles in society (ie war) but outside that role the postion of women and men in society become more blured
especially with influince of culture and even then, technology seeks to slowly erode all social roles men and woman have
evolution of war has permited a greater blurring and will contenue to as technology increases
you can deny gender roles and wait for the result of that. Denying gender exists is another thing entirely
that will translate into an effect on psychology and also evolutionary psychology as mating selection will change with it
gender isint sex
people are trying to replace sex with gender because sex is an old word thats harder to fuck with because of its concrete definition
@.B alright, then let me pose this question to you: What is gender?
if you see gender used in science outside of social or political science then its bullshit
@Grenade123 in the west, another word for "sex"
the only thing gender means to me that makes sense is for it to mean social and psychological sexual characteristics
also the classical joke of asking "Sex" can be followed by "yes please", while "gender" is followed by the binary answer
gender is defined by sex and thus not the same thing
gender, even if redifined, cannot be picked randomly
and all of use agreed sex is binary and that is not the definition we are examining. Different group of people have different definitions for words. even the US has its own variations on language. Coke can mean either the cola drink from coka-cola, just be a generic name for cola, or a generic name for soda.
if you suggest scientific and well defined categories, I might be temped to agree
Or the drug, cocaine.
yes, but that stays pretty constant across the US
your point being?
gender's definition was always tied to sex. If we want (let's assume) to redefine it, do it properly at least
otherwise we can just drop "gender" and just use "sex"
Pretty much.
Point being, you are talking about soda and we are talking about a specific soda. This is why i asked you not to confuse the specific definitions we are agreed upon for this discussion. Arch already state that sex is binary and gender =/= sex. Because i was interested in his views, i've been using his definition.
ill be back in a bit, need to eat
my point is simple, if gender != sex, define it in a way that is useful for society
otherwise the use of the word becomes irrelevant
well, that is what i was trying to figure out
we are in sync then
yes. which is what i was saying earlier
what would be the evolution of the word? where do you think this will go?
i was trying to figure out what Arch thought they (the left) referred to since he said he doesn't think gender exists despite saying sex exists.
clearly he must have some concept of it to stay it doesn't exist.
>that will translate into an effect on psychology and also evolutionary psychology
>the only thing gender means to me that makes sense is for it to mean social and psychological sexual characteristics
>>>psychological sexual characteristics
This is not "gender", and I wouldn't call that gender
"sexual characteristics" as in physical only?
that would be useful ๐ค
i think, in that statement, psychological characteristics refers to parts of people personalities that seem prone to being affected by your sex hormone levels, and then that translates into social sphere.
that would mean gender changes
which would make the word useless
if that is gender, then it is not binary. However, it would, i agree, be useless as that there would be as many potential genders as there are individuals on earth. that seems to be where we are going, as tim pointed out in that video about the 31+ genders.
idk why people started to define their identity on the gender category
because people are dumb on average
your identity is your identity
it is not gender
also, your identity isn't defined uniquely by sexual characteristics
trying to define your "sexual characteristics", both physical and phychological all into a category is, well.. retarded
this would be why anyone not alt-left calls them stupid
it will destroy the word "gender", and that's it
that seems to be all SJWs are good at, destroying things
And yelling at the sky.
they never want to make anything new, just destroy was already here
Or change something that already exists.
but if we agree it is stupid, why are you going along with it?
It's just talking to someone on their terms/for the sake of argument.
To learn more.
sjw: "comics are sexist"
random: "make your own comics then"
sjw: "NO! NO SEXIST COMICS ARE ALLOWED"
*changes everything, killing comics*
sjw: "ah, much better"
@JadenFrostwolf we weren't all here entertaining the idea, some ppl here really think we should redefine gender
No, I know.
@.B because in order to have any kind of constructive conversation, you need to work from a common vocabulary. And its much easier to destroy a persons argument if you use their vocabulary against them rather than try and get them to use your own.
Probably the most annoying thing is that in a lot of cases, they're not even fans of or consumers of the thing they are trying to change.
Like I think it's safe to say the vast majority of the people crying for Nintendo to change "Link" from the Legend of Zelda series into a girl, because... reasons....
...would not have even bought the game, or cared about how it would have affected the story.
@Grenade123 I agree, isn't that what we just did? =p
you are the one who asked why i was going along with it
gf just sent me a jumpscare
@JadenFrostwolf I've heard a lot of people saying Zelda should be genderbent into a girl ๐
ive been reading
<:yey:414288771824091137>
coz all video games have males in the titles
rightttttt?
Zelda is already a girl....?
you mean Link?
That's the joke.
that's the point, they thought Link was Zelda. They didn't even know the franchise ๐
People that know nothing of the game often call the character you play Zelda, since the game is called Zelda.
name an SJW that demands a franchise be changed that actually likes the franchise.
*cough* anita sarkeesian *cough*
"I've always been a gamer" *rewind less than 10 years* "I'm not a gamer and have never played games"
one redefinition of a word that "triggers" me is the word "gamer"
you play sudoku or candy crush? YOU'R A GAMER
I thought gamers were dead. <:Kappa:327142715592540171>
western games are kinda dead ๐ค
fuck, find me the gamer player sudoku, they are probably not too dumb.
so to reiterate my thoughts, sex defines biological differences of a species that store the method of reproducing a new lifeform of their species into 2 or more entities. this covers everything that empericly we can catagorize about them which are internally consistant. this means most physical traits and some psychological traits. gender has NO reason to define this, as theres no reason to have 2 words that mean the same thing. if you were to give gender a different definition scientificly, in my opinion it would need to define the social and psychological differences between individuals of different sexs
I kinda told you why "gender" was used
because in most languages "sex" is also a verb of the act
thats a weak arguement
in most languages the same word means different things
so to avoid confusion, "gender" was another way of refering to it that was clear to understand what you're asking
so gender so as to not pull an austin powers? *filling out form* "Sex? Yes please."
yes, I believe that is the main reason
not to mention sex is only an english word, in other languages the act of having sex is a different word
in my native language the same happens
in spanish too
in french too
gender: "late Middle English: from Old French gendre (modern genre ), based on Latin genus โbirth, family, nation.โ The earliest meanings were โkind, sort, genusโ and โtype or class of noun, etc."
I could do some research on it tbh
i dont think the chinese call the act of reproduction sex
consitering they have no latin roots
we are talking about the west
so not most languages
the Chinese have 5 different words using the same 3 letters
in the same order
if you go to asian countries, there's not even pronouns
kanjis are gendered
let's not dig a bigger hole into this
really i think only spanish has a word close to sex
sexo
what feminists are trying to do, removing gendered names of things can't even be done in most asian languages
italians use sesso
replace gender on all forms with "chromo" and have it be Y/X
portuguese too
well french use sexe
good luck trying to fix German if they are trying to make it "gender neutral"
even then though latin languages are also the most common languages to have a word with multiple definitions
and have those words transfer from verb to noun
also boats have genders apparently
but not sex
@Arch-Fiend is there no other language in which there is multiple words that mean the same thing?
yes there are
i think most languages do grenade
which is why "they use gender insted of sex because sex can also be a verb" is a weak argument
asking for the "sex" is also informal
its also not how science works
asking "gender" is considered the formal way of asking it
language has nothing to do with science
this is language, not science
perhaps you shouldent have been arguing that gender is a scientific word earlier then
most languages follow irrational evolutions
pretty sure science usually refers to things officially by sex, unofficially by whatever is common colloquial language
because the verb for sex in science is reproduction
or compitulation
or insemination
you misrepresent his statements
gender has, in colloquial English, be the same as biological sex.
then i can easly say it doesent exist
that does not mean biological sex is called gender in science
and just use a different language
aren't you contributing to my point? if you say "sex" you assume the act, if you say "gender" you assume the binary definition which can _also_ be defined as "sex"
well, no words exists
all words are socially constructed
yes.. so?
"socially constructed" says nothing
so, then saying it doesn't exist because its not science, but language, is not really a good argument
everything is socially constructed
its not useful to me to have gender and sex mean the same thing because you will have people argue that gender means whatever they want it to mean while sex will never be touched, sex will simply be replaced and ultimately youll lose the argument in the long run
the other way around
>to me
that is not an argument, but a preference
i rather maintain concrete, historicaly fortuitious language which i can argue my points with
which is fine to have, but does not mean it will apply to anyone else
if gender becomes volatile and not useful, people will just use "sex"
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 32/343
| Next