shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 210/343
| Next
Wait, where the hell did people get the idea of that?
That... an air raid shelter?
Funny, the only light source I see in the last one is the flash
That last one is a pic i edited
If there were windows out of shot, surely you'd notice that
in 10 mins
Applies to the unedited as well
Because some of the former i swear had contrast effects and/or photo contrast applied to them
You only changed the stains
yea on purpose
Right, and I'm saying if you want us to believe there's windows in that, you shoulda added some
whats even the argument here?
im not following
That it couldn't have been a gas chamber because it had windows. Or something.
Iunno, I'm not the one claiming that
Would make sense to have at least one, you know. So you can check if they're all dead without having to pump out the gas and unseal the door.
A holocaust denier want us to post pictures that is โhard evidenceโ of the gas chambers, we did, they then told us that they were not gas chambers. That is what is going on @GingaBomber
i dont even get why they would gas people instead of shooting๐ค
cheaper and more efficient
gassing is cheaper than bullet?
Sure it is
Yeah
Also, doesn't take bullets away from the war effort.
Much like how much more efficient an IED is than a gun +bullets
They bloody zyklon b too
That stuff ainโt nice
i mean it make sens to kill jews with pesticide๐
LD50 for cyanide is fairly low
Hence the suicide pills, I suppose
No that is a terrible idea Jesse, you need poisons that works relatively efficiently on human.
mustard gas?
and the shittiest of the chemical weapons
Really, mustard gas?
There is a reason the Germans stopped its use after WWI
And its not cause they made it a rule
Zyklon b Kill people to as efficient degree necessary for what the needed, it is a rather terrible poison to humans Jesse.
zycklon B isint even nasy one compared to mustard gas.
Cause it kills quick?
Mustard was what they could come up with with the time
Easy to disperse, isnt so affected by rain.
Well the cyanide is better at the making a person drop dead.
And probably the cheapest to produce en masse
But remember it kills really slowly
Like in days.
TO hours.
Hell, the effect did backfire once.
Ye. I could make some right now if I wanted to commit a really shit terror attack
Search up the Attack of the Dead Men
Not gonna, but I could
Not that hard
Well it is not that hard to do it, spree killers can do it on the regular in the USA, & some of the do it for stupid reasons like that fella who wanted to bomb the elections for sortition awareness
wat
Lmao
discord is left leaning, oh the irony.
April Glaser is criticising safe spaces. Nazi confirmed
oh shit
not enough censorship ergo fashism
I don't get it, what's the surprise?
Lol
Probs the guy left her because of her messed up ideology and world view.
What would that be?
Maybe she was a raving feminist?
Is this an actual Youtube channel?
I mean, I don't know her and she doesn't have the telltale signs of it
Plus YouTube is apparently largely right leaning
Which doesn't mean much anymore
... someone's obviously trolling.
?
How in the fuck is Youtube largely right leaning?
Implication: @oprahsminge is trolling by saying that.
Or GOT trolled and believed it.
The creator base of people who involve themselves in politics on YouTube are largely right leaning
Maybe I did get trolled. Hold on
Pro Tip: Any platform that banned Alex Jones is not Right Leaning.
The people in charge of Youtube are largely left leaning.
he may be a nutjob, but the rightwing supports free speech these days, leftwing are the ones who call freedom of speech advocates "extremists"
because free speech exposes the left's lies
Correction
If they were right leaning, Alex Jones wouldn't have been banned. Hunter Avalone, Chris Ray Gun, and most other political Youtubers wouldn't be demonitized or suspended or some shit.
I didn't say the PLATFORM is right leaning
YT in 2015 was full of lefties. The "debunk" videos destroyed them
Or wasn't trying to
I mean the content makers
Tim said it.
Well tbf Tim said the majority aren't leaning anything
How about all the "debunk" videos attacking PragerU, Computing Forever and etc.?
do you have any good ones? ๐
shoot
get me a PragerU debunk that is good
and isn't about religion
But of political ones it appears that they are right leaning. Now my supposition is that "right leaning" basically includes anyone not being gay based on social justice or whatever
Youtube creators are absolutely not right leaning.
The left only sees them as right leaning because anyone right of Stalin as being an Alt Right Extremist.
Or more simply put, not being insane
Based on Tim's "source" within YouTube
It's all I have to go on
I'd say the vast majority of youtubers are centerists, or even center left. But center left is now "basically hitler" according to the rightwing extremists that are the loudest.
Most of them are centrists that lean somewhat right. While we have Tim who's a "social liberal".
Sure
But again, a person from the platform of YouTube would be far left leaning no?
So from YouTube's perspective, most are right leaning. Which is pretty much exactly what I clarified later
not only that, right leaning people are more active on youtube
so it shows on the views/ratings/etc
the common lefty isn't politically active
they usually have nothing to say compared to the MSM
meanwhile the right is positioned as the underdog, against the mainstream, the media, and the public opinion (coz you can't be public about being right wing nowadays)
The realistic bell curve of political stances in modern society and across most platforms squarely puts the global average as slightly left leaning. The problem is, extreme lefties have gone so far that no one with a brain can support the left anymore.
there's also the component of censorship that is interesting. On twitter they censor everyone, on youtube they can only censor creators
so twitter becomes visibly lefty, while on youtube, when they censor creators, the viewers on the right start to consume more right wing content
Reasonably speaking, I'm center-left. But the left is so absurd that I find myself needing to rally around traditionally right-wing outlets because they're the only sane option left.
what I don't get is why lefties that are against the current left aren't more vocal about it
but anyway, the right is quite welcoming to them
if they want to change sides
Trump was a democrat all allong, after all
It's because it's not socially appropriate. If you are against the super-extreme politically correct "but not ALL Muslims are terrorists, therefore we must let ALL Muslims into our country, INCLUDING the terrorists, to prove we're not racist!"... then you're a racist.
then "be the racist"
im racist
and im ok with that
that gets you beat over the head by a bike lock by your antifa-loving leftie friends
I don't even think of "racism" as a problem tbh
the market auto-balances
in the way its described at this point? No its not
if it were 1930 I'd say "this is a problem"
yup
but at this point, its basically a non-issue at a population level
modern representation of what racism is: I'd be worried if you're not. Modern racism can be described as I did above.
as long as the laws are neutral, most examples of racism are just that, examples
ironically, the left is becoming more racist than any racism that existed before
"becoming"
they already were
Modern "racism" - Cops show up to arrest child rapists in germany and they all get away into the community, leading to future child rape. Police make a statement, "These men were... men. We cannot describe them further or it would be racist. So remember, if you see... MEN... they might be the rapists."
they were, but they were in small numbers
no. They were racist at a party level
sure, I agree on that
the intensity or way in which that presented itself has morphed but its been at their core since their inception
but the intensity is different now
imo
yeah of course
and the way in which it presents to the world is different
but its still the same core it was always
Modern "Not Racist" as demonstrated on Twitter, and by the New York Times hiring practices: "FUCK ALL WHITE PEOPLE, Y'ALL DESERVE TO DIE, IT'S TIME FOR A WHITE GENOCIDE #CancelWhitePeople"
they're racist against virtually everyone
just do what I do
including whites, blacks, asians, hispanics
say you don't identify as white
just people in general
๐
by racist i mean it by its literal definition obviously
yep
they care about race
and treat people based on it
yes
it's racism by the book
which is the main reason i find it funny that they throw that label out constantly
they went from "slavery is awesome" to "jim crow is awesome" to "republicans are racist, lets give black people stuff because republicans are racist and black people aren't capable of helping themselves" to "minorities are stupid and white people are evil"
just incredible
and the fact they succeeded in pulling that off blows me the fuck away
I'd love to see a news site that takes many of these extreme lefties quotes and MSM news stories and applies the Mein Kampf test.
they'd all ping on it
i have a copy at home
I never read it tbh
you don't have to read it.
i read about half of it
its kinda painful to read in that I don't like his writing
ppl already call me all kinds of names and I'm a bit to the left of "conservative"
so I guess I'll pass for now ๐
i mean i don't walk around with it waving it around lol
gotta buy it along the communist manifesto, just so people get confused
nah
the Mein Kampf test is that when lefties say things about LGBTZAEIEIO or BLM or whatever, you replace that with Austrian/White/Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes references, and then replace things like Cis/White/Straight with Jew/Black/etc. Then if the statement reads like something you'd expect to see in Mein Kampf, it fails.
yep, I heard about it on the fake studies that were accepted by journals
the Mein Kampf test existed before that.... that study thing actually flipped it entirely.
Rather than starting with quotes outside and seeing if they sounded like they fit in, they genuinely started with actual Mein Kampf and word-swapped out to Leftie-Speak.
from what I read about that, they started out subtle, the first 25% (or so) was normal leftie stuff they wrote to throw everyone off, then literally the last 75% was taken directly out of Mein Kampf with just those buzzwords changed.
do you have a link of it btw?
also, was the thing removed after being revealed or is still there?
ty
Towards the bottom it goes into detail about each of the papers, including which ones were accepted, and the actual comments they were given during peer review.
let's be blunt... when 75% of your article is Mein Kampf, and modern feminists are praising the hell out of you like this... I think it's a pretty good sign that the "left" isn't really very "left", are they?
wellllll...
democratic socialist, national socialist...
we no longer need wamen >:O
wat
did you even read the article?
>Baby mice have been made with two mums and no dad, say researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
>But there was bad news on the all-male front. Mice with double-dads were attempted, but died within days of being born.
soon tho
I've heard about this kind of stuff being theoretically possible a long time ago, but them doing it in practice is news to me
I'm not so sure we'll have the answer any time soon
for one, isn't the DNA they're taking coming from an old, damaged cell?
๐
if so, you'll run into the same issues you do with cloning, and it's not sustainable
Dolly the sheep was euthanized at the age of 6 with severe arthritis, expected life for a sheep of her kind would have been 12 years
you might get infants developing cancer, teenagers with Alzheimer's, etc.
also, you're still gonna need a womb of some kind.
basically what I'm saying is, we're approaching the point where it might make more sense to just make genetically engineered catgirls while we're at it
gamers rise up
all i want is a white trap ethnostate ๐ญ
is that to much to ask ๐ญ
Trump is meeting Kanye!
```it might make more sense to just make genetically engineered catgirls while we're at it```
I would help fund such a thing
why would anyone want a genetically engineered cat girl
it's just a woman with literally everything they're good for removed
there are far better animals for creating a spliced humanoid companion
Why not just put cat ears on a sexbot?
exactly
cats fucking suck
why the fuck would you want to give one the size and intelligence of a human?
cats are great, they're pretty independent and not so fucking needy
but yes, I can definitely see the potential for trouble
just put benis on womxn
cats are pets for people who can't have or don't want a real pet
catgirls, therefore, are for people who can't or don't want a real girl
true
also - the lifespan is short, so you don't have any real long term commitment, or throw up for adoption when you no longer want to care for them.
as long as they are regarded as pets and have no rights ๐
CONTACT LEFT
11OClock
TWO BOGIES
Democrats are Evil!
I can't stop laughing while watching this
LOL
this is old
but fits the left like a glove
This man has class.
too true
@Crow Is the middle one real?
no they're all fake thots
jesus.
he's not real either
What a race traitor ๐
I'm honestly not sure
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 210/343
| Next