shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 158/343
| Next
if they want to be a publisher, they get charged for what their users makes. if they chose provider, they need to stop curtailing content.
they shouldn't have the power to be both
I got lost
I have no idea what you mean
section 230 i believe it was, of the communications at or whatever, is what made websites free from litigation for what users post on their site, but doesn't have them fall into the same classification as like a library.
before then, you had, i forgot what term they used, but basically i think like a library, where you couldn't sue the library for what was in the books because they didn't make it. However, a news paper, who doesn't write the articles but does edit them, could be sued.
they were a publisher
Decency In Communications Act, section 230 was the only section that survived a court challenge so it is known only as Section 230
the whole thing came about basically because websites wanted to moderate their users content without being help accountable as a publisher
i skipped to the important part
Also go on Youtube and look up Youtuber Law, he has series of videos talking about all of this
i was gonna look him up, but i knew tim had a video just doing a quick cover
Lior ends up talking about 230 a lot.
basically, a forum was sued for libel. The forum said we are a library, thus are not responsible for what is in our books, the court said "no, you moderate foul language, making you like a newspaper where you are the editor and publisher, your users the article writers"
and through the usual BS we got section 230
which basically said websites have the protections of a platform (library) with the abilities of a publisher
which i think is kinda bs
if we remove section 230, i think we might see big firms remove moderation
because then users could sue facebook for libel and slander, rather than need to go after its users... unless it doesn't moderate
so imagine if youtube could get sued for alex jones. Yeah they could ban him, but then every person who has a beef with another youtuber could sue youtube.
I get the feeling she's implementing these biased algorithms instead of being a victim of them
...that's a woman?
@missdanger "That's a human?" fixed it for you
I'm assuming it started out with a front hole
Not sure if it even has holes now
Definitely one where its brain should be
tf is a "data skeptic"
Math is the final frontier for social justice. They can rewrite history to make it about how the white man only tortured minorities. They can rewrite science because it doesn't include their imaginary genders. They can rewrite language to make it completely PC and make wrongthink impossible.
But they can't rewrite math because it began from axioms we defined to be true. It's untouchable
doesn't mean they won't try
It's called common core math
"Math"
nothing is untouchable for newspeak
The only math they can do is to count their genders
they will just redefine it as a dog whistle to white supremacists
make 2+2 = 5
Holy shit Iโm listening to dankula talk to this peanut man and I think I have secondhand autism
He 's doing it?#
jeez. That man is either a troll or a retard. Either way it is going to be a pointless convocation.
Itโs painful
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
When he says thereโs no difference between social and legal consequences
Fuck
I can't tell what's going on in that picture. Is it meat or trash on the ground?
idk
Eid
E
Dead goats.
@Deleted User @Arch-Fiend What the fuck.
What are these moon runes?!
@Scribblehatch dab
Why y'all niggas talkin bout me
not enough suction
Tha bolarhatman "debate" with dankula was embarrassing, and not for Dank
Mr.Peanut?
He debated Dank?
yea
guy wasnt self aware at all
Heโs a roasted and salty peanut now. Kept going in circles during the arguement and wasnโt really trying to prove something, just to win the argument
kek truuuuuu
he wouldnt concede even if it contradicted his own beliefs
Dank was like "youve got to be a troll, you cant be real"
Why is this not suprising
?
report them
this extension automatically flags conservative videos or something?
By the looks of things is it give you a notification to go flag a vid.
What the actual fuck
If you use chrome then flag it.
Already did.
But I'm guessing Google ain't gonna do shit. They'll say it doesn't violate their ToS.
commies are just ddosing the companies anti child porn mechanisms
Youtube really needs to have more humans in the loop. Any automated system short of general AI is just going to be gamed.
...Eh?
i doubt they would be able to afford hiring that many people, especially not with commies making labor more costly
You guys talking about Venus
The turtle without a penis
tell me more
Sorry that rhyme is literally all I've got
I'm just old enough to know she exists but just young enough to not have payed attention
God
It's enraging that Next Mutation was ever made
More enraging that people still remember it
CNN?
reporting on this?
Itโs fake but i thought it was funny
lol
When should I refuel
when its so far past E that it reads full
Before you start worrying about whether you should refuel
pff you're fine
The time has come and so have I
2019. lol
I love this
It's a very impressive goof.
HOW!?!?!?
ROFL
This is how
This is the type of person that says "PERIOD" at the end of a statement.
Or "SIMPLE" or "FACT"
The worst of them don't even do you the courtesy of switching them out.
Do you know the basic of cqc?
I know the basics of qtpa2t
(try pronouncing it)
i dont get it
i know qt3.14
but not qtpa2t
is it the same thing?
Cutey patooty
Qtpa2t
Steven Crowder interviews a furry..... that has to be something else.
The only way to make this situation worse instead of better.. Is to make it about race.
Y'know. "THIS IS WHY WHITE IS RIGHT"
cursed
Theme of That Picture
I like this shoe. And I use it when I'm pointing out the horse shoe nature of the far Laft and far Right. But I'm not keen on the white background. Any idea on what I could replace it with that won't scare of the Normies?
Enjoy.
Thanks. But other than that. Maybe something that signifies what horse shoe theory is to the uninitiated.
Waldo used to travel hellscapes. My god.
Fuck, I need to find the photo realistic Waldo in Auschwitz picture again.
o:
Why do you need that?
We have the original
In VIDEO
Waldo's really made of stern stuff.
Nothing gets him down and nothing can kill him
I memba waldo
Liberal arts college cringe compilation - day 3. All instances of "chairman" have been replaced with "chairperson"
Why do you care
I don't really
just think it's stupid that anyone could find "chairman" to be offensive
I think man/men is the default state of humans, and women was invented because women didn't like being associated with men.
Will "human" be offensive so it will be "huperson"
Maybe we will go with Hu and Wo
and men don't get assigned anything?
can't talk to men
they are just it
>implying there will be cis hetero men in the future
We will turn you all gay, whether with chemicals or some gay agenda.
"What do you mean borders aren't an enumerated right" Article 1 section 8?
Anyway, engaging with such morons intellectually is a mistake. They should only be engaged with ridicule.
```LibetToday at 9:24 AM
Why do you care
```
Why don't you?
Chairman being replaced with chairperson.
That's something we had a second ago that we no longer have now.
Someone just took a loaf of bread from you
"Ah why should i care"
Care.
Stupid.
You stupid stupid shit.
What's wrong with you?
Do you think the people who changed it are stupid for caring about the man in chairman?
The word child is ageist. Please refer to them as 'early access adults' thank you very much.
Hold on.
Libet, do you care now or don't you?
This seems like caring.
I don't care about them saying chairperson
no one fored oyuto say it right?
*forced
I just think it's hypocrisy if people wouldnt care either way, but care because some crazy sjw changed a word they dont like
See this is exactly how the SJWs came to be in the first place
It was little changes like this at first.
People like me would point it out
People like you would go "UGH, WHO CARES"
But it kept happening
And then one day Trigglypuff
I point to Trigglypuff. No way in fucking hell you can ignore or deny the horror of Trigglypuff.
But it doesn't seem to matter
Because you're still... very stupid.
And even as all the signs start happening again, you have the same reaction as before.
"Who cares"
Call me insensitive, but I am unsure whether you are being serious or not...
You are a dope.
A dopey dope.
Trigglypuff didn't come out of nowhere. We need to be careful what we let ppl get away with.
idk, if someone called me out on using chairman i'd go 'he is a man' or chairwoman 'she is a woman'
"why should we care, it's just chairperson" is the kind of attitude they want. If you let them do something, they'll keep pushing the envelope until vagina becomes front hole and misgendering someone becomes illegal
@LEER I pretty sure @Scribblehatch is constently high. Joking but on point.
Your just a front hole. Be quiet.
literally shaking, bigot
When people are concerned that this is leading to something BAD, and there's a precedent for it, don't kneejerk with "Ugh who cares"
_Then the discord bots clapped_
call everyone them and it
Maybe I missed something? Is the usaage of chairperson obligatory or something now?
it's not obligitory but I'm afraid of the consequences of intentionally using it here on campus
like doing it once, "hey that's not nice"
but if I keep doing it, I'd expect to actually get in trouble for it
They get their foot in the door
Subtly implying something
You go long enough saying "chairman" instead, they start looking around at each other
"Hmph. Troublemaker."
And they can do a bunch of things you can NEVER PROVE IN COURT that they're doing.
we also don't say freshman here
we say first year
The universities are a fucking echo chamber.
when I asked about, they said something along the lines of "freshperson is too bulky"
I feel like the problem here is not 'chairperson' but some people who want to bully you.
All they need to agree on is to hate you, and they can conspire in ways that don't even require communicating with each other.
"Chairperson" is a germ. It's not the source of the germs, but it's a germ.
ELIMINATE GERMS
Be a goddamn scrubbing bubble you piece of shit.
because a small percentage of our student body is mentally ill, the whole campus has to go along with their stupid game
@LEER That's exactly it. It's not about what is being said , it's the fact that they made you say it.
"one person was offended, now everyone must repent"
Maybe I am wrong. But why can't we just call them chair :D
Doing what they tell you to do
Is a sign of ZERO PUSHBACK
Gamergate did the first thing no one else did.
"Nah."
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 158/343
| Next