shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 103/343
| Next
One at a time lads.
Germany is at it again.
Everyone know things come in trilogies. We got a part I and a part II. Now we just need a part III
This the part where Rogan says he does not like the extreme conspiracies?
Seeing alex complain is kinda surreal.
Then again part of his character
>literal fucking Stargate in the image
I didnt need to see that. Much like I didnt need to see that two years ago.
Also wht she standing in?
lettice
Lettuce? So its the HAES movement?
I dont think ive seen a haes man.
There are, but most I see are "women"
ยดtis just shooped
From this
And I said I didnt need to see that
Like I said I didnt need to see that an hour ago
To get rid of it, here's a shill of my currently ongoing thread of me drawing my new profile picture.
https://twitter.com/Hathi72421853/status/1010316007989112837?s=19
I'm sorry
@GingaBomber I disregarded that <:GWragFeelsComfyMan:390321740158468096>
Id like to see it shaded.
You know, like madworld style
Follow the thread, i'm shading it
When an article title is just asking for it: https://hbr.org/2018/06/when-did-the-u-s-stop-seeing-teachers-as-professionals
30%
I'm using a slight shade of green for the effect. I'll finish and post the final product in a few minutes.
President OG Macron and his crew.
I dont use this word often but Ill say it this time, damn thats alot of niggerfaggots
Since I wont see a better opportunity soon
Who are they anyway ? @Deleted User
Thats macron and his mother wife
Related to what I just said in <#398858182455459853>
Finished
@Deleted User I don't know who they are.
Nothing of value was lost
Always remeber (((they))) are hypocrites.
Pretty sure leech and mosqitoes are not parasites
Probably should have made it list of pests. Would be more accurate. Or get rid of the two.
Okay they are parasites
Nevermind
people speak often about the genders debate, but what of the actual nuances?
I'm not a SJW or anything so I don't subscribe to the belief "there are more than 2 genders" or whatever but I do think there's science that shows that it's a bit more complex than chromosomes for some people, for instance
There's intersex people, but they are way too much of a rarity to be classified as unique genders.
we can make it 3, whatever
but not fucking 40 :^)
i think most intersex people go male or female anyway
They're more of a aberration than a gender, really
That sounds really insensitive, i'm sorry
it kind of does :^)
if there's an actual reason you don't feel like a dude or chick i'm all for it
Regardless....that's he truth. Being intersex isn't really a gender, it's more of a hormonal imbalance and deformed genitals
but so far i haven't seen any besides snowflaking ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
I was intersex, surgically altered at birth
I haven't met another one though
The whole problem comes in when people are saying that Gender is a personality trait.
Or worse, as it seems, a categorization of multiple personality traits
The problem comes when people actually believe you get to choose
They call that tweet racism.... Then acknowledge that it was referencing a well know gang that targets immigrant children.... Where is the racism?
Also spread fake news with trump dehumanizing immigrates.
a lie something something truth
there are only two genders, because that is how many are needed to secure the survival of the species. works that way for all mammals.
everything else is ideology
They conflate gender and personality and wonder why people who know definitions of things question their conclusion that there are infinite genders
You know, all the conflict about 87 different genders etc could have been COMPLETELY AVOIDED if the snowflakes involved just made a completely new word instead of trying to redefine an existing word. But then again, redefining language is a long-standing strategy on the left.
There would be no confusion and no conflict if instead of the word 'gender' they made a new term like 'sexual mode' or 'sexual aspect' or something. For as long as the word gender has existed it has been synonymous with biological sex. Chromosomes. Redefining it is intentionally divisive and confusing.
Well not only rare but each oddity is so different that you may as well lump them all together.
Put a third bbiological checkbox and ask. I mean doctors need to know.
Doctors should already know given that it should be noted elsewhere in their file
And the third biological sex is called intersex
How about emergencies? Id isnt always available then.
They aren't genders, they are aberrations. It's brute and rude to say so, but that's the truth.
Well or imagined.
And well, usually they are infertile so its not going to be an issue with the gene pool
My theory is that the peopl who claim to be non binary and the sort are doing it to feel better, a kind of personal therapy
And being treated as unique helps
So attention whoring?
Ive seen worse attempts I guess
Itโs attention whoring with the intention of being treated better than others.
Then again thats all really.
Even tje attention one receives is reward enough.
Reminds me of that monster that drowed her two kids and then begged some imaginary kidnapper to retern them both. Made national news.
If by โporn literateโ he means realize that shit is just as fictional as Hollywood or a Tolkien novel I agree
Youโre never going to convince a kid to not watch porn if they want to
Imagine if someone who is in their early 20s thinks that Santa exists.
They're delusional to the point that they go to the mall and see 'Santa' every year, convinced it's the real guy.
We should NOT be in a society where we are expected to confirm that Santa exists, that that's the real Santa, that everything that they believe is true.
Just because they feel it is.
That does not mean we shouldn't have some degree of sympathy for the person who thinks Santa is real. But enforcing delusion is not constructive.
What some would call degeneracy, I call either personal choice (If they only involve themselves) or child abuse (if they hauck it off on their kids). People should have the rights to live their own lives as they see fit, provided it doesn't harm anyone else. But there are certain things that are, in fact, considered Normal. And not by society, but by biology.
Things such as heterosexuality, in some regard, being a necessity of perpetual life, Males and Females having different chemical compositions in their brains and bodies, adapting them for different tasks, generally speaking... stuff provable like that. And anyone who denies shit like that may as well be preaching a flat earth.
flat earthers are the better alternative here.
Atleast flat earthers are harmless
Feminists seem to be encouraging children into drag and get hormones
"Encourage". More like force really.
The kids in most cases do not get a choice in the matter.
https://www.twitch.tv/caligator come join for DM Corner
@RyeNorth I'd say otherwise, that we need to get into the habit of proving shit. because if we don't, then those delusions settle inside and become belief, and belief is hard as fuck to remove even with direct contradictory evidence
I think we agree more than we disagree.
I agree
The nuance is that, I don't think you can convince a flat-earther they're wrong if they're dead set on it.
nor can you convince male who thinks they should've been a female that they're wrong. That shouldn't change the way YOU operate.
discussions like that hinge upon the person seeing how they're wrong or right
which is difficult to do that with the standard approach people take to arguing: I'm right, you're wrong, here's why
when you argue like that, rather than being about finding any sort of truth, it becomes a childish fight
and topics as wide as the one you just brought up, you'd have to find an element within what they're saying in order for them to start to realize how it doesn't make sense, which is difficult without being able to latch on to something that they say specifically to show that it doesn't
those arguments are kinda difficult to get into because you can't focus on that element of what's definitely true, it puts us all in this weird arguing stance no matter what
ex. I dunno the sex of anyone here, but let's say you're male. I argue that you're female. you wouldn't dismiss that in quite the same way as you'd dismiss a flat earther. but if I say something like that, you have something you can go to immediately to show that that's wrong. you show me a picture of your dick (don't get any ideas), I lose that argument immediately
where's the flat earth dick pic? you show them that, then they'll get it
Flat earth confirmed.
The problem is, for most of the people affected by these things, truth is subjective for them, not objective. Attempts to explain a round earth to someone who believes in a flat earth fall short because they need proof (And most of the means of getting proof of this are more time consuming than they care for). And they've got ways of dismissing your arguments, I.E. dismissing photos of the curvature of the earth with the existence of a fisheye lens.
Similarly, someone who's affected by gender dysphoria is going to be convinced of their truth.
Trying to convince me that I'm female when I know I'm male isn't a good example, though. It's worth noting that someone who thinks they're female, despite having physiological differences otherwise has already dismissed the tangible evidence to the contrary.
The problem, I think you'd agree, is the culture of confirmation that's being created, not the issues themselves.
A flat-earther is wrong, but they aren't particularly harmful until they start violently demanding that other people accept their worldview.
Someone with gender dysmorphia isn't exactly harmful to anyone else until they - or those around them - begin to insist on punishment for people who don't play along.
It's the enforcement of conformity - ironically something those who rail against the Patriarchy supposedly speak out against - that becomes the danger to an individual.
@RyeNorth my example was not one to represent "disproving flat earthers" but to be used as an example of something you know immediately is not correct and why it's not correct and you wouldn't spend any energy debating it seriously because of how quickly you can crush it. the flat earthers one is different specifically because of how deeply you'd have to dig into it before you start seeing things that are wrong that you can express to them clearly
I just subbed to him.
he also has a forum called https://www.therpgsite.com/forum.php
@Deleted User Nice
original cock magic <a:POGGERINFINITE:436649104102391829>
That news made me eat chinese food zero times less than I did before the news.
i like that one
@zero_consequences but how did the info on that website affect your eating habits
Oh i dunno I didn't view the site, just recalling the fears of MSG so many years ago and how it didn't scare me away from eating any foods, particularly places like panda express.
i mean, thats good, given its just extra tasty salt, but the website is very informative
i heard it as a food preservative chemical, so i guess thats correct but it was always talked about like some cancerous thing a mad scientist cooked up in a beaker
MSG forms naturally in foods tomatoes, eggs, chicken, potatoes, many cheeses, and even human breast milk.
It must be stopped at all costs.
of course it was talked about as some cancerous thing, it would be bad form to be overtly racist.
so instead they picked some thing common in the food they sold
"Ban that thing! its bad! Ignore the fact i hate Asians. Got nothing to do with it"
"MSG is used in the food industry as a flavor enhancer with anย umamiย taste that intensifies the meaty, savory flavor of food, as naturally occurring glutamate does in foods such as stews and meat soups."
Basically the guy who discovered msg was looking for what made a certain soup so tasty.
"Monosodium glutamateย (MSG, also known asย sodium glutamate) is theย sodiumย saltย ofย glutamic acid, one of the most abundant naturally occurringย non-essentialย amino acids.Glutamic acid is found naturally inย tomatoes,ย grapes,ย cheese,ย mushrooms and other foods."
Extra tasty salt.
Parmesan cheese, tomato, both have high MSG (the cheese much more so than tomato) that's one reason why pizza is so universally liked.
My wise contribution to this conversation. As you were.
Usually there ARE tomatoes on pizza ๐
kek
I mean, that level of balls, and the level of chill on the band, just gives him a guaranteed backstage pass for every gig after that.
๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค
http://archive.today/fgufQ
Wow Huffpost went full on misogynist. They just need to learn how to lead and dominate a woman.
Crime by race. @Blackhawk342
This is a good one
hispanic is not accurate since there are a lot of undocumented ...
all us statistic is false
when hispanic included
Those are hispanics who are legally in America.
but then illigal"s crmes are not in?
No that is just the ones in America legally.
are you sure crimes are collected separately for illigals and are not included?
Yes you can read the source.
but then these are incomplete reports... since illigals do commit crimes
Yes I know illigals commit crimes but Hispanics aren't a majorty so why do they molest children at higher rates then white who are? I think it's because of their genes.
Here are the sources if you don't believe me then read them for yourself. https://www.census.gov/prod/1/pop/p25-1130/p251130.pdf
would be best if you get some other source about that... you have a whole continent of latino america to see iff there is serious problem .... but you have India, afganistan where almost all boys are raped as a cultural thing establishing power i guess... no genes there
Yes I know Indians and Afganistanis rape kids at higher rates then whites. Just because they hide it as a cultural pratice doesn't mean it isn't genenics.
I am more on the side we all have dark side (genetic) and we suppress those urges that doesn't benefit our existence ... dark/light symbolism
so culture..
Mate were animals and like other animals alot of our behaviour is determined by genes.
It's the bassis of Behavioural Genetics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioural_genetics
Surprising how fast AC went from that to a message virtue signaling about how "diverse" their dev team is every time you launch the game.
@Deleted User do you even click the long images you post here? Theyโre literally impossible to read, why bother posting them?
@Deller Bassicly the big image I psted earlier shows that blacks commit way more crime then whites. I know it has a low resolution but it's easier to read when you download it.
Ain't gang culture fun
I get the gist of what you're posting, but you posted a giant 4Chan thread that's literally impossible to read. What's the point?
It's easier to read when you download it as I said.
or you could read to parts I posted just now.
I'm 100% aware of the effects gangs have on crime. I live on Long Island. MS-13 is a major fucking problem here
It's not just gangs it's biology. Some races commit more crimes then others.
I personally think it's less biological & more cultural. Some cultures don't mix or refuse to adapt to American culture
you have so many variables to account for before you reach biology as the only answer.
Do you think 50% of blacks are members of gangs?
biology is just as lazy as saying "its racism"
It wouldn't surprise me to find out they were actually
but then again, you are a socialist aren't you?
@Deller They can't adapt to American culture because it's western.
Gang culture is pretty fucking huge
Answer the question.
@Deleted User claiming biology completely ignores the fact that blacks from immigrate families do well and integrate just fine, verse blacks born into a culture started in slavery, reinforced with segregation, and yet to be corrected for fear of being called racist
the reason a lot of them can't adapt because if they live in gang turf and don't join or leave they will be killed
literally Tim just talked about this on his podcast, and he owns this discord
I don't know the answer to what % of the population is associated with gangs. It could easily be 50%
It's kinda hard when nobody will willingly give that information up to authorities since it'll likely cost them their lives
@Grenade123 No they don't they live in their our communities like everyone else. Yes slavery was bad for blacks but segregation was obectivly better for them just like at the crime stats dring and after Jim Crow.
did you not even listen to tims podcast?
The fact is that blacks in America commit crime at a similar level to blacks in Africa.
hey, where is your middle east? or even Italy, or Russia?
Nice try. How can you explain it besides biology @Grenade123?
which parts of Africa? the westernizing cities, or the starving deserts?
how about where they fucking live?
The frist image list countires.
middle east vs northern Africa to start
second russia (all white) vs these countries
I am bad at geography sorry
actually any eastern European country
@Grenade123 You mean places that were built before they arrived by whites like Harlem. The fact is blacks don't build societies on the same level as whites do.
and where is the south American blacks?
Compare Haiti to Iceland.
Atlanta.
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 103/343
| Next