http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/japan-transgender-people-sterilise-before-transition-gender-change-lgbt-rights-a8086341.html

hehehe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyFbVA3Kop4

silly thing for japan to do, they dont have enough sterial people in the first place

that is no reason for having people you don't want having kids, well, having them

doesn't that go the lines of the europeans saying refugees are good because they reproduce more?

refugees arnt citizines

though, males who have their penis's removed will tend to be sterilized anyway

this might be a preventitive messure against genital transfer opperations which will be posible in 20 years

well its posible right now, just not very implamental yet

personally while im a transexual i want to keep my squirtgun because i havent figured out if i ever want to be a parent or not. i dont think this messure that japan is taking will have any long term benefits for them

https://twitter.com/MouthyBuddha/status/970009816960786432

I deleted all of my memes.

were you put on the SPLC's hate watch list?

And did you call them

I don't think so.
I should check to see if I'm banned in Israel.

yes

>personally while im a transexual i want to keep my squirtgun
@Arch-Fiend rly? 🤔

finn being force sensitive would make the next movie better consitering how many force users they have left (hint its not many)

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/001/246/210/d05.png yes

@Arch-Fiend kill my curiosity. How do you identify yourself politically? do you believe gender is binary?

okay, so I just quickly read over that Japan thing and all I could think of is "so... Trans people are angry that Japan wants then to fully commit to transitioning before being allowed to do so."

i usually just consiter myself a female even though i have a penis, or shemale, but mostly i just dont really care because unless im naked or tell someone people will just think of me as as they will. as someone on the internet i think you can understand that our interactions within this annonymous space render our identitys in the hands of others to forumulate based on our interactions with them and what little details can or will be provided to them in order to render an idea of us. i apply that to the physical world as well because the way we formulate the identity of others here is based on what we have learned before having access to the internet thus steming from a more fundamental psychological mechanism for identifying traits

basicly my philosophy on the matter is that "this stuff isint hard to figure out, its just people who cant help but spend far to long thinking about it lead to the most issues reguarding it."

i dont believe gender is binary, i dont believe gender exists, i think human sexual characteristics are bianary, but i also believe the flesh is weak and the blade is sharp

when you said you wanted to keep your "squirtgun" I assumed the swap was the other way around

cant really call a vagina a gun

I don't think there will be any good for society to consider gender non-binary

@Arch-Fiend here is a question: if gender =/= to sex, then what is gender to you (aside from not existing)? It seems to be a more or less recent divergence between sex and gender.

i consiter gender nonexistant and also communist propaganda

but what is it?

because it used to mean sex

but if it is not that, then what, exactly is it?

i mean if you have a definition for it then its your definition, i dont have a defintion for it

Thank you friend.

gender is a very new word

okay, let me rephrase, what is the gender that you say doesn't exist. I don't think you can say something doesn't exist if you don't have a definition for it.

nah, gender isn't a new word. Gender is also useful in biology and science. If you deny gender you will go backwards in many many areas

stats also become shit

i think gender to the people who invented the word means to discribe social and psychological sexual characteristics

so like gender roles?

rather than biological sex

if thats what they think

@.B please don't confuse things in this conversation, biological sex, as everyone here seems to agree, does exist and is binary. Unless you count more than just humans, then there is like 5.

unfortunately social and psychological sexual characteristics have to many veriables in my opinion to be solid scientificly. some are, because they are influinced by the hormones produced by our brains and also by the different needs birth givers have in society comparied to non-birth giving of the species. however when you throw culture into the mix gender roles become slightly more complicated

i wonder how many of these SJWs don't believe estrogen and testosterone exist

@Grenade123 I don't think I'm confusing it. Medication is gendered, stats we use to make up laws, are gendered. The left is also trying to redefine "woman" and "man".

pretty much all of the time you can tell that women wont be in extremely dangerous or certain death roles in society (ie war) but outside that role the postion of women and men in society become more blured

especially with influince of culture and even then, technology seeks to slowly erode all social roles men and woman have

evolution of war has permited a greater blurring and will contenue to as technology increases

you can deny gender roles and wait for the result of that. Denying gender exists is another thing entirely

that will translate into an effect on psychology and also evolutionary psychology as mating selection will change with it

gender isint sex

people are trying to replace sex with gender because sex is an old word thats harder to fuck with because of its concrete definition

@.B alright, then let me pose this question to you: What is gender?

if you see gender used in science outside of social or political science then its bullshit

@Grenade123 in the west, another word for "sex"

the only thing gender means to me that makes sense is for it to mean social and psychological sexual characteristics

also the classical joke of asking "Sex" can be followed by "yes please", while "gender" is followed by the binary answer

gender is defined by sex and thus not the same thing

gender, even if redifined, cannot be picked randomly

and all of use agreed sex is binary and that is not the definition we are examining. Different group of people have different definitions for words. even the US has its own variations on language. Coke can mean either the cola drink from coka-cola, just be a generic name for cola, or a generic name for soda.

if you suggest scientific and well defined categories, I might be temped to agree

Or the drug, cocaine.

yes, but that stays pretty constant across the US

your point being?

gender's definition was always tied to sex. If we want (let's assume) to redefine it, do it properly at least

otherwise we can just drop "gender" and just use "sex"

Pretty much.

Point being, you are talking about soda and we are talking about a specific soda. This is why i asked you not to confuse the specific definitions we are agreed upon for this discussion. Arch already state that sex is binary and gender =/= sex. Because i was interested in his views, i've been using his definition.

ill be back in a bit, need to eat

my point is simple, if gender != sex, define it in a way that is useful for society

otherwise the use of the word becomes irrelevant

well, that is what i was trying to figure out

we are in sync then

yes. which is what i was saying earlier

what would be the evolution of the word? where do you think this will go?

i was trying to figure out what Arch thought they (the left) referred to since he said he doesn't think gender exists despite saying sex exists.

clearly he must have some concept of it to stay it doesn't exist.

>that will translate into an effect on psychology and also evolutionary psychology

>the only thing gender means to me that makes sense is for it to mean social and psychological sexual characteristics

>>>psychological sexual characteristics
This is not "gender", and I wouldn't call that gender

"sexual characteristics" as in physical only?

that would be useful 🤔

i think, in that statement, psychological characteristics refers to parts of people personalities that seem prone to being affected by your sex hormone levels, and then that translates into social sphere.

that would mean gender changes

which would make the word useless

if that is gender, then it is not binary. However, it would, i agree, be useless as that there would be as many potential genders as there are individuals on earth. that seems to be where we are going, as tim pointed out in that video about the 31+ genders.

idk why people started to define their identity on the gender category

because people are dumb on average

your identity is your identity

it is not gender

also, your identity isn't defined uniquely by sexual characteristics

trying to define your "sexual characteristics", both physical and phychological all into a category is, well.. retarded

this would be why anyone not alt-left calls them stupid

it will destroy the word "gender", and that's it

that seems to be all SJWs are good at, destroying things

And yelling at the sky.