The fuck did I walk in on?

about holohoax. or what else ever was going on in here

@Jasse The Holocaust never happened because Hitler was fake and never existed

But Antifa loves his speeches, please be considerate

@xorgy I often ask myself that when i come on here 😄

One day, I want to do to an antifa meeting and read out a Hitler speech with jews replaced by white people

I wanns see what will happen

lol, that sounds like 4-chan

Hey brits

Your tax money goes to this https://twitter.com/bbcthesocial/status/1047525566491107330?s=19

The Ford testimony was like a master class in manipulative bullshit

^

From the *scratchy almost-like-I'm-gonna-cry* voice where she never actually choked up or cleared her throat, to the constant cutesy bullshit, it angered me to watch that and see people take her seriously

If you've ever recounted something that upset you to the point your throat made that sound, you'll remember clearing your throat or getting choked up and having to pause, kinda like kavanaugh actually did multiple times

You wouldn't just calmly read the whole story without stopping, then immediately after without drinking anything or coughing or clearing your throat be able to go back to normal speech on a good damned dime like she did

At least the dude defending himself actually matched up with how humans work, biologically

Kavanaugh might not have commited the crimes they accuse him of, but he sure violated the 4th amendment.
That alone is reason not to let him pass. Conservatives are being decieved and distracted from this fact by the overwhelming reporting about these accusations

How did he do that?

Idk much about him aside from this fiasco(my phone refused to let that word go in til I did it manually)

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/404751-brett-kavanaughs-views-in-privacy-and-the-fourth-amendment-should-make

Some of it, you can find more if you read the acctual rulings in cases handled by him.

did someone ping me

No, Someone pinged gamers @Bee

All of you go out and eat your vegetables get a job and start a family then build a farm compound and arm yourselves to the teeth

>start a family
Because apparently it's just that simple.

Hard part is finding someone that won't take half of your arsenal when she leaves you...

You dont need to worry about starting a family buddy

what a warm welcome. a Jew comes and the first things I see are "lolohoax"

and something about Jews being washed away. Finally I arrived into an unsafe space

about time to woke about JQ.

the JQ was invented by a jew

those damn jews are behind everything

I dont see a violation of the 4th from this article

https://youtu.be/S5bogm15OUk

@Timcast YO TIMMY, HAVE YOU SEEN THIS?

get out of <#463068752725016579> reeeeeeeeeeeeee

post in newsroom

lol

i just watched the same video

MSM asking "w w why did you limit the number of people to be interviewed by the fbi?"

we didnt

@Timcast i don’t get how you can hold your values when a quick look at what the “left” has done throughout history tends to show the literal millions of bodies rotting from the disgusting murders that your group guilt concepts lead to

Any attempt to do anything more than protect peoples god given rights ends in murder

Because ones values can be independent of party religion or ideology ? It's not that hard when you actually stop and think about it. But it's easier to guild by association and say my tribe is the true savior (TM) or something...
That never gets old

Tim is more libertarian. Those are the values he holds. What you are asking for is the complete opposite: to abandon his value whenever a party rebrands itself.

That's the opposite of retaining values.

@mer.at yeah it sounds like they're absolutely devastated to find this out

then you could hear them constantly trying to make some excuse as to why they could print that it was limited without lying.

i just finished it, at some point i believe i heard tongue snap or what you call it

also when that senator(?) said the phrase 'fake news' 100s of photos got taken in a second

yup

I'm enjoying listening to Orrin Hatch speak

Im asking him to not support retards like bernie sanders who would bankrupt our nation in a heartbeat

How would he do so @Faticati

Also

Our country is going to be bankrupt soon anyway lol

Simple what a man produces is his he pays his government for an army and roads

Leaches can die

The disabled and elderly can be taken care of by private charities

Think about it

We could go from spending massive amounts on entitlements per year to nothing

We could be a space faring country in 1 generation

If we only empowered the mind and not the sloth

The government is only capable of restricting your freedoms. They have regulations on guns, where I can drive, what kind of paints I can use on my yoyos. Now some things they do is good, I like being able to go out my house without have my property stolen or shot at; but most is unnecessary. If you want to maximize your liberty minimize the government.

Ford testimony was not master class

It just showcased to the rest of the country how fucking radicalized the left is

To the point where they don’t even care about due process

Call on the fbi when the fbi isn’t needed

Goes on for days sucking the fbis dick on how credible and impartial the fbi is

Then completely 180s and shits on the fbi calling it a partisan hack for doing what they brought them into do

They’ve really reached a new low here

I didn’t think it was possible for them to disgrace themselves this much

But bravo 👏

Master class public humiliation

Well...I like beer.

Same

Join the rape club

i see you are a rapist too

I can't remember last time I drank something.

I don't even take the Ouzo from the Greek.

and I really feel that.

what would be nice if the FBI Stuff could be declassifie....

You gave me a booze to Google. The things I learn everyday...

Yes

Sharing rape tips

With the fellow rapists

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-white

Polyarcho-capitalism is best ism.

"Part of our present difficulty is that we must constantly adjust our lives, our thoughts and our emotions, in order to live simultaneously within the different kinds of orders according to different rules. If we were to apply the unmodified, uncurbed, rules of the micro-cosmos (i.e. of the small band or troop, or of, say, our families) to the macro-cosmos (our wider civilisation), as our instincts and sentimental yearnings often make us wish to do, we would destroy it. Yet if we were always to apply the rules of the extended order to our more intimate groupings, we would crush them. So we must learn to live in two sorts of world at once."
-F.A. Hayek.

"We must promote the idea of secession. Or more specifically, we must promote the idea of a world composed of tens of thousands of distinct districts, regions, and cantons, and hundred of thousands of independent free cities such as the present day oddities of Monaco, Andorra, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Greatly increased opportunities for economically motivated migration would thus result, and the world would be one of small [classically] liberal governments economically integrated through free trade and an international commodity money such as gold."
-Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

I was reading some comments on Tims vids last night on Bitchute. This problem comes up a lot and in many forms and I see hypocrisy from all sides.

When a Muslim kills a bunch of ppl the 'left' and other Muslims declare they are not 'real' Muslims. The 'right' and 'red pilled' (for lack of a better term for ppl on the left and centre that know what's going on) disagree and call them Muslims.
When a liberal does something stupid like try and kick a woman in the face the right declare liberalism to be a mental illness and the 'red pilled' say this isn't real liberalism.
When a right-winger drives his car into a crowd of ppl the 'left' declare the right violent terrorists and the right say 'he's not with us.
Feminists declare anti-feminists woman haters and misogynists they they can point to numerus videos of ppl calling themselves anti-feminists calling for woman to lose the right to vote. 'They're the extremists' is cried.
Anit-feminists call feminists man haters and can point to the numerus articles declaring men to be the one cause of all problems in the world. 'They're the radical TERFs, they're not proper feminists' is the excuse.

My question is, what gives us the right to declare what someone else believes and how they identify themselves?
I think we need to work this out. the 'oh so #notall matters now does it' is an argument used by both sides and rightly so.

@KatieReid u beer u rape

Issa fact

@Faticati I guess so then. What a shame. 🍻

You better not try and be a supreme court justice

@Poppy Rider I go by peoples actions, not their words. lies are easy - actions are evident.
If the ideology and actions align, they are real "insert group here"

Collectivism is most evil thing, m'lady.

Ew

the other issue with words is people dont generally understand what a specific phrase is used for. Alt right used to be an alternative type of conservative - not a neocon ect. now it means ethno nationalist

Di half

so by the time normies start using a word in common parlance the meaning has distorted

dont seed the ligual ground.

#words matter

My party is the sons of liberty

Its an oldie but a goodie

All the founding members died but I’m restarting it

@Poppy Rider someone constantly on the defense can't strike back very well. It's a tactic

ya i got fucked a bit socially when alt right changed from neocon to white nationalists, i was going around telling people alt righters werent that bad lol

Milo got stung by it.

not sure if ignorance on my part or fault of fuckery with definitions everybody else did

he was the poster boy for the trolly alt right, 2 years on its ethno

its 1984 basics. control the language control the people

Horseshoe theory confirmed.
https://youtu.be/UnIuhRt3D-E

We live in a society

All milo wanted was an ethnostate a place were white babies are welcome and happas murdered

Horseshoe theory was a shit debate primarily because it views politics as existing on one axis. Amusingly, its critics often did the same as its proponents

Cory booker is a retard dont change my mind

How dare you call #Sparticus a retard

No True Muslim fallacy

Hypothetical question time. If we assume Brett sexually assaulted Ford in the manner described. Who is the bigger victim? Would the consequence of getting half the country to believe you are a predator and thus receive continuous death threats and having your daughters/family continually harassed about a terrible choice you made in your teens be justified? Or is that victim blaming? Where Bretts victimization from media, politicians and the public at large cannot be blamed on Brett?

The biggest victim is the 14th amendment

I was thinking 4th, 5th, and 6th

One of those amendments anyway

If Brett is the greater victim. And we #believethevictim... What does that mean?

Maybe he had it coming for being a beer-swilling chad

Could we believe everyone but just use Trial by Flamethrower to sort it all out?

Or we could do what lindsey suggested and try seeing if people float next.

you mean get the accused to the wall and blast them with flamethrower and if they flinch, they are guilty ?

I was thinking something more along the lines of if God's Holy Armor does not come down upon them and make them invincible then they are guilty. It could even be done on a larger scale with nuclear weapons. We just need to have a little faith...

that sounds perfect plan. lets nuke israel to see if they really are gods chosen people.

We already know that answer when God allowed the Romans to expell the Jews from Judea.

You ever gonna back up that link you posted way back when, @Jasse ?

huh. i which one?

i have been posting all over the internet lately...

The study you claimed proved heritability and immutable lower IQ of Black Americans when it actually suggested IQ malleability and the effect of upbringing when relevant to education

IQ is malleable to the extent.
but i dont see revelancy of that when starting postition is that they have way over one standard of deviaton lower IQ by genetic factors.

its not like education can magically bring their IQ level of whites.

I think you're forgetting something.

From the abstract "The socially classified Black adoptees, whose natural parents were educationally average, scored **above the IQ and the school achievement mean of the White population. **"
"The high IQ scores of the socially classified Black adoptees indicate malleability for IQ under rearing conditions that are relevant to the tests and the schools."

This is what I'm specifically asking about

Ashkenazi Jews have been tested as having some very high IQ. If IQ works like cooking then you just need to mix the right ingredients to raise the IQ.

oh that study.
you forgot "Biological children of the adoptive parents scored even higher. Genetic and environmental determinants of differences among the Black and interracial adoptees were largely confounded."

Shifted goalposts, no precise scoring used to compare the two in the abstract

Study showed that environmental factors can bring black students above the "white" mean, and the expectations from the school

Your initial argument was that the adopted black students saw no real change
"Black children raised in White households have similar IQ scores to Black children in Black households.
https://archive.fo/oNKYp"

If black children are more than one standard deviation lower than white children && black children in white households score above the white mean then != the two scores are similar

oh now i see what you miss undestood.

the one standard of deviatoin gap didint go anywhere.
those parents biological children still scored higher, even in exaxly same school and enviroment.

Right, the degree to which they scored higher is not mentioned, and I doubt we're dealing with ubermensch whiteys. I'd read through the study if it wasn't paid shit. Might hunt it down

I am having a dillema... Chuck Grassley v Lesley Graham. Who is the bigger Chad?

Been thinking about this for half a minute. Why is authoritarianism so demonised? I'm fairly liberal but isn't it just enforcing laws and that? When people talk about authoritarianism they always seem to characterise it as enslavement. Someone controlling every aspect of your life but that's just the extreme version of it. Seems kinda like people are just only considering the most extreme examples of it and making that look like the norm. Is that not similar to someone saying that libertarians are all child molesters and serial murderers?

I think it's the context of the time we live in, where power in the USA is concentrated at the federal level instead of state, or EU instead of country. And how both the extreme left and the Richard Spencer types both seem to be horseshoeing around to being anti-free speech

Authoritarianism tilts towards tryanny and that's never a good thing. It's also not so easy to identify where reasonable authoritarism begins that tilt into tryanny. Humanity has a social nature and we're pretty well aware of that. If that nature, if left unchecked, leads societies to tilt into that tyranny. We know that humanity tilts to an extreme before things get too bad and then they need to be regined in again. So it's a survival strategy to fight against the authorian tilt into tyranny but we don't know that exact tipping point. So people try and demonize authoritarianism in totality to fight against that.

That's a good point. I reckon there's a healthy amount of authoritarianism that society needs but there is a tendency, especially in recent history, for it to go too far.

Society requires authoritarianism to function, individuals require libertarianism to function. Need a good mix of the two that doesn't tip to either of the extremes

the state is only a means to an end. its end and its purpose is tp preserve and promote a community of human beings who are physically as well as spiritually kindred. above all, it must preserve the existence of the race, there by providing the insdisenceble condition for the free development of all of the forces dormant it this race.
those states which do not serve this purpose have no justification for their existence.

as long as authoritarian state serves its purpose its not tyrannical by the definition.🤔

uhhh what

you make it sound like humans always had a "state". humans never needed any significant form of government for the vast majority of homo sapien's existence. we made do with "man with biggest hat" for the longest time

also, you don't seem to understand what tyranny means. a happy slave is still a slave.

though, that would be under the assumption that you are even happy with the ruling power.

say, do you know of anyone you would be 100% totally okay with utterly surrendering to? Someone you would obey without hesitation?

any one person

In the time before the post-enlightenment state you were subject to random spartans/visigoths/vandals/mongols/ottomans wiping out all the stuff you built

>white people

yeah most of the history we lived in tribes. which serves exact same purpose.
state is/*should* be extend of that.

`also, you don't seem to understand what tyranny means. a happy slave is still a slave.`
>there by providing the insdisenceble condition for the **free development of all of the forces dormant it this race.**

hitler was good leader.
but i admit finding one is hard.

"free development of all the forces dormant *in this race"
what does this even mean? is this some new age+altright nonesense now? you're using ">" as if I'm supposed to understand the word salad you make out to be an actual talking point

also, tribes are a poor model for large-scale human organization. you can make almost any system work with around 150 people. you could argue humans would be better off in such numbers, but that would probably make you an anprim.

it's not just finding _one_ good leader. he's one day going to expire, and you'll need a system to find another. how would you propose another _supreme leader_ be chosen?

Community leaders maybe taking on a role of what the priesthood used to. But with less kid touching.

Strong backbone of tradition allowing leaders to train the next generation.

would that work on a modern scale though? we're talking millions, if not billions of people.

we're talking about ONE man, ruling all these people. sure, in smaller communities one bad leader can be ousted in a single night, but one such a large scale, with entire mechanized military and peacekeeping (and a presumably unarmed civilian population, as is a given with authoritarian regimes). The only way you're getting rid of that guy is a "lucky accident" or a high-raking coup.

plus the church was never a nation state. at most it worked in tandem with royalty and nobility. they could govern small towns (to and extent) but not kingdoms and certainly not nations

Ah, I'm not sure about leaders on that scale yeah. Cults of personality are fragile anyway.

`the free development of all of the forces dormant it this race.`
what part you have problem of understanding?

it dont need to be absolute dictator who cant be voted out.
and its not just one person who makes all decisions.

and church is pretty good way of ruling. but current christianity is degraded to so low level that it doesnt even serve purpose anymore.

And youth programs to train and find new leaders.

first off, what do you mean by "dormant forces"?

I literally have no idea what you mean. The fact that you are oblivious as to why just shows how far gone you are

what are the "forces" dormant within me? am I secretly wizard, but da joos are holdin' me back with their damn jew hexes?

what even

Maybe he meant the matrix

state must allow us to develop to the technological and well every aspect of life and society as high level as we are capable of.

i dont understand how thats some how contriversal or anything.

and just look at current society. it degrading fast in to degenerates. and torwards white genocide rly...

barring technology, there is no way to properly scale society by "levels". such a method would be completely arbitrary to the one doing the scaling (you). technological advancement is the only real way to rate a society's "level".

have you heard of the Rat Paradise experiment?

I can sum it up if you haven't

yes i have.

prosperity leads to degeneration.

whatever utopia you have dreamed up will ultimately spawn the antithesis to itself.

have you heard about marxist subversion.
because thats exactly whats happening.

yuri bezmenov summs it up pretty well

yes, and if it wasn't marxist subversion it would be something else (probably identical or similar)

_probably some retarded ethnonats who'll end up buried by the same system they put into place_

same shit, different pile. society will degenerate. it's just a matter of when, how slowly, and who'll burn it all down, and who'll off the guy who burned it down and then establish something that might be good or bad. the human struggle continues.

...ah, my nihilist misanthropy is getting the better of me.

say, what are your thoughts on genetically engineered superhumans? if your ethnostate somehow manages an authoritarian system but with untamed scientific advancement, it is a logical conclusion that someone would eventually try to improve upon the creature called Man.

would you bow before this new race of superhumans, or cling to the mythos of the white race?

thats kind of the reason you need authoritarian state. to stop that subversion.
in "liberal" society there is no ways for stopping it.

ethnonats want to healthier society and continue their race.

*black pills are bad mkey*

interesting question.
do you mean cyborg kind of stuff
or genetic manipulation.
if its genetic. it would be essentially same genes. but just weed out bad genetic mutations. like genetic diseases.
but that can get out of hands pretty easily...

Not cyborgs, but I'll admit I was being unfairly vague.

lets go with the unobvious versions.

a built-from-scrap human. lab created cells, grown in a vat, into a creature that is human by all means but genetic.

that would make them new race of people.
and there for not my people nor my race. so ofc i wouldnt allow that.

hmm, interesting. say, at what point would it become a new race?

say, if 50% of the cells in the body were designer cells, but the rest are natural?

where would you draw the line?

we share like 97% of genes with bigs.
but i get what you mean. its actually almost same question as now with immigration and "what is white" debates.

genetic differece is measured in Fixation index (FST)
like for example largest distance between europeans is 0.0667 FST
and distacne between europeans and africans is 0.23 FST

but basically thats just paradox called "loki's wager".

But the genetic different couldnt be that big. before it becomes different race.

Yo, your country is so fucked

How bout we don't look at race

Im an ashkenazi jew and im stupid

btfo nazis

Its jews who are claiming that ashkenazi jews have high IQ. But some how israels IQ is 95, *i wonder why*🤔

`How bout we don't look at race`
Thats very swedish beta cuck to say indeed.

Israel has more than just Ashkenazi Jews in it.

It’s like 25% non Jews with a majority of those being Arab and of Jews there are lots of Mizrachi, Spharadi, and Ethiopian Jews.

36% of population is ashkenazis

Yeah so that would lower the average IQ.

lol, was "Loki's Wager" ever cited by name in all that time when people were meming "Read Loki!" after the Sargon vs Spencer debate on Warski Live?

why is a woman, who had been "sexually assaulted", called a survivor?

i mean if she got her ass grabbed multiple times, she would still be called a survivor?
that's like calling someone a car crash survivor, who dented his car during parking.

it's easier to manipulate you, it has more punch than just 'victim'

also it helps in erroding the difference between rape and other forms of sexual assault

in my opinion that is

yeah so going up to a woman and saying, "hey wanna fuck", might end up in a ONS, in a relationship, or she might turn into a "sexual assault survivor"

or a slap 😃

"Ayy bb u wan sum fuk" confirmed Kavanaugh quote. #resist

>he would ask

>bobs and vagene

milk truck has arrive

Oh man

The tears of the libs empower me

Roboute kavanaugh has been revived and the god emperor marches on hill capital

Its gonna be a good year

The reps could hold the senate and house

Hope is alive

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/304839440121987073/498226168617500684/photo_2018-06-05_11-42-53.jpg

Time to go check on the salt mines. First stop splinternews

Bahahahhaha

They are eating each other already

I hope they hold the white house

Fuckin dems are authoritarian

YEs

So I've been wondering, how could the SC revert Roe v Wade? Who would bring a case to the SC to change it?

well, there would have to be a case that gets appealed that far tbh.

I am not sure there will be though.

"democrats are the party of crime"

From who? A father that doesn't want a woman to have an abortion?

Likely it's to be persons vs. States who enact laws restricting it

Eliminating roe v wade simply means each state can decide its own abortion laws.

Can't they do that at the moment? The SC can't just decide the a decision no longer applies can they?

afaik technically it can be overruled if it get before the SC again but not just on a whim

at least that's what I heard..i'm far from educated on US justice system

yes.

They have to have an actual case to decide come to them before overruling Roe vs Wade

@Joe_Limon The courts can also rule in the opposite direction that there's a right to life, at least in so far as they can't intentionally terminate it.

It's true they can reverse it, just look back at separate but equal which was later reversed as not being true. To bring it before the courts however for such a judgment you need to argue either that the supreme court hadn't considered a particular argument or couldn't conceive of it being used in "x" way.

Jews have very high IQ I am a jew and I am at 180

oh shit 190

yeah, 190kg you fat cellar kid

190iq jew you say

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1461100002&searchtext=plastic

IQ is like penis size. Its not the number that counts but what you do with it.

190 iq i find that doubtful

Especially since you messed up and said 180 first

190 IQ would put one in the top 0.0000001973%
If I haven't missed a decimal point there are ~15 people alive today with that IQ

Occam's Razor would suggest that such people would have better shit to do that shitpost on discord.

My IQ is 250

oh NVM thats my weight

Lol same

you can buff IQ score with practice, academics deny it but multiple people who went for highest IQ score admitted to spending time practicing for it lol

i forget his name but the one guy who held it for awhile, who ended up a comedy writer talked about doing that