#VoteMockingbird2020

I honestly just slap the roll on without looking

I cannot be controlled. I am the overhuman

^ did you get affected by the kid earlier

No. I'm just disappointed

Don't be disappointed. I'm sure I'll be elected.

unlikely

With a platform like that, there is no way I can lose.

best of luck

thx

@Jes I’d define Hitler as centre right

Imo

in aggregate yeah.

you cant put it in normal left right scale.
its third postition....

It depends on who you ask

Some people say Hitler is all sorts of things

I personally think if you look at him objectively he is centre right. Due to his mixture of right and left policies

yeah (((some people))) are spreading alot of miss information about him

What's your opinion on gaslighting?

you mean mainsream media😏

can anyone think of a justifiable example of violating the harm principle.

I thought the harm principal was like Azimov's rules for robots. a closed logic loop

The Harm Principle states that the *only* justification for interfering in another's liberty is to prevent harm to others.

its close to it but not quite the same thing

@toastermuffin to save white race.

have a feeling i would get kicked out of school if i wrote that

thats exactly the problem.
cultural marxism have gotten so far. and people are so brain washed.

bioethics is hard for a libertarian

yeah. beacause libetarians are just usefull idiots for marxist.

its like polar ends of the spectrum

libetarians arent doing anything to fight against marxist. and even agreeing to let them do what they want.

true to a degree

wait is your school assignment to find a loophole in the harm principal?

yup need to think up a counterpoint for it

easy.
libetarians have no ways of fighting against subversion.

there isnt an exception. thats why its so important

you dont have the right to harm others

others dont have the right to harm you

you have the right to self defence or the defence of others

wtf is your school teaching you?

ill probaly just wright that thee is no case in witch that its okay to violate it worst case its a single lost point

its a bioethics classs and we are focusing on autominity

you cant preemptivly harm people. it has to be defence

otherwise thatd be every killers defence in court

yeah there is no example i can tink ive asked like 5 diffrent people for help

no one can think how to prove it wrong but my professer bs

sorry mate, i may be showing my age here but is your prof a marxist?

he very well could be

because the only way to violate it is to state that the collective is more important than the individual

would not susprise me

and that goes against the core of the principal

ill make it work we will debate it in class and prove it true

so you got 2 choices. answer the question correctly and risk being marked down or write some marxist colectivist bs and get points

good luck mate, i dont envy your position

these are one point HW. he dosent even read them as far as i know just makes sure you wrote something. i can mention collectivism and how its still wrong

Just mention the standard thing, to prevent harm to others is the only time when harm should be done

Say preemptive counter strike.

@toastermuffin follow Shapiro advice here

thank yall for the help ill be sure to make the best of it as i can

Be on the republican underground

Join YAF or something. But always wear a face mask lol

You should become Jeffersonian Republicans

cough cough the Louisiana purchase is unconstutional

@toastermuffin ssssshhhh

We don't need to relitigate the Louisiana purchase. Last thing we need here are the fuckin french.

didnt say its a bad thing

Just. Yaknow?

Just don't tell them

😉

The US constitution gives no explicit direction on the acquisition of territory

besides do you really want that land to be part of the British Empire?

no you don't

therefor it is left to the individual states not the goverment

There were no established states in the Louisiana purchase

yes and the land should have ben purchased by individual states not the fed

why? That land was turned over to individual states once they were established
the purchase just secured the land as american

you are not wrong but the goverment was behaving outside of its scope

not saying it was a bad deal

just unconstutional

what part of the constitution did it violate?

since it is not expressly permited to the federal goverment the states reserve said right Amendment X
RIGHTS RESERVED TO STATES OR PEOPLE
Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791. The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights

and purchase of alaska

DAMN FEDERALISTS

Its not my FAULT

the senate blocked my amendments !

but at least we got Montana

Question that's really a poll:

Do schools in your local area read a book on due process like To Kill a Mockingbird or The Scarlet Letter?

only a few classes and only the honors ones

so you need to be an honour student to be taught about due process?

this explains a lot lol

To Kill a Mockingbird was pretty standard, from what I know.

To Kill A Mockingbird and The Scarlet Letter were pretty standard, but the curricula have been shifting and it's no longer a given people will read any particular book. Just as it has become standard to use *A People's History* as the standard History textbook, I got a hunch a number of school districts have removed these books from the curricula for more contemporaneous and politically-oriented flair.

50 years ago, everyone was required to read *The Federalist Papers,* Now you can't even find humanities college graduates who have read any of them.

And colleges will discipline people for handing out copies of the constitution.

That said, I don't have any data personally on what is being taught at local primary schools.

I've never read either but I did watch *Easy A* with Emma Stone a couple of years ago

@pratel my school required it. I believe that my son's school he will go to later requires it as well

But I'm trying to move him into the GT courses now in elementary school

So I dunno if it changes anything

"it" being which book?

The two you mentioned

To kill a mockingbird and scarlet letter

Is this a red district/state or blue?

Blue

But we have a red governor. Flips back and forth

Maryland is a bit of a mixture. It's only solidly blue for presidential elections

And maybe senatorial ones

It's not like most blue places

Imo

MD always seemed pretty Blue to me. I went to DMV and felt completely out of place in MD. But I'll bite.

I've just lived here my whole life

Ironically, felt much more in place in PA.

Yeah pa is way more blue than here

It probably helped I was in western PA.

Yeah

But Philly didn't seem as blue as MD to me.

But it would have also been the DC side of MD too.

Where did you go?

I compared it to VA.

In md

Around DC.

Oh well yeah. That's blue af

When you go pretty much anywhere else it gets pretty red

Montgomery, prince George's counties are really blue. Deep blue

Yeah, I got the impression rich Democrats live in MD. Business happens in DC and Republicans find places in VA.

They live around DC so yeah

Though VA has been trending blue due to DC.

You also have to remember a lot of Republicans aren't exactly wide open about it the way Dems are

You can spot a Dem

It's a bit harder to find the Republican unless they're old and you're assuming it

I think that's actually a problem with Republicans.

I was surprised by how many people love Hogan as governor

It creates a situation where the left is always dominating the conversation.

But will agree, the right tends to silence and 'getting along'

I was surprised by how many people love Hogan as governor

I'm not concerned about left leaning stuff at the state level. I just don't want the fed doing it. I'm a republican even still but until I'm not debating the entire fucking country and instead just debating people in my state, I'm not going to be satisfied.

Don't really follow.

But all politics is local.

The nation follows the states.

And state policies can matter as much as federal ones.

They do, but there's too much time spent by the left trying to have fights at the federal level

Turns out its okay to violate the harm/nap if it's for your own good kms

https://youtu.be/SPic1FXWQAQ?t=28m

watch the last minute.
i get the feeling, he already tries to setup his 2020 nomination

first gay US president, and then it's a Republican from the southern states? boy i'd pay to watch that!

that wasnt anything new.
afghanistan will stay as opium production place and america "somehow" never find peace with talibans.

Question: utilizing the l.ogic you normally read from outlets like Jezebel is this title not racist?
https://jezebel.com/an-ode-to-the-genius-of-immigrant-food-1829442559

>Logic
>Jezebel
Your question has flaws.

Hey <@&464233153654030360> any see the ford news

why would you at gamers?

What?

Wich one??

You mean the stuff from her ex-boyfriend, gamer?

AAAAAAAAAA

GAMERS

What?

Epic gamers in here

RISE UP

uhhhhhhhhhh

Lol

GAMERS RISE UP

<a:pingannoyed:424293636402970626>

GAMERS ARE THE MOST OPPRESSED GROUP

nah

Is fourchan at Ford and the other accusers??

im good

Who is this Four Chan?

Why

idk whats going on

Oh u mean like the car game? Ford?

The presumption of innocence is sexist

It’s 2am you cock blaster @Jokerthefool

Innocent until proven guilty is oppression

*who what why beddy bye -_-*

I have a vagina, believe you me

@Swedishmafia101 it's like the Chinese triad, only there's four of them

WHY MUST I BE CALLED IN THE GAMING CHANNEL FOR POLITCIS

Seriously tho

HOW IS THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE NOW AN ISSUE???

THAT'S LITERALLY THE FOUNDATION OF EVERY DEMOCRACY'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM

BECAUSE THE LEFT HATE MAKING THINGS COMPLEX

you mean love* (?)

THEY WANT TO SEE KAVANNGH AS A RAPIST NO MATTER THE LACK OF EVIDENCE

SO OF COURSE THEY HATE THE PRESUMPATION OF INNOCENCE

This is how dictatorships are born

BECAUSE THEY THINK IT'S A RULE THAT PROTECTS RAPISTS

We won't have random dictatorships because some people think presumption of innocence is a bad thing

This is just a bunch of democrats taking advantage of their emotion-driven base to make political gains

it's really nothing new

I'm saying the rhetoric is that of a dictator

That evidence is not required

The presumption of guilt

That the burden of evidence should fall on the accused

All of that is true, but a bunch of liberal Democrats probably don't believe Republican is deserving of a Presumption of Innocence

So it's not that they don't believe in it

Have you seen that??
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qNMAp8kXWrc&feature=youtu.be
@Timcast seen how they trolled Antifa with Hitler Quotes (translated)??

It's more that they that don't believe it should be applied equally

"The presumption of innocence only applies to us"

I'm guessing these people wouldn't say "RONALDO SHOULD GO TO JAIL IMMEDIETLY"

@Stefan Payne Of course people can troll Antifa with Hitler quotes

I saw that video

Because they've never listened to a Hitler speech

So they don't even know what their enemies believe or preach

Stalin was worse than Hitler. Change my Mind.

They barely know what they preach themselves

How can I change your mind when what you say is totally correct

Thought as much 😉

Hitler did a handful of good things

I can't think of any good Stalin did

Did Stalin give every Russian family an affordable car?

Hitler was responsible for VW and the VW beetle was the "Kraft durch Freude Wagen".

Did Stalin build roads that would be used for like 70 years after his death?

Oh dear, now you can flame every radical lefty driving a VW or an Audi...

I for one appreciate Stalin for murdering the competent military leadership soviets had

Did Stalin make a SODA?

Btw Fanta also comes from Nazi Germany

Damn really?

Yes but not the one we have right now

Fanta is nazi coke

The United States wouldn't allow Coca Cola to be made in Germany, so the Coke workers in Germany made Fanta instead.

IIRC the Original Fanta was something with Apple Juice.

Man nazis had some great taste in soda

We should give Fanta to a bunch of lefties and then tell em they're drinking Fizzy Nazi Soda

I really hate that you can't talk openly about history and only have to remember the bad things....

They have now consumed Nazism

Will this be the new *Milk is a white supremacist drink* Meme?

Hm, if Ben Shapiro ever drank Fanta??

You know the design clothes Hugo Boss?

Hugo Boss was the man who designed the uniforms for the Wehrmacht.

*Fanta is the Nazi drink of choice, be sure to get in an extra Aryan flavor!*

IIRC even Henry Ford collaborated with the Nazis

and some say that WW2 happened because of FDR and his involvement with the Polish

Never has evil been so stylish!

in short: FDR fucked the Polish really really hard and caused WW2 to start

You know the Bosch dishwasher company?

Bosch was involved in the equipment used in the Holocaust.

Holy fuck

First they wash dishes

lol holohoax

then they wash away the jews

Is it true that there were no deathcamps in Germany???

***WASH AWAY SIE JUDEN***

and that the Polish did all the killing?

concentration camps. not deathcamps

The biggest football stadium that is currently in Germany was built by Hitler

its always funny to ask people who belive in holohoax give picture of gas chambers.

Get rekt Allied Forces tards

Some Chemist said somewhere that it woudl be a bit ineffective.

But I have to believe in the Holocuast

yeah be carefull you might end up in prison if you dont belive in it.

Deutschland 👌

@Swedishmafia101 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisitorial_system

Oh shet