No, see above: The YT shooterhad been demonetized..Tim has been demonetized.....so I asked if Tim was vegan (and the timing of his firearms video)

Yeah, so we were making the same joke.

soon

vegan terrorism

it will be pretty easy to stop tho

they wont be able to help themselves, they will just tell you there plot and mention they are vegan while doing it

there used to be a tech channel here, but i guess i will have to ask here now

AirDroid, you guys use it? you got better alternatives?

she wanted to be famous

thats my opinion

holy shit tim replied

lol

I want to know more about qt3.15

I'm thinking she was probably schizo on some level

video at 4 will talk about her real motivations

she just wanted to be famous

censorship was her excuse

jesus

lol

i wonder if this will blow up or not

Anyone trying to 'get famous' by offing folks is likely crazy

or will youtube do the suppress and smokescreen

it might put her outside the category of schizo, but don't mean she ain't cray cray

I watched some of her vidya and it was some fucking funny shit

her workout videos are weird

yeah

the dancing green screen abuse vidya is way worse though

where is she from again

oh Persian youtuber

Iranian

that's like a unicorn

oh

nvm

Don't play the 'persian' ball

i was just searching it up ;-;

curse you google

I'm hoping for another eichenmeltdown

btw have you seen metokur vid on kurt

hilarious

and kind of scary that there are a bunch of loons like that

vid(s)

it's good

it's reflecting reality

oh right 2 parts i just watched them in one go

the coughing of zack confused me for a sec

she made weird parody videos

then made sexually suggestive videos

then made activism videos

to me it seems like she couldnt figure it out

then she started complaining about "stupid" youtube videos

yeah

then got mad at youtube as a whole

I only saw one, I think metokur linked it

crazy gonna crazy

she's weird

and that's an understatement

Looking forward to your 4pm vid

Was she not actually demonetized?

is her channel gone

Well, demonetized or not, her actions at YT HQ were a bit.....extreme

Crazy. Just say it, it's OK

crazy is also an understatement

her action is of an extremist

Careful, calling a female Muslim crazy is frowned on.....are you a patriarchal white male Grossly?

Crazy is a spectrum

she's a freakin loonytoon character

can't wait for d.franco and tim vid on her tomorrow (I'm in a different timezone)

i dotn think she was demonetized

she just wasnt making money

what was she angry about?

Ah, okay. Has her channel already been removed?

not being famous?

I can't find it. That just seems really fast. I mean, Elliot Rodger's channel still exists.

the actual numbers of accounts information "abused" is 87 and not 50 million

from facebook

https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2018/04/04/facebookschandaal-blijkt-veel-grote-dan-gedacht--87-miljoen-acco/

trigger warning: dutch

Another reason the west is fucked with mass immigration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrcnZS-gbK0

Wooo, I see a BPS video.

Ever see an Aryan deer before?

https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/oakland/2018/04/03/kensington-albino-white-deer/480411002/ 😉

awaw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM4r3Iqgv08

Shh, lest people call whiteness unnatural

So is anyone keeping track of if the YouTube shooting has disappeared from the minds of the MSM yet?

yeah 2 more days max before the majority of MSM ignore it entirely even if new info comes out, because it doesn't fit the narrative

Dunno, Im hearing the news reddit removing posts related to it.

prolly due to that "don't wanna publish tragedy" thing

the leftist agenda is freakin real

jesus

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/04/nasim-aghdam-everything-know-youtube-hq-shooter/

It's hard for me to believe her videos were taken down due to "severe violations" of YT policy.

The only YT vid of heres that I saw was the one claiming she was being filtered...but some news articles said some of her vids had graphic vids of animals being slaughtered so maybe that was the reason?

Although I have seen them not remove some pretty bloody jihadist vids...so much for YT consistency

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/apr/05/whats-up-pewdiepie-the-troubling-content-of-youtubes-biggest-star this article is smarter than it seems, its clickbaited well known twitter folk like ian miles chong by the title and had them go ballistic about it on twitter dispite the article actually being fairly neutral and informitive to audiences who may know nothing about the subject matter

that writer looks like ricahrd spencer

lol

Sadly I don't think he mirrors spencer on an ideological graph

He would've just called Pewds alt-right or alt-lite right off the bat if that was the case

lol, Richard Spencer w/ a swirly

Does this mean they are a nazi and we are allowed to punch them?

we, as a society, need to make more "richard spencer has a massive forehead" memes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4thCQUZmzE

Mashable made the woman white for some reason

I dont get how they ran that photo

it was actually ahrd for me to find the doctored photo of her

It's not the first time something like that has happened so it's hard for me to believe it was unintentional.

I saw that shit

I thought it was something she edited honestly

with her shitty green screen shit

They are white washing current events?

And we are supposed to be the racist ones?

Eh

"Probably just bad at what he does" --Timmy

the photo existed since before november

but how this guy used a rare photo over the millions of normal ones

thats odd

however

I cant prove it and wont claim it was deliberate

yeah

is it not just propaganda?

propaganda generally needs to be intentional

otherwise it's (mis|dis)info

well, disinfo would be intentional too

ok, meetings

Shill the discord!

I noticed the original image seemed a little dark over all, is it possible someone in the editing room just used a program to lighten the whole thing and it had ended up changing the eye color?

my mom told me wen I was young never trust the news collect information and make up your own mind.

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2018/04/dutch-hospital-challenges-big-pharma-by-making-own-version-of-very-pricey-drug/

ZOOM IN ON CAT

So, it seems Deerfield, Illinois has now officially banned "assault weapons."

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Deerfield%2C+Illinois+assault+weapons&t=ffab&ia=news

I'm linking the duckduckgo search instead of listing all of the sources, but all of the big names are reporting on it: cnn, washington times, chicago tribune, cbs news, etc.

It looks like any weapon carrying more than 10 rounds.

Including pistols.

"Trustees voted unanimously."

And people who own a gun classified as an 'assault weapon' are going to be forced to turn it in or risk a pretty hefty fine.

They're going to be dragged in front of the court, because it's simply unconstitutional.

If I owned a gun there I'd look into moving and if they tried to fine me before I moved, look at taking them to court for not giving sufficient time to leave the town with my lawfully owned weapon.

hopefully it gives the other states more legal fodder

A real gun friendly state should look at classifing any legal gun holder in their state as part of the "state militia" so they can say any federal law trying to restrict their ownership as actually unconstitutional.

Nice.

I like that idea.

Meanwhile, didn't Texas just allow for open-carrying *swords?*

I mean, why not? Lmao

Funny how most "gun nuts" respond to haters by either inviting them over to a shooting range, or simply ignoring them.

Well, not sure if thats all of them. But seems to be the experience on the gun reddits.

Kinda why I dont trust weapon registers, I support registering to own them like they have CCW permits, but I dont like the sound of the company selling the gun keeping records on who bought what. Or at least keeping them but forced to turn them over to the govt or face punishment.

why would a company not keep records of their customers?

They could and should. Its the idea of the govt forcing them to give them over.

i mean, lets face it, the government could probably find out who owns guns and what kinds if they really wanted to even without company records

Okay, assume thats true then. Good luck actually taking them.

they can take them. the question really is at what cost do they consider it worth while

actually, the ATF is expressly forbidden of creating an owner registry

that doesn't stop the states from doing it and then making it available though

however tech has come pretty far

and I suspect at least half of the AR-15 owners also own an 80% lower (Completed or not)

@Chijohnaok Yeah, the inconsistency bugs me. I wasn't aware of the jihadist stuff, but there's a lot of gory content available. Up-close-and-personal surgeries. How-to-field-dress-a-deer videos. And did they ever remove those disturbing finger family songs? I saw a handful of her videos, and only one included some animal cruelty footage. A couple of them had to do with exercise. Wacky, yes, but I can't imagine what was so in violation of YT's Terms of Service, given the stuff that's still on the site.

Jaden, Can confirm. I can walk around with a sword strapped to my back if I like. God bless Texas.

So... He-Man Cosplay is now legal in Texas? 😁

"Party Islam wants to introduce Sharia and men and women separately on the bus in Belgium"
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nieuwsblad.be%2Fcnt%2Fdmf20180405_03448149 🙀

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fnl.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FIslam_%28politieke_partij%29&edit-text=&act=url

Battle Cat is still a ways off, but pretty close.

Well... have you TRIED to paint a Tiger green? 😁

@Ghostler Zoom in on Betsy taking a bath and catching up on zzzs. 😺

I haven't, but I'm sure if it was your pet and it was young enough, you could try to dye it green...though if it's a white tiger then it would look as though it rolled around in fresh cut grass for a while after

wat

oh

yeah

Independent news enthusiasts? Naw, this is a Betsy the Besty fanclub.

what's up ryecake

better

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article208100709.html

https://twitter.com/FarLeftWatch/status/982346163742388224

^ professor found dead at his home, threats were being left on his lab door at the campus.

Apparently he was convicted of felony assault and plead guilty to strangling his gf (not to death tho).

Still, interesting to see what the cause of death is

Still love those comments
"Is having a convicted abuser not theat enough?"

A domestic abuser? No. Unless everyone on campus is their lover but at that point we have bigger problems probably

It's scary that people are actually celebrating this.

If you create a weapon, expect it to be used on you at some point in the future. These people would do well to remember that. They should learn from history.

They are trying to make the new guillotine but seem to have forgotten what happened to it's inventor and the man who championed it's use in France.

"That can never happen here."

"But we're the good guys. We're not like *those* people."

"We are on the right side of history."

Whelp

https://www.windowscentral.com/xbox-banning-people-taking-clips-vaguely-pornographic-xbox-game

#irony

Need that spongebob meme.
"This game is fine for me to own"
"Yep"
"And it's okay to take screenshots of games I own"
"Uh-huh"
"So is should be able to screenshot this game"
"I see nothing wrong with that"
*Screenshots game*
*BANNED*

welcome to 5 year old... i mean modern reasoning skills,

They can think of solutions, but they never realise how those solutions will work out on themselves

Make sure those gamers among us don't miss @shnarkattack post on the Subverse channel. She discusses the politicization of Far Cry 5 in games media. It's a rather well done piece. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U27GfnpMTdM

lol

Finish the fucking story

I watched that yesterday. Not really a gamer here, but it resonated, because the same goes for certain movie reviews. People have to be able to get out of their heads sometimes, and it's frustrating to see various forms of recreation judged by whether or not they provide a particular commentary on the state of the world.

I mean, first off that game was in development for 6 years, and they wanted relevant political commentary from the last few years of development? And of course they want it to be on their side. It's narcissistic political game reviewing that requires the subject medium to validate their own unrelated perspectives.

Let games be games. Overpoliticization is part of the problem.

Yeah, it feels like everything is being critiqued to death. Maybe we should steer clear of reviews for a while. 😄

I prefer reviewing the reviewers. Momes should make that a regular thing.

I'd tune in, for sure. She could discuss movies, too.

Curious, anyone here played Far Cry 5?

I had alot of fun with it.

Though I did the opposite. I made sure that the peggies called for reinforcements, every outpost.

Though It felt wierd that the LMG handled like a SMG, with an insane magazine size.

https://twitter.com/4cytos/status/982640800675885062

^ vehicle of peace event in Munster, Germany

It's been awhile...

might not be over yet, 2 additional perps still being hunted, alledgedly

http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-target-criminal-background-job-applicants-0407-story.html

Apparently it's discrimination for a retail store to not want to hire a convicted theif.

I mean, I'm all for giving people a second chance to earn a living, but come on.

so what they are saying is that african-americans and latinos are all criminals... 😒

Next a convicted pedophile should be allowed to work alone with children.

how exactly does a policy of "we don't hire convicted criminals" target african americans and latinos?

I mean, isn't it more racist of the person making that statement as they are the ones voicing the assumption that convicted criminals are going to be mostly black and Hispanic?

It very clearly is, but then again, the people 'defending' blacks and hispanics are the actual racists in power nowadays.

you would need to be able to make logical connections from a to b to come to that conclusion

Gotta love how the "progressive" seem to think that the bar for societal standards needs to be lowered in order for minorities to meet them. It's almost like they believe people who belong to these minority groups are not able to meet these evidently high standards. This seems rather racist.

the premise is inherently racist, yes.

it is also the exact opposite of what should be done.

you don't lower standards you improve the performance of those that don't meet them.

Exactly

It's like when they were letting women into the military. People wanting the strength requirement to be lowered and my only thought was "you are saying women are equally capable yet you are insisting that the standards should be lowered because women cannot meet them.... Which implies they are not equally capable."

yep. i don't have a problem with women in the military (well... if anything i have a problem with military in general but that's not the point) but if they don't meet the standards than they should not be allowed in it

in that case it is literally a question of life and death

what helps against not getting a job because of your criminal record? not having a criminal record.

Not having a criminal record is white privilege apparently

yeah... white privilege...

I can explain that

I've debated with people concerning the whole 'police are killing black people' thing

One of the issues constantly brought up

is perceived 'overpolicing' of black communities.

So the argument for not having a criminal record being white privilege

would be that the police don't actually deal with white communities the same way they deal with Black communities

the fallacy being that this fact is based on the race of the subject

yeah... no.

Best way to illustrate why this is wrong

is to turn away from 'frameable' crimes

and describe murder rates per community.

At least from what I've found.

i was raised by a single - physically handicapped - mom and i never got in trouble with police. granted the society is different here... but that would make my point...

That's detatched by a couple degrees by the argument at hand.

And, in fact, might be used by someone debating against you as an own goal.

how?

Assuming that you're white, that would be the determining factor as to why you never had trouble with the police.

That's part of the thing

you recognize the risk factors that lead to crime

that's quite evident in your argument

the determening factor would be that i never did anything illegal

but the ones arguing white privilege don't recognize the risk factors that lead to high crime

The root of their argument is white patriarchy, generally.

even if you go down to an actual root, they implant that reason one layer below.

there is no layer below not doing anything illegal to not get into trouble with the police