don't waste the cash on an R700

You can buy clones, or buy something with a better platform

Accurizing R700's is not really a super easy thing to do

things about it are picky

Savage 10's are fucking wonderful; tikka if you wanna pay a bit more, or sako if you want to pay a lot more and have something pretty.

I would say the savage rifles are probably the best choice overall; if you need mods there are plenty of barrels that you can acquire

remington has been total shit up the wazoo; missing major things, half-assing finishes

Some FFL ordered a 870 and when he acquired it the finish in the bolt looked like someone had taken a large metal file and scraped it all through

Playing hell march overlayed on tim's vidya is wonderful

Why aren't we doing this to foreigners?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseknutsen/2013/01/28/israel-foribly-injected-african-immigrant-women-with-birth-control/#5ff88bdc67b8

Because if America did that we'd have gone extinct during the Great Depression

why don't we just kill all the poor people? that'll solve poverty

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/immigration-priority-south-african-farmers-facing-systematic-land-confiscations-and-murder

South African Judge Says Rape Is a Part of Black Culture in Exposed Facebook Conversation

https://archive.li/r4ZDK#selection-131.0-131.89

That article doesn't get the point across that you think it does. Do you read this shit, or do you just repost headlines?

time is precious, gotta stick to the headlines yo

i get a feeling if a lot more people read more than just headlines, there'd be less extremists

https://medium.com/@CKava/why-almost-everything-reported-about-the-cambridge-analytica-facebook-hacking-controversy-is-db7f8af2d042

Has Tim pool mentioned he’s mixed race yet

He also used to work at Vice, or so I've heard.

Bavaria, Germany: This summer, toughest police law since 1945
https://translate.google.be/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fnetzpolitik.org%2F2018%2Fab-sommer-in-bayern-das-haerteste-polizeigesetz-seit-1945%2F&edit-text=

i wonder if some kind of contractual provisions shouldent be put into place in the united states in order to protect against organized boycotting used as a method to influince advertisments that support entertainment and journalistic industrys. though it would probably not be easy enough to argue that advertisers leaving a service did so due to this cause. maybe the problem is just how easy it is for advertisers to pull out of anything like contracts themselves are basicly meaningless.

it seems to me to be a big problem right now, that out of all things to boycot people for what 99% of it seems to have been in the last 20 years is because someone said something other people dont agree with. back in the day boycotting use to be a form of public regulation on ethical standards of bussinesses

no one really cares what a business does anymore than running an advertisment right after they see someone say something they dont like

now im not saying that we need to put advertisers in chains but i also think that consitering advertisment holds the livelyhood of 2 entire industrys inside its influince it should have some kind of contractual obligation not to completely abandon anyone it wants for its own sake

kurt is still flipping out on twatter

it's amazing

I think his brain was destroyed by a particular kind of monster

yeast infected loli pussy tentacles

😐

Hogg is getting increasing more unhinged

It's great to watch

@Arch-Fiend technically they still believe they are calling for boycotts for the ethics of the business in question. I.E. "you support people who attack children".

TIDS

Trump Induced Derangement Syndrome

It's strong

It’s great to watch until you realize how many people are actually listening to him

If you bring in enough pajeet they start leaving poo on your streets. http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/gps-data-will-be-used-to-catch-taxi-drivers-using-a-laneway-in-sydneys-innerwest-as-a-toilet/news-story/07e4e4fced45c25b7788518d36d54f7d

"But only the police should have guns" says the leftist. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-08-31/victorian-police-lose-hundreds-of-guns/964780

Glad I don't have Facebook (kikebook) then. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-29/state-department-demand-us-visitors-turn-over-social-media-history

@Grenade123 I think we should one-up them on progressiveness,

Lets listen to the childrens opinion, especially the minority ones, in fact lets listen to the smallest minority, the 17 year old KID who started shooting!

Oh wait...

I'm quite perplexed no one has made that argument yet 😛

especially since that bald weirdo openly shouted in a speech that the bullying (verbal attacking) of Cruz was justified

https://youtu.be/GcAp_qWEKQ0

^ ^ ^ @Jay Turner (The War Kettle) Self-Promo in the newsroom? really, m8? Pretty low class.

They found Hogg’s Reddit username: https://bluntforcetruth.com/news/exclusive-blp-confirms-david-hoggs-anonymous-reddit-account/

Also I’m pretty sure reporting these days come from a mix of twitter, Reddit, and 4chan

Jesus. I nailed him.

I'd attempted to profile David Hogg based on old tweets

@Dr.Wol I mean, to be fair, you really should listen and evaluate everyone's opinion. Doesn't mean you have to agree but if you don't listen then you are progressive. But if we want to one up the progressives, then yes, we should listen and then deem valid the shooters opinion on gun control and bullying.

i know, i was joking about it

I'm actually okay with not listening to anyone who wants to attack ANY of the bill of rights, right now.

cuz they are all about "Listen to the children!" and "listen to minorities" blabla

so i joked that we should listen to the 17 year old (child) that is 1 person (minority vs millions) 😛

Also, of course a progressive would say bullying is justified. If they said it wasn't, it would just add to the pile of what makes them massive hypocrites because their whole victim platform runs on bullying "opressors"

exactly

me and Goy had a few hours of debating with Aussie in the shitposting room just now, in which i went through every source and argument aussie made in order to debunk it

Given the rhetoric going about, one guy saying we don't want to take your guns, the next saying we DO want to take your guns, another saying if you give an inch (by banning bump stocks) they'll take a mile...

oy vey

@RyeNorth you should listen.... Doesn't mean agree with. If you don't listen then you are just ignore intel the enemy is giving you for free. I mean come on.

But it does get old quickly

its so tiresome, but If i want to stick to my principles, i have to explore my opponents side, regardless of how bad its structured 😦

Well, yeah. Maybe in a year or two. Right now, the only degree to which I'll listen to them is to know which arguments to counter

It's not gonna be anything for consideration

Prior to the March for our Lives, I was all like, okay, we can give up bumpstocks... we can do with a few little reforms here and there

then I heard the speeches...

Just read this and see why they can take no ground https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text

I don't trust that website...

Fair enough.

Dammit. was hoping you'd reassure me that it was the US congress.

Sometimes jokes don't pan out...

That's a scary as fuck bill.

Yeah

Signed by some 170 Democrats.

It's just common sense gun laws... 😮

If they were trying to ban the wrong people from having guns I’d take them more seriously but clearly that’s not their goal as they are focusing on the guns themselves.

If I launch bottle rockets from my shotgun, is it then illegal?

Probably just having a shotgun would be illegal to them.

Even if something like this passed

I think the supreme court might be uncucked enough to stop it.

It will never pass the president anyways.

A veto would probably guarantee a 2020 win.

He's got more work than just that to do...

he needs to shitpost more on his twitter

he should actually write taht post about building a wall around New Mexico too 😛

https://pics.me.me/e-donald-trump-saturday-at-3-38-pm-im-building-a-16245857.png

I don't get why people are so shocked and upset that he's wanting to ask about legal status on the census

reason is lost on these people, its all about emotional outbursts now

I could maybe get the problem with 'country of origin'

but from what I understand, it's simply asking if you're a citizen.

Because if you deduct non citizens then states like California have less representation in the electoral college.

Hmm, in general airsoft guns are not illegal... But if something like an assault weapons ban passed, would that make them illegal if you had certain functional attachments on them?

aren't assault weapons already banned?

No

Assault rifles are.

The assault weapons ban ended in... 2004 was it?

welp, thats my knowledge of the guns universe suddenly doubled

Basically the ban that made certain attachments and the color black illegal.

Proof that the Dems are racist.

Actually colorist or whatever their new word is

Yeah colorist.

Light brown (wood) guns are fine, but black guns are scray

the color Tyrone is illegal now? 😛

If I was in an offensive mood, I'd make skin colors in a video game have actually names.

"you can be Tyrone color or Jerry color."

haha

thats the new southpark game difficulty slider aint it? 😛

Easy difficulty is white skin

Hard difficulty black skin

Haha

And the old one had Jew as a class.

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/southpark.gif

heres the difficulty slider

This is a good read. https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21739668-having-learned-identity-politics-left-right-wingers-are-shaping

@Timcast re: your latest video, I will simply quote Uncle Ben. "With great power comes great responsibility". These people are abusing their power in a very irresponsible way.

Am I the only one that thought the latest video title reads like a Harry Potter parody?

A little bit

Although my favorite parody sentence involving Harry Potter and guns is 'Avada Kadavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova.'

https://youtu.be/hhmyvNNv48M
Watch "Long Island Dad Pulls Out A Knife During PTA Meeting To Make His Pro-Gun Point!" on YouTube

I live on Long Island. We have a very serious MS13 problem here, and it’s spread to our schools. His concerns are extremely valid

lol

That is fucking GREAT

I want that guy on a pedestal

give him a prime time reality show where he goes to gun free zones

pulls out a knife (But doesn't actually present the blade) and asks "What are you going to do?"

Wasn't it a normal folding knife? Why did that broad call it a switchblade?

I couldn't tell 100%

"that's illegal" boy. It was not hard to get a knife into school. I've done it, although because I'm an outdoors type and just liked having one on me at all times for utility reason and just often forgot. But it's easy as all hell, a single stab to the gut can have you bleed out in 10 minutes, and it's not hard to quickly stab several people in the gut quickly and since it's not nearly as loud, people will be slower to realize what happened.

It was a pocket knife. The Dipshit filming doesn’t actually know anything about knives and assumes any knife that folds is a switchblade

I work in an Arcade. I carry a pouch with a Kobolt multitool & a folding knife on me that I use daily

It’s just something I have, and I never think twice about it

Gonna ban assault knives

Mad respect for the guy doing that
I hope this spreads everywhere

Gotta love how everyone seeing a knife safely displayed to prove a point and all they go to "this person with a knife is a maniac killer! Arrest him!"

Just how they view law abiding gun holders

The amount of times I’ve walked into places and reached into my pocket only to think, oh shit I have a knife with me has been more than I can remember

Ikr

Like, I’ve reached for my wallet in a bank only to realize I accidentally brought a knife into a bank & no one stopped me

My sister once got it on through carry on. She completely forgot it was in that bag, tangled up.in laptop wires.

But unlike that school, the bank had a armed guard, so if I were some maniac, I wouldn’t be able to accomplish much

I edc a 4-something inch folder

and I'm super used to knives and guns

as long as he wasn't presenting the blade and threatening me I wouldn't even register it as a threat

I once had to disarm my cousin in law on a cruise ship cause he threatened to stab one of my other cousins... he was waving it around in the dining area

but those people freaked the fuck out

yeah, see, that's a fucking tard

I know knives. I personally hate guns, though I know how to handle a rifle & shotgun thanks to my time in Boy Scouts.

sperging the fuck out and waving a weapon everywhere is retarded

let's ban kitchen knives, because no one needs a knife that big

I like guns.

I like knives.

I like responsible people using tools

@Deller ay, a fellow former scout

In terms of weapons, I can't think of anything I'd scoff at

While I’m not a gun person, I respect the fact others like them. Just because I don’t want to own one doesn’t mean someone else can’t enjoy them

The scouts were taken over by mormons so I decided I didn't wanna participate

It really depends on your troop

I'm sure

not my cup of tea

I gotta go shooting tomorrow but my head started hurting pretty bad

I find guns to be impersonal. If I’m going to be forced to take a life, I’m going to force myself to look at that person. If I can’t watch them die & live with myself, I don’t deserve to end their life.

I dunno if I'll actually be able to go

Don't shoot folks who don't deserve it?

You don't bring a knife to a gunfight

Unless the fight is within 10 feet.

And the gun is still holstered

I dunno what you're imagining

use case scenario of nearly never

lol

Unless you are a cop, then it very common

Actually, very common in a lot.of self defense cases

Close range yes

but shanking someone instead of shooting them is pretty rare

There is a reason the first rule of self defense is create distance

usually they... yeah

you pull out your firearm while moving backwards

and if they're trying to grab something move sideways so that they'd need to take more time to target you

I don't remember all the shit

Point being, at close range even a pistol is not gonna help you.

Until you make space

There are actually training sessions where you utilize semi-automatics and snubnose revolvers in close quarters

and knives too I think

muscle your mammories

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/31/students-at-florida-high-school-stage-walkout-in-support-second-amendment.html

even in california knives are only banned in government buildings, and only past 2 inches

never heard of a problem with banks

It would potentially fall under brandishing a weapon laws.

So it's not so much having it in a bank as pulling it out. They could get very upset by that

i think you'd have to unfold it:P i usually have a folder pocket clipped, no way to accidentally take it out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y49rv3QBtkk

Training video for gun vs knife.

yea i know the tueller drill heh

I wonder why no one asked that dude that said "You can't do that! thats insane" on the knife if: "You're going to tell that to a guy if he's charging at you with a knife to try and kill you?"

I would have replied, "He's right. We should illegalize murder, too."

sad thruth is that they'd prolly be dense enough to say "Thats already illegal"

totally missing your point

lol

these people don't think in logic they think in emotion

which just boils down to "I'm right and we should do what i want because im angry"

Emotion is evil.

Especially with idiots on „the left“ that have a total lack anything even resembling empathy.

Emotion is a motivator,

But just because you're upset doesn't mean you're right, nor should have priority over logic

If you‘re upset and make a decision based on that... you‘re probably wrong.

nah thats not true

If a person swinging a knife, or firing his gun around makes me upset
and i leave the area due to that, its not a wrong idea 😛

but the thing is that is a logical response too

"the left" just doesn't have logic, they just believe that the level of being upset somehow overrides reasoning

I‘m anti gun... not because „think of the children“, but because it is easier to defend yourself from someone who does NOT have a gun... (don’t want to get into it, just an example of logic vs emotion 😉 )and yeah your example is not right because emotion but because logic

I've been over the 'no gun' debate way too many times now to bring forth the typical arguments, myself. lol

the main reasoning behind having guns though,

Is to level the playing field against someone that has more in his arsenal

say you're a scrawny asian woman of 4 ft 5, weighing like 50 kilos
and some 6 ft guy with well over 90 kilos wants to rob you

or someone who has a gun and you're in a locked down area so you can't escape

Well... its better to remove guns from the equation alltogether than to have the bigger arsenal... but again... not going into it now... too much emotion, not enough logic in that topic.

because the issue behind legality of a gun is no concern of a criminal

Norway has gun laws, that didn't stop Anders Breivik from mowing down 40+ children

Except you can't do that. There is no "nobody has guns" option.

it didn't stop those terrorists in france

its like "murder is illegal" too

and i know where you're coming from, i "ideally" wouldn't want guns in a society either,

But since its not impossible to get a gun, realistically i can't have the ideal anymore

Yeah, I would rather they didn't exist.

But they do.

I should have used another example 😩

It's alright lol, there aren't very many anti-gun examples to choose from.

I mean for logic vs emotion

Oh, I don't know much about that.

I do know that an emotional response is also a part of our survival instinct.

Logically i'm okay with guns for leveling the playing field
Emotionally, I want a gun so i can kill anyone i've crossed to the point where i'd fear they'll want to retaliate against me
for Pre-venge

cuz thats what Emotions really boil down to

One last thing about guns... the idea that there is „common sense gun laws“ that improve the situation in the US is complete bullshit. Everything you could do will only serve to arm criminals.

"me me me"

Or civil war...

common sense gun laws are just an appeal to emotion,

Yeah... the emotion of „think of the children“ (which usually gets a „why? What are you hiding?“ from me)

its common sense in the middle east to rape girls if they don't dress "modestly" enough,
So if you go with "Just use common sense" then cultures will clash

Well, it is funny people speak of "common sense" gun laws as if they are a self-explanatory thing, yet when asked they can't name a single provision.

its because there isn't any such provisions, "Common sense" is subjective,

Right-wingers think its common sense to work for your share
Left-wingers think its common sense that as long as you work (at anything) you deserve as much as anyone that works an equal amount of time

Christians think its common sense to pray to god
Atheists think its common sense to be a nice guy that finishes last

You'd be surprised how many people don't know that automatic weapons are already banned in the US, for the most part.

thats because many don't know what "semi-automatic" means, they just go with that meme of a feminist reading somethign that has the word "man" in teh sentence and get triggered

Common sense? Weapons are made for killing, killing is illegal so weapons should be illegal. So repeal the second, and ignore the fact that criminals will not give up any guns and will be further armed by a thriving black market.

i agree! back to swords and maces!

😛

but yes you're absolutely right

And again, with the "well just call the police" argument, I would normally ask what if they don't show up on time. With the Parkland shooting I now get to ask, "what if the police don't do anything?"

but thats my take on pretty much every single "leftist" argument nowadays, its literally like they took a valid Issue, and cut out the last 50% of it

Emotion says „guns bad“, logic says „no guns worse because bo guns not happening“

People being offended is bad, but it breeds strength and you can't "never offend" anyone

Gun violence can quickly escalate, but if you make guns illegal, criminals can still use them so you'd disarm citizens

Censorship can help against stupid ideas, but censorship can also prevent good ideas from being spread

Child labor is a bad thing, but the alternative is that they have to find other more terrible means to survive in those countries (prostitution etc)

You always have to think of the consequences and side effects more than of what you are actually trying to achieve... and thats not really intuitive when you are guided by emotion.

You can‘t not offend.

Slavery is the worst thing ever, but maybe you shouldn't be buying that Apple phone, and starbucks latte used with african beans

😛

Even just doing/saying nothing can be offensive.

Just be sure to stay out of the UK when you say something on the internet... they jail people for wrongthink.