newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 328/350
| Next
Listen and Believe, Metoo and Believeallwomen target minorities too, what else is new?
Younger people tend to be DD'd
Not this minority bullshit
I sure wish Tim had scrolled down the news story a bit on the electoral college video
Must be having problems finding a anything
HR1 116th Congress
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/198730949#q198730949
https://www.brennancenter.org/legislation/for-the-people-act-2019
prepping a list of notable pages and sections
here's an unsorted document with points of interest, cleaning up for better viewing
This seems serious.
Though I wouldn't be too sure of trusting /pol/
@Timcast
Too bad you didn't mention this in the Video:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juden_in_der_AfD
Sadly only in German.
In short: The Jews say that the AfD is the only party in Germany that deal with the Anti-Semitism from certain peoples that the Jews face.
So the news Media is really bad.
Especially the shit going on in Chemnitz. It wasn't "Far Right", there were just too many people to be "far right". Yes, there might have been some "Neo Nazis", but most were not.
And its a total shitshow in Germany right now.
one example: A german girl was murdered, a Member of the AfD wanted a Minute of Silence in the Bundestag - was "shouted down", mostly by Greens.
After the Cuban-German in Chemnitz was stabbed, Merkel did not mention him and said some shit like "its no time for hate".
Of course people in Germany are not happy...
Also the "Migrants" are only said to be from Syria when they really are often from Sub-Saharan Africa.
If people are tossing explosives at a political party office (no matter which party) things are really fucked up
There was an Acid Attack in a Demonstration in Berlin.
Of course from the "no Hate" Left Radicals towards the participants that have to deal with the "Merkel-Germans".
Problem is the fucked up Media that is not honest and very close to the Establishment and smears the AfD as "Far Right Radicals", wich is a total lie.
@Khanclansith would you call UKIP Far Right?
I wouldn't call them anything since I don't have sufficant data for a solid anaylisis
They are clearly a (State) Nationalist group, but beyond that, I don't have enough reliable data to create a solid assessment.
Its essentially a German Interpretation of UKIP
I know the AFD is marketing it's self as "Counter-EU"
The leadership of the AfD is highly suspect and prone to making statements that are... not well thought out if you want to distance yourself from certain people...
I stand by my previous assessment, regarldless of what you think of the AFD any time people are tossing explosives at a political party's office shit is bad
I would have to look up what they said specifically because i canโt be bothered to remember the stupid shit politicians say ๐
Anyway, that's the Video the people are talking about:
https://youtu.be/d7OS2o-mMg0
Oh, cuts out at the end, not the whole segment...
What was that about??
right now we only know that it happened...
A shooting at a bowling alley?
Maybe it was the king pin.
something for Tim ๐
Just watched that.
It's crazy that even Bernie gets MeToo'd.
no, the obvious conclusion.
if that shit doesn't stop, every man alive will have been metoo'd
making the senate into a smaller house of rep will cause a lot of issues and undermine its purpose IMO
The Founding Fathers have thought about population centers beeing able to supress the minority.
Yes.
that is what that Electoral college is for.
I actually started throwing away my list of MeToo'd men.
to prevent the tyranny of New York and California from reaching the whole country.
It's easier to keep track of the men in the world who have not been MeToo'd.
and yes, it should be reworked - towards less power of citys.
I wish we had an merit based voting system.
Or something based on IQ.
We all had.
that was 100 years ago.
but then the 19th came for the US...
and the Rest followed as well...
back in the day not every idiot could vote, only some people that owned a business or so....
i agree stefan, with the house catering to population centers the senate should be the opposite to maintain the checks and balances idea
Ouch.
I thought I was the only one edgy enough on here to say that.
#Repeal19th
Soon to be popular opinion.
BTW, women on the right should support this, because repealing the 19th would mean that they would get their party for the rest of their life.
Ann Coulter might support it.
i dont think the 19th should be repealed but our voting system does need a reboot
Wouldn't that reset the uptime counter?
lol
no thanks
lots of love?
that's a bit personal
I feel flattered, though.
```i dont think the 19th should be repealed but our voting system does need a reboot```
Just look at Justin T.
Do you still want females to vote?
we just need to reduce the amount of fluff in the voter pool. every time i see articles about non-citizens voting and corrupt counting it infuriates me
the nice dude and his socks, that demanded a 50:50 representation of his Cabinett...
Sounds like a certain bird speaking.
Yeah, that's how the corupptions aka Democrats are staying in power.
and of course because of the oppression of the Citys.
and by the way: Patrik Little for president *scnr*
whats sad it they dont even know whats happening to them ... lamb to the slaughter
Didn't think I'd find someone supporting Patrick Little on the Tim Pool discord.
No, I don't support him.
I see him as a lolcow
He is many things that people say about the AfD, wich they are not X-D
to be honest: I'd rather see him where he belongs: With the Democrats.
So Styx has no confidence in Bernie, I guess.
What does he say about those polls showing Bernie to be the most popular politician in the country?
Bernie lost all that goodwill when he endorsed Clinton.
The most recent results I saw were from April 2018.
That did irritate me, though, when he endorsed Hillary.
I don't understand why Bernie is being attacked in 2019 when he's already proven that he'll bend the knee to the DNC.
Maybe he learned something after the last run.
Video about that:
https://youtu.be/bZc-G_XpP-A
The SPLC should be annihilated.
Too bad Majid Nawaz settled
Yeah. He should've gone for the kill.
Exactly
Settling just allowed the SPLC to hide its racketeering.
UI, that's hot...
Watching James video right now.
darn, that's spicy
The SPLC paid for (allegedly) stolen, confidential documents
They attack the 501C3 of the SPLC!
fuck the SPLC
That's from the deplorable.
Haven't seen those pics until now
what in the fuck? it never stops getting crazier
Sadly someone has to die because of this shit for it to get better:(
but I doubt it will get better even when someone dies
the only way this will get better is when it starts being turned against the left and center left
no, when the Corporate Media crap finally dies.
Unlikely that it ever will
google...reddit...
let's not pretend legacy media is the only enemy
the media will get bought by some larger corporation and then kept afloat at a loss for the PR alone
(official subreddits)
Its the biggest/most powerful enemy right now
google is the single biggest enemy
hands down imo
impossible to even put a price on how much value/power can be gained from changing the public's perception/narrative/thoughts/ entirely.
they are preparing for 2020 with fierce effort and planning. they will not get complacent and allow a 2016 again
Making jokes is a banable offense apparently
it won't work
hopefully
and people will realize
it's working in EU... and Canada quite well
censorship is first developed as self-censorship. then they roll in the legislation when people give up. it's really all so sinister when you dig into it more
not really
free speech is no longer a thing over there...I mean that alone is just hard to fathom. how decadent we are getting and allowing it
True but look at the wins of the AfD!
even though its censored a lot and smeared as far right Neo-Nazi party, they gain real power right now.
yeah but look how much damage has to be endured just to get a non-socialist party viable
MERKEL was a fucking conservative. that's how batshit it is
no, she is not
she's a commie
nah she's seen as conservative man..
plenty of more left leaning people trying to snatch that EU empire power right up
don't get me wrong, I despise her too.
nobody in their right mind does, that is somewhat informed about Politics.
but then again, I fear that the Problem is that she's a woman...
are you from EU? you'd be surprised..
Merkel is centre-right as are her Christian Democrats. She'd be a Republican in the States. She's against gay-marriage and is no friend of LGBT. She's not flaming anti-abortion but clearly she's not a supporter of abortion. She's pro-business. She would have been best buddies with Jeb Bush or even Tom Cruz.
She's a conservative in the mold of Reagan and Bush I/IIa/IIb. That said, she's not a Jacksonian Populist like Trump.
Honestly, if you asked many Senators in the US, they'd say Merkel is a more "proper" conservative than Trump. But of course "liberal" and "conservative" have no real meaning anymore. They're tribes and they mean whatever the groupthink is for each side at the moment.
Circus factions. History repeats...
yeah it's kind of like macron, he's terrible until you see your other ""options""
macron is actually far more free market than those other crazy fucks. it's a total illusion of choice
Macron is also centre-right but he's also way to comfortable with the trappings of a presidency. He's an authoritarian by nature and high on the power of one of most potent presidencies in the world with more centralized power than the US President.
Merkel is a parliamentarian at heart.
More like a Thatcher or a Churchill.
he's a globalist
total puppet
but yes he is actually right leaning when you look at all your great other options comrade
Macron and Trump actually have many similarities in that they both believe they know best and would be happy to just command things happen since they have no doubt of their cause. Why waste time and money on debate when the solution is "obvious". That said, despite Macron having enviable parliamentary majorities he has paper-thin public support that is going up in literal flames. Trump has a solid hold of 1/3 of the US electorate but uncertain legislative support.
Trump is a populist, Macron is hallucinating that he's a populist
Reagan and the Bush Family were globalists
WJ Clinton pushed through NAFTA but it was negotiated by Bush I.
The US became a net importer during the 1980s (Reagan era)
Macron is an absolute textbook globalist
which is the single best way to actually identify who these people bend the knee to.
right wing left wing bs is just a way to narrow the public discussion so i can choose between national socialism and my beloved international socialism
nothing new, Hegelian dialectic in the modern day. polished and shiny
but they both belong to the left... wtf
shhh
don't let them know..
Again, I don't even know what "left" and "right" even mean anymore
I just think that if Merkel is left than so would be Thatcher, Reagan, and Bush (I and II)
I think you guys are ignoring just how open borders Merkel and Macron is. If these leaders had any sort of 'My nation first' attitude to them then I'd agree with you when you say they had any right wing tenancies. However thats not that case, so its completely safe to think of them as 'left winged'
If im gonna be real its also ridiculously dangerous to be calling Merkel and Macron 'Center-Right' as it can put people in the mindframe of people who have more right leaning views to be smeared as 'Far-Right' or 'Alt-Right'.
left and right is just a "sports team" that you can root for and keep the D&C strategy they have been doing for thousands of years. still going strong
For Marcon and Merkel. I see them as far-right economic, and between center and fa left culturally
ehh... let's not pretend they are some free market saints. the fact we even are labeling them as anything but socialists -lite is terrifying
The only way they could be considered right wing is economically, everything else has raging leftism in their blood, and I'd agree that there isn't any 'Left/Right', just look at what happened in France. But we can't ignore there is 'Left/Right' thought no matter what
they pay crazy taxes
how crazy big EU empire programs and now army
let's not give them credit, lol. I am far from impressed.
No surprise this is what you get when Europe is disarmed...
most don't even have kids... they have no incentive to do what is 'good'
Honestly in Europe, if you're doing good you're probably breaking the law aswell, really no incentive to even live in Europe anymore save for a few countries
Reagan was rather generous to illegals
At least to Dreamers
more I read about Reagan, the more I dislike him now
He was pretty darned conservative for the time, especially on social issues. Look at him on the HIV/AIDS issue. ๐ฆ
still no where near as bad as bushes/clintons/obamas i guess. but wtf is that for a comparison.
He tried to stop IRS at least... got him shot too. so I guess he took some risks
My point is that until second term Obama and Trump there was little difference between Dem and Repub in the entire post-war period when it comes to immigration
JFK had balls 10x as big
yeah but look how easy obama had it
almost no bad coverage
96% negative propaganda articles for trump from "media"
people obsessed with blocking you just for status, not even merit
WE GOTTA STAY IN SYRIA GUYS!!! and fight ISIS!!! oh wai-
When there's so much merit
you have to be absolutely GONE to think we should stay in syria. The Clintons, Bushes clapping their hands in excitement of another era of "freedom making"
We should never have gotten into Iraq or Syria. I have said that since literally 9/11 when i predicted Iraq had nothing to do with it but Bush would go in anyway. That said, now that we are there, we are stuck dealing with it. Otherwise we end up with a vacuum that will either benefit ISIL or Iran...or both.
Since we've decided to go the hard route with Iran since we backed out of a less-than-ideal-but-better-than-the-alternative Iran Compact, that makes it even more critical we don't leave that vacuum.
If we'd not driven Assad deeper into the arms of Russia and Iran, maybe it might be different. But now...it's not going to be pretty.
After 2011 we (as in the west) interfered in Syria as part of the Arab Spring which along with the CF that is Iraq yielded us ISIL. Trump kicked off his presidency by getting us far deeper involved in Syria. Now we're just leaving with the mess all still there.
We were dumb to axe Saddam and we were dumb to try to axe Assad. Now that we've kicked the dog repeatedly but not killed him, we're walking away because we don't like getting bit. We'll get bit far worse later.
Oh, yeah, clearly ISIL is about to overrun the nation.
Libya was perhaps the biggest mistake
fucking depressing to see
Republican or Democrat, apparently destabilizing the Middle East is a bipartisan issue.
Killary and Citibank Obama... nation destroyers
Libya from jewel of africa to a slave market ISIS shithole in total disarray
GREAT JOB OBAMA
Luckily, the current president seems to be understanding that the only winning move is not to play.
he's not a globalist, yeah
has fuck all to do with repub/dem nonsense
This actually isn't a 'hate speech' clause (it has to do with the author falling into 'disrepute'), but it is adjacent and is a sign of the times.
Do read. It's pretty chilling what some of these clauses have. Stuff like returning all money earned from the publisher or being terminated at the slightest twitter storm.
oO ๐ฎ
so who to twitterstorm to get fired from the leftwing extremists?
You've been banned from Twitter for...we haven't decided yet, but you're banned.
well, I am not banned there *muhahahaha* ๐
because I was never there ๐
"journalists" ๐
Oh shit, we're in the big league now boys
Important question: Why does twitter allow these antifa accounts?
Man, I'm glad my meetup in Nashville was in August, I'd hate to go this summer
@Wulfolme I had a convo in another discord. They reject the concept of free speech and see no problem by muting those the disagree with. This is PoV from a โnormieโ
The author is self described centrist.
ohhhhh ....
Mmm, oof, ouch, owie
Something I have noticed, as someone who was a feminist once upon a time. Feminism relies on perporting something social as fact, and it's impossible to prove it without social testing but it *sounds* right because it follows hollywood tropes.
@4AM_critter ๐ That's always the fuckin way. Everything I'm doing is literally stopping literal Hitler.
They justify anything with that.
I realized that the only people I ever found victim blaming me for skimpy clothes were feminists and gtfo'd
They love treating something unproven as known truth
Everyone is already in agreement about the known truth.
Because they are social trends that people tend to feel are true
You can but naked for all I care we donโt use vid in our convos here ๐
and that can be totally due to public discource not truth
I put on too much weight being a disabled shitlord to really pull off skimpy clothes anymore, but finally working on that again now that most big issues have healed.
In other news
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA9P8lemjjk
Modern feminism is no longer about equality, its who can be the biggest victim
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 328/350
| Next