Tim was talking about this

“ Senate panel asks FBI to investigate person who gave ‘false statements ‘ against Kavanaugh “ by Christal Hayes on USA Today

A Rhode Island resident falsely claimed that they witnessed Kavanaugh sexually assault a woman. They quickly recanted, and are under FBI investigation. And they tell us to listen and believe.
http://archive.today/EEiRB

While I have a deep loathing of the first group for screwing up the world, the latter two are beyond that... I genuinely worry for their sanity, and fear for anyone who is in one of those groups and then turns around and openly encourages Sharia Law.

Agreed

Raises the question of what level of falsehood is tolerable. But noone wants to take on that fight because taking action in this case means you are against rape victims

Really frustrates me when people thrust law out because of individual situations.

I strongly believe in that "Walk a mile in their shoes" mentality.
If Open-Borders upper class assholes had to directly face the consequences, they'd all turn nationalist and want to close the borders within a month. Give it a week to wipe away the starry eyed "wow this is great", another week to erase their conviction of "But it's for the best", by week three they'll be crying "Why did I do this... no, I must persevere, this is for the good of the world!" and by month's end, 90% of them will be howling "WHY DID WE EVER WANT THIS?"

As for the feminists and LGBT... I can't even say that for them, because they'd all be stoned to death within the first week.

as for false rape accusations.
I think the laws need to be made stricter. It's a slap on the wrist for the accuser who's proven to be lying, while often still ruining the man's life forever.

Our open borders policy is hurting our nation, and honestly, it's probably hurting Mexico even worse.

I believe the laws definitely need to be made stricter, oftentimes we avoid doing things because of this culture of not offending or hurting anyone. But give an inch and they will take a milr.

Mile*

Here's a question that I genuinely don't know, but think it would be a reasonable thing to look into.

If I make a false accusation against someone that they stole something valuable from me. I mean high enough value that it's clearly into major felony territory (similar to Rape), what punishments would I get if it was proven that I knew it was false and did it just for trying to obtain money/fame and to damage that person?

Dunno, but i feel reparations are in order. But then again thats taxpayer money.

reparations would be a civil matter, I'm talking criminal still.

Well applying it in both has to happen

Eventually, yes. But let's start with the criminal side.

Well then wouldnt it be classified as embezzlement or something of similar classification?

I don't know. Isn't that more like taking money from a company you own?

More like stealing money from a company or persons without their consent iirc

would you get currently? or should you get if things were equal?

I'm thinking like... I walk up to ... pick a big name celebrity... Will Smith. Flashing my pure gold, diamond covered watch that I just claimed to have bought for 5 mil, all over his big party for his latest movie release. Then the next day, I openly accuse him of taking my watch when he's seen with a similar one.

A week later, it's found that I never lost my watch, that watch isn't the same as mine, and the whole thing was a con by me to ruin his name and try to score some cash.

What laws would I have broken, and what would be the punishment if I was fully prosecuted?

or logical

because technically that is a libel/slander case and is civil

the criminal is filing a false police report

which is like, a slap on the wrist

Is a false police report really the ONLY law I would've broken?

pretty sure

Pretty sure thats still pretty much civil

So I could make a huge scandal like that, report about it all over the news, whip everyone up into a frenzy, and then walk away effectively unpunished.

Well, this is why the law needs to be made harsher.

^

Pretty sure thats why i dont party in college.

because these rape charges are worse than what I just described, but they're happening fucking constantly... 4 out of 4 rape accusations against a supreme court justice were found to have been lies.

the problem becomes it IS a libel/slander case

and as such, it is as hard to prove as a libel/slander case

now i agree, there should be a criminal aspect to using libel/slander to get someone jailed

maybe we DO need to embrace Sharia law on this one. No one should ever believe a rape accusation without 3 men to support the accuser.

Lol more like a mix of people

i mean, even then it still doesn't fix things

(fyi, I don't actually support that, I'm just being an asshole on that statement, since Feminists keep wanting sharia law, and that's their stance on it)

because we have these feminist allies who would become the 3 men

... as a Man, I find that commend deplorable. Feminist allies aren't men, they're soyboys.

so there are not 2 genders

Not according to them. 😄 I want to respect their choice.

true

I tend to carry traditional views which is opposing to said views

Once you dip your toe into the world of crap they've pushing, it's easy to use their own doublestandards against them. Shame the real world is stuck in this half-measure where they're given enough power to fuck things up, but not enough rope to hang themselves with (to abuse the metaphor).

Lol

I mean ive learnt 3 new words today

Simps, soyboys, beta cucks.

betas and cucks are two different things, while largely overlapping, it's not 100%.

I mean ive heard them used often in the same

you can be a beta male and still not be a cuck.

but generally all cucks are beta males.

Confusing af

But don't tell the NPCs that. They'll bluescreen.

People.exe has corrupted

they even put out that article that being a cuck is some kind of high-intelligence fetish or some shit

beta is someone weak. cuck is someone so submissive as to let their partner fuck other people, and you get pleasure from it.

typically cucks are viewed as betas

all 3 are used to imply weak willed usually

Sad that new words have to be created to describe something small

I disagree with you there Socrates. Making new words to describe things is a good thing, as long as it's something worthy of being described.

You want a word that's not worthy of existing. Cis.

language is literally the making up of new words to describe things

Well creating 3 words to describe the same thing and rhats a prefix

the fact someone had to invent the word Cis is... a fucking disgrace to all of humanity.

Thats*

they all have slightly different means

Weak

Beta=weak

Wea>k on ur keyboard why is it that hard to type weak

soyboy implies they are weak because of what they eat, beta implies weak because of lack of testosterone, and cuck is weak in terms of skill and confidence, so much so their partner needs someone else to satisfy them

beta can also mean lack of fighting ability

Lol thats typically subjective and can occur with alpha type mammals.

and in the animal kindgom, betas usually need to resort to rape in order to procreate

hence the male feminist ally being a rapist trope

There's more to it than that.
Originally the idea was applied to animal packs.
The Alpha Wolf being the leader, and the Betas being the others that follow.
In humans and our modern society, it's been twisted slightly, but the idea of an Alpha still exists (see Trump), where the idea of a Beta has become... well, a hyper-extreme of the concept. Human Betas are so utterly BETA in that regard, that if animals understood, they'd commit suicide to be considered a beta on the same tier.

See example: Male Feminists are Betas.

its just nature after all

Alphas are the strongest and best, Betas are doomed to second place, they can't compete against Alphas.

Eh its a stretch with words nowadays. I could call someone an omega and that would be last guy.

So are they worse than betas or better than alphas

the terms beta and alpha stem from what we observed in pack animals

but Grenade123's description of the other terms is largely right.
Soyboy- Implied to only eat soy and has a low testosterone level. Often seen as a reason they're all betas.
Cuck- Worthless at everything they do, so bad at sex that they need someone else to come fuck their partner to satisfy them.

the alpha is usually the leader

some times there are a pair of alphas, the dominate mating pair

I mean wolf packs are what you are comparing to right?

everyone else is a beta

lions, any pack animal really

with a noticeable power structure

I mentioned wolves as an example, yes, but most pack animals have this mindset, that there is a clear LEADER that all others follow.

also as Grenade said, often the leadership role is seen as a pair of alphas. An Alpha Male and an Alpha Female.

but that's only in animals.

often times, betas, usually males as you need less males than females to keep population sizes up, are forced out of the packs after a certain age. As a result, some species resort to raping the females belonging to an alphas pack, because they can't take on the alpha and win the "rights" to the females

so they sneak in, rape a female, and run away

^ also describes Feminist Male Allies surprisingly well. Betas raping the women because they're too worthless to earn a woman on their own.

while the alpha gets all the sex he wants

yes, it does, doesn't it. It fits too well.

That's why the term started being used on them.

actually i think it was just because they were so submissive

they bent over for anything a female wanted or claimed

just happens we are animals still, and most women don't seem to really want someone who just folds over

hell, i don't think most people want someone who just rolls over entirely.

It was because of their general attitude and overall way they presented themselves. Humans are animals too, so it's only natural that when someone looked at them and said "yeah... That's a fucking Beta Male." - Duh they're going to have the same traits as beta males from other pack animals.

not guaranteed, but certainly seems to be working out that way.

but the left denies science, so of course they wouldn't see the comparison.

no, nothing is 100%, but trends are trends for a reason.

like if tomorrow there's a gang rape of a preteen girl over in Germany... pick the racial group most likely to have done it.

doesn't even need to be racial, pick the religious group

given that is female, muslim

if it was male, Christians

specifically a clergymen

there are black and white muslims, remember

that's less gang-rapey, usually individually done, and they've slowly been outed by Muslims doing it so often XD

but that's a fair point

in fact, there is a good number of Muslims in africa

All I'm saying is, it's not racist to say muslim refugees from the middle east as your answer.
It's a trend that's has taken over, and the fact it is happening isn't something you should look away from and scream "I DON'T SEE IT, CAN'T BE REAL! THAT'S RACIST!". No. You just point out that this is the norm.

Same as anything else I've described. Being a beta is being a beta. There is a certain norm to it.

actually, if it was male it would be toss up between a religion group, and a school teacher

oooh ouch. Or coach.

anyone who works with children really

but that's more a US thing.

which is not really a surprise

and those wouldn't be gang rapes.

true, not gang rapes

although its usually a greater number of victims so really they might as well be equal

It's not equal, it's more incidents of it happening. So it's worse as a whole for how many people it harms, while being less disturbing and disgusting on individual incidents.

So. Newest youtube scandal in the works.
They're allowing big companies to remove dislikes on videos to adjust their like to dislike ratio.

remove just dislikes, or remove the like/dislike bar entirely?

I'm honestly surprised youtube still has dislikes at all

is there a source for this?

i'm all for letting youtube kill indy creators so they move off platform

i'm just waiting for the day they manage to ban pewds (unintentionally) and he goes "fuck you" makes his own platform or something.

no, not disable the like/dislike, lots of places have done that.
They're actually REMOVING DISLIKES, while keeping the bar up.

Source: I've seen it firsthand, but if you want other accounts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itBu7xfYekk

“ I’m a liberal because I’m autistic “ by Mathew Rozsa on Salon

Mathew is a liberal because he’s too autistic to get a job. He doesn’t feel like he should learn to understand social norms, and thinks the world should be trained to handle his emotional and mental inadequacies. I guess you could respect his honesty.

http://archive.today/rV0rB

Bullshit. My autistic friend looks at the alt-Left and it hurts his head. Their opposition to basic logic makes him cry and he begs to stay on the right.

the left is the party of "the grass looks greener... therefore i am owned greener grass. i don't care if its not greener, give me!"

A lot of people are calling bullshit on this @JustTom

The diablo thing?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-01/google-to-bias-accusers-regulating-youtube-would-be-disastrous

According to Google free speech is diastrous.
They complain that by bounding them to first amendment rules would not allow them to censor what they say to be propaganda, hate speech etc.

Yeah. The "Good Censor" bullshit.

Differnt opinions cause conflict, so lets sensor the speech we dont agree with so "all of us" can just get along............

Stupid in my opinion but thats just how some think

Pro-Tip, I don't hate muslims, I don't hate migrants and immigrants, I don't hate LGBT, I don't have feminists. Have any of those come up to me and speak to me rationally, sanely, and even if we disagree, I'll give them a hearty handshake, or even a big hug of acceptance.

What I hate is what many of their leadership/face members are doing which is causing severe damage to the world. And I do mean the WORLD, as they are harming not just the US and the EU, but through the damage they're doing to the superpower nations, they are extending their harm to other countries.

Take someplace like the middle east. Do you really think that having so many people flee their countries is a good thing? The Dalai Lama himself, someone who WAS a persecuted migrant who had to flee his country, has gone on record saying that you shouldn't just run from your country and that's the end of it, but the goal is to return to your homeland and help improve it. (Paraphrasing some here.)

So when I "hate speech" about how migrants should go home, is it really "hate speech" or ... are the lefties ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRKz82v5JQY

(the movie that's from is so goddamn terrible, I completely forgot this scene existed, but it's great to grab out of context, it describes the Left perfectly.)

It reminds me of the only sci-fi troupe with AI. That in order to prevent human suffering, it reasons that the best solution is to kill everyone.

Rule Zero. Of course.

Yeah, we had that idea already you bucket of bolts.

It's called Buddhism.

We removed the kill switch by just respawning them.

or rather, Three Laws, law zero.

Google wants to protect dialogue by ending it.

Unfortunately for google, blockchain propagation of data is quickly being researched and advanced in a way that youtube may soon be ousted.

and we've seen how fast old platforms die when a truly superior competitor shows up.

it's hard to compete with google tho

they're balls deep in the internet infrastructure

many (all?) implementations of blockchain hosting would prevent the removal of illegal material and the enforcement of copyright. i cannot see any infrastructure for such being permitted to exist in the US large scale.

it's not like the feds are just going to shrug and say "welp guess we can't delete all that CP"

they'll go after anyone who hosts the network.

~~I'm fully against hunting down CP~~ (don't mind me, I did a dumb and failed sarcasm attempt due to distraction) and jailing everyone responsible, just like I'm fully against hunting down Isis and murdering every last fucking one of them in the most brutally efficient way our government can do.

But that wasn't the issue under discussion. The issue everyone is currently concerned about is censorship of non-illegal things, which the left has gone crazy on.

yeah, i don't think blockchain hosting is a practical solution to that problem.

It's not. But considering the way they've attacked Gab.com, it's the only solution we currently have barring making our own internet.

it doesn't stop the left from completing their domination of the conventional net, and they'll just enlist the federal government to destroy the blockchain net.

@JustTom ?! What did I miss about CP? Why are you not enthused by the idea of jailing all pedos and child abusers?

I was being sarcastic about that initial statement. And think I lost my train of thought mid-typing. XD

I think he might have misspoken.

Okay cause I just tabbed in and saw that and was disgusted

No idea of the context though

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-immigration-soros/george-soros-mastercard-to-partner-to-aid-migrants-refugees-idUSKBN1531H2

not sure what I was aiming for anymore but the context was that youtube has royally fucked up repeatedly and google is openly censoring anyone they disagree with, even putting out that "Good Censor" thing internally that later got leaked.

still not lvl 10 damit

!rank

bah

So we need something to compete. And since everything is being shut down by the left leaning internet currently, our options are Blockchain or Make our own internet.

we need proud company owners that wont sell thei companies for a few millions or billions to the bigger fishes

What we need is the government to step in, pick up that google "Good Censor" document, and say "heeey, this thing says you guys openly admit you're no longer just a Platform, but you're acting as a Publisher... Well, I guess that means you don't want those Section 230 protections anymore, Riiiiight? Make you a deal- Stop fucking censoring politics you disagree with and you can keep it, but you keep this up, and we're going to start prosecuting you to the fullest extent of the law. You've got 1 week to comply."

one of ben shapiro's people got suspended on twitter earlier today for a joke, so maybe they'll start getting the hint. the big problem we face is that the mainstream conservatives with connections in washington are generally unaffected by the censorship and therefore they doubt it's even happening.

or else they're nevertrumper types who the left doesn't want to censor.

Screenshot?

but generally i think it's just that those in power are unaffected and ignorant. like the heritage foundation types aren't having to deal with this or else the entire republican hierarchy would be screaming about it.

What was the joke?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrH87HIVAAAvns5?format=jpg

Oh that's not even bad

It's hilarious though XD

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrGDiz7W4AIn0tR.jpg

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/271233/threat-multiracial-white-supremacists-daniel-greenfield

ah, taht one again

We had that one?

Well, then about penis stealers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjticizsas

STOP STEALING MY PENIS, YOU DICK LORDS!

http://observers.france24.com/en/20140522-mob-kills-genital-thief-burkina-faso-lynching

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=df0M7jgfyzc

https://youtu.be/OuOcnGAv4oo

https://youtu.be/fiCKf7hfagk

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/woman-pretends-persecuted-trump-supporter-scams-conservatives-thousands-dollars/

fucking

https://youtu.be/Xon4aUTodlE

@JDM_WAAAT I think serious news folks might find this video to be intresting. Its a documentry on some guy who posted a video online of someone acting racist and the fallout that happened afterwards. About how it went too far and it interviews the indaviduals who acted racist, the guy who shot the video, and the woman that the men were being rude too. Seems to do a pretty good job hearing all sides.

There is more cultural enrichment in Germany.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/11/german-police-commissioner-its-their-own-fault-if-women-fall-victim-to-mass-rape-one-can-drink-less-alcohol

So, niggers like her are why everyone hates democrats these days.

I was just discussing voting with my brother and I know he's kinda a moron sometimes, so I started looking up who all was running in our district.

... fuckin' hell, after I looked it up, I just bluntly sent him the info, and without hesitation he responded that there's no question he can't vote any of the democrats, they're all horrible people.

By glorious happenstance. We're in Florida's 23rd district.
Which has the woman who helped Hillary steal the nomination from Bernie currently sitting in power in US congress.

As in, the one Wikileaks caught and then got fired for her actions.

(well, one of the ones)

import milions of young men from third worlds that are like animals and form rape gangs all around country.
>if women didint dress like that they wouldnt get raped be rape gangs.

i mean yeah women shouldnt dress like thots. but there shouldnt be sand nigger rape gangs freely running around country.

... Fuck that Jasse. I'd rather have a bunch of sexily dressed women that can enjoy themselves dressing like that and understand that they do it to be oogled as eyecandy, so guys like me can enjoy.

We should lynch all the goddamn rape gangs. Like, old skool style. Tie them up behind a car and drive them at slow speeds 20 miles along dirt roads before we find a nice big tree to hang them from.

That way we can get back to the era of hot girls walking around being hot.

by 'slow speeds' I mean like a good 10mph or so. Enough to drag them good and proper and make it long and painful.

>women looking like whore is good thing.
wtf...

who's quote is that?

well thats up to them isnt it

if that was implied to be what I said, that's not it at all.
Would you say any of the sexy dresses actresses wear on the red carpet that show a little skin are "Whoreish"?
I just want women to be able to dress well in potentially sexy clothing, without having a bunch of goddamn rapists from Carbombya going after them.

Its up to them but you cant get around the fact people will get an impression of you

social interaction goes both ways, its not just ME ME ME ME

That I like sexily dressed women? I'm fine having women think that of me.
Or is it that I'm against rapists? I'm fine having people think that of me too.

and im not talking about the gang rapes

no im talking about this idea that some women have that they dress like that and then get upset over getting attention from men

the wrong kind of men ofc, the ones they dont want ofc

aaah, that.
Yeah, I get what you mean in that regard.
If she dresses that way, she should expect guys to look at her and those who're interested to flirt a bit. But if she says no, it still means no.

Well if your main problem is getting attention, you can always put on 20 sweaters and a bag over your head

should be fine

"modest"

I mean i do get some of it tho

when i see how men react on social media to pretty women i just cringe so hard

shiiit. If I had the kind of supermodel body that a star male model had (hah as if), and I went someplace like the beach showing off my abs and stuff, or ... well really any kind of outfit that attempts to flaunt that I had an amazing body. I think that would be an open sign screaming "Pay attention to ME, ladies. *eyewiggle*"

Yeah thats allright, but im just talking about the apparently increasing number that seems to take issue with getting attention when doing that alltogether

but for men it's usually a showing of wealth rather than their body due to societal norms, and you already KNOW that most women will absolutely dive after guys they think are rich.

Well recently one of our leftwing media outlets decided to unironically post a top 10 to go for guys for women

Needless to say, it might as well been a list from the 50s

It's the modern generation of feminists that have this broken idea that being sexy and being praised for being sexy, is bad.

i suppose thats true, im just annoyed with this idea being that a women should be able to dress the way she wants even nude if she wants and NOT have to deal with people looking at her

like what the fuck is wrong in your head

Maybe that's why they don't mind Islam? They know they're too ugly to get raped by rape gangs, so they're happy to welcome them?

nah i dont think so

its just a means to an end

but little do they know that in that end, they wont have a single thing to say

radical feminism is desinged to destroy traditional families.

most extreme left idealogies are meant to destroy traditional families (among other things)

part of marixt ideology.
get women to be thots and destroy normal familys.
women will sleep around and get pregnant to nigger.

and after that no man will want that thot with mulatto kid

eh. Lynch feminists too then. Maybe we can get the grid girls back after that.

not like we're losing anything if we do, they're 99% fat, ugly, unfuckable stains on society that won't be part of reproduction anyhow unless a male feminist rapes one.

yeah we need to luch feminists. they are turning good girls to thots.
and they them self are fat blobs with big mouth.

but of course if turing feminits to good woman would be possible that would be best solution.

It's not though.

Related to hot women conversation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWpFktVpiKs

https://electronicintifada.net/content/watch-film-israel-lobby-didnt-want-you-see/25876

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gXFYcw8MBI

Wow, this guy spent $100k just to defend himself against his Indian psycho ex.

Whoa, how Tucker gets Ben to stutter
https://youtu.be/Bh8vqof9hAk

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UTTCYT5DG5lu/