newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 251/350
| Next
That said, credit where credit is due, seems pretty even handed
The article that is
I see Asian Women all the time....
@Stefan Payne might I get your opinion on the above listed vid
Wich one?
The one from PokemonHacker about german immigration policies
Yes, it might look like that.
Ok, ty
BUT: it looks like there is an Anti-Merkel Movement inside the CDU, SPD is killing itself (again).
the AfD is on the rise and every Establishment Politician is crapping his pants about them.
then we have the "uprisings" of Chemnitz and Kรถthe.
So there is hope....
But not with Merkel and her bootlickers
What Schรคuble said is true, but Schรคuble was also the one with the black money....
Well, we have to wait until the Bavarian Elections, what happens there...
if CSU looses dramatically (=they are the single gouverning party of that State for many decades), things will get interesting....
And there has to be - god help us - a coalition gouvernment in Bavaria...
i love the one reply on that
I wonder what is he arguing for... does he think "russians" care about privacy laws ? its corporations such as google, facebook etc. that fear privacy legislations, since they build their businesses around abusing privacy.
TDS
muh russia
I would understand if he would mention chinese though ๐ edit. oh, I forgot russian government also implemented anti-privacy laws...
fucking boomers
Lmao
fox ratings should serve as a huge warning? what, that maybe Fox news is now more trustworthy than lefty new sources and that you might be losing?
"It's everyone else's fault our ratings have been plummeting for the last several years!!"
Troll Account?
4Chan behind that?
Meme of the year? Bowsette
Distracted boyfriend didn't get normies jacking off to Bowser
bowser a qt u watch your mouth
"Your code is ours now shitlord"
At least her github has commits that actually contain code.
what is the deal with idiots who reply to everything with gifs
so now our OS choice is pretty much between two spyware OSes and SJW OS. cool.
....or TempleOS
soon to be 3 spyware OSes
a person who worked for intel used the new coc to force out the guy who blocked a push by intel to use a compromised command
oh, is this what it all about?
๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค
<:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
@Poppy Rider no, its 110% social justice
but as we know, all SJWs have their own agenda and used social justice to bully people
IT wouldn't surprise me if the MS and Intels are tring to get something in. With Linux soon to be Normie friendly, with games and the like, they can't let the ppl have something.
There's no choice left
Time to install TempleOS
Glow in the dark CIA agents hate it!
Since UEFI replaced BIOS and OS kernels are required to be digitally signed with root code signing certificates, microsoft haveโgraciouslyโ allowed ubuntu, Debian and other distros to be signed by theirs. These are not normal code signing certificates.
temple os hasnt been touched since 2014
anyways, we are now eyeballing haiku os
Why would it be? It's perfect as is. It is the only divinely inspired operating system.
@scaryred24 wiki says it was updated in November, 2017
oh boy are we back to Linux doomsaying over tweets again?
well it seem like everything thus far was only hardened back then for whatever reason
you cant gatekeep GPL-2. They dont have to accept commits (if this goes all the way to the top) but they cant prevent a fork
so worst comes to worst Linux setup gets a little harder because not enough of the distros avoid the cancer edition
so this idea that people have "taken over" a free and open source work is silly
especially if they manage to drive out people who would rather not work in a hostile witchhunt-ridden environment, which they almost certainly will
the main problem becomes, since they are throwing out meritocracy, how many systems may end up paralyzed by shitty code because they were not aware such a change happened.
well you just revert to a prior ed if that happens
I feel like people are too used to Microsoft now. You can just not use shit in Linux
people are not the problem
i'm thinking servers
I just mean this idea that there's all these insurmountable problems
people dont just hop to new versions willy nilly my dude
you get one sacrificial lamb machine so you can vett the changes
then if it sucks, its stuck there, potentially with a security flaw, until they are switched over to a new non cancerous version
which happens on one non essential machine
which then just gets reverted
there is potential financial damages this move from meritocracy could incur.
very *very* minor damages
unless the whole IT department is on crack
like MS released a fucked update just like... this year?
this shit happens fairly often
yes, but that is not a forced migration to an entirely new os
just revert and wait for ms to fix itself
you can just use an old version of an OS
like most companies already do with windows
the ones not concerned with security yes
not really. Not all machines need to be win10 for security purposes lol
plus if the new update is fucked, that's a bigger security issue
well if thats how you want to look at things, then i hate to break it to you but everything is a security loophole
as for the code they want to revoke, this will mean that the os itself would be crippled
prior versions are still available
if they do take back their code they help contribute, it wont just open up security holes, it would also make certain things what we generally depend upon upright mia
this dispute is whether or not CoCLinux can keep the shit
well heres the dilema for older versions
not whether or not every version of Linux gets taken apart
it doesnt work like that
certain distros will need certain variants of certain dependencies
if they dont have what its looking for, it wont work
you can possibly patch it to work with a newer variant but thats just not feasible
yes, and you just revert to a prior version of the already functioning distro
the new version will be fucked, old version is fine
um
no
all versions are fucked for a different reason
how long will it take for a perfectly functioning older build to be fucked?
wut, companies *already installed them*
you can revert *in linux* to an older build ez
if the new one is buggered
or at all
you have to reinstall the whole damn thing
>you might have to reinstall the whole thing because something happened outside of your PC
wot
listen shithead, you need to see it how we represented it to you, not how you want things to be
comform to our ideas and keep your ass backwards ideas out of it
"you need to see it in this very specific way that doesnt make sense, or I'll insult you"
que?
>Microsoft releases new FUCKED PATCH
>Everyone installs it
>Oh no, this is fucked
>Everyone reverts back to prior patch, which was already installed, which backups exist for
>someone makes fucked Linux commit
>everyone installs it
>oh no, this is fucked
>apparently we have to reinstall the whole thing now
I dont understand
Are we talking past each other here? Is there a separate issue you're trying to describe
dont talk again about this until you can go do your fucking research before spewing more of your bs out of your ass
that I'm somehow mistaking for this one?
@scaryred24 if i have an image of a machine before the fucked up version of linux was released, its impossible to fuck up that image
okay thats perfect
but how long will it takes before something gets buggered with that?
not even just consciously saved images. CentOS SAVES PRIOR UPDATES and you can revert to them at any point in time
**automatically**
if it wasn't buggered when you made the image, then never
you cant remotely fuck data without accessing the specific machine and fucking with the image lol
well heres where im kinda against using backup like that
so unless SJWs are going to hack America and fuck up everyone's backups, this isnt a thing
you are just archiving a 1:1 image of the os that was snapshoted at a very specific date
it might be stable enough now but what about later on down the road?
I know this will sound crazy to anyone who has never worked in IT, or talked to someone who has, but that shit happens *all the time*
People are still running earlier versions of MS Server software
like '03
there are companies with machines running on windows 3.0
so people are still running windows xp?
yes
like there are companies that are *just* upgrading to 7
well in a realistic scenario, virtual machines like that are supposed to be closed off from the general public from accessing them
think a lot of ATMs still us XP
legacy support exists for a reason
or at least they did not too long ago
thats the thing though- if the new version's fucked, people use the old one until an unfucked alternative is presented
for me once the legacy software stops functioning, you are left no choice but to upgrade to a newer variant or adopt something else
you would only hold onto legacy software until something makes it obsolete enough that it would hold no value
you've got it a bit backwards though. Enterprise software (third party at least) conforms to the needs of the consumer
the consumer being the company
which means those companies still end up supporting older versions becasue everyone's on XP/7/whatever
well you know how you get the customer to adopt newer operating systems
you choose to end support for said platforms
by not breaking the OS :^)
and that only works on new versions, which like... people only upgrade for new features/added utility
but the main point is i really dont care what you use for software on your os, i only care for the stability of the os itself
right but in terms of damage caused, a fucked patch isnt as bad as y'all are making it out to be. It happens all the time
it's unfortunate, but it's very surmountable
and then the question is: does a linux fork happen, or does mainline linux get better commits
okay in the short term, you would want to stick with what works the best for the entire scene
in the long term, when the fork gets better, you adopt that
that depends on who you're talking about, but sure
if you want to be an early adopter and use the fork as soon as it comes out, thats fine and all
but if you want stability or just want to run a server, you really dont want this
as linux has a stronger presence in the enterprise industry, it would seem to mater there
this coc change affects the home, non-commercial users
give it a few years
it will then affect those who runs servers
the CoC affects everything really
>important contributor hates CoC
>works on fork instead
>fork now has important changes and no CoC
>company now has to choose between CoC version and version with important changes
well the coc means nothing if you dont actively contribute to the scene
if you are paranoid, then sure it would
they are actively contributing, just not to that branch
but just wait until people start pulling their code out of the kernel
like look at LibreOffice/OpenOffice
OpenOffice creator was a dick, so they just forked it. Done
okay thats fine
Look at Nexuiz, where the rights holder decided to go commercial. They changed the name and some assets. Done
its not like the entire backend to the os
no, but it's the same process
do bare im mind that not all open source projects arent treated equally
Sure, but they adhere to the same legal standards as long as they follow the same license
or similar
you can mix and match them
but dont like release that to the public
its one way or the other
well the ways in which they can be mixed is a little more complicated
unless you got the rights to do so and they sign off on it
Like you couldnt just take Xonotic and go "lol it's paid now", nor can you feasibly change the license to say "Only weebs can contribute and request source" without consulting the other people who contributed
but even if that *does* happen, everything up until 10.fucked edition works fine
or at least as well as it ever did
and you just use that until shit gets sorted
you know what i find very interesting about all of this?
only those that are with a rolling release is currently affected by this
semi-rolling arent going to be affected for at least 6 months from now
then you got the ubuntu way of rolling out updates which if you are a lts user, it can take upmost of 2 years before you see that catastrophic affect
anyways im not too worried about it now but im quite concerned about our future
I think if people want a solution to this problem it wouldnt be hard for them to produce one
unless like.. 100% of contributors want the CoC and all other associated changes
not all of them would want it
yes we do not need this bs in developement
but you shouldnt be ejected just because they dont like who you are
or how you got there
sure, and it's unfortunate that a split has had to happen
but it wouldnt be the first time, and it wouldnt be the dumbest reason lol
3 accusations against Kavanaugh
liberals are saying "believe all women"
unless they are accusing Keith Ellison?
@ryuplaneswalker or Al Franken
many liberals supported him even after that picture
that picture is more solid evidence than any of Kavanaugh accusers have ๐คท
and by more solid you mean
"Any"
that 2nd reply xD
Of course if there's any water to those two guys, the anti-Kavanaugh folks'll say "but what about the other 3 accussers hmm? Hmm? HMMM???"
I'M Spartacus!
And, another thing, why didn't the other accusers come out right after Ford? Or with Ford? Literally two days before the hearing they come out
The whole thing smells to me, to be honest. I'm skeptical unless it gets confirmed.
In other news, a nice editorial.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/beto-orourke-wont-get-brett-kavanaugh-treatment/
Screw sexual misconduct or criminality
we need to have an investigation into him being the most White, White WHITE guy on the planet and having a spanish nickname.
That right there is some grade A appropriation
Cruz is a minority
A quote from Rye:
The Texas Senate election is between a white guy with a Hispanic nickname and a Hispanic guy with a white nickname.
It's actually kinda laughable when you think about it.
But I hadn't heard of the attempted theft for example. Or that he seems to be the product of a classic corrupt political machine, having benefited from nepotism for along time.
When I was young I always wondered about the Tammany political machine that ruled NY politics (and at the time, extended into National politics) or the Dealy Machine. Then I moved to NY and learned really, really fast. And then I found out these things are everywhere.
And Cruz is called a White Supremiest
You cant make this shit up
His name is Ted
Just like the Unabomber
Checkmate
Man, you make that joke
but go read the Unabomber Manifesto
There are a few things that have been scarily accurate (not that it justifies bombing)
the Unabomber is what happens when you take smart people and decide to fuck with their heads in the name of government research.
There is a fine line between genius and insanity, its generally ill-advised to give them a push
gay
Anyone else watching the hearing?
Eugh miracle of sound.
@RyeNorth everyone in general is talking about the hearing
I noticed.
Have we stopped the presses yet?
getting closer and closer to him taking the company private.
he should now make it private and the accusation would be dropped
Apparently Lindsey Graham and a few other Senators got doxxed.
From inside US house of representatives
whoever did that is fucked.
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 251/350
| Next