newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 247/350
| Next
This is rapidly becoming a male vs female battle.
It is.
But the men are at a distinct disadvantage.
And women are fucking ruthless.
Also true.
And manipulative. And organized.
Title IX is at least being used against them now
I don't expect that to hold forever though.
The left is very good at finding excuses for itself.
See Marcuse.
In other news, the US birthrate just dropped below replacement. I guess this how civilizations die.
>guy calls up universities making title IX challenges on all "diversity" focused programs
>guy charges gal with sexual assault after drunk sex
Make more babies
I like this strategy.
The one about Title IX.
It's already happened
It's hilarious
You don't have to even go to the school to make the claim
As for making babies, it's a dangerous move these days.
Wew
And yeah it definitely is
To some extent it's always been dangerous
Bets on the matriarchy?
Is intrasexual competition in women more or less extreme than in men?
https://twitter.com/carloslage/status/1042829596675190785?s=19
https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1042834982849441793?s=19
How purges work. This is how SJWs seem to always be in control of the institutions.
Find your enemies and eliminate them. We are somewhere around phase 1 with respect to the data and society report.
>Kavanaugh must go first
I hope to god Grassley shuts this shit down.
If she doesn't show up voluntarily on Monday they should just subpoena her ass. This is getting dangerous with more and more ridiculous demands being presented as normal and reasonable by the media and democrats.
Theirs is obvious
What world do they live in where 30 year old allegations with no witnesses, no time, no date, no location can force a man to defend himself without the testimony of the accuser at his disposal?
we start by figuring out what we have and how to support it.
Like, start getting video game videos and stuff uploaded onto bitchute.
That's a good backup, it's harder to take out a platform you don't control.
And bitchute is much harder to censor than YouTube.
Pewdiepie is pretty woke these days. Get him to mirror on bitchute and others will follow.
Doesn't cost him a cent. Just time.
We should talk about how to minimize that time.
There's also the obvious organization problem.
We need to figure out how to get people to be able to meet and find ways to oppose the situation locally.
Which gets back to the Linux situation. People need to stand firm with Ts'o.
And possibly start removing people like Ada.
But to do that requires setup and laying the groundwork.
Which means first playing defense for Ts'o.
I'm not part of linux and probably never will be. But it's stuff like that that needs to be talked about.
@pratel pewds wont join bitchute.
Why not?
Some sort of exclusivity agreement?
I'm not thinking Pewd is joining bitchute until there's enough other stuff it's not full of alt-right types.
Plus, he's going to want a viewerbase.
Chicken and egg problem then.
Which is where I was saying people need to be more proactive and resolve it.
who will be our jordan peterson?
I'm guessing NR is right leaning?
i dunno. i saw it on fox when reading it at work, but wanted to search out another take.
Is this only cali?
i avoided the fox one and breitbart, NR was the next one after politifact that just used a bunch of fear-mongering quotes to establish how wrong the first two sites were
Or are they intent on it being federal
NRO is right-leaning but tends to be anti-Trump.
politifact is being disengenuous by saying it only effects trans elderly to make sure they can't get kicked out of homes. lawl yeah im sure thats the only measure the bill specifies.
if it did i'd vote for it. who gives a fuck
accelerationism?
No, this is serious. They already do something like this in NYC.
National Review is the original Conservative news magazine.
It's analogous to The New Republic or The Nation and the left wing analogs.
@GingaBomber only CA for now, but it won't just stay there.
Too much to ask I guess
When NYC passed, people made "it's only NYC comments." This would be the first time it's a whole state.
The nursing and medical limitation is to avoid people really thinking about it.
Thats kinda how they work. It'll only be this. It's like talking to a child.
Its a wormy response.
"quit making slippery slope arguments"
as we salami slice your rights.
Its the lefts favourite fallacy
"It doesn't affect me, why should I care"
stop with all the strawmen, that'll never happen like that
It affects me, you should care
So you guys saw this shit too...
Kavanaugh not being allowed to be in the same room as Ford, and having to 'testify' first.
I really really *really* wanted to approach this one unbiased
But it just keeps getting worse.
Rumor mill says Grassley ain't having any of this shit.
Damn straight.
In this nation, you have a right to face your accuser.
And making him go first is virtually making him testify against himself, as well.
As there won't be an official allegation until AFTER he testifies.
There is a simple fucking expectation I have of someone in Ford's situation.
Testify. Under Oath. Unconditionally.
This is an obvious fucking GAME that they're trying to play.
She doesn't remember when.
She doesn't remember where.
They have the power to command her to testify. Judiciary Committee can just subpoena her. There's a federal airfield 15 minutes from her house. Have federal marshals escort her there, government plane to Andrews AFB.
She's supposedly not in her house anymore.
She's been receiving 'death threats'.
Doesn't matter. Give the lawyer the subpoena. She can contact her.
^ ^ ^
Absolutely.
This is a 'speak now or forever hold your peace' moment.
whappened to innocent till proven guilty?
No, this is beyond holding your peace.
It's fulla holes.
She must testify, under oath, NOW.
I'll give her the out to back out if she wants to.
We can't let an allegation compromise a supreme court justice.
How will this prevent Kavenaugh from being sworn in?
But that's a trial with no plaintiff.
If she backs out the smear will remain.
It doesn't matter either way.
She'll be a fucking martyr and if the democrats ever take congress again they'll impeach him.
Clarence Thomas STILL gets smeared for Anita Hill's accusations.
The fucked up part of this is that this ISN'T a judicial scenario.
If she testifies before the council
They don't render a verdict here.
They don't even apply charges.
It's all showmanship.
Every last drop of it.
Maryland DA made some idle speculation about kidnapping charges.
For all the claims being made
She hasn't committed a crime unless she lies under oath.
May I ask
Ask away. You're unfamiliar with our system here.
whill this stop Kaven from getting sworn in?
Potentially.
And what they hoping to achieve? Trumps gonna find another man
It's a drawn out game being played. I can explain it easier in chat, I think.
And you got someone whos pissed off at the left.
Ok\
GingaBomber, they're hoping they flip a senate seat in November. They're stalling until then.
They want the supreme court deadlocked as long as possible. If it's deadlocked it's neutered.
Atkins, hop in Talk Room 1
```1
Vice President Mike Pence Republican
2
Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan Republican
3
President pro tempore of the Senate Orrin Hatch Republican
4
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo Republican
5
Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin Republican
6
Secretary of Defense[A] Jim Mattis Independent
7
Attorney General Jeff Sessions Republican
8
Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke Republican
9
Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue Republican
10
Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Republican
11
Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta Republican
12
Secretary of Health and Human Services[B] Alex Azar Republican
13
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson Republican
โ[C]
Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao Republican
14
Secretary of Energy Rick Perry Republican
15
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos Republican
16
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie Republican
17
Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen Independent
```
I'm actually batshit afraid of a blue wave.
They're already talking about impeaching Trump on bullshit.
If they got the House and the Senate, two things would happen.
One, they would be able to remove both the President and the Vice President.
Two, they would have Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer as the Speaker and Pro Tempore
They would impeach Trump & Pence ASAP to prevent filling the supreme court.
Worse.
They get a President Pelosi.
That's war.
Impeach Trump because Russia
Impeach Pence because Trump
You've missed the boat. They've actually talked about getting rid of Trump and Pence.
There's no other way to express it. President Pelosi is war.
I've known that
but I haven't seen anyone talking about what that means
Right now, that means that we get President Ryan
After the election, that means we get President Pelosi.
I'd be concerned about Mattis in the event of President Pelosi.
He'd have a real crisis of conscious to contend with.
Please. The entire staff would be fired overnight.
Firing Mattis? I don't know.
We're not talking about subtlety.
The man is like God to the military.
And they would desperately need the military.
They fired him once before
Not a peep.
Obama id
That was under completely difference circumstances.
If they impeached a president who is extremely popular with the military under trumped up charges, replaced him with fucking Pelosi and then fired Mattis they'd have open rebellion.
A blue wave could EASILY lead to the darkest hour in US history.
Marines marching on Washington.
I can't read that website.
It's kinda like "The Onion" for the military.
I can't even be coherent right now. The democrats have no idea what they are set to unleash.
They have learned nothing.
The democrats need a platform before they pose a risk.
And no, Trump is hitler is not a platform.
Banning guns? it polls well.
They pose a risk. They pose a risk within Months.
Old news article from laat summer
Mccain is dead. And opposing trump now from withing the party would be suicide as everything is going even better. And the vast majority of republican voters support Trump.
TUCK FROMP
We're in a senate election year.
We also lost Session's seat that would've been Roy Moore
Do you think more people will show up to vote scared in order to protect Trump. Or tds enough to show up and vote mad?
I'm pretty scared Texas is going to lose Cruz to Beto.
And I'm sure as hell showing up for that vote.
More people need to know the stakes, though.
Then keep engaging people on various platforms
You dont have to win or even start a debate, you simply have to be civil and figure out what other people believe
Than keep promoting the "blue Wave coming!!!"
because that will get Reps to vote and Dems to stay home
The dems right now are as big a risk for the US as Angela Merkel is for Europe
The main issue is that people dont understand whats behind their platforms
If you keep asking questions youll bring that lack of understanding to light
Most people wont take this well and will react defensively or attack you as a person
Washington Dems are the worst but it's impossible to vote them out, because you get your ballot in the mail here and if you ever get a state ID or driver's license you're automatically registered to vote
Inb4 Mega Man Battle Network Internet
I find it funny that the Dems still think FEMA is useless. It's like every disaster "give more money to FEMA" only for it to be wasted in mismanagement, meanwhile people doing work voluntarily help way faster and better time and again.
Cut their Funding and give it back to the people so we can help more
FEMA is useless because Hillary lost and they could no longer use the agency to create gamer concentration camps
Please, FEMA was useless going back to bush
Scott Adams says 85% of the Blame is the Local Gouvernment
Yeah its corrupt bureaucrats who built shitty infrastructure and pocketed the difference
So of course a gentle breeze knocks out all their power
Hawaii recovers from its hurricanes rapidly in contrast
hopefully this will explodey
it's ticking up slowly atm
What are you talking about
"Hello I think that X candidate is the better choice, so you should vote for them"
THIS IS AN ATTEMPT AT HACKING THE ELECTION THROUGH MISLEADING INFORMATION. CANDIDATE Y IS THE PROPER CHOICE. REPORT TO GOOGLAG HERETIC.
Can't wait for this debate in Texas.
James woods got flagged on twitter
for a really strange thing
with a really strange message about "manipulating votes"
lol
shut it down
What was James replying to?
hmm
someone captured an image
I tried typing it in, that's why I asked
fuck lemme try and find it
They made him delete it so no one would have to see those soy grins
That's parody.
There is no legitimate basis for believing that this could impact an election.
Anyone who believes that to be a legitimate democrat ad is too stupid to vote anyway.
and there is the crux of democracy
It's effective advertising to non-regressive youth
Remind them who they can antagonize by voting
Should have left it up, could have made it easy for repubs to win
You can easily make a PAC that calls itself Democrat but actually plasters up picks of soyboys to energize the republican base. If you don't like it, you should be trying to get rid of Citizens United, not censoring Twitter.
Perhaps the future is not too bleek. Now if only this could come to marvel
I don't think they really care at all about their comics. It's really sad how poorly the comics industry has been doing at a time when super heroes are more popular than ever before. Like how badly do you have to fuck things up for that to happen?
The movies are popular. That doesn't always translate to better comic sales
The comics industry is a mess, they're making a huge deal trying to keep a guy from self-publishing his innocent comic about a cyborg frog
It's a bunch of adult children screaming they are not getting their way
Cyborg Nazi Frog*
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 247/350
| Next