newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 186/350
| Next
Sadly, too many people are stupid like that
Nah the cop with the tazer definitely drops it, and at least 2 gun sounds match his gun kicking
Not sure why he didn't want to kneel though
Maybe he's from beyond the wall?
There should be a 30 second law. Do what the cop says in 30 seconds or you get shot.
Figure out whats right and wrong after the fact
More emphases on body cam, less arguing and BS
It would soon rid the corrupt cops
well a timer would be too extreme,
But I do agree something should be done to protect cops when something like this happens, when some dude obstructs
And yes, more cameras, better for all involved
The 30 second law is not a good idea tho
Yea..also media making poc extremely paranoid about cops doesn't help as well
15 seconds it is then
heh
If they -only- ever talk about cops doing bad stuff when it concerns POC it makes them paranoid.
well, same is reverse, when media talks about cops getting shot by unruly colorlings, cops get ichy trigger fingers
or the reverse, cops won't do anything for fear of being deemed a criminal in the court of public opinion
yea
If every cop was forced to record everything, and all recording was made public, nobody would ever have a reason to not follow orders
believe me, people will still try
Isn't it in UK where the cops are afraid to arrest POC for fear of being branded as a racist?
Body cams to everyone would be good start
Hence the 15 second law
it's 15 now ?
Yes, I compromised
Do what the cop says, get the video, cop gets fired if it was mal practice, nobody dies
>cop orders someone to hands up
>person is deaf
>person makes hand motions signing they deaf
>cop: well, 15 seconds up and I have no translater here, too bad buddy
>cop shoots the deaf person
10/10
any seconds to comply law is stupid
it could be abused to hell
Survival of the fittest, life is cruel man
this incident happened before, where the cops were barking conflicting orders to a guy, he was literally crying out of fear, and they shot him
Turns out they got the wrong guy
yea
people do stupid things when they're terrified, they might get catatonic
He might be doing some hand signs to call his homies
Well he didn't listen, he didn't even move, he was terrified, but we shot him cuz law you know
Well if it was common practice to follow direction..
that guy had no chance
They prolly need to update on their terms of engagement
Every time someone argues with a cop, they help push the narrative to resist or you die
When the reality is resist and die
I wonder how few people have been shot for following police direction
Like that dude who's missus was live streaming to Facebook last year maybe
But not many
I think context of the situation is important in deciding whether or not to resist
And by the look of his missus, the cop did him a favour
Would you want to date someone that would live stream your death to Facebook and publish it while they still in the car slipping on a slush puppy
At least take a 5 min break between your bf being shot dead and hitting the publish button
If they give me 15 seconds, I would
Coming to grips with your lovers death should take longer than the time required to finish a frozen coke
It was the middle of summer
She might be a stone cold bitch, but he still tap dat ass
Ayyyyy
I concede
ass tapping? waht i miss?
Apparently other citations in the infowars cover
So the baby was decapitated, but Mercat didn't hide it
Not sure that makes it better..
It makes it more of a 'normal' event if that helps
yeah, but thats still really bad
๐
mighty voodoo indeed
Lol
@Dunk Massive I mean yournewswire and infowars seem pretty bias thats why I inquired, so... there was no radio silence, but this actually did happen, and they recognize it as basically an honor killing or they didnt want to go that far because they'd be called xenophobic and thats a death knell for anyone in Germany?
Don't know if the guy was "reaching" or not, but once he's on the ground, why does the cop keep shooting?
ensure the "threat" is neutralised
I thought tasers rendered people immobile? How is that a threat?
tasers don't always work
you just reminded me of donut operator
with his rant about tazers never working
Looked to me like the guy had his hands up until the cop said "I'm going to tase you" and started moving in.
I got into an argument as well why its not feasable for everyone to use nonlethal
It's less about them 'never' working
His argument that if americans wanted self defense, then why not use non lethal?
De-escalation needs to be a thing. I didn't sense any from that cop.
***REEEEEEEEEEEE***
And more of a fact that, if it's not 100% reliable, and you're trying to use it to stop someone trying to attack you
why the hell do you depend on it?
two barbs. both have to hit. Even so, there are some people who can resist it.
And some clothing can render it neglegible
Some people don't crumple at pepper spray, either.
adrenaline, one hell of a drug
Uh huh.
Also drugs.
I mean people sometimes dont reaalize they were shot
yes, drugs are one hell of a drug too
Tranqs are also on the same boat.
Different dosages
And overdoses. Also have to be applied at specific parts.
localised overdose you say?
oh noes! his left foot is OD'ing, quick! amputate it
Basically, imagine if you had a 'non-lethal' means of self-defense. This mode of defense rolls two six sided dice. If either die rolls a 3 or lower, the attack fails. If the total comes out below an 8, the attack fails.
Would you trust that weapon to defend your life?
you roll a dice?
When did reality become D&D?
do i get + points from my charisma buff?
No. ๐
But I mean, that's the taser dilemma in a nutshell.
You've got a low chance of it actually working
you get bitched at by the media for using it
you get bitched at by the media for not using it.
I mean, the media was talking about some guy at a felony traffic stop having a 'shotgun' pointed at the suspect.
media is damned if you do, damned if you dont
as long as they can rake in profits and don't get attacked
Never mind the fact that the shotgun they were pointing had a green buttstock, indicating that it was loaded with non-lethal rounds
I.E. beanbags
Meanwhile, Metokur covering a protest in Chicago right now
Where people are playing in the freeway.
roadkill for detroit?
10 points
Metokur's already talking about how CocaCola should counter the old rioter pepsi ads
by just running a coke truck through the crowd...
I hear Coca Cola Deathsquads?
Moments before a Coca-Cola truck of peace
do i hear a loud car off in the distance?
lel
thats killzone
Anyway, if a suspect's on the ground not moving, I see zero reason to swap taser for gun and start shooting. Also, I heard gunshots before the tasered man even hit the ground.
Maybe I missed the specific, can you link me?
Just a sec, will try to find.
Aaaand that's an example of police officers fucking up.
Ever notice how cops generally call 'Tazer Tazer Tazer'?
Yeah... the cops with live rounds were standing around, high adrenaline, suddenly he's hit by a tazer and his hands go down rapidly. Other cops started shooting.
uhh the cop further away wasn't even aiming
the one that's back to camera you can't really tell
They do?
Often times, yeah.
It's an alert to other cops that a taser is being deployed
I didn't see any real communication between the cops in that scenario
so what the fuck was that video
He announces twice he's gonna taze the suspect
loudly
y'all see the video where one cop was freaking out with his gun out and the other cops are just like
"don't mind jackass here"
I don't remember where I saw it
but it was some black kid being accosted for whatever reason and most of the cops there are just being chill
but this onw motherfucker has his gun out, hands shaking, ON YOUR KNEES AAAAAAAA
and nobody's taking him seriously
it was fucking dumb
Has the time of big university purge come ?
>enough.webm
๐
they are delusional
so desperate for a win
'transition the United States to a 100-percent renewable energy system by 2035.' lmao good luck with that
What're we at now? 15% on a good day?
that article thinks that US can tackle climate change alone..how cute
at least that's how it sounds to me
Thats always how it is because we always seem to disagree with europe on how it needs to get done and they're the only other ones interested.
Interesting how emerging market countries don't want to switch from cheap sources of energy. Hmm. HMMMMM
Climate Change has to be handled internationally
these people don't know anything outside of the US
but we cant give all responsibility to the State
no they dont
outside of what the media says about Mexico
yea..you guys can ruin your country however much you want to try achieve that in 20 years but doesn't matter shit if most of the world doesn't give a shit.. specially china
pretty much
iirc China is actually doing more to fix things
We are the ones falling behind now
You can "ruin" your country and then repent with conservatorship over the next decade to fix it all. It works. But while you're in the industrial stage you're contributing to the global problem
are they now ? big if true
point is Cortez and her supporters cannot assume they are the only ones who can fix the problem
it might literally be a ploy for power though
but people like .. socialist believe changes have to be radical so .. yeah they will believe that
Emerging states have every right to do terrible things in order to make money so they can fix things later. That s how shit works
Socialists and Communists all think they are doing whats morally correct
all while committing im-moral acts
same with real fascists tbh
They are Machiavellian
Ends justifies the means
well..the article is already being ratio'd fast
i love that term
?
ratio'd means a post is getting more negative comments than likes and/or retweets
o
yea
๐ "We can finally dismiss their opinions like we do all movie stars."
Alright guys
And gals
My grandmother just called me an isolationist because I think that we should have a choice to pay into Medicare
replies are kinda fucked up
lol what?!
how???
they arent that related
I dont know
Bit that's what she said
Isnt it common sense to have a choice to pay into a governmental system
Because I pay for medical insurance and because of that I feel I shouldn't have to pay into Medicare
Is that not the correct way of looking at it?
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...
dunno about you burgers but here if goverment is taking money for something , it's never optional
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
isolationism... medicare... isolationism... medicare...isolationism...
Lol
โ_โ
i think health care should be an option provided by the State and private businesses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YqLqVeJGgM Kyle shows his true colors
RED
lel
I personally dislike his apparent hate of centrists
He legit admits that its a hostile take over
Didnโt you know that centrists are Nazi enablers?
that advocate for half genocide
siiiiigh
yeaa siigh.. rising star of barely winning by getting barely any votes
the miss Cortez
true
Dems are loosing their way
allowing themselves to be taken over
I have hard time finding any fucks to give about democrats ruining themselves anymore tbh..
yea to some extent i agree but i just dont want to be surrounded by commies when i get more into politics
I donโt care because itโs just going to make more Republicans.
ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
I need to snatch the right people and maybe make that moderate party thing happen
idk
oh def it will
problem is that effectively makes us psuedo-one party state and i want to avoid that
7.3 percent of elegible voters voted for the socialist
unfortunately the way things are going it looks like republicans are going to be in charge until another political party rises to replace the democrats
I'm watching actual sane thinking democrats every day on twitter trying to talk sense into the party and failing and being called names..
that is not a number that says that the party should listen to her
Sounds like it's time to do a soft coup of the Libertarian party
Rename it USIP
๐
usip lmao
Yea thatโs why I want to try to find the same ones and either take over the libertarians or start a new one depending on who joins
Although yea she did barely win so
make it BFI..because fuck it
that could actually be viable though. just take over the Libertarians and turn them uh... libertarian
Maybe things are thaaaat bad
Not AnCaps lol
Except I personally donโt think the market should have full freedom I believe in regulations so long as itโs reasonable
๐ ฑ
I do not agree with giving the market over to the State though
So I might be a bad libertarian
I agree that a completely free market is probably a bad thing โข
Industrial Era markets were nuts until regulations
Also when Communism became a thing
communism should never be a thing
Nope
I meant more as a concept
But comrade <:commie:463087263153258506>, we should never questionthe State's <:commie:463087263153258506> authority
Is bad for lifespan
Fuck the State
State works for me not the other way around
Which oddly what Commies THINK theyโre trying to achieve
But seems democracy is the only form of government that holds the state accountable for its actions in accordance with the people
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 186/350
| Next