US should just make their own really

Might as well put Saudi Arabia in the women's rights council

Oh wait

Also Venezuela is on there too

And India isn't for some reason

So its official?

THey left yet?

Haven't left yet

Sources informed Reuters about it

Also Trump wants to reinstate Russia into the G7

http://thehill.com/policy/international/391485-trump-russia-would-be-an-asset-to-g-7

there does need to be more diplomacy between europe and russia to prevent tensions between america and russia

so i can see why

like we pretend the cold war is over yet its really just got more players now

there can't be, Europe needs a scapegoat to blame for their lack of leadership and to explain why they're losing their authority

other than their own incompetence

in the end they are fucked if america and russia become friends behind their back

so they are going to be dragged into diplomacy with russia like it or not

I wouldn't be surprised if Russia secretly already IS friends with Trumps inner circle

Putin is smart enough to realise that Trump doesn't want war, Trump wants trade

I found this http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/392573-white-house-officials-ignored-trumps-request-to-invite-putin-to-white?amp=1

eh its actually kind of for the best he didint have that last year

this year though is a different matter

Ignore or said no?

ignore im guessing because trump doesent seem like the kind of person who can be said no to

not even sure the white house could tell him no legally

conveniently forgetting is a thing though

So they hope he thinks its incompetence?

they'd better,

Otherwise its wilfully ignoring the commander in chief

Thats like treason? 😛

I doubt they can outright refuse the president

An unnamed official told The Washington Post

welp

there it is

another unnamed source

didnt the last unnamed white house source they had turn out to be an intern?

I dare say! an unnamed source told me that this time the unnamed source is speaking the truth!

Dont get me wrong, i understand the need for and purpose of unnamed sources

after a certain point they lose credibility and theres really no way to redeem it without naming their source

unnamed sources only work if they're rare

AND, if they have PROOF

you can't go

"An unnamed source told us that the president likes to whisper to the gorilla channel"

but you CAN go "an unnamed source leaked this report with an authentic signature detailing the plan to burn gay people at the stake"

and show it if its there

"An Unnamed source told us, video production news, that Tim Pool is a gay supremacist"

"If we are wrong, it's not our fault."

I just did a podcast with Lior from youtuber lawm itll be up tomorrow

but basically we go over how anyone can legally lie about anyone else

Isn't that Slander?

or Libel?

Lior?

Typo or actual name?

thats his name

Interesting. How deep in do you guys go?

@Deleted User Depends on the context.

hes been doing a few vids on EU article 13 lately

30 minutes talking about sargon vs akilah and how fair use works

then we talked about cassandra and emma roller and how you can defame someone

then maddox and dick and how people can run you through court on purpose without the intent to win

Have you thought about talking to YouTuber Law?

That's who it was.

someone asked him on stream about how article 13 would affect the sargon akilah case.. he said he would have to think about it.. seemed to be really messy

seemed to really throw him off like he was quite stumped

Tim, do you know if the dankula thing is him trolling or real? (him joining ukip)

ukip is generally seen as quite bad here

people can do real things in the name of comidy

i suspect its a matter of that

Sounds ironic a lawyers name sounds like liar

Dank said he was serious.

Where will the AkilahVSargon be held? If it's the UK, Article 13 will fuck over sargon

its all in NY I think

its an NY case and sargon will likely win accoring to Lior

yeah thanks to akilah's first lawyer 😛

basically admitted that its transformative... or at least criticism

lior said he thinks she ran out of money

had to switch lawyers

and then cheap lawyers fucked up

@Deleted User In order for it to be libel/slander you have to demonstrate that they knowingly pruprorted false statements against you. By having the unnammed sources make the claims journalists are shileded from all responsibility because they have no idea if the information is false or not.

Do false accusations of sexual assault count as slander/libel?

If the person filing it knows that its flase then probably

Uh you @ the wrong guy

@Blackhawk342

did I?

my bad

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/border-patrol-video-ohono-oodham-arizona.html

even knowing they are fasle might not win

Emma roller knew she provided false statements

but the ok sign being white power is an opinion not a fact

wasnt that started by 4chan?

Usually is.

thats the other hurdle with libel

opinions vs facts

Hey Tim, posted this here yesterday if you're still around...

regarding school enrollment, it would be nice to see if there's an uptick in regional schools at the expense of the ones going down

numbers aren't everywhere because its early in the year and not necessarily news

but I did see how some schools in the regions around those three are seeing uptick

and here's an article saying something very similar: http://www.ky3.com/content/news/As-Mizzou-sees-enrollment-declines-MSU-sees-increases-485299001.html

Whoa, Dave Cullen got dropped

from patreon?

His youtube ad management group

That sucks. I havent seen much from him beside his 'how is this a thing' vids but he seems pretty middle of the road.

jesus these people exist and are influential https://twitter.com/JessicaValenti/status/1007746126714494981?s=20

There is so much wrong with the replies to that tweet.

And the tweet itself obviously.

Dankula joined UKIP

i'm not a brit so I dunno what that means, but ?

unless he's trolling in which case, carry on.

jessica valenti is irrelevant all that matters is KSI vs Jake paul

its weird

feminist freq wants game to change for moral reasons

not market reasons

this is abig issue in the culture war

market vs morals

JBPs compelled speech vs natural speech changes due to language evolution.. same thing

that's a really good idea, what's the affect on market changes on society vs revolutionaries

i.e. the market wouldn't accept racism from the point of if I serve more people regardless of race, I make more money vs people telling you to not be racist

@wacka this is a bit of an explanation of their mentality, Stephen explains Bill Cosby to someone who seems to be clutching at straws for metoo
https://youtu.be/ObsXzYf6Rng

but the idea that we should through out innocent until proven guilty and go to guilty until proen innocent (and even then it will be too late) .. but only if the victim and witness is the same woman :S

I don't want to post 2 Molyneux links in a row Tim, but his video on 'Death by Welfare' has a good explanation of that

just go to margaret thatchers quote "the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money" 😃

@wacka yeah it's some good indoctrination, if you look at the mentality of the girl in the link instead of what she says, it's all about avoiding the facts she just agreed too in order to make her narrative

Mission training: He is guilty
Reality: He is proven innocent
Available option: Avoid reality, proceed with mission

you should never have to prove innocence

you should only ever need to prove guilt

I'm watching this Stephen video atm, she literally just said she agrees with him and sees his point clearly, and still tries to say women have no responsibility in getting the Cosby dick while using their sexuality to exploit him

answer me honestly... would anyone here watch a gender swapped sucker punch?

My god these people must be so confused inside their own head, they can hold two points in their head that are polar opposite and have no explanation how they link, yet still believe both points

Didn't someone call Tim gay yesterday? I guess he would watch it if so *jk

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/moscow-taxi-crash-latest-world-cup-2018-injuries-updates-a8402461.html

merch just arrived

Got a pic of the 'logo' you choose?

video is going up in like 10 minutes on my second channel

Is there an official Tim Pool beanie yet

no

those are hard to make

somehow every time i hear something about Bree Larson i'm less interested in seeing Captain Marvel

so far the only person i actively avoid seeing movies of is tom cruise, but she is getting there...

a beanie with a logo stiched on it..

OR

just sell the logos, in a make your own tim pool beanie kit

though that is more work and you might lose sales that way

beanieception

i dont think thats how that works

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjZU0_dOoqQ

if tim has kids... are those beanie babies?... i'll see myself out

lol

heheehe

call me bad joke watch dog, cause (w)oof

bear with me... i'm drunk 😄

i only critisised to make a bad joke myself, dont worry

i actually laughed a lil

greay

that's greayt

Available until tomorrow!

damn tim only available for a day

limited edition

Counter Argument just done a video about Rubin.

young rubin looks weird 😄

ye the side says "greay"

for the subverse shirt in gray

brown hued gray?

i wouldn't kick out of bed for farting

who is getting a beanie shirt?

missed oppurtunity with the piramid logo, the eye should have been X'ed like its dead

i dono, i need some new shirts, i might get some

I have a issue with fabrics so I can't just buy a random shirt

oh cool.. you went with silentium victoriam accerat in the end 😃

(pewdiepie voice) can I copy strike timcast?

/s

yes

yes you can

and should

we can singlehandedly take him of the air

oh wait, this is his discord, forget everything I said

😄

the rubin report counter argument is... weak... i don't really get what he wants to say...

his argument is that he claims to use larry king as his interview style

and yet inspired by

inspired by <> mean exactly the same

i got that much...

that's it

I think dave is falling into a bubble

that's his entire argument

and ye

agree tim

his rogan interview was atrocious

too much IDW stuff

yea rogan tore him open on regulation

I think it might jsut e that dave went on tour with JBP so he needs hes split up a bit

needs time to sink back into the groove

either you're an interviewer or a an opinionist

yes

I think that's it

I mean its fresh in his mind

he brought up the tour a bunch

but honestly, he's been saying the SAME things for almost a year

this is why i dont like speaking at palces

you get pulled out fo the loop

ideas haven't evovled, broken record, etc

which fine

but not if you talk about them all of the time

as in the same topic

well... it's not like the things that rubin "critizises" have evolved...

yea dave needs to make sure he stays sharp otherwise he will "milo out"

milos talking points havent evolved

milo 😒

yeah falko, its like, we get it, you left the left

and now you're a classical liberal

its like shapiro and his dr wife

gets old

dr wife... is he cheating on burch gold now?

I mean rogan is an interviewer, but he diosn't fall into the same trap

i think rogan has a wider variety of guests

you get a sense of what he thinks, especially on certain things, pot/climagte change, but honestly his show stays pretty apolitical

which helps to not pigeonhole yourself

where as rubins is rooted in it

I can see Rubin sputtering

I went to JBP and he opened, it was.. well... bad

rubins show pretty much started political

cringeworthy

I remember back years ago though, Rubin would get constantly lambasted for not pushing guests enough and not taking hard enough stances on issues. I wonder if he listened to those critics, because it really seems like he's accelerated into that direction.

its almost as like he wants to be a part of the cool kids club, but just doesn't make the grade...

to me, you have to watch rubin with the "don't disagree"-stance in mind... helps seeing his disagreements

silence = disagreement. Interesting.

pretty much...

i was thinking of doing a counter crowder thing

i dont necessarily want to do it

but i think it would be cool to see the other side argued

"there are more than two genders change my mind"

because crowder argues with stree folks its kind of unfair

i would love to be on a change my mind gun control thing 😄

I think the two genders argument is his wekest position

honestly I just don't give a fuck what someone wants to identify as

hes often wrong too

crowder does this on college campuses, right? so gets the 08/15 college responses

and he doesn't really hvea good point

Crowder's no scrub. He may interview people off the street for stuff but he's challenged shapiro and the likes of Sowell before

easy to prepare if you know the arguments beforehand

if he approached it as a forced speech issue it would be better

because who cares if someone identifies as a attack helicopter if they aren't hurting anyone

I don't even get the gender debate, like what is gender even based on?

just don't force me to call you as such

there are only 17 genders, change my mind

lol you would get pushback from the left on that, who say there are more

no tim, gender is a spectrum

lol

there are 2 genders... idiots and non-idiots, change my mind 😄

there are 289 genders, change my mind?

With 17 is is of questionable consent so there must be 18

not enough!!!!!

#droptheb