newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 9/874
| Next
No spamming, no doxxing, be reasonable.
Follow the discord policys so we all get along.
There are some example rules.
thats a good start
Well, add in shit that isnt common sense
Well actually, its probably not that common though if people have to be reminded sooo
>no doxing
ZERO'S WAIFU IS YUKIE
Common sense isn't common.
@Kori Tainaka >Has an anime avatar...
Kori, no!!
What have you done?!
>I have an anime avatar
you have to be explicit with your rules though, as ambiguous rules are designed to be broken. If you want to create a healthy discourse, you need objective rules that can easily be judged by moderators.
<:yukie_smile:350106585864994826>
So shit like no hatespeech isnt a good rule since its subjective
exactly
No commie speech
thats what Tim's video today was saying
Nor is it good for someone who is explicitly free speech.
Yeah, a much better rule than "No hate speech" would be "No speech", because that's purely objective. You can't talk.
:D
We need context.
Silence is golden I guess
But duct tape is silver
Xd
even better, tape them mouths shut, silence
Still, i will be here for the chaos, assuming that actually happens. Sorry for the debbie downer, but Ive seen it happen pleanty so best of luck to the mod and future mods
@balticnapo max raises a good point in that video, but you are missing the point. The point is not whether or not the rules are objective, the point is that we should be striving to get as close as possible to an objective set of rules, and since this is a discord server linked directly to Tim, it shouldn't be that hard to find a set of rules that we agree on the necessity of, because we are likely coming from a similar point of principle, i.e. something close to the principles of freedom of speech and free discussion. Keeping that in mind, that is what we should design the rules to protect.
Well, ill leave that to bruce and tim to discuss
also, a lot of the point of that video is that ais are now determining what people see online and catering specifically to their biases.
i.e. the ais are designed to cater for maximum engagement rather than maximum objectivity and truth.
which can lead to the exact opposite of this
Lol, well, Tim has done a really good job at explaining issues with some laws. I am sure hed have little issue with writing up rules for a small discord server.
Well, small as of now
yeah, but as with all things, its better to do some forward planning with some kind of vision, because that increases the likelihood of you achieving that vision, so I'm just asking the mods to think about what they want to see on this server and how they are going to achieve that.
I just want to make shitty puns.
Like when the inevitable chan raid happens, I want to yell out pools closed.
lol
yeah but you aren't a mod so your goal may be different to the mods ๐
Every time I'm granted power on a forum/channel/whatever, the first thing I do is I ban myself
Because if I've got the power to ban people, why not start with the worst offender?
Im only an admin on one server, really small one with double digits (like 50). But I do fuck all there.
Back when I was in scanlation (on IRC) I was an operator on several channels and I was admin on one, but that was mostly because the group's leader let their channel lapse and I reclaimed it for them
I think the biggest channel I was in back then was 75 people
I'm aware that mee6 has a slowmode
I'm familiar with it
@WOODY Except for the part where you have to figure out what permissions to give the bot so that it can do everything for you
it will also help if and when a raid occurs
you just make a role for the bot
Yeah, most Discord bots have anti-raid utilities
its not too hard
The bot I use didn't have good documentation around what permissions it needed, so it took me a few days to get everything right
use a different bot then? theres plenty of bots around for all sorts of things.
I got one bot set up right. Why would I switch to another bot and go through another potential headache?
Emily and I are going to head to Montreal ina few days and then Detroit if you have any story suggestions
How bout a channel for that
this is the newsroom channel
Maybe you should make another text channel for general discussion so that the distinction is more apparent
Oh so shitposting is the general?
@Kori Tainaka I think <#398973785426100234> is for shitposting
If you could shoot some drone Footage off Mont Royal that would be a great scenery for a video or an interview spot @Timcast
mountain right in the middle of the city
@Timcast I would be grateful if you would read my suggestions further up, some of them could be quite helpful.
dji drones are the worst
all of my batteries failed
RIp
I was talking about this with another member of the discord yesterday on voice chat but something to look into maybe in the future is what's going on with California and pot. And I don't mean like the debate, I mean how right now a lot of start-up bussinesses have just dumped a TON of money into pot production and might have to find a way to pull out all their resources really quick.
Yeah pot is a hot debate right now if you haven't done it already
Has nothing to do with Montreal though
oof
I don't understand Sessions, obsession with pot
he said it had *basically* the same risk as heroin, which is just objectively false
Like on the freeway near me there are ads for edible products already for sale, apps that help you find pot stores and all of that; what legally is going to happen to those people if the feds crack down? Does creating an ad for pot products and posting it on a bilboard have a different sentance or punishment then being caught selling it?
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
technically no
because each state was allowed to have pass their own laws on marijuana
but now that, that has been repealed
businesses that were created before the repeal *might* still have legal standing with the federal government, def with the state governments
So in the overlap of this repeal, what happens to those who don't pull their products, or take down their publicly displayed ads on time?
but anything created after is def in jeopardy
Pretty sure if 32 states pass medicinal marijuana or decriminalization of it, there will be nothing the FED can do because the majority of people will outrage over it
If not already
I would assume criminal charges would be filed, but then again the Fed hasn't neccessarily come out and said they were going to remove state's right to have legalized pot
The repeal doesn't neccessarily entail that, unless new information has come out to which I was unaware
@Kori Tainaka if you look throughout the union in general, basically everyone wants pot to be legalized, for whatever reason Sessions seems to have a personal vendetta against it and wants it removed entirely
From what I've read, the Cole Memo was a "guidance document" and not an actual law. I don't know if that affects the outcome of its repeal
Can you get in trouble for advertising or producing a product in the grey time between it being legal and illegal? It's this weird middle ground that I think would be worth looking into; it would be cool to hear from the farmer who started to buy seeds or even plant crops and now has to consider burnning it all. Or the company that has a warehouse of now-illegal product that they can either try to store for a later date secretly or destroy it now to stay safe.
@Deleted User he's probably just one of those old people who thinks one marijuana joint is the equivalent to 20 years of smoking or something
more like taking heroin
idk why he believes this
Like there isn't an evidence that suggests marijuana and heroin are even close to being on the same page, especially since heroins only real medinical use is for numbing pain, but we have plenty of other stuff for that
so we obviously don't need it
vs marijuana which has been shown to drastically help and improve the quality of life for people with Parkinson's disease for example
Well that and the fact that big pharma pushes opioids these days
wtf happened?
I left just now and I come back to a discussion.
that's the other thing i don't understand, why the fuck is Sessions targetting marijuana when Trump literally announced the Fed would be going after the Opiod crisis like a week or two ago?
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 9/874
| Next