so you are assuming that when you see the other extreme that would push you to their side

I think it is exactly the opposite

there is a term

you have the regular run of the mill non extreme liberal types

and then the other liberal sjw antifa race baiting types are shitlibs

The more I see welfare, the more I side with nationalism. Though ideally I'm for free market and not protectionism

I've been on both sides of the whole welfare thing. And lemme tell you. It's not pretty.

Technically I'm still on one side of it but yeah.

thats what Im saying... open up to the ideas... find compromises

@>Cytos, de lieve goede synth How do you define that by the way? Is it how they define themselves or how they act?

Open to new ideas means understanding them and their points. What most would do is swing more to their side because they understand that it's "needed"

i guess a smol test would be in what they think of conservative

like

if you are for welfare you HAVE to be nationalist, otherwise you are just bad at maths

Exactly

Nonsense, just give everyone $0.50 in bread. It'll be fine, right?

literally hitler = shitlib
disagree passionatly but still human/allowed/etc = liberal

have debt? just print more money!

Yeah that's kind of the issue I guess.

Part of the reason I was pushed to care too damn much about politics and this entire debate is because of what I've lived with for the past few years.

They're self-proclaimed "moderate, progressive liberals."

`In actuality they're some of the most disgustingly racist people I've ever come in contact with.`

But they don't exist either, because everywhere you go everyone blames the modern "shitlib" mentality on middle-class white people and this is a severely low/fixed income black household. :v

if "racism" is a problem to you, you should discard the victim card already. Its a waste of everyone's time

God I wish I could make them do that.

when is this farmlands video coming out?

I dont know if I can trust Southern that much, but it seems like an important docu that the MSM doesnt seem to want to cover

https://a.uguu.se/4maVn1sDKWhF_chrome_2018-05-03_14-05-01.png

Referring to this?

ya

It's in final production, maybe a week or two

i take her videos with a grain of salt

https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/992116587002933248

to be fair we have people on 56k dial up here, they would also lose to the pidgeon 😄

I don't see how she leaves out any more info than Tim, she is right and Tim is left, they both have a focus on different sides, but both are honest and true

er.. macron just said the Australian PMs wife was "delicious" ... to his face.....

okay... but is she?

I haven't seen her be proven wrong by anyone credible

to macron? probably https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Lucy+Turnbull&num=50&safe=off&rlz=1C1CHBF_en-GBGB734GB734&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAOPgE-LUz9U3MCwpyElRAjNNDEoKLLUkspOt9AtS8wtyUoFUUXF-nlVxQX5pcSoA9FRHgjIAAAA&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwirn8O7n-raAhWIT98KHfc5DgoQ_AUICygC&biw=1920&bih=910

https://a.uguu.se/bZ8ZxjADWaFO_firefox_2018-05-03_14-11-47.png

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/05/02/macron-calls-australian-leaders-wife-delicious-and-demonstrates-the-perils-of-diplomacy-in-a-foreign-language/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2c2247a6a6c7

So basically, a huge non-issue.

I'm Australian, am I delicious?

yes

its a french guy trying to speak anything but french, of course its a non issue 😉

I mean we could test that, but considering you're Australian there's a high chance getting anywhere near you would result in us dying.

Note to self: If I ever go to Australia, I should check out the local cannibal restaurant.

lol 👍

`Just order pork at an aussie restaurant. Same effect, far more convenient.`

heh.. the PMs face https://twitter.com/Ruptly/status/992111429762379776

https://a.uguu.se/VaCYbVmXGcJ2_firefox_2018-05-03_14-15-20.png

that forced smile like.... "wtf just happened"

That's not 'really' a bad thing to say in Australian context, it's taken as more of a visual term here

She looks delicious, not she tasted delicious. It's just not PC to say so, but PC is on the way out hopefully

off topic... was weinstein ever accused of sexual assault?

Maybe it'd help if everyone stopped assuming whenever someone says something that isn't perfectly calculated and triple checked with the backing of a huge panel that it wasn't automatically meant to be offensive?

I have a panel triple checking to make sure everything is offensive, it's called being an Aussie

~~cunt~~

Cunts rulez

BBC said he had numerous allegations of sexual assault... but I thought it was just indecent requests and abusing his power in the industry?

Quick search is showing the court case hasn't happened yet.

Abusing power = abusing dumb people

But based on being forced to listen to the MSM, he's not really in the news right now.

Just a bunch of moral grandstanding.

the story wasnt about him.. they just slipped that in there

on this one http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43994591

Is there no other way, they choose to fuck him for the easy path

I dont think they did... did they? .. wasnt it just a weird.. watching him shower thing or something?

damn, that reaction time on polanski...

It was consensual, watching him fap, if I got the right person

..Wasn't that someone else?

Some comedian.

Except he was rejected after asking.

Properly, yeah you're right

louis CK

Right, him.

Yeah, that's him

I don't think he actually did anything wrong in that case.

I mean, he *did* ask.

huh.. apparently its world press freedom day .... happy world press freedom day Tim

thats a scary rise in that "journalists imprisoned" chart at the bottom http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-43961380

it's not really surprising, though

hmm it probably doesnt mean anything.. and is just an odd coincidence.. but the rise in imprisoned journalists is inversely proportional to the major stock markets - you can see it clearly when there was a big dip in 2012, the imprisoned journalist count went up

although that fails in the last 2 years... 😛

I don't see why it wouldn't be directly linked at face value

Who drives the people that drive the stock value that drives the money that drives the law that drives the media (and repeat)

yeah I suppose.... as they say... follow the money

is it me or is calling someone "right-wing" to "defame" them a weird concept... considering we live in capitalist societies where the majority actually vote right wing

I think that's the focus of a video Tim is doing, everything is so extremely left that even Tim thinks he is center, to put it in perspective I think Tim is left AF, which he is, he is a liberal, but he isn't drastically left, nor retarded left

Anything that isn't SJW is an insult in media, so to them Tim is a conservative alt right

ok but just to be clear, saying he is left... and saying he is liberal, are 2 different things

Which makes me satan himself lol

like you can be right and liberal... and you can be left and authoritarian

It shouldn't though, left and right is where peeps physically sit in parliament, Tim would sit on the left of the room and argue with me on the right

the founders of the US were right wing liberals

left and right are just opinions on what would be the best system to run a society economically

they wanted individual rights - and the rights to own property

the other axis is Authoritarian - Liberal, which is a system on how to best run a society socially

@wacka I grew up in a part of the country where it was totally normalised to think of "the right" as a thing that doesn't exist except in backwards, incredibly low intelligence places where everyone has a thick accent.

Nobody was contrarian to this in the classroom and nobody really brought it up as a concept.