probably so

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=repxFQXVsHc

No way this was his real account right 😆 https://twitter.com/LilithLovett/status/1029893331491254272

The purge sure is going strong either way

Considering that Williams hanged himself, his account being "suspended" is not a good look

Twitter can be a real pain in the neck.

(forced thing I couldn't find a use for earlier)

It's not the only thing that'll give you a crick in the neck, Genie

https://youtu.be/pvQo4cKymZU

actually we did a checkup on the way back machine

that was his twitter

so he got banned posthumously?

well done twats

persumably someone hacked into his account

that makes much more sense

but he hasnt been with us for the past 4 years

and i even loved his work

such history shall be perserved, not tossed through the shredder

but sadly letting the past die and killing it if we have to, is the new mantra of this wacky hivemind that is forming

what could go wrong?

you anger those that are perserving history

which isn't even the worst of it

the worst part is not having a record of the past

you simply cannot understand the present or hope to project the future without an understanding of the past

but fuck those old timey racists that built our country, lets burn all the statues to the ground and pretend were all magical ponies 🤷

as a mater of fact, the declaration of independence is considered racist

if you go by today's logic

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past

well i was wrong: https://twitter.com/anthonypants/status/1029911646787973120

damn Robin Williams is hot

no it IS robin williams https://twitter.com/zeldawilliams/status/294924653581959168

thats the one thats suspended

Zelda? that's his daughter? i knew he was a gamer but wow lmao

yeah he was in the american comertials for ocerina of time

i wish he did VO for some games

yeah it is a shame

wonder why he never did, he loved video games

Bruce Campbell did though. Shit's great

Also he did do VA for one game

Disney's Math Quest with Aladdin :^)

i mean wasnt this advert that nintendo did tell you anything: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bINUfbLV_0M

no homo but i kinda want to just nuzzle up to that beard

That's probably the least gay thing I've ever heard

Let the past die. Kill it if you have to

Source: @SugarPsycho sugaposted it originally in *Dank Memes Only*

Seems fitting

“ On Periscopes, Alex Jones tells supporters to get their “ battle rifles” ready against Antifa, the mainstream media, and “ Chicom operatives” by Media Matters

This is the dishonest headline that the media used against Alex Jones to get him suspended off twitter. He called for peaceful opposition against these groups. The use of political, economic, judicial tactics to move legally and using criminal justice against Antifa and the media that endorsed their violence. The “ Battle Rifle” comments are in the context of people getting doxed and attacked. He says to keep them ready by your bedside. A clear call for self defense against a home invasion by Antifa thugs.

http://archive.today/lo2iy

“ Twitter suspends Alex Jones for seven days over tweet” by Cecilia Kang on The New York Times

NYT lies about Alex Jones calling for his followers to “ get their ‘battle rifles’ ready against the media and others.” He said no such thing. He told his followers to keep their rifles by their beds because of doxing and Antifa attacks. A call for his followers to be ready to defend themselves from Antifa home invasions.

http://archive.today/isTzm

Invasions which do actually happen in evrope

Yup

More fake news on Alex Jones incoming!

“ FCC shuts down Alex Jones flagship radio station” by Jacqueline Thomsen on The Hill

The FCC finned a Pirate radio station for operating without a license. They aired Infowars among other shows. This wasn’t run by Alex Jones in any way. The media is falsely associating this with Alex Jones.

http://archive.today/4z1Nt

“ At Def Con, children show how easy it can be to hack an election “ by Eric Brackett on Yahoo News

This contest, sponsored by the DNC, gave young hackers direct access to a voting machines. These machines are not online, and are constantly watched, so this is already an unlikely event. Even with this unlikely access, all they were able to do was make it play music and display a simple animation. They also failed to hack a well secured replica of a voter registration website. The media is focused on the success hacking of replicas of government websites that display voter totals to the public. Something of little importance. This whole event is DNC propaganda.

http://archive.today/nxBbV

Paper ballots ftw

A lot of the current voting machines are easily compromised due to poor manufacturing standards

Because they want to be cheap

But then they charge shit loads for districts to buy

http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/

Machines are designed to be rigged.

Votes in my state are done via paper ballots and the only electronic aspect is the counting machine

So poll workers in my state are the only people with access to people’s voter info and the counter

It may not be as Streamlined but it’s def less risky where I live

If hackers could easily rig the elections, then why hasn’t the hacker 4Chan done it yet. Checkmate Athiests

They can’t. @Crimsom That event gave hacker direct physical access to the voting machines, and they couldn’t do shit. Online hackers can’t effect the machines because they aren’t online.

Not that I have a problem with paper ballots

I know, it was a joke.

Yeah, I got that. Just saying.

The 4Chan must not be Russian. The hunt continues!

XD alex jones should just abandon the conspiracy theory shit and start being a real reporter

then be like IM BANNED CUZ THEY DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW THE TRUTH

lol $$$$$ profit

he's doing that while sticking with the conspiracy theory shit

which is worrying because people believe him more now that he's been banned

yeah if hed drop that shit itd be nice

fresh

How much longer til deep fake dead celebrity becomes more of a thing?

The "Couple Goes to Middle East To Prove Evil Isn't Real" video on the Timcast* channel is entirely fake news. I'm really surprised he didn't look into it more.
They kept a blog here: http://www.simplycycling.org/
They never said any of the quotes about evil not being real, they didn't set out to tour the middle east to prove humans are good.
They quit their jobs to spend a couple of years cycling around the world because they love cycling. They worked for 7 years to be able to afford it.

At no point in their blog do they cream about the goodness of people, in fact they detail problems they had with locals always asking them to stop for photographs and how they had to ask people continually to leave them alone. They just wanted to cycle, and Tim seems to have blindly gone along with the article as-written without putting in literally the two minutes it takes to skim their blog, which you can find by googling their names.

There's no ideological language used, there's no highlighting of the brave, good people they meet along the way. It's just a group of friends cycling, because that's what they loved doing and it's disgusting to see so many people cheering their deaths because of what they 'probably believed'.
100% fake news.

@Timcast I've been a fan for a long time, please consider looking into that cyclist story again, because the version shared is really inaccurate.
The video's comments are a huge circle jerk of self-righteous hatred for dead people who aren't even cold yet, based on opinions they never shared or even demonstrably held.

We gotta take news ourselves

They're still dumb as shit for biking through these countries, though

Snopes seems to suggest that this "evil" story comes from the Pluralist.com on 15th of August.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/millenial-couple-isis-tajikistan/
However, they fail to mention that The New York Times wrote a similar quote about evil on the 7th of August: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/07/world/asia/islamic-state-tajikistan-bike-attack.html

The author of the NYT article also (co)authored this article: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/30/world/asia/tajikistan-attack-cylists.html

""badness exists… by and large, humans are kind. Self-interested sometimes, myopic sometimes, but kind. Generous and wonderful and kind. No greater revelation has come from our journey than this.""

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/washington-dc-couple-american-cyclists-tajikistan-isis-lauren-geoghegan-jay-austin/

so I think pluralist skewed it in that they claimed people being good is what they learned

not that they wanted to prove it

Here’s a TYT video where they pretend the Pirate radio station that was finned and shut down is a part of Alex Jones’s operation. This radio station played other things besides Infowars, and Alex had no part in it. Fake News.

https://youtu.be/zQKdlca2YWs

why would TYT make Jones seem bigger than he is?

i really don't get this

They want to make their victory seem greater by making their foe seem stronger. And the message is also that 'our reach isn't limited to the internet'.

which ironically increases the people listening to jones because they go "wow, he has that much reach? wtf he saying?"

they are going to ban tyt soon too

theres a reason they are on youtube

they dont want them in the msm

i hope they ban tyt

i hope

just so we can laugh and say "i told you so", then get them fighting for our cause

bit late to the convo, but most voting machines are made by the manufacturers of ATM's and ATM's are filled with security holes its just that the machines are often in very public places, they're not secure they're just relying on other factors to prevent loss of money, any company willing to lose money mostly relying on banks to keep it hush hush because their reputation would be damaged also.... if they do that with money on the line, do you really think they care about vote tampering...

does tyt ever mention being demonitized? I assume they do just like all news channels but if they don't then they're clearly on a special list that will make them less likely to be banned

an atm is pretty much a normal windows pc in most cases

with a touchscreen and a card reader

conected to a intranet (a private Wide Area Network / WAN) that spans over the county, city or state

in best practices

but novadays you cans ee atms conected to the internet

i wouldnt be surprised if thats the case too with the voting machines

its worse than a normal windows pc, its usually windows xp

still

which means it gets no security updates and all the holes are known

@okbork tim responded

Hey, I'm a Gamergate dude/normie to this Discord. @Timcast talked about GG in a recent video for a fake news article that claimed "no one on the GG reddit got more than 300 upvotes". Tim repsonded with the fact that there was a post that had nearly 500 points and that plagiarism wasn't the biggest deal to that community.

The thing is though that it was actually a decently bigger deal than that on the sub. For some reason Tim organised by new instead of relevance or top when searching for “IGN”. If he organized by relevence, he would have noticed that it's the 2nd result that comes up (across all time) with over 900 upvotes, 149 comments and multiple followups that hit similar numbers. Same thing happens if you search by top of this month. On the day it was put out it had hit the top of the sub in less than an hour. I understand that Tim was defending GG, I'm not trying to reeee at him or anything. But since he filtered by new for a situation that was resolved almost 2 weeks ago, he made it seem like it had signifigcantly less impact for people in the movement than it actually did.

Anyways Sorry if I've been a bother, I know he's got bigger stories to talk about and all that, just wanted to get that out there.

me no Gamergate

Also it's worth noting that IGN actually handled this case well. They fired him as they should have. GG was more about systemic issues than any one person being corrupt. It's inevitable that something like this will happen from time to time. It's when the game journos and their publishers all circle the wagon around cases like this that GG really cares. If the websites would respond this way to all breaches of ethics then GG wouldn't exist.

Yeah pretty much.

To be honest, if gg went after him harder the sites will be crying harrassment

But hes been fired, articles deted, what else are they expecting gg to do?

Drive him out of the video game industry... Oh wait he already was

Sucks for him, last 2 editors in his position went on to work for nintendo.

been watching videos about this ign thing for days

even philip de franco talked about it

its basicly lying propaganda that article he read

Imagine if the writer was a woman. The narrative will be different.

"I used a block list to make sure that everyone who talks about GG positively or follows any pro-GG people are blocked." "Why don't I see anyone talking about this??"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0-gZygKv6c

Oh, not just was that guy fired from IGN & had his review deleted, he created a (NOT) apology video & challenged people to prove that he has plagiarised before, not just did he have multiple instances of plagiarizing stuff that was posted to IGN (which also had to be deleted), he also plagiarized a a job template on his linkedin account.

"I hate that you can't criticize things because you'll be called a bigot" - Tim... Welcome to the Anti-SJW side of the culture war, because even if you don't identify with that side, the SJW's will make damned sure people see you that way.

And you know why they say 'Alt Right' as often as they do.. lol

They WISH 'Anti-SJW' had the same sting.

But no. SJWs are FINALLY reviled now. And anti-that sounds heroic.

My god it took so long for SJWs to be hated, but now it's so glorious.

SJW was originally THEIR term. They LIKED IT.

Then again the ones calling themselves antisjw are kinda cringy in their own right.

Why?

I mean if that's your entire identity.

But it's often just one checkbox of many.

Mainly if thats their entire thing is based of refuting another instead of standing on its own. Then yeah.

Being an SJW often dictates everything else about you.

Being Anti-SJW is on the side of logic, so you can come from any walk of life to be that.

Which is also why sjws are cringy people

But if you're machine purely made to debunk SJW shit

It gets old quick.

Because SJWs mostly just... ignore points, and repeat their own.

It's exhausting dealing with them for this reason.

i know of people who only criticize other ideologies but never reveal their own, because that would expose them to criticism

I mean that was my point. At some point you realize that you are just doing the base expectation of being logical.

The "extreme centrists"?

i dont even know, because they dont say

I mean, theres alot of memes out there.

Usually its like this

Metokur.

miss argue afainst sjws. I argue other side is shit too

It's not really a side though.

It's a response.

By normal people.

She points how sjw is shit. And I go "too baderino" both sides are shit

Anti-SJWs don't have a collective goal after the SJWs are gone.

And act as if being neutral makes me above criticism

I mean alot of gg people wish gg doesent have to exist

being neutral is a pretty radical position which can even be difficult to realize

most countries fail to maintain their neutrality

But once you make your entire identity arpund opposing something.

anti sjws?

It starts looking like fanatism

Neutrality isn't always people not wanting to be seen on one side of the other.

arent the anti sjws everyone is not a sjw?

Neutrality is often "Oh I haven't looked into it enough yet."

My point isnt being neutral is bad

Jordan admits it all the time.

My point is people say they are neutral, which means they hold no views and therefore cant be critisized

Nidhoggr is right.

yeah if they don't make a positive claim, it's hard to criticize them, unless you criticize them for that on its own

Without acknowledging neutrality on a subject is an opinion in its own right

https://youtu.be/HLNhPMQnWu4?t=1m

but you can make a positive claim from neutrality though, advocating compromise or taking the middle road

if i am right, then the goal of the anti sjws would be to live a happy life with out some stupid inmature more than often mentally retarded or unstable fuck geting into their faces for everysingle stupid reason they think is reasonable.

Not everything has the middle road

not much has a middle road imo, and it's actually a logical fallacy

And not making the choice is a choice

yes

not making a choice?

is not a choice

i think thats correct too

you're choosing to not choose

no you didnt chose shit on the first time

you're choosing to stay undecided

so you missed chosing

there was no choice

lol it's a semantic paradox i think

this choice something sounds tribalistic

like pick a side

sounds infantile

neutrality is a side

is not

Now this is based on the asumption the individual is aware of the choices

you are asuming everybody in teh world is listenign to you

cant you make choices without being aware of them though?

like subconsciously

no

Now this is based on the assumption the user is 100% informed of them

which is a fallacy

When the user wil only have the info they are aware of at that point

if you raise one of your hands to scratch your nose, imo it's a choice even if you're not aware of it

thats like saying when you were born it was your choice

I dont see the tribalism in that alone. Choosing something does not make you tribal.

What makes it tribal is your reason for making a choice

Did you choose x because all your mates did the same

i dont get the similarity. someone else is birthing you.

Or did you come to your own conclusion that x is better

forcing ppl to make a choice or be part of the proccess of a choice making with out their knowledge is tribalistic

you are talkign now out of power

Choosing to not choose is a choice. To choose not to, one has to be aware of the choice.

with those unetical line of thoghts you are giving people guilt or resposability of actions and choices they had ntohing to do with

tribalistic

Now thays a rather pointed accusation you are making no?

no

thats ethics

We are not talking about laws or crime here.

ethics is not that

I am saying that holding a neutral position on something is a side on its own.

the base of all judgment on a person it starts on the line of choices the person has done in his, her life

Or in other words you choose to withhold judgement until something changes you mind

yes

There is no harm in choosing

Or choosing not to choose

of course theres no harm but is unethical

and if applied in real life with out proper explanation will lead to unethical behaivour

for example senators and such

on laws, theyh ave an abstain vote

but by abstaining they are pandering to the mayority

thers a whole dilema there

Wouldnt the whole choice thing bypass that?

no

So lets get this straight

they abstain knowingly

this si an example of people chosing to be neutral

You dont think not making a choice does not count as making a choice

hyh?

huh?

lol

that sentence needs more negations

that wasnt my point

We lost the point 50 messages ago

my point was, that a person taht is ignorant of the making of any choice and by that they are neutral of it they are not making any choice so they are not responsable

Where did responsibility come into this?

if a person knows the subject at hand, and decides to not to decide then thats a choice

that carries repercusion

Thats assuming the individual also knows the repercussions of his choice

yes

Hey what in the sam hill is goin on here?!

Buut that is not always true

we going dip babe