The pinball is stuck in the machine, used like a tool until it loses its worth and falls away, and is immediately replaced by another entity for the machine, made to benefit the overlord, you

ah. Maybe all sitcoms should have been banned as well.

lol i dont wanna ban stuff. some stuff yea but not everything

Maybe if those people read about the history of humans they'd realize that we're a shit breed and television isn't teaching us anything new.

Also, Remember when you bought a computer and it came with pinball downloaded?

space pinball is political

one spectrum wants to go to space, the other says no

cant go to space to preserve the enviroment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ZgtEzXcJc

https://youtu.be/u4fuw9sAHtc

Ha-ha

Apparently to the left, Trump didn't win because the left had gone apeshit crazy. Trump won because the left didn't go apeshit crazy **ENOUGH**. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS-sxJFn6O0

...and I only watched the first minute of it. I know where he's going with it.

they always double down

"Shut the fuck up! Centrism, LOL!" -the leftwing 2019

They still don't understand about electoral collage and the fact that they need to win the swing states.... not get supermajority of Commifornia, New York city, Seattle and Portland.

Leftist logic is basically: because the leftwing was not *left enough*, swing voters chose to vote rightwing.

The centrists decide who wins. Far right and far left are already settled on whi they vote for

they understand the electoral college, which is why they want to abolish it

once it's gone (or subverted enough), the left will hold power in perpetuity through importing destitute third-worlders who will be grateful for whatever socialist pittance they receive.

Yeah. Abolish electoral college to get their socialism finally impelemented.

Import more welfare recipients to ensure majority support continues.

honestly the left almost accomplished this. donald trump was a fluke. a black swan event. if the hilldawg won there'd be no stopping them.

they'd hold power for all time (or however long it took for financial collapse)

Continuing with the video, it does appear there's more to the NYTimes "journo" being idiot. Not thinking that further left is the solution is actually the only thing she's correct about (even though that's the first left thinks she's **wrong** about). Calling Tulsi an Assad sycophant is ridiculous, as calling Trump an Assad lover. The MSM just loves to call anyone against perpetual warfare to be a Russian pupper, Assad/Putin lover, etc.

i guess to some extent they have an interest in perpetuating war. it gives them something to cover.

Yeah. Imagine being so sociopathic you promote warfare to get to report on it. That's **LITERALLY** being a James Bond villain.

And I do mean, literally literrally, not Millenial "liderally".

I don't remember which Bond movie it was but one of the villains perpetrated false flag attacks to get USA and Russia into a nuclear war... just for news headlines. That's what MSM is doing *in real world*.

It's just sad that unlike in Bond movies, you cannot have MI6 send an operative and put 9mm through the brain of journos who want to spark WW3.

(That's a cute snek avatar, btw. I need to find a high-res version of it to make it into wallpaper.)

why is this server on retarded mode? 'cause i can still edit my comments anyhow

@whiic I need to know what Bond movie that is LOL

Was this the guy?

https://jamesbond.fandom.com/wiki/Elliot_Carver

He was in "Tomorrow Never Dies"

Tim Pool is an alt-lite useful idiot and "reporter", who speaks of being a high school dropout with outright pride, not realizing to what extent this gives him a tin ear for not just right-wing dog whistles but even rhetorical subtext intended to be overt (for instance, insisting the statement "men are not women" shouldn't be construed as transphobic because it remains true if trans men are counted among men and trans women among women), as well as leaving him ignorant of the contexts of social phenomena, which he'll often "explain" a naïve understanding of in a condescending tone.

k

I am fine with this

anyone got the full unedited video of this clip? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33WNq45d4tM

i'd argue that tim's lack of indoctrination from higher education has meant that he's more able to inform himself and avoid the biases that are taught to people who go through the degree mill

As soon as you said "alt right dog whistles" I lost interest

dog whistle is a dog whistle

if it's a doggie whistle to the alt right, and you can hear it ...

that means that you're on the alt right.

Yeah lmfao

People don't know what the term even means

`only racists homophones can hear this thing` says the racist homophone

It's just another phrase they use to dismiss ideas without having to actually engage with them critically

it's like how buzzword became a buzzword

Yeah oof

and talking about virtue signalling became virtue signalling in and of itself

it's not one particular side or faction, it's just there are more idiots with lots of free time, i guess.

Hes a troll guys o3o

Hes cool.

How is an "alt right dog whistle" dangerous anyways
As said only other alt righters would be able to hear it
If you're a normal person you wouldn't get the supposed reference
Is it supposed to be some secret brainwashing technique

Oh lol
Still an interesting discussion to have

Alt right whistles are a thing just like alt left whistle are a thing. They draw you that direction

Being a far righter myself, ppl in the center of right are going more right

However far righters are going back more center

How tho
By definition they're disguised phrases to signal to others you share their school of thought, if you're in on it.
"Cheese banana" could be a dog whistle, how does that make an outsider be drawn into my ideology

so no purge?

Maga is a dog whistle

but i've spent the passed six months getting my helicopter pilots license

the media wants you to think maga is a dog whistle

who or what am i supposed to throw out now?

It is technically cause it swoops ppl up to be anti immigration

how tho

Last I checked saying the phrase does not change people's minds on anything

Build a wall less immigrants etc. Have trade wars with other countries

But it has though.

why not a real war?

real wars are more fun

You need to convince them of things
The phrase "make america great again" does not in itself hold any meaning or power and will not convince anyone of anything, mostly because it's an empty statement you can add any meaning to

Companies that are international can cause more damage than actual warsm they are incredibly powerful

well invade those companies then

The meaning has been added and thats the dog whistle

bish bash bosh

Like climate change is also a dog whistle

Its a simple.phrase that gets ppl to change their minds

So because some people associate a certain meaning to the phrase that means the phrase itself can convince others to join in on that meaning?
Not last time I checked. If I associated my dog whistle "cheese banana" with slaughtering all people who dislike cheese or bananas, that does not then mean that saying that phrase to someone else will brainwash them into agreeing with me.
Associating meaning with a phrase does not give that phrase some sort of magical property

It takes time to associate a word to something. Racial slurs are a perfect example. People are convinced certain phrases mean something.

one thing to keep in mind here is that there are lots and lots of brain-dead morons out there who just absorb narratives like sponges absorb water.

There are some racal slurs that were normal words like faggot

It used 2 be ciggarates

Eh, true I guess

even if there is no rational reason to believe a phrase has power, enough morons give it power

Like if I say ni

U say maga, the magapedes stand up, you say climate change and the libtards stand up

drinking milk

XD

Milk is racistlol

okay sign

Doing 👌

And cheese is also racist

Cause nom whites tend to be non lactose intolerant

turtleneck with lips on it

🥛 👌

I'm a nazi now guys

the power isn't in the phrase, the power is in the morons

Its why /pol/ was throwing milk into the camera of the HWNDU incident

And not every trump supporter is smart

Dis you know that breathing oxygen is a white supremacist dog whistle?

Which is why dog whistles are neccesary

Poor Shia

Worrying about oxygen is a leftwing dog whistle. They go on and on about clean air

Like you huff in farts all the time

Lol

Eh. I still find it amazingly stupid when people will dismiss an argument because "ALT RIGHT NAZI DOG WHISTLE"

meanwhile they live in smog filled cities.

Or make up dog whistles on the spot to dismiss someone

Its absurd to say everything is an alt right dog whistle ill agree 2 that

But they see it like i see climate change. Its important to have the convo but if you agree to it you will probably go hardcore liberal

I saw a video from some retard who tried to claim that a video of Jordan Peterson fumbled during a lecture and said "so the fourth-sorry, third reich..."
And he was like "fourth reich is a Nazi dog whistle Jordan Peterson is a Nazi hahaha! Got him!"

you're trying to apply modernist epistemological methods to post-modernists

Lmao i still remember the h3h3 podcast

Which one lol

When jordan peterson was rationalizing hitlers actions to a jew

He went off the rails and has said so much stupid shit on there lately

guys guys

let's focus on the real issue here

"how dare you try to understand Hitler's psychology you evil naaaazi"

hila looks a lot a lot like ethan's momma

how can you use the notions of objective facts, logical progression, human reason, and truth to people who fundamentally do not believe in such things? arguing with leftists is pointless. trying to corner them into explaining why something is a dog whistle is pointless. there is no logic in it. there doesn't have to be for it to serve their purposes.

4 chan loved that event. But yea, any political phrase is a dog whistle

Just some dog whistles can take you really far

all that matters is that it allows them to wield power. the truth of it is irrelevant. truth is whatever they need it to be at the moment. or nothing at all.

Truth is subjective

the only weapons that can be used against them are either manipulating their emotions, or wielding naked power against them.

no, you're subjective ...

Ill play devils advocate

just make fun of them, and use whatever institutional or legal power you can get.

Ill answer in the most lefty way possible

trying to convince them of something with objective fact, logic, reason, etc, is a waste of time and effort. equivalent to talking to a wall.

Ask me something ud wanna ask a lefty

"How do you intend to provide 15 billion people with a first world lifestyle?"

Autoratarian or liberal?

Ill jusy pick liberal

By opening borders you open the ideas of other people to each other and technologirs and science move faster country to country if we establish a one worls goverment. Thru centralization of a one world goverment, we can better identify the worlds problems as were able to have a mich larger pool of resources to handle problems at large. Just like how even the poorest have phones, the meeting of countries leads to poorly developed nations to prosper.

@Atkins. o3o ima parrot things that have been said to me, see where this goes

tasking one government with a myriad of issues makes them have to specialize in which case theyd have branches for x demographic and whatnot
you should just leave their independance so they can work without regulations in their way and deal with problems as efficiently as possible

But its clear that some countries are working againts the interest of making a better world, an example being a disregard of regulations. Leaving countries to their own independence would allow them to do actions againts the interest of the world

yes there are but there are also good countries. peace is not a given and who's best to defend a countrys interests than its own people

But that isnt guaranteed. Saying no plan is the best plan is illogical.

who is this bad country and how would one government solve this issue

Most countries do not act to the accordance of what is good for their own ppl

i agree and they never will, we always try to reach a democratic consensus on whats best for the majority unless its a tyrannical regime

in which case we're discussing foreign intervention matters

This is my political ideology

But eventually their countries will fill up and they will come here. When that time comes, are you willing to push them away with bullets?

Those failing countries will eventually come, it is only 1 earth afterall

im no saint to claim we can save the lives of every asylum seeker but i think we can do a better way of handling the whole situation and transparancy is key
dont goad them into crossing thousands of miles of water if we're not able to let them all in due to regulatory processes and give back power to the people

`: But eventually their countries will fill up and they will come here. When that time comes, are you willing to push them away with bullets?`
i've read 'Camp of the Saints'. and my answer is yes.

we are our civilisation and questioning how much blood is on our hands will always come to bite the working man

and who does the government owe first and foremost? its people

Well if those birds arent fed and they run out of food, they will attack people. Likewise they could also destroy their own enviroment for the sake of catching up and then cause trouble for us

if they attack people, kill them

if they attack people then the people will fight back,

not 'invade and occupy and spend trillions rebuilding their shithole slightly faster than they're destroying it themselves'

less marshall plan, more punitive expedition

but i do think everybody vastly underestimated the whole refugee issue and allocated too little resources to properly integrate asylum seekers as we'd have much more capacity

i think they allocated too few anti-ship missiles to NGO boats

But those issues do bot fix the ever growing problem. These places are developing nukes

that comes with the whole lying about europe taking /everybody/ in bit

But its not a lie that choices you guys have made have been war over peace

there is only a problem because we subsidize third-world hellholes

And that we shpuls continue to compete and kill over resources

africa is already a universal shithole, barely living on the edge of subsistence with massive foreign aid, and they're set to add another 700M people in the next 30 years.

which we'll still have to fucking pay for. stop the insanity.

what do you mean you people chose war over peace i havent had an iphone in years

So we set up for them to prosper or we start killing them

they will never prosper

we've been shoveling billions into that hellhole for generations

the problem just keeps getting bigger and bigger and the people we feed have 7 kids

But see african american iqs have gone up, 15 points higher than african iq

It is possible yo raise an ethnicities total iq in a short time

and nobody actually living there can economically compete with "free shit"

i'm not talking about IQ. none of this conversation is about IQ or race

africans are closing their farms because getting rotten chicken from first world countries is cheaper

this is about being forced under threat of invasion to endlessly pay hostile foreign dependents.

all of this can be solved by giving back power to the people

stop making them dependant on first world countries

But see what im saying is exposure to a greater societg can lead people to prosperitg

this can all be solved by treating them like sovereign independent humans instead of children

Hence we need an exchange of science and cultures

this white savior bullshit has to end. one way or the other.

But that statement is false. Some countries do not improve. Even japan needed western exposure

and i'd prefer it ended without the collapse of the few free technological societies we have.

And i bring in iq because nations that are doing well have a certain iq average

i'm not talking to you if you're going to obsess over race and IQ

did the huns have anything to repay to the countless peoples they massacred

why arent the black slave owners coming to my country and giving my children free food

Im speaking avout a better future, not a mangled past

Also im playing devils advocate anyway. I dont really want a one world goverment. Im fine with a war being the end result of not helping ppl

yeye we know

man if you were a real person and brought up that bs argument of "better future this, the past is forgotten" id probably lose my shit

this whole white guilt thing is built on past accidents which most if not all agree were bad. sure theres still the resource war going on which is a much more delicate issue imo

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2725066.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFYfqkrshp4 Posted?

I think the left is hyper logical

They disregard things like incentives, which is a feeling not logic

They even have equations to make their communist utopia work, not realising human nature, or feelings, will get in the way

On paper, its perfect. But in practice not so much.

hm yeah maybe incentives are better payment for third world countries than insufficient money

communism is based on the idea of society having a base unit of one single individual of such and such economic value

when in reality the base unit of society is the family.

Whi h is based on feelings. Patrionism helps make better communities imo

Blarie White is a man

and what a sexy man she is

9/11 would m-preg

communism is based on the fungibility of humans, which is false. people are not interchangeable parts. and if people have to be taken as distinct individuals with different talents and qualities, the labor theory of value falls to pieces.

Also saying african americans have 15 iq points higher than africans is an anti race and iq argument

i wouldnt say theyre irreplacable as my boss could very well replace me but the resault would look different

what do you mean when you say `race` ?

it's such a stupidly broad term tbqh

Earlier he said that if i obssesed over race and iq

Well from where slaves came from and comparing african americans to midwest african

you want to know something wierd and disturbing?

personality is also heritable

Racist

👻 ✝ 🔥

but to what degree

more heritable than it is environmental

so we're talking at least 51:49 split

more than 51

probably a 60:40

Anyway. If things become more automated and less human interaction, individuals matter less. Most people are very productive just being able to drive

that depends

It depends on the race.

i'd say the opposite

automation makes some individuals matter more. like the people making and programming the machines.

i agree, opposite seems more plausible

the kind of tech that is being developed may decentralise government, industry, and society as a whole

the industrial revolution was a mistake tbqh

software engineers will be worth much, much more than truck drivers.

You guys have jobs

truck drivers are only worth what they are because they give the best blowjobs

theres an interesting shift in responsibilities happening in the swiss pharma landscape

probably

idk

theres more responsibilities shifted to the client making them pretty much obligated to take care of themselves and properly read the manuals

but overloading the individual with information gives more importance to people who can give you these informations as needed

isn't this why we have doctors and nurses?

so that people can find out what will make them better, and the how (etc)?

it is but im saying overloading them with responsibilities and information will make them seek someone who knows it without them having to do the work

Basically, its only important to have low iq ppl as banks and they become less and less important but we give them a role to play in everything that isnt impactful

humans are lazy

which is whats happening when you automate every aspect of life, you put more responsibilities on the individual