cherries declared independence

Discord machine 🅱roke?

yeah 😦

http://subverse.net/2018/07/15/professor-uses-title-ix-against-women-only-programs-at-university-of-michigan/

nice website tim

we call that a scoop

Hello Folks 😃

o/

it sucks when I can see youtube screw my video over

it also sucks when I spend a ton of time and energy to do a story and youtube fucks with it

its like theyd rather me just do extreme opinion videos

:(

let's see some radical extremist tim

Let's see some radical centrism tim

Also, if you want a poppin beat for your day have this https://open.spotify.com/track/4LYlim7K0XmAxgeES3Oddk

Too Many Zooz are a former busking group turned actual hit from NYC

it's just a bari, a trumpet, and a drummer

they're so fucking good

I like that you are starting to utilize sponsorships. I think it is better to go that route than stressing out over YT monetization.

Yeah

On Tims recent TYT video, it is no surprise this happened. Chemist & skitical youtuber Myles Power highlighted their irrational chemophobia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljtn9mHQW14

Lol did you guys see latest thunderfoot eu video ?

He is back with a vengeance lol

What's the gist of his argument this time?

"I told u so sargon i was right pls like me daddy"

I never seen their initial discussion

But basicaly he was highlighting some of his prediction which came true

And some of sargons which didnt

Eh I stopped following thunferf00t when the whole sargon/Russian deadpool drama shot happened

I stopped when he wanted out of the skeptic "community"

Yeah that deadpool drama was stupid

I'll check it out later

His science videos are still great

Everything else is fucking terrible

especially the jordan peterson video

He literally argues with a 10 second soundbyte

His reiteration was becoming nauseating to waddle through

Does he still do that? Taking 70% of the video to reiterate what he aleady said in other videos, even sometimes using the same clips

Yeah that's a thing with veteran sceptic youtubers

Like cult of dusty

It's really annoying

I dunno about veteran, TheQuartering does it and that made me stop watching his videos xD

He's pretty new

Well, he's just bad then

lol

It's not that he doesn't do good work, but I just can't sit through what amounts to 10 second arguments that takes him 10 minutes to explain

I love how in every anita sarkeesian video thunderfoot made he literally makes the exact same arguments

I like The Quartering

Jeremy seems like a cool dude

He's a funny guy

(Assuming his gender)

his videos are meh

Fair enough

Him as a person is fine, I just can't get into his style of videos

Same with Amazing Atheist

Funny guy

meh videos

Too much of what feels like meandering to me*

He annoys me to be honest. Like I supported him in his fight with WotC and don't have anything against him as a person, but I don't want to watch his videos

He seems like he has a really big ego

I guess it's just the character

The problem is that so many people cover the same topics. At some point, I gotta unsubscribe from some

Because in the warski streams, he's a really cool dude

laidback, self-aware, and all that

I don't watch Warski at all so I can't comment xD

I miss warski so much

There's that too xD

I can believe that. Some people just come across differently in different mediums.

He was my introduction into the anti-sjw community

Mine was ...

And now he's burning his nipple on livestreams

I believe Karen Straughen

I never got into Warski. I didn't like his delivery and there's something about him I don't trust

lmao

Well, I was 14 when I got into anti sjw stuff

sargon and karen were too long

How old are you now?

17

OLD

hey

Bébé

get out grandma

andy warski was perfect

False

his videos were short

and funny

I'm just teasing, you're fine

and had jus enough for me to understand his point

I think I found karen straughan through the MRA community

I forgot how I found Warski, but his presentation didn't suit me at all

I think it started with watching the Red Pill documentary

I looked up the honeybadgers

and through that I found Karen Straughan

Ah, yea, your introduction to them was the reverse for many MRAs xD

lmao

But it's been....eye opening

I initially hated Sargon when I first saw his stuff a few years ago. But I was also religiously watching TYT at that time as well lmao

I wasn't ever full on sjw check yo privilege feminist, but I never knew about the MRM

I feel the opposite about Sargon

I didn't know about TYT until later xD

I quite liked his content a few years ago.

I dont really like it anymore.

I really like sargon now honestly

Especially the brilliant venezuela video

He's definitely not for everyone

There are some areas where I think he has taken a step back on

But I feel like he's the YT personality who resembles my political philosophy the closest

Him and Matt Christiansen

He used to focus on espousing the 'classical liberal' point of view, which i respect a good amount, even if i dont agree on everything.
He's really moved away from that as far as i can tell.

I dislike Sargon's debate style sometimes @_@

Sargon is a horrible debator

He's simply terrible

Hahaha

He wasn't always this bad

Though the mythcon debate was amazing

I heard that Styx is a good debater

thomas smith being a moron helped

In the Styx & Sargon vs Richard & another person who I can't recall, Styx did the heavy lifting

A potato can out-debate Thomas Smith

Mythcon was alright

But as of late he's been pretty poor at explaining his stance

"When there's equality of opportunity, white men get to the top!"
-Thomas smith, Anti-racism activist

It's literally a white supremacist statement lol

He's on the left so it can't be

I mean, is that out of context?

Surely?

Nope

Sargon disagreed with equality of outcomes

and thomas said that

Not a fan of debates too much, thanks to William Craig. He "wins" debates by not doing much but leading the opponent away from the topic pretty much. And by debate rules thats how you get a winner

It was amazing

He said that, and didnt add anything to it?

Nope

"White men get to the top because....... (------)"

Let me find the timecode

Not 100%. The end statement is the same, but the reasoning behind that statement is that there are systematic rules in place for to be the only inevitable outcome. Which is pure bullshit, but it's not 100% white supremacist

Ah okay, so it wasnt said in a vaccum.

That makes more sense.

I don't 100% remember the debate, but that's what anyone could probably infer from his stance

I've never heard of the guy personally

Same before the debate

I just remember that he made it a glorious laugh

Trapping himself with lines like that

The debate should be on Youtube

It's not very intellectual

Eh, im not terribly interested, especially if its one sided.

Or rather

Not very deep

For the most part

He ends up storming off

It was actually supposed to be an interview IIRC

But Thomas chose to turn it into a debate

@Ashers
https://youtu.be/mTFL0wKmsC0?t=1692

Thomas:"I'm in favour of making things more equal."
Sargon: "I'm in favour of making things more free."
Thomas:"Freedom allows white men to control everything!"

Oh yeah, that guy was not at all qualified to be there.

But then again he was one of the only ones willing to be there to defend their side

SO HE'S A WHITE SUPREMACIST

CONFIRMED

lmao

Sargon did something similar today/yesterday

I don't remember the full context but he was talking to a BBC chap and a feminist MP and the topic of womens rights and human rights came up

and Carl argued somethign to the degree of "name rights women have that men don't" and the reporter mentioned abortion. Sargon said "Don't you think men can have abortions?"

the bBC reporters said no, and Sargon replied with "then by her (feminist)'s opinion you're transphobic"

in regards to FtM people

lmfao

the reporter seemed a little confused and dazed

To be fair, the argument isn't that white men are *better* than other races/women, but that they got a head start and were able to rig things in their favor

Which is a fair assessment in western civilization ^

@Deleted User Yea, I'm not denying he said that line. All I'm saying is that their reasoning behind them coming ot the same conclusion as white supremacist is not the same.

I know, I know

I agree

I remember that video with the bbc reporter

There were a bunch of golden lines

"I'm a journalist, It's not my job to see if something's credible."

"Human rights are subjective though"

Yea, but that can apply to anyone who's already established themselves within a civilizations. If slaves were never brought over, any non-white immigrant would have to start from the bottom up anyways.

THOSE WERE SOME LEGIT HOT TAKES SHIV

@Ashers Yea, for example in egypt, brown people are far more succesful than the white population

Thomas:"I'm in favour of making things more equal."
Sargon: "I'm in favour of making things more free."
Thomas:"Freedom allows white men to control everything!"
^
This is far more in line with what i'd expect

Yup

and even then, there are some pretty successful non-whites in America, aren't there?

And in china and other asian countries, white people are among the least succesful groups

@Ashers Just look at the top 100 in billboard man

Black immigrants from Africa tend to be very successful in America. Of course those are the ones who are already successful enough to immigrate in the first place, but it doesn't seem like they're being held back once here.

Yeah

Jeremy told me the immigrants who were actually from africa were vastly different from the black students

So, Shiv is 17? Are alot of you here quite young?

I think I may be the youngest

Tim should promote this server more

I'm ancient

I think there's a good mix of ages here.

I was a fan of his from the vice days, and I couldn't find it until recently lol

I figured i'd be at least in the younger half, at 21

A remnant of a time long since gone

From a random livestream that got recommended to me

When the internet was yet to be born

But its a hard to predict this sort of thing.

If I had to guess I'd say we average out to around 35 year old boomers

I'm definitely an outlier here tbh

I don't think most 17 year olds have attention spans for tim pool

26 here

More extreme channels are more entertaining

Like Crowder or PJW

i think i'm 25

They can be awfully boring in a different way from my point of view.

years blend together these days

27 here, I think the majority of us are late 20's, but that there are enough older people to skew the average higher

If 90% of what you say i expect after watching the first few minutes of your video

Eh.

i'm either 24 or 25 and i'm unwilling to count out the years

@Scarlet They're boring if you don't want to hear the same talking points over and over again

Though Im not from the US. But I like watching Tim anyways

I'm from india lol

Canadian for me.

Tim's vids have nothing to do with here, I still like them

Same here Scarlet

I'm 26

Damn commieleafpeople

Thats a surprise for me. I though most people should be americans

Yeah, reactionary channels like that can be good for the occasional chuckle, but they're not the sort of thing I'd want to regularly watch

Maybe

But this is a small sample of a snapshot of the server userbase

I like crowder myself, I think he can be funny, and i love the change my mind videos

Ask at different times and you probably would get mostly american

Crowder is fun, I enjoy the "Change my Mind" bits

Otherwise I don't watch his other stuff xD

His interviews and debates are pretty good actually

Cant really stand crowder as a person.

Most of the people who try to change his mind don't have a good grasp on what they're talking about sadly

Was shown a few of his videos, made pretty crap impressions on me too.

Yea

to be honest, Crowder's a really nice guy

On JRE, he was really respectful and well spoken

Like I could do a better job making their arguments and I usually disagree, but I guess that's because they don't understand *his* position well enough to refute it

i watch crowder only occasionally

He plays a character on his show

I find that an understanding of both sides helps when developming good arguments

I remember he got kinda pissed with sargon lol

They were having an interview, and sargon said jesus was a communist

Oh boy.

That's dum

I like it when people say that though, there's a grain of truth.

Jesus probably wouldnt approve of free market capitalism

The were both just joking, sargon was kinda drunk

But crowder legit got pissed

It was hilarious

oof

It's annoying when people say that X was Y ideology because they shared some beliefs with said ideology

It's more of a problem when used in a accusatory way

Like X is a nazi