general
Discord ID: 463054787336732683
845,392 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 496/3382
| Next
Try this, it's what I use to bypass some paywalls
HAX ^ ^
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEe
i have them blocked in my hosts file. i have to read them this way.
@Ace K cool link bro never heard of outline
Danke
>land and labour are a result of government
You've lost me
@Atkins smart
It's an impenetrable defense against clickbait.
"while it fiercely represses the fact that power and coercion are the unacknowledged features of all market participation." Wew
We getting a little socialist rhetoric in here
Yeah, and the funny thing is that you can make the same argument for Socialism. "Power and Coercion" are universal.
It's a new rallying cry to make economic authoritarianism as more "free"
It is fact comrade. You would not be arguing with fact, no?
I think tim got the race realism stuff wrong.
It just means that you accept that *on average* there are differences between racial groups.
For example: If you accept that Blacks have *on average* darker skin tones than whites, you're a race realist.
Thing is what you do after that. And my reaction woudl be "yes, and?"
Whatever you believe I think academia is at fault for not being honest about this sort of shit for so long relegating all of these sorts of discussions away from the venues where they could be had responsibly
People usually use RR in re: to IQ
True but that shouldn't be a reason to stop reasearching this shit.
and one of those things is to research why there are differences or not...
Sure
Part of it is testing itself. I got to mess with an ethnonat at one point via the Flynn Effect
Agreed.
and why do we even care about that race shit??
especially why protect people for their behaviour?
Some people can not see beyond Race.
Yes and?
And people are stupid
But not me, I'm the only non-stupid person in existence. You can trust me on this because I'm smart.
Its one thing to talk shit about races another is to act on it.
So again, we are at the Thoughtcrime level here.
To quote Dracula (1929) They're crazy, they are all crazy, except me and you. And some times I have me doubts about you..."
@Schedrevka *tips fedora* ah I see you are an enlightened individual like myself
In response to the "Vox Argues..." Timcast video: The "you oppose us and you are on the right" has been an argument used in sociology circles for as long as I've been around. If you read any of those journals you'll see the "right-wing" adjective thrown around everywhere.
It's hardly new.
It just wasn't mainstream.
China should be sanctioned
actually - I don't see how germany has not placed sanctions on China yet
if you think a country is so dangerous that you cannot send chinese citizens to china for fear of government opressing them - then how is it moral to continue trading with them
China must fall
Because we in the west live with an incredibly comfortably priced goods thanks to cheaper & under regulated labor produced in Asia & Africa, & we are willing to let it slide...
da, I'm not sure that view is completely accurate
let me find something
correct, the market would stablize without cheap labor
it would force other improvements to technology and research to counteract those
i.e. the world isn't going to stop because people live in shitty conditions working
> In fact, foreign investment is only good for an economy if it brings needed technological or managerial innovation or if that economy cannot otherwise raise funding for domestic productive investment. If neither holds โ and they hold in developing economies only, not advanced countries like the United States โ foreign investment always forces the recipient country to choose between a higher debt burden and higher unemployment.
> As long as the United States is the only country willing and able to run the current account deficits that result from foreign accumulation of dollars, the dollar will be the only important global reserve currency. And as long as other economies try to goose domestic growth or reduce domestic unemployment by forcing up exports relative to imports, either U.S. debt will be higher or U.S. growth will be lower and unemployment higher. This is why the United States will eventually limit foreigners from accumulating dollars for their reserves.
> The logic is inexorable. As the global economy grows relative to that of the United States, it is only a matter of time before Washington is forced into defensive action. The only question is how much economic pain and domestic unemployment the United States is willing to accept before it acts. As long as the dollar is easy to acquire in near-unlimited amounts, foreign countries with weak domestic demand can simply buy dollars and force their domestic demand deficiencies onto their trading partners. Until then, it doesnโt matter whether or not the Peopleโs Bank tries to improve the SDRโs visibility. It is entirely against Chinaโs economic interests for the SDR to replace the dollar โ let alone for the renminbi to do so.
LotheronPoole, sure the world isn't going to stop because people live in terrible working conditions, if it did, then sociaty would have hit multiple standstills through out history.
its not clear that china's behaviour has actually been a benefit to the west - I think in many ways China has gotten more out of it than the west has
China has also been a currency manipulator hasn't it?
Grenade - that is basically the point of what I quoted - but it'ts a very complicated issue
artificially fucking with its own currency to keep it down low relative to the dollar
Grenade, the fault is mostly US' - not Chinas
well i mean, it takes two to tango so yes
> There is, in short, no way Japan could have benefited from Peopleโs Bank purchases of its yen bonds. Only the United States permits unlimited purchases of government bonds by foreign central banks โ not because, however, it is immune to the problems Japan and other advanced countries face. Like them, the United States can easily fund productive domestic investments without foreign capital, and so rather than cause productive investment to rise, foreign investment causes domestic savings to fall, which can only happen with a rising debt burden or rising unemployment.
Before we sanction China, we should do something about Venezuela
VZ is toast already
drop leaflets telling the poeple to move out, then carpet bomb the whole place, let nature reclaim it
Stefan, China is worse than VZ - I think VZ will sort itself out way before china - but yeah sure, VZ also needs sanctions (if they don't have already)
And how many people have to die in VZ and how many other Countrys have to be flooded with Refugees?
bill it as a "save the rainforest" act
no, Venezuela is the one of the worst situations we have right now!
there's no we
they fucked themselves
It needs to come from the inside
It really does unfortunately.
And I know someone in there right now.
or else it's just imperialist america not letting socialism work
See, why then sanction China? It has to come from within.
because china is a world power
you can't treat the two the same
It annoys the *shit* out of me that this "DON'T EAT PORK" shit is still going on.
We have learned how to prepare pigs.
So its OK if people in VZ die but China is a different story?
Why the fuck are people still avoiding pigs.
EAT YOUR FUCKING PIGS.
Because its an order from the Book!
To be fair, in counties without a well developed pig farm industry, it could still be a bad call.
Like in the US it is fine, but in like Somalia? Eeeeeh
Did my excellent linkage just kill the chat.
yes, you should be charged with 1st degree murder
I mean, you're basically arguing that yours is the one true way and that everyone should conform.
(I'm back btw)
LOL; nice, Tim kinda proved my pro-Religion Point ๐
The way people's principles break down over particular topics is astounding.
(Just finally getting to watch Tim's video. I knew what his take was going to be on the headline. Pretty funny)
I argued the same points he did without seeing them. ๐
I've earned my avatar's beanie.
If you cannot maintain your principles across unfavourable situations they are not virtues. There is no virtue without sacrifice
I don't like Islam. I know what it preaches. And I don't like it.
But there are SOOOOO many fucking problems with targeting someone based on the beliefs they hold
Well it basically boils down to - there is no value in holding a position only when it is convenient
As I said earlier and will say until I'm blue in the face
I will not support a philosophical argument that can be turned around to outlaw me.
I will not support the jailing of individuals based on their beliefs - this is described as 'thought crime'.
I think there's a lot less wrong targeting for beliefs than immutable birth characteristics.
What you believe actually... says a lot about what you're willing to do.
Are you willing to fight to defend your own liberties?
Flip the quran 5 pages in any direction
See if you can avoid calls for murder.
I don't care.
You don't?
Are you willing to fight to defend your own liberties.
I don't understand the question.
People are free to write vile shit
And other people are free to read and like their writing
If you were targeted because you believe you should be free to pursue your own choices, and the powers that be say you can't
You haven't done anything
The quran isn't just 'vile shit'
but this 'libertarian' concept is a mental illness
If it was written today?
I don't care what the quran says.
--STOP NOT CARING
They are CALLS TO ACTION
Jesus christ.
This annoys me.
My principle applies regardless of what the quran says.
CALLS. TO ACTION.
"Murder this guy. Murder that guy. Murder gays."
On and on and fucking on and on.
So people who read it revoke their rights?
If you wrote it today, there'd be reasons to put you away.
Like Charles Manson.
Charles Manson didn't write a bunch of vile shit.
He killed people.
No he didn't.
ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Moot point as well, the prophet isn't being forcibly reeducated
Charles Manson didn't kill a single person.
His followers are
If you don't see a dangerous action being taken against them that could just as easily be turned on you, you're blind.
They're not being charged with a crime, even.
It's being declared a mental illness, which is a loophole that, even in the states, could be abused.
--Hold up
You didn't know Charles Manson didn't kill anyone.
I did some primer research. I get your point there.
I don't see how it acts against mine.
He called for the actions.
There couldn't have been the murders without his direct tutelage.
And the quran is that.
He ran a cult. I get it.
Oh and Islam isn't that.
Because it's so damn big
Big makes it authentic.
*Got it.*
You're not getting it.
Not one fucking bit.
```But there are SOOOOO many fucking problems with targeting someone based on the beliefs they hold```
We are talking about Religion. And abolishing the freedom of religion is a small price to pay, is it not?
It is a MASSIVE price to pay.
Absolutely fucking astronomical.
Or at least ban Supremacist Religion
no, its not. The Law rules, fuck your Religion
Every religion believes it's the 'one true'.
Their religion is still warlord shit.
I mean when fucking a 10 year old isn't rape because of Religion....
Rape should be punished.
Yes but no other Religion tells to kill the nonbelievers
Vlad the Impaler is a folk hero for a reason.
yes but its not rape because Muslim did it!
Strawman,.
That's not what I'm fucking arguing.
And I'm pretty god damn sure you know it.
No, bu that is the consequence of the Freedom of Religion we have right now
No, it is not.
You don't live under the Constitution, you don't understand it.
Other religions do have "kill the sinner" clauses
Sinners != Unbelievers
and no other religion practices it.
Absolutely they are though
yes, sinners is arguably worse
Since nobody is safe, not even believers
...and the Hypocries....
>work on a Saturday
>killed
Hypocrites?
Also, Saturday is the sabbath.
Just saying.
Yes, that is also in the Book, that they are equal to the Nonbelievers
Yes I'm aware
A non-muslim is by definition not innocent, and if you're not innocent you're fair game. To be, y'know, killed.
Ah, nvm
I'm so used to people defaulting to Sunday.
You don't BEGIN the week with a day of rest. ๐
Killed, ultimately. But on the interim it's also okay to lie to you and steal from you.
I read Leviticus and went "well shit I've had the wrong day this whole time"
It's Scientology's 'fair game' to a T.
You shouldn't be imprisoned for believing in Xenu either
Well here's the difference
Hubbard actually retracted fair game because it was bad for public relations
When Scientology evolves faster than Islam, that speaks volumes about Islam.
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>
:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>
Well said, shillbot.
Scientology just hides the bad shit. Islam does too but does a worse job
Huh, it didn't post for me either...
There we go.
Hiding it at least shows shame for it.
Are that even boobs?
Anyway, that Hyporcite and other lines prevent any leap forward for Islam.
And here that with the sex with the 10 year old not being rape:
https://www.rt.com/news/425925-finland-sex-migrant-10yo/
And you think I don't think that's fucked up?
It doesn't change my stance.
Because my stance says that REGARDLESS of what you believe, you are held by the same standard of law as anyone else.
What is your Solution to Islam?
Enforce fucking commonlaw.
Because you could, if you want to, see them as enemy combattants.
Rape is rape. Murder is murder. None of it's virtuous.
I will not target a person because they practice Islam
I will target them if they are a murderer.
I will target them if they are a rapist.
I will target them if they are a member of a grooming gang.
And what with the Enablers?
You mean the police?
All the people who knew and didn't say anything?
They're complicit in it too.
well, them too
I'd charge a godfearing Christian with a neglect crime at the *VERY* least if they knew something and didn't speak up about it.
I'd charge half a damned catholic parish if I were in position to.
I will not persecute a person for what they believe. I will persecute a person for what they have done or neglected to do.
Is this the news equivalent of talking in third person?๐ค
http://archive.today/ae9oL
Jesus (pun intended) you are still going on about that ?
Absolutely.
Its the main issue in Europe RN
It's a matter of principles. I'm not for being targeted as mentally deficient for being an Atheist or Libertarian. (There are plenty of other reasons to consider me mentally deficient)
The problem you have in Europe is that everyone's too islamaphobeaphobic to actually ENFORCE THE DAMN LAW.
Nobody wants to be called an islamaphobe, therefore they let people go scott free. That's cowardice.
Despite the Muslims we have in the United States, we don't have those problems, because we enforce our laws. Heaven forbid that ever change, but I don't see that changing in the next 2 years at least.
Well depends on the judge
It still rears it's ugly head now and then
Problem is we need to bring in th Army to arrest the drug dealers.
but it gets punished
Those fuckers at that compound havent got their comeuppance
It gets made clear that it's unacceptable in Western society.
That's why I laugh any time someone calls Europe 'Western'.
where people cower before Islam and jail people for a joke.
Yeah, that's pretty fucked up, too...
New Mexico is rather lefty. I'm not sure what to expect there...
If it was Arizona, they'd be fucked over by now.
The Problem with your principle stance is that it will lead to civil war. Just look at lebanon
845,392 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 496/3382
| Next